Skip to main content

Advanced Search: Build a Custom Dashboard

In the fields below, search for indicators by location, topics, population, classification, subgroup, or comparison. No fields are required, but we suggest selecting a location or two to start. In the additional search options section, select options to group and order search results. To learn more about how to customize a dashboard, see our help center.

Visit the Indicator List Page to see the full list of indicators and locations available on the site.

  • Map View
  • County : Mendocino Census Tracts
  • County : Mendocino Zip Codes
  • All Health Topics
  • All Community Topics
  • All Economy Topics
  • All Education Topics
  • All Environmental Health Topics
Search display options:

Search Results:

Indicator Gauge Icon Legend

Legend Colors

Red is bad, green is good, blue is not statistically different/neutral.

Compared to Distribution

an indicator guage with the arrow in the green the value is in the best half of communities.

an indicator guage with the arrow in the yellow the value is in the 2nd worst quarter of communities.

an indicator guage with the arrow in the red the value is in the worst quarter of communities.

Compared to Target

green circle with white tick inside it meets target; red circle with white cross inside it does not meet target.

Compared to a Single Value

green diamond with downward arrow inside it lower than the comparison value; red diamond with downward arrow inside it higher than the comparison value; blue diamond with downward arrow inside it not statistically different from comparison value.

Trend

green square outline with upward trending arrow inside it green square outline with downward trending arrow inside it non-significant change over time; green square with upward trending arrow inside it green square with downward trending arrow inside it significant change over time; blue square with equals sign no change over time.

Compared to Prior Value

green triangle with upward trending arrow inside it higher than the previous measurement period; green triangle with downward trending arrow inside it lower than the previous measurement period; blue equals sign no statistically different change  from previous measurement period.

More information about the gauges and icons

Health / Alcohol & Drug Use

Health / Alcohol & Drug Use

Health / Alcohol & Drug Use

County: Mendocino

Value
Compared to:

Health / Alcohol & Drug Use

County: Mendocino

Value
Compared to:

County: Mendocino Adults who Binge Drink

Current Value:

County: Mendocino Adults who Binge Drink

14.8%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Mendocino has a value of 14.8% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 15.3% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 15.8%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Mendocino has a value of 14.8% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 15.5% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 17.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (15.5%), Mendocino has a value of 14.8% which is lower and better.
US Value
(15.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

County: Mendocino Age-Adjusted Annual Opioid Prescription Rate

Current Value:
435.0
Prescriptions per 1,000 residents
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Mendocino has a value of 435.0 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 371.0 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 437.5.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to the CA Value (291.0), Mendocino has a value of 435.0 which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(291.0)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the prior value, Mendocino (435.0) is less and better than the previously measured value (498.9).
Prior Value
(498.9)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Mendocino value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Mendocino Age-Adjusted Buprenorphine Prescription Rate

Current Value:
101.5
Prescriptions per 1,000 residents
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the CA Value (19.8), Mendocino has a value of 101.5.
CA Value
(19.8)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the prior value, Mendocino (101.5) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (97.2).
Prior Value
(97.2)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Mendocino value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Mendocino Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to All Opioid Overdose

Current Value:
54.9
Rate per 100,000 residents
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Mendocino has a value of 54.9 which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 17.7 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 25.4.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to the CA Value (18.7), Mendocino has a value of 54.9 which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(18.7)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the prior value, Mendocino (54.9) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (54.7).
Prior Value
(54.7)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Mendocino value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Mendocino Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Drug Use

Current Value:
56.2
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2019-2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Mendocino has a value of 56.2 which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 22.3 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 31.0.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 57 California counties.
Compared to the CA Value (21.4), Mendocino has a value of 56.2 which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(21.4)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the prior value, Mendocino (56.2) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (42.0).
Prior Value
(42.0)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Mendocino value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Mendocino Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Fentanyl Overdose

Current Value:
47.7
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Mendocino has a value of 47.7 which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 14.8 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 22.3.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to the CA Value (16.6), Mendocino has a value of 47.7 which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(16.6)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the prior value, Mendocino (47.7) is less and better than the previously measured value (49.1).
Prior Value
(49.1)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Mendocino value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Mendocino Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Heroin Overdose

Current Value:
8.6
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2019)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Mendocino has a value of 8.6 which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 1.1 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 2.6.
CA Counties
(2018)
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to the CA Value (2.4), Mendocino has a value of 8.6 which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(2.4)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the prior value, Mendocino (8.6) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (3.4).
Prior Value
(3.4)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Mendocino value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (4.2), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(4.2)

County: Mendocino Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Prescription Opioid Overdose

54.9
Rate per 100,000 residents
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Mendocino has a value of 54.9 which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.6 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 24.9.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to the CA Value (18.1), Mendocino has a value of 54.9 which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(18.1)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the prior value, Mendocino (54.9) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (53.2).
Prior Value
(53.2)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Mendocino value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Mendocino Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Synthetic Opioid Overdose (excluding Methadone)

49.9
Rate per 100,000 residents
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Mendocino has a value of 49.9 which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 14.8 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 22.3.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to the CA Value (16.7), Mendocino has a value of 49.9 which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(16.7)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the prior value, Mendocino (49.9) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (49.1).
Prior Value
(49.1)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Mendocino value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (8.9), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(8.9)
<div>IVP-22: Reduce overdose deaths involving synthetic opioids other than methadone</div>

County: Mendocino Age-Adjusted Drug and Opioid-Involved Overdose Death Rate

41.3
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Mendocino has a value of 41.3 which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 17.8 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 22.0.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 48 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Mendocino has a value of 41.3 which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 25.3 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 35.8.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 1,303 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the CA Value (16.5), Mendocino has a value of 41.3 which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(16.5)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (23.5), Mendocino has a value of 41.3 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(23.5)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Mendocino (41.3) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (44.2).
Prior Value
(44.2)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Mendocino Age-Adjusted ED Visit Rate due to All Drug Overdose

Current Value:
195.9
Rate per 100,000 residents
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Mendocino has a value of 195.9 which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 141.5 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 183.3.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to the CA Value (143.7), Mendocino has a value of 195.9 which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(143.7)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the prior value, Mendocino (195.9) is less and better than the previously measured value (246.7).
Prior Value
(246.7)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Mendocino value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Mendocino Age-Adjusted ED Visit Rate due to Heroin Overdose

Current Value:
4.3
Rate per 100,000 residents
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Mendocino has a value of 4.3 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 3.1 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 5.9.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to the CA Value (3.6), Mendocino has a value of 4.3 which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(3.6)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the prior value, Mendocino (4.3) is less and better than the previously measured value (10.2).
Prior Value
(10.2)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Mendocino value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Mendocino Age-Adjusted ED Visit Rate due to Opioid Overdose (excluding Heroin)

88.2
Rate per 100,000 residents
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Mendocino has a value of 88.2 which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 48.2 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 70.0.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to the CA Value (54.9), Mendocino has a value of 88.2 which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(54.9)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the prior value, Mendocino (88.2) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (25.3).
Prior Value
(25.3)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Mendocino value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Mendocino Age-Adjusted Hospitalization Rate due to All Drug Overdose

50.2
Rate per 100,000 residents
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Mendocino has a value of 50.2 which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 37.5 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 45.9.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to the CA Value (48.3), Mendocino has a value of 50.2 which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(48.3)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the prior value, Mendocino (50.2) is less and better than the previously measured value (77.6).
Prior Value
(77.6)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Mendocino value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Mendocino Age-Adjusted Hospitalization Rate due to Heroin Overdose

0.0
Rate per 100,000 residents
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Mendocino has a value of 0.0 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 0.3 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 0.8.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to the CA Value (0.7), Mendocino has a value of 0.0 which is lower and better.
CA Value
(0.7)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the prior value, Mendocino (0.0) is less and better than the previously measured value (5.6).
Prior Value
(5.6)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Mendocino value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Mendocino Age-Adjusted Hospitalization Rate due to Opioid Overdose (excluding Heroin)

12.9
Rate per 100,000 residents
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Mendocino has a value of 12.9 which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 8.0 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 11.8.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to the CA Value (12.1), Mendocino has a value of 12.9 which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(12.1)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the prior value, Mendocino (12.9) is less and better than the previously measured value (25.3).
Prior Value
(25.3)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Mendocino value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Mendocino Age-Adjusted Long Acting or Extended Release Opioid Prescription Rate to Opioid Naive Residents

