Skip to main content

Advanced Search: Build a Custom Dashboard

In the fields below, search for indicators by location, topics, population, classification, subgroup, or comparison. No fields are required, but we suggest selecting a location or two to start. In the additional search options section, select options to group and order search results. To learn more about how to customize a dashboard, see our help center.

Visit the Indicator List Page to see the full list of indicators and locations available on the site.

  • Map View
  • County : Mendocino Census Tracts
  • County : Mendocino Zip Codes
  • All Health Topics
  • All Community Topics
  • All Economy Topics
  • All Education Topics
  • All Environmental Health Topics
Search display options:

Search Results:

Indicator Gauge Icon Legend

Legend Colors

Red is bad, green is good, blue is not statistically different/neutral.

Compared to Distribution

an indicator guage with the arrow in the green the value is in the best half of communities.

an indicator guage with the arrow in the yellow the value is in the 2nd worst quarter of communities.

an indicator guage with the arrow in the red the value is in the worst quarter of communities.

Compared to Target

green circle with white tick inside it meets target; red circle with white cross inside it does not meet target.

Compared to a Single Value

green diamond with downward arrow inside it lower than the comparison value; red diamond with downward arrow inside it higher than the comparison value; blue diamond with downward arrow inside it not statistically different from comparison value.

Trend

green square outline with upward trending arrow inside it green square outline with downward trending arrow inside it non-significant change over time; green square with upward trending arrow inside it green square with downward trending arrow inside it significant change over time; blue square with equals sign no change over time.

Compared to Prior Value

green triangle with upward trending arrow inside it higher than the previous measurement period; green triangle with downward trending arrow inside it lower than the previous measurement period; blue equals sign no statistically different change  from previous measurement period.

More information about the gauges and icons

Health / Alcohol & Drug Use

Health / Alcohol & Drug Use

Health / Alcohol & Drug Use

Adults who Binge Drink

Value
Compared to:

Health / Alcohol & Drug Use

Adults who Binge Drink

Value
Compared to:

Adults who Binge Drink County: Mendocino

Current Value:

Adults who Binge Drink County: Mendocino

14.8%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Mendocino has a value of 14.8% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 15.3% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 15.8%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Mendocino has a value of 14.8% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 15.5% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 17.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (15.5%), Mendocino has a value of 14.8% which is lower and better.
US Value
(15.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults who Binge Drink Census Place: Albion

Current Value:

Adults who Binge Drink Census Place: Albion

16.4%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Albion has a value of 16.4% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 15.8% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 17.0%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,472 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Albion has a value of 16.4% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.4% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.2%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,528 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (14.8%), Albion has a value of 16.4% which is higher and worse.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(14.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the US Value (15.5%), Albion has a value of 16.4% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(15.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults who Binge Drink Census Place: Anchor Bay

Current Value:

Adults who Binge Drink Census Place: Anchor Bay

13.8%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Anchor Bay has a value of 13.8% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 15.8% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 17.0%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,472 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Anchor Bay has a value of 13.8% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.4% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.2%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,528 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (14.8%), Anchor Bay has a value of 13.8% which is lower and better.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(14.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the US Value (15.5%), Anchor Bay has a value of 13.8% which is lower and better.
US Value
(15.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults who Binge Drink Census Place: Boonville

Current Value:

Adults who Binge Drink Census Place: Boonville

16.0%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Boonville has a value of 16.0% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 15.8% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 17.0%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,472 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Boonville has a value of 16.0% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.4% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.2%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,528 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (14.8%), Boonville has a value of 16.0% which is higher and worse.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(14.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the US Value (15.5%), Boonville has a value of 16.0% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(15.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults who Binge Drink Census Place: Brooktrails

Current Value:

Adults who Binge Drink Census Place: Brooktrails

17.4%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Brooktrails has a value of 17.4% which is in the worst 25% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 15.8% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 17.0%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,472 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Brooktrails has a value of 17.4% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.4% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.2%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,528 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (14.8%), Brooktrails has a value of 17.4% which is higher and worse.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(14.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the US Value (15.5%), Brooktrails has a value of 17.4% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(15.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults who Binge Drink Census Place: Calpella

