Skip to main content

Advanced Search: Build a Custom Dashboard

In the fields below, search for indicators by location, topics, population, classification, subgroup, or comparison. No fields are required, but we suggest selecting a location or two to start. In the additional search options section, select options to group and order search results. To learn more about how to customize a dashboard, see our help center.

Visit the Indicator List Page to see the full list of indicators and locations available on the site.

  • Map View
  • County : Mendocino Census Tracts
  • County : Mendocino Zip Codes
  • All Health Topics
  • All Community Topics
  • All Economy Topics
  • All Education Topics
  • All Environmental Health Topics
Search display options:

Search Results:

Indicator Gauge Icon Legend

Legend Colors

Red is bad, green is good, blue is not statistically different/neutral.

Compared to Distribution

an indicator guage with the arrow in the green the value is in the best half of communities.

an indicator guage with the arrow in the yellow the value is in the 2nd worst quarter of communities.

an indicator guage with the arrow in the red the value is in the worst quarter of communities.

Compared to Target

green circle with white tick inside it meets target; red circle with white cross inside it does not meet target.

Compared to a Single Value

green diamond with downward arrow inside it lower than the comparison value; red diamond with downward arrow inside it higher than the comparison value; blue diamond with downward arrow inside it not statistically different from comparison value.

Trend

green square outline with upward trending arrow inside it green square outline with downward trending arrow inside it non-significant change over time; green square with upward trending arrow inside it green square with downward trending arrow inside it significant change over time; blue square with equals sign no change over time.

Compared to Prior Value

green triangle with upward trending arrow inside it higher than the previous measurement period; green triangle with downward trending arrow inside it lower than the previous measurement period; blue equals sign no statistically different change  from previous measurement period.

More information about the gauges and icons

Health / Physical Activity

Health / Physical Activity

Health / Physical Activity

County: Mendocino

Value
Compared to:

Health / Physical Activity

County: Mendocino

Value
Compared to:

County: Mendocino 7th Grade Students who are Physically Fit

Current Value:
57.5%
(2018-2019)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Mendocino has a value of 57.5% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 60.8% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 56.8%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to the CA Value (61.0%), Mendocino has a value of 57.5% which is lower and worse.
CA Value
(61.0%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the prior value, Mendocino (57.5%) is less and worse than the previously measured value (58.1%).
Prior Value
(58.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Mendocino value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Mendocino 9th Grade Students who are at a Healthy Weight or Underweight

58.5%
(2018-2019)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Mendocino has a value of 58.5% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 62.4% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 57.6%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to the CA Value (62.2%), Mendocino has a value of 58.5% which is lower and worse.
CA Value
(62.2%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the prior value, Mendocino (58.5%) is less and worse than the previously measured value (60.2%).
Prior Value
(60.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Mendocino value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Mendocino Access to Exercise Opportunities

Current Value:
65.9%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Mendocino has a value of 65.9% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 85.9% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 75.7%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Mendocino has a value of 65.9% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 63.4% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 46.3%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,080 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the CA Value (94.6%), Mendocino has a value of 65.9% which is lower and worse.
CA Value
(94.6%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (84.0%), Mendocino has a value of 65.9% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(84.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

County: Mendocino Access to Parks

Current Value:

County: Mendocino Access to Parks

45.4%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Mendocino has a value of 45.4% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 69.6% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 55.4%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to the CA Value (82.4%), Mendocino has a value of 45.4% which is lower and worse.
CA Value
(82.4%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the prior value, Mendocino (45.4%) is greater and better than the previously measured value (42.1%).
Prior Value
(42.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Mendocino Adults 20+ who are Sedentary

Current Value:

County: Mendocino Adults 20+ who are Sedentary

15.7%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Mendocino has a value of 15.7% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 15.8% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 17.9%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Mendocino has a value of 15.7% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 18.9% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 21.9%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the prior value, Mendocino (15.7%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (13.4%).
Prior Value
(13.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Mendocino value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Mendocino Adults Who Are Obese

Current Value:

County: Mendocino Adults Who Are Obese

29.7%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Mendocino has a value of 29.7% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 32.3% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 38.8%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to the CA Value (28.8%), Mendocino has a value of 29.7% which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(28.8%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (33.6%), Mendocino has a value of 29.7% which is lower and better.
US Value
(33.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System
Compared to the prior value, Mendocino (29.7%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (21.6%).
Prior Value
(21.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Mendocino value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Mendocino Adults who are Overweight or Obese

Current Value:
64.2%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Mendocino has a value of 64.2% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 66.2% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 71.2%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to the CA Value (62.3%), Mendocino has a value of 64.2% which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(62.3%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (67.7%), Mendocino has a value of 64.2% which is lower and better.
US Value
(67.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System
Compared to the prior value, Mendocino (64.2%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (57.3%).
Prior Value
(57.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Mendocino value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.