3.0
Per 100,000 population
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Mendocino has a value of 3.0 which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 1.7 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 2.4.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to the CA Value (1.2), Mendocino has a value of 3.0 which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(1.2)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the prior value, Mendocino (3.0) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (3.6).
Prior Value
(3.6)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Mendocino value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Mendocino Death Rate due to Drug Poisoning

Current Value:
43.8
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Mendocino has a value of 43.8 which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 18.0 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 22.6.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 52 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Mendocino has a value of 43.8 which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 21.7 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 30.8.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 1,797 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the CA Value (17.3), Mendocino has a value of 43.8 which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(17.3)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (23.0), Mendocino has a value of 43.8 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(23.0)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Mendocino (43.8) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (37.7).
Prior Value
(37.7)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Mendocino value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (20.7), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(20.7)
<div>SU-03: Reduce drug overdose deaths <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong></div>

County: Mendocino Opioid Prescription Patients

Current Value:

County: Mendocino Opioid Prescription Patients

3.7%
(Q3 2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Mendocino has a value of 3.7% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 2.7% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 3.6%.
CA Counties
(Q2 2022)
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to the prior value, Mendocino (3.7%) is less and better than the previously measured value (3.8%).
Prior Value
(3.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Mendocino value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Mendocino Quarterly Opioid Prescription Rate

Current Value:
483.2
Prescriptions per 10,000 population
(Q3 2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Mendocino has a value of 483.2 which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 330.2 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 440.1.
CA Counties
(Q2 2022)
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to the prior value, Mendocino (483.2) is less and better than the previously measured value (491.0).
Prior Value
(491.0)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Mendocino value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Mendocino Residents on More than 90 Morphine Milligram Equivalents (MME) of Opioids Daily

11.8
Residents on >90 MMEs of Opioids per 1,000 residents
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Mendocino has a value of 11.8 which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 7.6 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 9.9.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to the CA Value (6.3), Mendocino has a value of 11.8 which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(6.3)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the prior value, Mendocino (11.8) is less and better than the previously measured value (14.2).
Prior Value
(14.2)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Mendocino value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Mendocino Teens who Use Alcohol: 11th Graders

Current Value:
34.0%
(2017-2019)
Compared to:
Compared to the CA Value (16.0%), Mendocino has a value of 34.0% which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(16.0%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the prior value, Mendocino (34.0%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (31.0%).
Prior Value
(31.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Mendocino value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Mendocino Teens who Use Marijuana: 11th Graders

Current Value:
22.0%
(2017-2019)
Compared to:
Compared to the CA Value (16.0%), Mendocino has a value of 22.0% which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(16.0%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the prior value, Mendocino (22.0%) is less and better than the previously measured value (27.0%).
Prior Value
(27.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Mendocino value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Health / Cancer

Health / Cancer

Health / Cancer

County: Mendocino

Value
Compared to:

Health / Cancer

County: Mendocino

Value
Compared to:

County: Mendocino Adults with Cancer

Current Value:

County: Mendocino Adults with Cancer

8.4%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Mendocino has a value of 8.4% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 6.6% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 8.5%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Mendocino has a value of 8.4% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 7.9% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 8.6%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (7.0%), Mendocino has a value of 8.4% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(7.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

County: Mendocino Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Breast Cancer

Current Value:
19.1
Deaths per 100,000 females
(2019-2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Mendocino has a value of 19.1 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 18.5 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 19.9.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 56 California counties.
Compared to the CA Value (17.8), Mendocino has a value of 19.1 which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(17.8)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (20.0), Mendocino has a value of 19.1 which is lower and better.
US Value
(20.0 in 2016)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is National Cancer Institute
Compared to the prior value, Mendocino (19.1) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (15.6).
Prior Value
(15.6)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (15.3), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(15.3)

County: Mendocino Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Cancer

Current Value:
159.9
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2019-2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Mendocino has a value of 159.9 which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 131.2 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 143.2.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to the CA Value (124.9), Mendocino has a value of 159.9 which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(124.9)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (155.9), Mendocino has a value of 159.9 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(155.9 in 2016)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is National Cancer Institute
Compared to the prior value, Mendocino (159.9) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (150.8).
Prior Value
(150.8)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Mendocino value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (122.7), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(122.7)

County: Mendocino Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Lung Cancer

Current Value:
30.8
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2019-2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Mendocino has a value of 30.8 which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 24.6 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 30.7.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to the CA Value (21.6), Mendocino has a value of 30.8 which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(21.6)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (38.5), Mendocino has a value of 30.8 which is lower and better.
US Value
(38.5 in 2016)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is National Cancer Institute
Compared to the prior value, Mendocino (30.8) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (27.9).
Prior Value
(27.9)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Mendocino value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (25.1), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(25.1)

County: Mendocino Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Prostate Cancer

Current Value:
24.2
Deaths per 100,000 males
(2019-2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Mendocino has a value of 24.2 which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 19.1 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 22.4.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 57 California counties.
Compared to the CA Value (18.4), Mendocino has a value of 24.2 which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(18.4)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (19.4), Mendocino has a value of 24.2 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(19.4 in 2016)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is National Cancer Institute
Compared to the prior value, Mendocino (24.2) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (25.0).
Prior Value
(25.0)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (16.9), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(16.9)

County: Mendocino Breast Cancer Incidence Rate

Current Value:

County: Mendocino Breast Cancer Incidence Rate

115.8
Cases per 100,000 females
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Mendocino has a value of 115.8 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 121.0 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 129.6.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 56 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Mendocino has a value of 115.8 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 122.1 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 133.5.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,478 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the CA Value (121.0), Mendocino has a value of 115.8 which is lower and better.
CA Value
(121.0)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (127.0), Mendocino has a value of 115.8 which is lower and better.
US Value
(127.0)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Mendocino (115.8) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (115.4).
Prior Value
(115.4)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Mendocino value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Mendocino Cancer: Medicare Population

Current Value:

County: Mendocino Cancer: Medicare Population

9.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Mendocino has a value of 9.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 11.0%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Mendocino has a value of 9.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the CA Value (11.0%), Mendocino has a value of 9.0% which is lower and better.
CA Value
(11.0%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (12.0%), Mendocino has a value of 9.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(12.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Mendocino (9.0%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (8.0%).
Prior Value
(8.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Mendocino value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Mendocino Cervical Cancer Incidence Rate

Current Value:

County: Mendocino Cervical Cancer Incidence Rate

8.5
Cases per 100,000 females
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Mendocino has a value of 8.5 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 7.7 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 9.1.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 40 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Mendocino has a value of 8.5 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 8.0 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 10.1.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 696 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the CA Value (7.3), Mendocino has a value of 8.5 which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(7.3)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (7.5), Mendocino has a value of 8.5 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(7.5)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Mendocino (8.5) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (9.7).
Prior Value
(9.7)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Mendocino value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Mendocino Cervical Cancer Screening: 21-65

Current Value:
81.4%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Mendocino has a value of 81.4% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 81.4% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 80.0%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Mendocino has a value of 81.4% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 81.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 79.3%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (82.8%), Mendocino has a value of 81.4% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(82.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

County: Mendocino Colon Cancer Screening

Current Value:

County: Mendocino Colon Cancer Screening

67.3%
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Mendocino has a value of 67.3% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 67.8% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 64.5%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Mendocino has a value of 67.3% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 64.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 61.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,142 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (66.4%), Mendocino has a value of 67.3% which is higher and better.
US Value
(66.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

County: Mendocino Colon Cancer Screening: USPSTF Recommendation

Current Value:
62.7%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Mendocino has a value of 62.7% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 62.6% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 60.1%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Mendocino has a value of 62.7% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 70.7% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 67.7%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (72.4%), Mendocino has a value of 62.7% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(72.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

County: Mendocino Colorectal Cancer Incidence Rate

Current Value:
39.3
Cases per 100,000 population
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Mendocino has a value of 39.3 which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 33.4 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 36.2.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 56 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Mendocino has a value of 39.3 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 40.1 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 46.1.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,401 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the CA Value (33.5), Mendocino has a value of 39.3 which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(33.5)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (36.5), Mendocino has a value of 39.3 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(36.5)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Mendocino (39.3) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (38.6).
Prior Value
(38.6)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Mendocino value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Mendocino Lung and Bronchus Cancer Incidence Rate