Current Value:

Adults who Binge Drink Census Place: Calpella

17.1%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Calpella has a value of 17.1% which is in the worst 25% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 15.8% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 17.0%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,472 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Calpella has a value of 17.1% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.4% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.2%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,528 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (14.8%), Calpella has a value of 17.1% which is higher and worse.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(14.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the US Value (15.5%), Calpella has a value of 17.1% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(15.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults who Binge Drink Census Place: Caspar

Current Value:

Adults who Binge Drink Census Place: Caspar

14.3%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Caspar has a value of 14.3% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 15.8% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 17.0%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,472 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Caspar has a value of 14.3% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.4% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.2%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,528 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (14.8%), Caspar has a value of 14.3% which is lower and better.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(14.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the US Value (15.5%), Caspar has a value of 14.3% which is lower and better.
US Value
(15.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults who Binge Drink Census Place: Cleone

Current Value:

Adults who Binge Drink Census Place: Cleone

15.3%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Cleone has a value of 15.3% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 15.8% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 17.0%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,472 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Cleone has a value of 15.3% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.4% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.2%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,528 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (14.8%), Cleone has a value of 15.3% which is higher and worse.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(14.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the US Value (15.5%), Cleone has a value of 15.3% which is lower and better.
US Value
(15.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults who Binge Drink Census Place: Comptche

Current Value:

Adults who Binge Drink Census Place: Comptche

15.6%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Comptche has a value of 15.6% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 15.8% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 17.0%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,472 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Comptche has a value of 15.6% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.4% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.2%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,528 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (14.8%), Comptche has a value of 15.6% which is higher and worse.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(14.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the US Value (15.5%), Comptche has a value of 15.6% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(15.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults who Binge Drink Census Place: Covelo

Current Value:

Adults who Binge Drink Census Place: Covelo

15.7%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Covelo has a value of 15.7% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 15.8% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 17.0%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,472 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Covelo has a value of 15.7% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.4% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.2%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,528 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (14.8%), Covelo has a value of 15.7% which is higher and worse.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(14.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the US Value (15.5%), Covelo has a value of 15.7% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(15.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults who Binge Drink Census Place: Fort Bragg

Current Value:

Adults who Binge Drink Census Place: Fort Bragg

16.1%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Fort Bragg has a value of 16.1% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 15.8% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 17.0%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,472 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Fort Bragg has a value of 16.1% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.4% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.2%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,528 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (14.8%), Fort Bragg has a value of 16.1% which is higher and worse.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(14.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the US Value (15.5%), Fort Bragg has a value of 16.1% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(15.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults who Binge Drink Census Place: Hopland

Current Value:

Adults who Binge Drink Census Place: Hopland

17.6%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Hopland has a value of 17.6% which is in the worst 25% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 15.8% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 17.0%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,472 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Hopland has a value of 17.6% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.4% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.2%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,528 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (14.8%), Hopland has a value of 17.6% which is higher and worse.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(14.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the US Value (15.5%), Hopland has a value of 17.6% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(15.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults who Binge Drink Census Place: Laytonville

Current Value:

Adults who Binge Drink Census Place: Laytonville

17.0%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Laytonville has a value of 17.0% which is in the worst 25% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 15.8% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 17.0%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,472 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Laytonville has a value of 17.0% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.4% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.2%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,528 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (14.8%), Laytonville has a value of 17.0% which is higher and worse.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(14.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the US Value (15.5%), Laytonville has a value of 17.0% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(15.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults who Binge Drink Census Place: Leggett

Current Value:

Adults who Binge Drink Census Place: Leggett

18.2%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Leggett has a value of 18.2% which is in the worst 25% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 15.8% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 17.0%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,472 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Leggett has a value of 18.2% which is in the worst 25% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.4% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.2%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,528 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (14.8%), Leggett has a value of 18.2% which is higher and worse.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(14.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the US Value (15.5%), Leggett has a value of 18.2% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(15.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults who Binge Drink Census Place: Little River