Current Value:
43.4
Cases per 100,000 population
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Mendocino has a value of 43.4 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 39.5 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 47.4.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 55 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Mendocino has a value of 43.4 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 63.2 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 74.4.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,471 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the CA Value (37.6), Mendocino has a value of 43.4 which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(37.6)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (54.0), Mendocino has a value of 43.4 which is lower and better.
US Value
(54.0)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Mendocino (43.4) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (44.2).
Prior Value
(44.2)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Mendocino value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Mendocino Mammogram in Past 2 Years: 50-74

Current Value:
64.8%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Mendocino has a value of 64.8% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 67.7% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 66.4%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Mendocino has a value of 64.8% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 70.7% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 67.9%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (78.2%), Mendocino has a value of 64.8% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(78.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (80.3%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(80.3%)

County: Mendocino Mammography Screening: Medicare Population

Current Value:
37.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Mendocino has a value of 37.0% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 41.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 38.0%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Mendocino has a value of 37.0% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 45.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 40.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,123 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the CA Value (41.0%), Mendocino has a value of 37.0% which is lower and worse.
CA Value
(41.0%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (47.0%), Mendocino has a value of 37.0% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(47.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Mendocino (37.0%) is greater and better than the previously measured value (36.0%).
Prior Value
(36.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Mendocino value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Mendocino Oral Cavity and Pharynx Cancer Incidence Rate

Current Value:
11.9
Cases per 100,000 population
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Mendocino has a value of 11.9 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.4 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 13.0.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 54 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Mendocino has a value of 11.9 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 13.1 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 15.1.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 1,706 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the CA Value (10.1), Mendocino has a value of 11.9 which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(10.1)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (11.9), Mendocino has a value of 11.9.
US Value
(11.9)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Mendocino (11.9) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (10.5).
Prior Value
(10.5)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Mendocino value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Mendocino Prostate Cancer Incidence Rate

Current Value:

County: Mendocino Prostate Cancer Incidence Rate

88.1
Cases per 100,000 males
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Mendocino has a value of 88.1 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 93.3 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 102.0.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 57 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Mendocino has a value of 88.1 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 107.9 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 125.6.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,500 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the CA Value (95.4), Mendocino has a value of 88.1 which is lower and better.
CA Value
(95.4)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (110.5), Mendocino has a value of 88.1 which is lower and better.
US Value
(110.5)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Mendocino (88.1) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (87.8).
Prior Value
(87.8)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Mendocino value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Health / Diabetes

Health / Diabetes

Health / Diabetes

County: Mendocino

Value
Compared to:

Health / Diabetes

County: Mendocino

Value
Compared to:

County: Mendocino Adults with Diabetes

Current Value:

County: Mendocino Adults with Diabetes

8.2%
(2021-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Mendocino has a value of 8.2% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 8.9% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 11.9%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to the CA Value (10.7%), Mendocino has a value of 8.2% which is lower and better.
CA Value
(10.7%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (11.5%), Mendocino has a value of 8.2% which is lower and better.
US Value
(11.5% in 2022)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System
Compared to the prior value, Mendocino (8.2%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (9.8%).
Prior Value
(9.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Mendocino value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Mendocino Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Diabetes

Current Value:
20.1
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2019-2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Mendocino has a value of 20.1 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 21.1 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 27.8.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 57 California counties.
Compared to the CA Value (23.1), Mendocino has a value of 20.1 which is lower and better.
CA Value
(23.1)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (24.8), Mendocino has a value of 20.1 which is lower and better.
US Value
(24.8 in 2020)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Compared to the prior value, Mendocino (20.1) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (19.4).
Prior Value
(19.4)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Mendocino value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Mendocino Diabetes: Medicare Population

Current Value:

County: Mendocino Diabetes: Medicare Population

16.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Mendocino has a value of 16.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 20.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 25.3%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Mendocino has a value of 16.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 25.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 28.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the CA Value (21.0%), Mendocino has a value of 16.0% which is lower and better.
CA Value
(21.0%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (24.0%), Mendocino has a value of 16.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(24.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Mendocino (16.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (16.0%).
Prior Value
(16.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Mendocino value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Health / Disabilities

Health / Disabilities

Health / Disabilities

County: Mendocino

Value
Compared to:

Health / Disabilities

County: Mendocino

Value
Compared to:

County: Mendocino Adults with Disability

Current Value:

County: Mendocino Adults with Disability

28.9%
(2016)
Compared to:
Compared to the CA Value (29.7%), Mendocino has a value of 28.9%.
CA Value
(29.7%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (20.6%), Mendocino has a value of 28.9%.
US Value
(20.6% in 2015)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System
Compared to the prior value, Mendocino (28.9%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (41.7%).
Prior Value
(41.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Mendocino value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Mendocino Adults with Disability Living in Poverty

Current Value:
26.4%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Mendocino has a value of 26.4% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 22.6% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 28.1%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Mendocino has a value of 26.4% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 26.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 32.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,132 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the CA Value (22.7%), Mendocino has a value of 26.4% which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(22.7%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (24.9%), Mendocino has a value of 26.4% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(24.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Mendocino value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Mendocino Children with a Disability

Current Value:

County: Mendocino Children with a Disability

5.4%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the CA Value (3.7%), Mendocino has a value of 5.4%.
CA Value
(3.7%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (4.5%), Mendocino has a value of 5.4%.
US Value
(4.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Mendocino value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Mendocino Disabled Persons with Health Insurance

Current Value:
91.1%
(2011-2012)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Mendocino has a value of 91.1% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 85.4% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 81.8%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 44 California counties and county groups.
Compared to the CA Value (83.2%), Mendocino has a value of 91.1% which is higher and better.
CA Value
(83.2%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the prior value, Mendocino (91.1%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (91.4%).
Prior Value
(91.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Mendocino Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty

Current Value:
7.7%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the CA Value (4.6%), Mendocino has a value of 7.7%.
CA Value
(4.6%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (5.3%), Mendocino has a value of 7.7%.
US Value
(5.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Mendocino value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Mendocino Persons with a Disability

Current Value:

County: Mendocino Persons with a Disability

18.7%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the CA Value (11.0%), Mendocino has a value of 18.7%.
CA Value
(11.0%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (12.9%), Mendocino has a value of 18.7%.
US Value
(12.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Mendocino value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Mendocino Persons with a Hearing Difficulty

Current Value:
4.4%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the CA Value (2.9%), Mendocino has a value of 4.4%.
CA Value
(2.9%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (3.6%), Mendocino has a value of 4.4%.
US Value
(3.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Mendocino value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Mendocino Persons with a Self-Care Difficulty

Current Value:
4.1%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the CA Value (2.7%), Mendocino has a value of 4.1%.
CA Value
(2.7%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (2.6%), Mendocino has a value of 4.1%.
US Value
(2.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Mendocino value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Mendocino Persons with a Vision Difficulty

Current Value:
3.1%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the CA Value (2.1%), Mendocino has a value of 3.1%.
CA Value
(2.1%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (2.4%), Mendocino has a value of 3.1%.
US Value
(2.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Mendocino value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Mendocino Persons with an Ambulatory Difficulty

Current Value:
9.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the CA Value (5.8%), Mendocino has a value of 9.5%.
CA Value
(5.8%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (6.7%), Mendocino has a value of 9.5%.
US Value
(6.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Mendocino value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Health / Family Planning

Health / Family Planning

Health / Family Planning

County: Mendocino

Value
Compared to:

Health / Family Planning

County: Mendocino

Value
Compared to:

County: Mendocino Teen Birth Rate: 15-19

Current Value:

County: Mendocino Teen Birth Rate: 15-19

17.6
Live births per 1,000 females aged 15-19
(2019-2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Mendocino has a value of 17.6 which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.5 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 17.6.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 55 California counties.
Compared to the CA Value (10.3), Mendocino has a value of 17.6 which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(10.3)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (15.2), Mendocino has a value of 17.6 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(15.2)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Health Statistics
Compared to the prior value, Mendocino (17.6) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (16.8).
Prior Value
(16.8)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Mendocino value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Health / Health Care Access & Quality

Health / Health Care Access & Quality

Health / Health Care Access & Quality

County: Mendocino

Value
Compared to:

Health / Health Care Access & Quality

County: Mendocino

Value
Compared to:

County: Mendocino Adults Delayed or had Difficulty Obtaining Care

Current Value:
24.2%
(2019-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the CA Value (22.0%), Mendocino has a value of 24.2% which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(22.0%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the prior value, Mendocino (24.2%) is less and better than the previously measured value (26.3%).
Prior Value
(26.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Mendocino value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Mendocino Adults who have had a Routine Checkup

Current Value:
64.9%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Mendocino has a value of 64.9% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 63.3% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 61.8%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Mendocino has a value of 64.9% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 75.8% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 72.9%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (73.6%), Mendocino has a value of 64.9% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(73.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

County: Mendocino Adults with Health Insurance: 18-64

Current Value:
91.4%
(2020-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Mendocino has a value of 91.4% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 92.4% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 89.4%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to the CA Value (91.2%), Mendocino has a value of 91.4% which is higher and better.
CA Value
(91.2%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the prior value, Mendocino (91.4%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (94.9%).
Prior Value
(94.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Mendocino value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Mendocino Adults with Private Health Insurance

Current Value:
58.3%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Mendocino has a value of 58.3% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 62.6% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 56.1%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to the CA Value (65.4%), Mendocino has a value of 58.3% which is lower and worse.
CA Value
(65.4%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the prior value, Mendocino (58.3%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (67.8%).
Prior Value
(67.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Mendocino value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Mendocino Adults without Health Insurance

Current Value:
10.1%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Mendocino has a value of 10.1% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 9.2% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 13.0%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Mendocino has a value of 10.1% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.1% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 13.8%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (10.8%), Mendocino has a value of 10.1% which is lower and better.
US Value
(10.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

County: Mendocino Children and Teens Delayed or had Difficulty Obtaining Care

6.5%
(2019-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the CA Value (8.7%), Mendocino has a value of 6.5% which is lower and better.
CA Value
(8.7%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the prior value, Mendocino (6.5%) is less and better than the previously measured value (8.2%).
Prior Value
(8.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Mendocino value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Mendocino Children with Health Insurance

Current Value:

County: Mendocino Children with Health Insurance

94.8%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Mendocino has a value of 94.8% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 97.1% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 96.2%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 42 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Mendocino has a value of 94.8% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 96.3% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 93.6%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 828 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the CA Value (96.8%), Mendocino has a value of 94.8% which is lower and worse.
CA Value
(96.8%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (94.9%), Mendocino has a value of 94.8% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(94.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Mendocino (94.8%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (85.2%).
Prior Value
(85.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Mendocino value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Mendocino Medicare Healthcare Costs

Current Value:

County: Mendocino Medicare Healthcare Costs

$7,003
Dollars per enrollee
(2015)
Compared to:
Compared to the CA Value ($9,100), Mendocino has a value of $7,003.
CA Value
($9,100)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value ($9,729), Mendocino has a value of $7,003.
US Value
($9,729)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Mendocino ($7,003) is greater  than the previously measured value ($6,713).
Prior Value
($6,713)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Mendocino value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Mendocino Non-Physician Primary Care Provider Rate

Current Value:
105
Providers per 100,000 population
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Mendocino has a value of 105 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 80 while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 66.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Mendocino has a value of 105 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 90 while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 61.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,131 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the CA Value (80), Mendocino has a value of 105 which is higher and better.
CA Value
(80)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the prior value, Mendocino (105) is less and worse than the previously measured value (107).
Prior Value
(107)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Mendocino value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Mendocino People Delayed or had Difficulty Obtaining Care

Current Value:
21.7%
(2021-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Mendocino has a value of 21.7% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 17.5% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 19.2%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to the CA Value (16.5%), Mendocino has a value of 21.7% which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(16.5%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the prior value, Mendocino (21.7%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (22.4%).
Prior Value
(22.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Mendocino value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (5.9%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(5.9%)

County: Mendocino Persons with Health Insurance

Current Value:

County: Mendocino Persons with Health Insurance

90.3%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Mendocino has a value of 90.3% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 92.4% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 91.0%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Mendocino has a value of 90.3% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 89.6% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 85.4%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,140 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the CA Value (91.9%), Mendocino has a value of 90.3% which is lower and worse.
CA Value
(91.9%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the prior value, Mendocino (90.3%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (88.8%).
Prior Value
(88.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Mendocino value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (92.4%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(92.4%)
<div>AHS-01: Increase the proportion of people with health insurance <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong></div>

County: Mendocino Persons with Private Health Insurance Only

Current Value:
37.3%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the CA Value (53.5%), Mendocino has a value of 37.3%.
CA Value
(53.5%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (54.8%), Mendocino has a value of 37.3%.
US Value
(54.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Mendocino (37.3%) is greater  than the previously measured value (35.2%).
Prior Value
(35.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Mendocino value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Mendocino Persons with Public Health Insurance Only

Current Value:
41.2%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the CA Value (29.8%), Mendocino has a value of 41.2%.
CA Value
(29.8%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (24.8%), Mendocino has a value of 41.2%.
US Value
(24.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Mendocino (41.2%) is greater  than the previously measured value (40.3%).
Prior Value
(40.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Mendocino value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Mendocino Preventable Hospital Stays: Medicare Population

Current Value:
1,823.0
Discharges per 100,000 Medicare enrollees
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Mendocino has a value of 1,823.0 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 2,111.5 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 2,576.5.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Mendocino has a value of 1,823.0 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 2,729.0 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 3,374.5.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the CA Value (2,275.0), Mendocino has a value of 1,823.0 which is lower and better.
CA Value
(2,275.0)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (2,677.0), Mendocino has a value of 1,823.0 which is lower and better.
US Value
(2,677.0)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Mendocino (1,823.0) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (1,593.0).
Prior Value
(1,593.0)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Mendocino value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Mendocino Primary Care Provider Rate

Current Value:

County: Mendocino Primary Care Provider Rate

88
Providers per 100,000 population
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Mendocino has a value of 88 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 67 while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 44.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Mendocino has a value of 88 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 47 while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 30.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,995 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the CA Value (81), Mendocino has a value of 88 which is higher and better.
CA Value
(81)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the prior value, Mendocino (88) is less and worse than the previously measured value (91).
Prior Value
(91)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Mendocino value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Health / Health Information Technology

Health / Health Information Technology

Health / Health Information Technology

County: Mendocino

Value
Compared to:

Health / Health Information Technology

County: Mendocino

Value
Compared to:

County: Mendocino Households with an Internet Subscription

Current Value:
86.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Mendocino has a value of 86.0% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 89.8% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 86.0%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Mendocino has a value of 86.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 83.9% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 79.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the CA Value (91.6%), Mendocino has a value of 86.0% which is lower and worse.
CA Value
(91.6%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (88.5%), Mendocino has a value of 86.0% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(88.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Mendocino value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Mendocino Households with One or More Types of Computing Devices

91.1%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Mendocino has a value of 91.1% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 94.7% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 93.0%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Mendocino has a value of 91.1% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 91.1% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 88.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the CA Value (95.9%), Mendocino has a value of 91.1% which is lower and worse.
CA Value
(95.9%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (94.0%), Mendocino has a value of 91.1% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(94.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Mendocino value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Mendocino Persons with an Internet Subscription

Current Value:
90.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Mendocino has a value of 90.0% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 92.4% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 88.9%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Mendocino has a value of 90.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 87.7% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 83.3%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the CA Value (93.4%), Mendocino has a value of 90.0% which is lower and worse.
CA Value
(93.4%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (91.0%), Mendocino has a value of 90.0% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(91.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Mendocino value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Health / Heart Disease & Stroke

Health / Heart Disease & Stroke

Health / Heart Disease & Stroke

County: Mendocino

Value
Compared to:

Health / Heart Disease & Stroke

County: Mendocino

Value
Compared to:

County: Mendocino Adults who Experienced a Stroke

Current Value:
3.9%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Mendocino has a value of 3.9% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 3.2% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 3.7%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Mendocino has a value of 3.9% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 3.7% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 4.2%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (3.3%), Mendocino has a value of 3.9% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(3.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

County: Mendocino Adults who Experienced Coronary Heart Disease

Current Value:
7.7%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Mendocino has a value of 7.7% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 6.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 7.3%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Mendocino has a value of 7.7% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 7.6% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 8.6%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (6.1%), Mendocino has a value of 7.7% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(6.1%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

County: Mendocino Adults who Have Taken Medications for High Blood Pressure

77.2%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Mendocino has a value of 77.2% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 74.1% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 72.2%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Mendocino has a value of 77.2% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 80.2% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 78.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (78.2%), Mendocino has a value of 77.2% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(78.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

County: Mendocino Adults with Heart Disease

Current Value:

County: Mendocino Adults with Heart Disease

9.2%
(2019-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the CA Value (6.9%), Mendocino has a value of 9.2% which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(6.9%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the prior value, Mendocino (9.2%) is less and better than the previously measured value (9.5%).
Prior Value
(9.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Mendocino value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Mendocino Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Cerebrovascular Disease (Stroke)

35.3
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2019-2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Mendocino has a value of 35.3 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 37.7 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 42.5.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to the CA Value (37.2), Mendocino has a value of 35.3 which is lower and better.
CA Value
(37.2)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (38.8), Mendocino has a value of 35.3 which is lower and better.
US Value
(38.8 in 2020)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Compared to the prior value, Mendocino (35.3) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (37.1).
Prior Value
(37.1)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Mendocino value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (33.4), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(33.4)

County: Mendocino Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Coronary Heart Disease

97.8
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2019-2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Mendocino has a value of 97.8 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 80.0 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 98.6.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to the CA Value (79.0), Mendocino has a value of 97.8 which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(79.0)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (91.8), Mendocino has a value of 97.8 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(91.8 in 2020)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Compared to the prior value, Mendocino (97.8) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (90.4).
Prior Value
(90.4)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Mendocino value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (71.1), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(71.1)

County: Mendocino Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Heart Attack

Current Value:
64.7
Deaths per 100,000 population 35+ years
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Mendocino has a value of 64.7 which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 44.5 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 51.5.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 49 California counties.
Compared to the CA Value (44.4), Mendocino has a value of 64.7 which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(44.4)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the prior value, Mendocino (64.7) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (52.6).
Prior Value
(52.6)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Mendocino value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Mendocino Age-Adjusted Hospitalization Rate due to Heart Attack

24.5
Hospitalizations per 10,000 population 35+ years
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Mendocino has a value of 24.5 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 26.2 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 28.8.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 56 California counties.
Compared to the CA Value (25.5), Mendocino has a value of 24.5 which is lower and better.
CA Value
(25.5)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the prior value, Mendocino (24.5) is less and better than the previously measured value (25.6).
Prior Value
(25.6)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Mendocino value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Mendocino Atrial Fibrillation: Medicare Population

Current Value:
12.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Mendocino has a value of 12.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 13.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.0%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Mendocino has a value of 12.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 14.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 15.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the CA Value (13.0%), Mendocino has a value of 12.0% which is lower and better.
CA Value
(13.0%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (14.0%), Mendocino has a value of 12.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(14.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Mendocino (12.0%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (11.0%).
Prior Value
(11.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Mendocino value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Mendocino Cholesterol Test History

Current Value:

County: Mendocino Cholesterol Test History

85.8%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Mendocino has a value of 85.8% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 85.5% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 82.9%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Mendocino has a value of 85.8% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 84.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 82.2%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (86.4%), Mendocino has a value of 85.8% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(86.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

County: Mendocino Heart Failure: Medicare Population

Current Value:
7.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Mendocino has a value of 7.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 9.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 10.0%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Mendocino has a value of 7.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 13.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the CA Value (10.0%), Mendocino has a value of 7.0% which is lower and better.
CA Value
(10.0%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (11.0%), Mendocino has a value of 7.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(11.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Mendocino (7.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (7.0%).
Prior Value
(7.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Mendocino value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Mendocino High Blood Pressure Prevalence

Current Value:

County: Mendocino High Blood Pressure Prevalence

46.5%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Mendocino has a value of 46.5% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 37.3% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 42.0%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to the CA Value (34.8%), Mendocino has a value of 46.5% which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(34.8%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (32.4%), Mendocino has a value of 46.5% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(32.4% in 2021)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System
Compared to the prior value, Mendocino (46.5%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (27.9%).
Prior Value
(27.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Mendocino value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (41.9%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(41.9%)

County: Mendocino High Cholesterol Prevalence: Past 5 Years

Current Value:
39.8%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Mendocino has a value of 39.8% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 35.9% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 38.5%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Mendocino has a value of 39.8% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 38.1% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 40.2%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (36.4%), Mendocino has a value of 39.8% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(36.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

County: Mendocino Hyperlipidemia: Medicare Population

Current Value:
49.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Mendocino has a value of 49.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 61.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 64.0%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Mendocino has a value of 49.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 63.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 67.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the CA Value (61.0%), Mendocino has a value of 49.0% which is lower and better.
CA Value
(61.0%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (65.0%), Mendocino has a value of 49.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(65.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Mendocino (49.0%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (47.0%).
Prior Value
(47.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Mendocino value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Mendocino Hypertension: Medicare Population

Current Value:
54.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Mendocino has a value of 54.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 59.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 62.0%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Mendocino has a value of 54.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 67.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 71.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the CA Value (58.0%), Mendocino has a value of 54.0% which is lower and better.
CA Value
(58.0%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (65.0%), Mendocino has a value of 54.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(65.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Mendocino (54.0%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (53.0%).
Prior Value
(53.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Mendocino value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Mendocino Ischemic Heart Disease: Medicare Population

Current Value:
11.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Mendocino has a value of 11.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 19.0%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Mendocino has a value of 11.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 21.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 24.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the CA Value (18.0%), Mendocino has a value of 11.0% which is lower and better.
CA Value
(18.0%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (21.0%), Mendocino has a value of 11.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(21.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Mendocino (11.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (11.0%).
Prior Value
(11.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Mendocino value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Mendocino Stroke: Medicare Population

Current Value:

County: Mendocino Stroke: Medicare Population

3.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Mendocino has a value of 3.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 5.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 5.0%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Mendocino has a value of 3.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 5.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 6.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the CA Value (5.0%), Mendocino has a value of 3.0% which is lower and better.
CA Value
(5.0%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (6.0%), Mendocino has a value of 3.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(6.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Mendocino (3.0%) is less and better than the previously measured value (4.0%).
Prior Value
(4.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Mendocino value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Health / Immunizations & Infectious Diseases

Health / Immunizations & Infectious Diseases

Health / Immunizations & Infectious Diseases

County: Mendocino

Value
Compared to:

Health / Immunizations & Infectious Diseases

County: Mendocino

Value
Compared to:

County: Mendocino Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Influenza and Pneumonia

12.1
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2019-2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Mendocino has a value of 12.1 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.7 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.3.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 57 California counties.
Compared to the CA Value (11.5), Mendocino has a value of 12.1 which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(11.5)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (13.0), Mendocino has a value of 12.1 which is lower and better.
US Value
(13.0 in 2020)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Compared to the prior value, Mendocino (12.1) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (14.2).
Prior Value
(14.2)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Mendocino COVID-19 Daily Average Case-Fatality Rate

Current Value:
0.0
Deaths per 100 cases
(Mar 3, 2023)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Mendocino has a value of 0.0 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 0.2 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 1.3.
CA Counties
(Feb 3, 2023)
The distribution is based on data from 56 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Mendocino has a value of 0.0 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 0.5 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 8.3.
U.S. Counties
(Mar 25, 2022)
The distribution is based on data from 2,811 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the CA Value (1.0), Mendocino has a value of 0.0 which is lower and better.
CA Value
(1.0)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (1.7), Mendocino has a value of 0.0 which is lower and better.
US Value
(1.7)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Mendocino (0.0) is less and better than the previously measured value (4.2).
Prior Value
(4.2)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Mendocino value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Mendocino COVID-19 Daily Average Incidence Rate

Current Value:
4.21
Cases per 100,000 population
(Mar 3, 2023)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Mendocino has a value of 4.21 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 5.99 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 8.75.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Mendocino has a value of 4.21 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 8.84 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 13.01.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,142 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the CA Value (6.23), Mendocino has a value of 4.21 which is lower and better.
CA Value
(6.23)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (10.97), Mendocino has a value of 4.21 which is lower and better.
US Value
(10.97)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Mendocino (4.21) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (3.74).
Prior Value
(3.74)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Mendocino value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Mendocino Flu Vaccinations: Medicare Population

Current Value:
35.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Mendocino has a value of 35.0% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 44.5% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 36.0%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Mendocino has a value of 35.0% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 43.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 36.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the CA Value (48.0%), Mendocino has a value of 35.0% which is lower and worse.
CA Value
(48.0%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (50.0%), Mendocino has a value of 35.0% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(50.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Mendocino (35.0%) is greater and better than the previously measured value (33.0%).
Prior Value
(33.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Mendocino value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Mendocino Kindergartners with Required Immunizations