Current Value:

Adults who Binge Drink Census Place: Little River

14.2%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Little River has a value of 14.2% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 15.8% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 17.0%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,472 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Little River has a value of 14.2% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.4% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.2%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,528 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (14.8%), Little River has a value of 14.2% which is lower and better.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(14.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the US Value (15.5%), Little River has a value of 14.2% which is lower and better.
US Value
(15.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults who Binge Drink Census Place: Manchester

Current Value:

Adults who Binge Drink Census Place: Manchester

16.4%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Manchester has a value of 16.4% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 15.8% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 17.0%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,472 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Manchester has a value of 16.4% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.4% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.2%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,528 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (14.8%), Manchester has a value of 16.4% which is higher and worse.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(14.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the US Value (15.5%), Manchester has a value of 16.4% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(15.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults who Binge Drink Census Place: Mendocino

Current Value:

Adults who Binge Drink Census Place: Mendocino

14.6%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Mendocino has a value of 14.6% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 15.8% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 17.0%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,472 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Mendocino has a value of 14.6% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.4% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.2%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,528 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (14.8%), Mendocino has a value of 14.6% which is lower and better.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(14.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the US Value (15.5%), Mendocino has a value of 14.6% which is lower and better.
US Value
(15.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults who Binge Drink Census Place: Philo

Current Value:

Adults who Binge Drink Census Place: Philo

17.0%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Philo has a value of 17.0% which is in the worst 25% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 15.8% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 17.0%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,472 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Philo has a value of 17.0% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.4% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.2%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,528 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (14.8%), Philo has a value of 17.0% which is higher and worse.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(14.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the US Value (15.5%), Philo has a value of 17.0% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(15.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults who Binge Drink Census Place: Point Arena

Current Value:

Adults who Binge Drink Census Place: Point Arena

17.7%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Point Arena has a value of 17.7% which is in the worst 25% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 15.8% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 17.0%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,472 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Point Arena has a value of 17.7% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.4% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.2%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,528 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (14.8%), Point Arena has a value of 17.7% which is higher and worse.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(14.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the US Value (15.5%), Point Arena has a value of 17.7% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(15.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults who Binge Drink Census Place: Potter Valley

Current Value:

Adults who Binge Drink Census Place: Potter Valley

17.6%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Potter Valley has a value of 17.6% which is in the worst 25% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 15.8% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 17.0%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,472 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Potter Valley has a value of 17.6% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.4% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.2%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,528 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (14.8%), Potter Valley has a value of 17.6% which is higher and worse.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(14.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the US Value (15.5%), Potter Valley has a value of 17.6% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(15.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults who Binge Drink Census Place: Redwood Valley

Current Value:

Adults who Binge Drink Census Place: Redwood Valley

17.2%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Redwood Valley has a value of 17.2% which is in the worst 25% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 15.8% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 17.0%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,472 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Redwood Valley has a value of 17.2% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.4% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.2%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,528 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (14.8%), Redwood Valley has a value of 17.2% which is higher and worse.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(14.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the US Value (15.5%), Redwood Valley has a value of 17.2% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(15.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults who Binge Drink Census Place: Talmage

Current Value:

Adults who Binge Drink Census Place: Talmage

15.3%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Talmage has a value of 15.3% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 15.8% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 17.0%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,472 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Talmage has a value of 15.3% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.4% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.2%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,528 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (14.8%), Talmage has a value of 15.3% which is higher and worse.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(14.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the US Value (15.5%), Talmage has a value of 15.3% which is lower and better.
US Value
(15.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults who Binge Drink Census Place: Ukiah

Current Value:

Adults who Binge Drink Census Place: Ukiah

16.6%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Ukiah has a value of 16.6% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 15.8% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 17.0%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,472 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Ukiah has a value of 16.6% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.4% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.2%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,528 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (14.8%), Ukiah has a value of 16.6% which is higher and worse.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(14.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the US Value (15.5%), Ukiah has a value of 16.6% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(15.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults who Binge Drink Census Place: Willits