Current Value:
88.8%
(2021-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Mendocino has a value of 88.8% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 94.1% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 90.5%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 56 California counties.
Compared to the CA Value (92.8%), Mendocino has a value of 88.8% which is lower and worse.
CA Value
(92.8%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the prior value, Mendocino (88.8%) is greater and better than the previously measured value (87.3%).
Prior Value
(87.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Mendocino value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Mendocino Persons Fully Vaccinated Against COVID-19

Current Value:
69.9%
(May 10, 2023)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Mendocino has a value of 69.9% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 63.9% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 55.8%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 50 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Mendocino has a value of 69.9% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 52.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 44.1%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,125 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the prior value, Mendocino (69.9%) is greater and better than the previously measured value (69.8%).
Prior Value
(69.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Mendocino value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Mendocino Pneumonia Vaccinations: Medicare Population

Current Value:
5.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Mendocino has a value of 5.0% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 7.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 6.0%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Mendocino has a value of 5.0% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 6.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 5.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the CA Value (8.0%), Mendocino has a value of 5.0% which is lower and worse.
CA Value
(8.0%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (8.0%), Mendocino has a value of 5.0% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(8.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Mendocino (5.0%) is greater and better than the previously measured value (3.0%).
Prior Value
(3.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Mendocino value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Health / Maternal, Fetal & Infant Health

Health / Maternal, Fetal & Infant Health

Health / Maternal, Fetal & Infant Health

County: Mendocino

Value
Compared to:

Health / Maternal, Fetal & Infant Health

County: Mendocino

Value
Compared to:

County: Mendocino Any In-Hospital Breastfeeding

Current Value:

County: Mendocino Any In-Hospital Breastfeeding

96.5%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Mendocino has a value of 96.5% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 94.4% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 89.6%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to the CA Value (93.8%), Mendocino has a value of 96.5% which is higher and better.
CA Value
(93.8%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the prior value, Mendocino (96.5%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (95.3%).
Prior Value
(95.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Mendocino value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Mendocino Babies with Low Birthweight

Current Value:

County: Mendocino Babies with Low Birthweight

6.7%
(2019-2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Mendocino has a value of 6.7% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 6.7% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 7.2%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 56 California counties.
Compared to the CA Value (7.1%), Mendocino has a value of 6.7% which is lower and better.
CA Value
(7.1%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (8.5%), Mendocino has a value of 6.7% which is lower and better.
US Value
(8.5% in 2021)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Compared to the prior value, Mendocino (6.7%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (6.5%).
Prior Value
(6.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Mendocino value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Mendocino In-Hospital Exclusive Breastfeeding

Current Value:
77.2%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Mendocino has a value of 77.2% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 72.7% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 58.9%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to the CA Value (68.5%), Mendocino has a value of 77.2% which is higher and better.
CA Value
(68.5%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the prior value, Mendocino (77.2%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (76.3%).
Prior Value
(76.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Mendocino value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Mendocino Mothers who Received Early Prenatal Care

Current Value:
81.6%
(2019-2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Mendocino has a value of 81.6% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 84.8% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 80.3%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to the CA Value (87.9%), Mendocino has a value of 81.6% which is lower and worse.
CA Value
(87.9%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (78.3%), Mendocino has a value of 81.6% which is higher and better.
US Value
(78.3% in 2021)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Compared to the prior value, Mendocino (81.6%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (77.0%).
Prior Value
(77.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Mendocino value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Mendocino Preterm Births

Current Value:

County: Mendocino Preterm Births

7.7%
(2020-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Mendocino has a value of 7.7% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 8.8% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 9.4%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to the CA Value (9.0%), Mendocino has a value of 7.7% which is lower and better.
CA Value
(9.0%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the prior value, Mendocino (7.7%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (7.9%).
Prior Value
(7.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Mendocino value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (9.4%), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(9.4%)

Health / Mental Health & Mental Disorders

Health / Mental Health & Mental Disorders

Health / Mental Health & Mental Disorders

County: Mendocino

Value
Compared to:

Health / Mental Health & Mental Disorders

County: Mendocino

Value
Compared to:

County: Mendocino Adults Ever Diagnosed with Depression

Current Value:
19.2%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Mendocino has a value of 19.2% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 18.8% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 19.6%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Mendocino has a value of 19.2% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 22.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 24.2%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (19.5%), Mendocino has a value of 19.2% which is lower and better.
US Value
(19.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

County: Mendocino Adults Needing and Receiving Behavioral Health Care Services

59.4%
(2021-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Mendocino has a value of 59.4% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 60.5% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 55.8%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to the CA Value (55.9%), Mendocino has a value of 59.4% which is higher and better.
CA Value
(55.9%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the prior value, Mendocino (59.4%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (62.2%).
Prior Value
(62.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Mendocino value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Mendocino Adults with Likely Serious Psychological Distress

Current Value:
12.9%
(2021-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Mendocino has a value of 12.9% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.8% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 20.7%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to the CA Value (16.7%), Mendocino has a value of 12.9% which is lower and better.
CA Value
(16.7%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the prior value, Mendocino (12.9%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (12.7%).
Prior Value
(12.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Mendocino value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Mendocino Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Suicide

Current Value:
24.2
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2019-2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Mendocino has a value of 24.2 which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.0 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 20.6.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 57 California counties.
Compared to the CA Value (10.3), Mendocino has a value of 24.2 which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(10.3)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (13.5), Mendocino has a value of 24.2 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(13.5 in 2020)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Compared to the prior value, Mendocino (24.2) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (20.8).
Prior Value
(20.8)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Mendocino value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (12.8), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(12.8)
<div>MHMD-01: Reduce the suicide rate <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong></div>

County: Mendocino Depression: Medicare Population

Current Value:
12.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Mendocino has a value of 12.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.5% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.0%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Mendocino has a value of 12.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the CA Value (14.0%), Mendocino has a value of 12.0% which is lower and better.
CA Value
(14.0%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (16.0%), Mendocino has a value of 12.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(16.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Mendocino (12.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (12.0%).
Prior Value
(12.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Mendocino value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Mendocino Mental Health Provider Rate

Current Value:

County: Mendocino Mental Health Provider Rate

683
Providers per 100,000 population
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Mendocino has a value of 683 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 376 while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 244.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Mendocino has a value of 683 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 131 while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 58.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,941 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the CA Value (424), Mendocino has a value of 683 which is higher and better.
CA Value
(424)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the prior value, Mendocino (683) is less and worse than the previously measured value (809).
Prior Value
(809)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Mendocino value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Mendocino Poor Mental Health: 14+ Days

Current Value:

County: Mendocino Poor Mental Health: 14+ Days

15.7%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Mendocino has a value of 15.7% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 15.3% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 16.6%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Mendocino has a value of 15.7% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 17.5%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (14.7%), Mendocino has a value of 15.7% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(14.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Health / Mortality Data

Health / Mortality Data

Health / Mortality Data

County: Mendocino

Value
Compared to:

Health / Mortality Data

County: Mendocino

Value
Compared to:

County: Mendocino Life Expectancy

Current Value:

County: Mendocino Life Expectancy

78.5
Years
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Mendocino has a value of 78.5 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 79.5 while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 77.6.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 57 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Mendocino has a value of 78.5 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 76.9 while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 74.9.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,072 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the CA Value (81.0), Mendocino has a value of 78.5 which is lower and worse.
CA Value
(81.0)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (78.5), Mendocino has a value of 78.5.
US Value
(78.5)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Mendocino (78.5) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (79.5).
Prior Value
(79.5)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Mendocino value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Health / Nutrition & Healthy Eating

Health / Nutrition & Healthy Eating

Health / Nutrition & Healthy Eating

County: Mendocino

Value
Compared to:

Health / Nutrition & Healthy Eating

County: Mendocino

Value
Compared to:

County: Mendocino Adult Fast Food Consumption

Current Value:

County: Mendocino Adult Fast Food Consumption

54.0%
(2016)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Mendocino has a value of 54.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 59.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 69.4%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to the CA Value (65.6%), Mendocino has a value of 54.0% which is lower and better.
CA Value
(65.6%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the prior value, Mendocino (54.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (41.0%).
Prior Value
(41.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Mendocino value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Mendocino Adults who Drink Sugar-Sweetened Beverages

Current Value:
13.2%
(2019-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the CA Value (13.7%), Mendocino has a value of 13.2% which is lower and better.
CA Value
(13.7%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the prior value, Mendocino (13.2%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (12.3%).
Prior Value
(12.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