Current Value:

Adults who Binge Drink Census Place: Willits

15.7%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Willits has a value of 15.7% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 15.8% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 17.0%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,472 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Willits has a value of 15.7% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.4% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.2%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,528 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (14.8%), Willits has a value of 15.7% which is higher and worse.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(14.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the US Value (15.5%), Willits has a value of 15.7% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(15.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults who Binge Drink Zip Code: 95410

Current Value:

Adults who Binge Drink Zip Code: 95410

14.9%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Zip Codes, 95410 has a value of 14.9% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 15.9% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 17.1%.
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,730 California zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 95410 has a value of 14.9% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.5% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.1%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 31,435 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (14.8%), 95410 has a value of 14.9% which is higher and worse.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(14.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the US Value (15.5%), 95410 has a value of 14.9% which is lower and better.
US Value
(15.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults who Binge Drink Zip Code: 95415

Current Value:

Adults who Binge Drink Zip Code: 95415

16.1%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Zip Codes, 95415 has a value of 16.1% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 15.9% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 17.1%.
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,730 California zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 95415 has a value of 16.1% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.5% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.1%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 31,435 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (14.8%), 95415 has a value of 16.1% which is higher and worse.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(14.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the US Value (15.5%), 95415 has a value of 16.1% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(15.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults who Binge Drink Zip Code: 95417

Current Value:

Adults who Binge Drink Zip Code: 95417

16.1%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Zip Codes, 95417 has a value of 16.1% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 15.9% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 17.1%.
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,730 California zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 95417 has a value of 16.1% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.5% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.1%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 31,435 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (14.8%), 95417 has a value of 16.1% which is higher and worse.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(14.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the US Value (15.5%), 95417 has a value of 16.1% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(15.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults who Binge Drink Zip Code: 95420

Current Value:

Adults who Binge Drink Zip Code: 95420

15.1%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Zip Codes, 95420 has a value of 15.1% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 15.9% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 17.1%.
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,730 California zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 95420 has a value of 15.1% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.5% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.1%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 31,435 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (14.8%), 95420 has a value of 15.1% which is higher and worse.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(14.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the US Value (15.5%), 95420 has a value of 15.1% which is lower and better.
US Value
(15.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults who Binge Drink Zip Code: 95427

Current Value:

Adults who Binge Drink Zip Code: 95427

15.4%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Zip Codes, 95427 has a value of 15.4% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 15.9% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 17.1%.
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,730 California zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 95427 has a value of 15.4% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.5% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.1%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 31,435 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (14.8%), 95427 has a value of 15.4% which is higher and worse.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(14.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the US Value (15.5%), 95427 has a value of 15.4% which is lower and better.
US Value
(15.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults who Binge Drink Zip Code: 95428

Current Value:

Adults who Binge Drink Zip Code: 95428

15.6%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Zip Codes, 95428 has a value of 15.6% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 15.9% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 17.1%.
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,730 California zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 95428 has a value of 15.6% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.5% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.1%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 31,435 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (14.8%), 95428 has a value of 15.6% which is higher and worse.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(14.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the US Value (15.5%), 95428 has a value of 15.6% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(15.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults who Binge Drink Zip Code: 95429

Current Value:

Adults who Binge Drink Zip Code: 95429

14.5%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Zip Codes, 95429 has a value of 14.5% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 15.9% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 17.1%.
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,730 California zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 95429 has a value of 14.5% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.5% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.1%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 31,435 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (14.8%), 95429 has a value of 14.5% which is lower and better.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(14.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the US Value (15.5%), 95429 has a value of 14.5% which is lower and better.
US Value
(15.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults who Binge Drink Zip Code: 95432

Current Value:

Adults who Binge Drink Zip Code: 95432

15.2%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Zip Codes, 95432 has a value of 15.2% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 15.9% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 17.1%.
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,730 California zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 95432 has a value of 15.2% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.5% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.1%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 31,435 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (14.8%), 95432 has a value of 15.2% which is higher and worse.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(14.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the US Value (15.5%), 95432 has a value of 15.2% which is lower and better.
US Value
(15.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults who Binge Drink Zip Code: 95437