Health / Older Adults

Health / Older Adults

Health / Older Adults

County: Mendocino

Value
Compared to:

Health / Older Adults

County: Mendocino

Value
Compared to:

County: Mendocino Adults 65+ who Received Recommended Preventive Services: Females

29.2%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Mendocino has a value of 29.2% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 31.3% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 28.6%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Mendocino has a value of 29.2% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 36.6% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 33.8%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (37.9%), Mendocino has a value of 29.2% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(37.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

County: Mendocino Adults 65+ who Received Recommended Preventive Services: Males

38.3%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Mendocino has a value of 38.3% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 38.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 35.4%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Mendocino has a value of 38.3% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 42.3% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 39.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (43.7%), Mendocino has a value of 38.3% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(43.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

County: Mendocino Adults 65+ with a Disability

Current Value:

County: Mendocino Adults 65+ with a Disability

36.4%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the CA Value (33.5%), Mendocino has a value of 36.4%.
CA Value
(33.5%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (33.3%), Mendocino has a value of 36.4%.
US Value
(33.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Mendocino value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Mendocino Adults 65+ with a Hearing Difficulty

Current Value:
15.4%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the CA Value (12.9%), Mendocino has a value of 15.4%.
CA Value
(12.9%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (13.7%), Mendocino has a value of 15.4%.
US Value
(13.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Mendocino value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Mendocino Adults 65+ with a Self-Care Difficulty

Current Value:
9.3%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the CA Value (9.5%), Mendocino has a value of 9.3%.
CA Value
(9.5%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (7.4%), Mendocino has a value of 9.3%.
US Value
(7.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Mendocino value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Mendocino Adults 65+ with a Vision Difficulty

Current Value:
7.9%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the CA Value (6.1%), Mendocino has a value of 7.9%.
CA Value
(6.1%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (6.0%), Mendocino has a value of 7.9%.
US Value
(6.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Mendocino value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Mendocino Adults 65+ with an Independent Living Difficulty

Current Value:
16.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the CA Value (16.4%), Mendocino has a value of 16.0%.
CA Value
(16.4%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (13.6%), Mendocino has a value of 16.0%.
US Value
(13.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Mendocino value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Mendocino Alzheimer's Disease or Dementia: Medicare Population

Current Value:
3.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Mendocino has a value of 3.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 5.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 5.3%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Mendocino has a value of 3.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 6.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 6.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the CA Value (5.0%), Mendocino has a value of 3.0% which is lower and better.
CA Value
(5.0%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (6.0%), Mendocino has a value of 3.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(6.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Mendocino (3.0%) is less and better than the previously measured value (4.0%).
Prior Value
(4.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Mendocino value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Mendocino Elder Index (Elderly Household Below Income Threshold)

23.7%
(2019-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Mendocino has a value of 23.7% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 24.2% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 34.6%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to the CA Value (27.7%), Mendocino has a value of 23.7% which is lower and better.
CA Value
(27.7%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the prior value, Mendocino (23.7%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (33.5%).
Prior Value
(33.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Mendocino value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Health / Oral Health

Health / Oral Health

Health / Oral Health

County: Mendocino

Value
Compared to:

Health / Oral Health

County: Mendocino

Value
Compared to:

County: Mendocino Adults 65+ with Total Tooth Loss

Current Value:
11.2%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Mendocino has a value of 11.2% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 9.7% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.1%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Mendocino has a value of 11.2% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.6% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 15.6%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (13.4%), Mendocino has a value of 11.2% which is lower and better.
US Value
(13.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

County: Mendocino Adults who Visited a Dentist

Current Value:

County: Mendocino Adults who Visited a Dentist

60.4%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Mendocino has a value of 60.4% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 62.9% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 58.4%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Mendocino has a value of 60.4% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 60.6% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 54.3%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (64.8%), Mendocino has a value of 60.4% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(64.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

County: Mendocino Children who Visited a Dentist

Current Value:

County: Mendocino Children who Visited a Dentist

87.4%
(2019-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the CA Value (89.5%), Mendocino has a value of 87.4% which is lower and worse.
CA Value
(89.5%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the prior value, Mendocino (87.4%) is greater and better than the previously measured value (82.6%).
Prior Value
(82.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Mendocino Dentist Rate

Current Value:

County: Mendocino Dentist Rate

79
Dentists per 100,000 population
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Mendocino has a value of 79 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 78 while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 58.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Mendocino has a value of 79 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 43 while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 27.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,056 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the CA Value (91), Mendocino has a value of 79 which is lower and worse.
CA Value
(91)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the prior value, Mendocino (79) is less and worse than the previously measured value (86).
Prior Value
(86)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Mendocino value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Health / Other Conditions

Health / Other Conditions

Health / Other Conditions

County: Mendocino

Value
Compared to:

Health / Other Conditions

County: Mendocino

Value
Compared to:

County: Mendocino Adults with Arthritis

Current Value:

County: Mendocino Adults with Arthritis

29.1%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Mendocino has a value of 29.1% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 23.2% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 27.7%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Mendocino has a value of 29.1% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 30.2% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 32.7%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (25.2%), Mendocino has a value of 29.1% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(25.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

County: Mendocino Adults with Kidney Disease

Current Value:

County: Mendocino Adults with Kidney Disease

3.8%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Mendocino has a value of 3.8% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 3.2% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 3.7%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Mendocino has a value of 3.8% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 3.6% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 3.9%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (3.1%), Mendocino has a value of 3.8% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(3.1%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

County: Mendocino Chronic Kidney Disease: Medicare Population

Current Value:
10.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Mendocino has a value of 10.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 14.5% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 17.0%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Mendocino has a value of 10.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 17.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 19.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the CA Value (16.0%), Mendocino has a value of 10.0% which is lower and better.
CA Value
(16.0%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (18.0%), Mendocino has a value of 10.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(18.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Mendocino (10.0%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (9.0%).
Prior Value
(9.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Mendocino value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Mendocino Osteoporosis: Medicare Population

Current Value:
9.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Mendocino has a value of 9.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 13.0%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Mendocino has a value of 9.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 9.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 11.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the CA Value (13.0%), Mendocino has a value of 9.0% which is lower and better.
CA Value
(13.0%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (11.0%), Mendocino has a value of 9.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(11.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Mendocino (9.0%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (8.0%).
Prior Value
(8.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Mendocino value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Mendocino Rheumatoid Arthritis or Osteoarthritis: Medicare Population

26.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Mendocino has a value of 26.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 31.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.0%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Mendocino has a value of 26.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 35.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 38.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the CA Value (32.0%), Mendocino has a value of 26.0% which is lower and better.
CA Value
(32.0%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (35.0%), Mendocino has a value of 26.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(35.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Mendocino (26.0%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (25.0%).
Prior Value
(25.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Mendocino value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Health / Physical Activity

Health / Physical Activity

Health / Physical Activity

County: Mendocino

Value
Compared to:

Health / Physical Activity

County: Mendocino

Value
Compared to:

County: Mendocino 7th Grade Students who are Physically Fit

Current Value:
57.5%
(2018-2019)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Mendocino has a value of 57.5% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 60.8% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 56.8%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to the CA Value (61.0%), Mendocino has a value of 57.5% which is lower and worse.
CA Value
(61.0%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the prior value, Mendocino (57.5%) is less and worse than the previously measured value (58.1%).
Prior Value
(58.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Mendocino value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Mendocino Adults 20+ who are Sedentary

Current Value:

County: Mendocino Adults 20+ who are Sedentary

15.7%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Mendocino has a value of 15.7% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 15.8% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 17.9%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Mendocino has a value of 15.7% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 18.9% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 21.9%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the prior value, Mendocino (15.7%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (13.4%).
Prior Value
(13.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Mendocino value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Health / Prevention & Safety

Health / Prevention & Safety

Health / Prevention & Safety

County: Mendocino

Value
Compared to:

Health / Prevention & Safety

County: Mendocino

Value
Compared to:

County: Mendocino Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Firearms

Current Value:
12.3
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Mendocino has a value of 12.3 which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 8.2 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 11.8.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 45 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Mendocino has a value of 12.3 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 14.4 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 19.4.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 1,083 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the CA Value (7.4), Mendocino has a value of 12.3 which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(7.4)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (12.0), Mendocino has a value of 12.3 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(12.0)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Mendocino (12.3) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (14.7).
Prior Value
(14.7)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Mendocino value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (10.7), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(10.7)

County: Mendocino Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Unintentional Injuries

106.5
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2019-2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Mendocino has a value of 106.5 which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 53.8 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 70.9.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to the CA Value (43.4), Mendocino has a value of 106.5 which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(43.4)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (57.6), Mendocino has a value of 106.5 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(57.6 in 2020)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Compared to the prior value, Mendocino (106.5) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (89.6).
Prior Value
(89.6)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Mendocino value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (43.2), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(43.2)

Health / Respiratory Diseases

Health / Respiratory Diseases

Health / Respiratory Diseases

County: Mendocino

Value
Compared to:

Health / Respiratory Diseases

County: Mendocino

Value
Compared to:

County: Mendocino Adults with Asthma

Current Value:

County: Mendocino Adults with Asthma

12.6%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Mendocino has a value of 12.6% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 17.9% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 20.5%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to the CA Value (17.0%), Mendocino has a value of 12.6% which is lower and better.
CA Value
(17.0%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (15.7%), Mendocino has a value of 12.6% which is lower and better.
US Value
(15.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System
Compared to the prior value, Mendocino (12.6%) is less and better than the previously measured value (32.0%).
Prior Value
(32.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Mendocino value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Mendocino Adults with COPD

Current Value:

County: Mendocino Adults with COPD

8.4%
Percent of adults
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Mendocino has a value of 8.4% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 6.4% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 7.7%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Mendocino has a value of 8.4% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 8.5% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 9.9%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (6.4%), Mendocino has a value of 8.4% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(6.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

County: Mendocino Adults with Current Asthma

Current Value:

County: Mendocino Adults with Current Asthma

10.1%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Mendocino has a value of 10.1% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 9.8% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 10.2%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Mendocino has a value of 10.1% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.2% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 10.8%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (9.7%), Mendocino has a value of 10.1% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(9.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

County: Mendocino Asthma: Medicare Population

Current Value:

County: Mendocino Asthma: Medicare Population

5.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Mendocino has a value of 5.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 6.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 7.0%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Mendocino has a value of 5.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 6.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 7.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the CA Value (7.0%), Mendocino has a value of 5.0% which is lower and better.
CA Value
(7.0%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (7.0%), Mendocino has a value of 5.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(7.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Mendocino (5.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (5.0%).
Prior Value
(5.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Mendocino value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Mendocino Children and Teens with Asthma

Current Value:

County: Mendocino Children and Teens with Asthma

9.8%
(2019-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the CA Value (12.3%), Mendocino has a value of 9.8% which is lower and better.
CA Value
(12.3%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the prior value, Mendocino (9.8%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (6.7%).
Prior Value
(6.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Mendocino COPD: Medicare Population

Current Value:

County: Mendocino COPD: Medicare Population

7.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Mendocino has a value of 7.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 9.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 10.0%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Mendocino has a value of 7.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the CA Value (8.0%), Mendocino has a value of 7.0% which is lower and better.
CA Value
(8.0%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (11.0%), Mendocino has a value of 7.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(11.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Mendocino (7.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (7.0%).
Prior Value
(7.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Mendocino value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Health / Sexually Transmitted Infections

Health / Sexually Transmitted Infections

Health / Sexually Transmitted Infections

County: Mendocino

Value
Compared to:

Health / Sexually Transmitted Infections

County: Mendocino

Value
Compared to:

County: Mendocino Chlamydia Incidence Rate

Current Value:

County: Mendocino Chlamydia Incidence Rate

409.7
Cases per 100,000 population
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Mendocino has a value of 409.7 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 344.1 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 485.7.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to the CA Value (484.7), Mendocino has a value of 409.7 which is lower and better.
CA Value
(484.7)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (495.5), Mendocino has a value of 409.7 which is lower and better.
US Value
(495.5)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is National Center for HIV/AIDS, Viral Hepatitis, STD, and TB Prevention
Compared to the prior value, Mendocino (409.7) is less and better than the previously measured value (430.9).
Prior Value
(430.9)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Mendocino value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Mendocino Congenital Syphilis Incidence Rate

Current Value:
113.5
Cases per 100,000 live births
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Mendocino has a value of 113.5 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 46.9 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 151.4.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to the CA Value (114.9), Mendocino has a value of 113.5 which is lower and better.
CA Value
(114.9)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the prior value, Mendocino (113.5) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (0.0).
Prior Value
(0.0)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Mendocino value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (33.9), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(33.9)

County: Mendocino Death Rate Among Persons with Diagnosed HIV Infection

1.1
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Mendocino has a value of 1.1 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 2.8 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 4.8.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to the CA Value (5.4), Mendocino has a value of 1.1 which is lower and better.
CA Value
(5.4)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the prior value, Mendocino (1.1) is less and better than the previously measured value (6.8).
Prior Value
(6.8)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Mendocino value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Mendocino Gonorrhea Incidence Rate

Current Value:

County: Mendocino Gonorrhea Incidence Rate

244.5
Cases per 100,000 population
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Mendocino has a value of 244.5 which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 140.0 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 212.7.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to the CA Value (230.9), Mendocino has a value of 244.5 which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(230.9)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (214.0), Mendocino has a value of 244.5 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(214.0)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is National Center for HIV/AIDS, Viral Hepatitis, STD, and TB Prevention
Compared to the prior value, Mendocino (244.5) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (169.2).
Prior Value
(169.2)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Mendocino value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Mendocino HIV Diagnosis Rate

Current Value:

County: Mendocino HIV Diagnosis Rate

3.4
Cases per 100,000 population
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Mendocino has a value of 3.4 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 7.0 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 10.4.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to the CA Value (12.2), Mendocino has a value of 3.4 which is lower and better.
CA Value
(12.2)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the prior value, Mendocino (3.4) is less and better than the previously measured value (4.5).
Prior Value
(4.5)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Mendocino value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Mendocino HIV/AIDS Prevalence Rate: 13+

Current Value:

County: Mendocino HIV/AIDS Prevalence Rate: 13+

235.2
Cases per 100,000 population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the CA Value (414.1), Mendocino has a value of 235.2.
CA Value
(414.1)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the prior value, Mendocino (235.2) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (236.3).
Prior Value
(236.3)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Mendocino value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Mendocino Persons Living and Diagnosed with HIV who are in Care

79.5%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Mendocino has a value of 79.5% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 76.4% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 71.6%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 56 California counties.
Compared to the CA Value (73.7%), Mendocino has a value of 79.5% which is higher and better.
CA Value
(73.7%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the prior value, Mendocino (79.5%) is less and worse than the previously measured value (80.2%).
Prior Value
(80.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Mendocino value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Mendocino Persons Living with HIV Rate

Current Value:

County: Mendocino Persons Living with HIV Rate

199.2
Cases per 100,000 population
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the CA Value (355.6), Mendocino has a value of 199.2.
CA Value
(355.6)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the prior value, Mendocino (199.2) is greater  than the previously measured value (138.5).
Prior Value
(138.5)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Mendocino value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Mendocino Syphilis Incidence Rate

Current Value:

County: Mendocino Syphilis Incidence Rate

17.6
Cases per 100,000 population
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Mendocino has a value of 17.6 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 17.1 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 25.6.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to the CA Value (22.3), Mendocino has a value of 17.6 which is lower and better.
CA Value
(22.3)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (16.2), Mendocino has a value of 17.6 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(16.2)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is National Center for HIV/AIDS, Viral Hepatitis, STD, and TB Prevention
Compared to the prior value, Mendocino (17.6) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (8.0).
Prior Value
(8.0)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Mendocino value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Health / Tobacco Use

Health / Tobacco Use

Health / Tobacco Use

County: Mendocino

Value
Compared to:

Health / Tobacco Use

County: Mendocino

Value
Compared to:

County: Mendocino 11th Grade Students Who Report Vaping or Using E-Cigarettes

43.4%
(2017-2019)
Compared to:
Compared to the CA Value (26.2%), Mendocino has a value of 43.4% which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(26.2%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the prior value, Mendocino (43.4%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (11.5%).
Prior Value
(11.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Mendocino 7th Grade Students Who Report Vaping or Using E-Cigarettes

9.2%
(2017-2019)
Compared to:
Compared to the CA Value (4.0%), Mendocino has a value of 9.2% which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(4.0%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the prior value, Mendocino (9.2%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (6.1%).
Prior Value
(6.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.