Current Value:

Adults who Binge Drink Zip Code: 95437

15.9%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Zip Codes, 95437 has a value of 15.9% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 15.9% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 17.1%.
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,730 California zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 95437 has a value of 15.9% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.5% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.1%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 31,435 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (14.8%), 95437 has a value of 15.9% which is higher and worse.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(14.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the US Value (15.5%), 95437 has a value of 15.9% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(15.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults who Binge Drink Zip Code: 95445

Current Value:

Adults who Binge Drink Zip Code: 95445

15.3%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Zip Codes, 95445 has a value of 15.3% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 15.9% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 17.1%.
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,730 California zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 95445 has a value of 15.3% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.5% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.1%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 31,435 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (14.8%), 95445 has a value of 15.3% which is higher and worse.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(14.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the US Value (15.5%), 95445 has a value of 15.3% which is lower and better.
US Value
(15.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults who Binge Drink Zip Code: 95449

Current Value:

Adults who Binge Drink Zip Code: 95449

16.6%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Zip Codes, 95449 has a value of 16.6% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 15.9% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 17.1%.
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,730 California zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 95449 has a value of 16.6% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.5% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.1%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 31,435 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (14.8%), 95449 has a value of 16.6% which is higher and worse.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(14.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the US Value (15.5%), 95449 has a value of 16.6% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(15.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults who Binge Drink Zip Code: 95454

Current Value:

Adults who Binge Drink Zip Code: 95454

16.3%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Zip Codes, 95454 has a value of 16.3% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 15.9% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 17.1%.
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,730 California zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 95454 has a value of 16.3% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.5% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.1%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 31,435 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (14.8%), 95454 has a value of 16.3% which is higher and worse.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(14.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the US Value (15.5%), 95454 has a value of 16.3% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(15.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults who Binge Drink Zip Code: 95456

Current Value:

Adults who Binge Drink Zip Code: 95456

12.6%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Zip Codes, 95456 has a value of 12.6% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 15.9% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 17.1%.
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,730 California zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 95456 has a value of 12.6% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.5% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.1%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 31,435 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (14.8%), 95456 has a value of 12.6% which is lower and better.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(14.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the US Value (15.5%), 95456 has a value of 12.6% which is lower and better.
US Value
(15.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults who Binge Drink Zip Code: 95459

Current Value:

Adults who Binge Drink Zip Code: 95459

16.0%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Zip Codes, 95459 has a value of 16.0% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 15.9% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 17.1%.
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,730 California zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 95459 has a value of 16.0% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.5% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.1%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 31,435 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (14.8%), 95459 has a value of 16.0% which is higher and worse.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(14.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the US Value (15.5%), 95459 has a value of 16.0% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(15.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults who Binge Drink Zip Code: 95460

Current Value:

Adults who Binge Drink Zip Code: 95460

14.4%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Zip Codes, 95460 has a value of 14.4% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 15.9% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 17.1%.
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,730 California zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 95460 has a value of 14.4% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.5% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.1%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 31,435 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (14.8%), 95460 has a value of 14.4% which is lower and better.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(14.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the US Value (15.5%), 95460 has a value of 14.4% which is lower and better.
US Value
(15.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults who Binge Drink Zip Code: 95463

Current Value:

Adults who Binge Drink Zip Code: 95463

14.7%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Zip Codes, 95463 has a value of 14.7% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 15.9% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 17.1%.
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,730 California zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 95463 has a value of 14.7% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.5% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.1%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 31,435 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (14.8%), 95463 has a value of 14.7% which is lower and better.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(14.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the US Value (15.5%), 95463 has a value of 14.7% which is lower and better.
US Value
(15.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults who Binge Drink Zip Code: 95466

Current Value:

Adults who Binge Drink Zip Code: 95466

15.2%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Zip Codes, 95466 has a value of 15.2% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 15.9% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 17.1%.
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,730 California zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 95466 has a value of 15.2% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.5% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.1%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 31,435 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (14.8%), 95466 has a value of 15.2% which is higher and worse.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(14.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the US Value (15.5%), 95466 has a value of 15.2% which is lower and better.
US Value
(15.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults who Binge Drink Zip Code: 95468

Current Value:

Adults who Binge Drink Zip Code: 95468

16.3%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Zip Codes, 95468 has a value of 16.3% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 15.9% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 17.1%.
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,730 California zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 95468 has a value of 16.3% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.5% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.1%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 31,435 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (14.8%), 95468 has a value of 16.3% which is higher and worse.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(14.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the US Value (15.5%), 95468 has a value of 16.3% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(15.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults who Binge Drink Zip Code: 95469

Current Value:

Adults who Binge Drink Zip Code: 95469

16.8%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Zip Codes, 95469 has a value of 16.8% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 15.9% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 17.1%.
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,730 California zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 95469 has a value of 16.8% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.5% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.1%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 31,435 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (14.8%), 95469 has a value of 16.8% which is higher and worse.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(14.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the US Value (15.5%), 95469 has a value of 16.8% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(15.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults who Binge Drink Zip Code: 95470

Current Value:

Adults who Binge Drink Zip Code: 95470

17.3%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Zip Codes, 95470 has a value of 17.3% which is in the worst 25% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 15.9% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 17.1%.
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,730 California zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 95470 has a value of 17.3% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.5% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.1%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 31,435 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (14.8%), 95470 has a value of 17.3% which is higher and worse.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(14.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the US Value (15.5%), 95470 has a value of 17.3% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(15.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults who Binge Drink Zip Code: 95482

Current Value:

Adults who Binge Drink Zip Code: 95482

16.5%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Zip Codes, 95482 has a value of 16.5% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 15.9% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 17.1%.
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,730 California zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 95482 has a value of 16.5% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.5% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.1%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 31,435 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (14.8%), 95482 has a value of 16.5% which is higher and worse.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(14.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the US Value (15.5%), 95482 has a value of 16.5% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(15.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults who Binge Drink Zip Code: 95488

Current Value:

Adults who Binge Drink Zip Code: 95488

15.1%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Zip Codes, 95488 has a value of 15.1% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 15.9% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 17.1%.
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,730 California zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 95488 has a value of 15.1% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.5% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.1%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 31,435 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (14.8%), 95488 has a value of 15.1% which is higher and worse.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(14.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the US Value (15.5%), 95488 has a value of 15.1% which is lower and better.
US Value
(15.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults who Binge Drink Zip Code: 95490

Current Value:

Adults who Binge Drink Zip Code: 95490

16.2%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Zip Codes, 95490 has a value of 16.2% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 15.9% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 17.1%.
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,730 California zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 95490 has a value of 16.2% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.5% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.1%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 31,435 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (14.8%), 95490 has a value of 16.2% which is higher and worse.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(14.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the US Value (15.5%), 95490 has a value of 16.2% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(15.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults who Binge Drink Zip Code: 95494

Current Value:

Adults who Binge Drink Zip Code: 95494

16.0%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Zip Codes, 95494 has a value of 16.0% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 15.9% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 17.1%.
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,730 California zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 95494 has a value of 16.0% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.5% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.1%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 31,435 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (14.8%), 95494 has a value of 16.0% which is higher and worse.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(14.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the US Value (15.5%), 95494 has a value of 16.0% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(15.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults who Binge Drink Zip Code: 95585

Current Value:

Adults who Binge Drink Zip Code: 95585

17.3%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Zip Codes, 95585 has a value of 17.3% which is in the worst 25% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 15.9% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 17.1%.
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,730 California zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 95585 has a value of 17.3% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.5% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.1%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 31,435 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (14.8%), 95585 has a value of 17.3% which is higher and worse.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(14.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the US Value (15.5%), 95585 has a value of 17.3% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(15.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults who Binge Drink Zip Code: 95587

Current Value:

Adults who Binge Drink Zip Code: 95587

15.2%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Zip Codes, 95587 has a value of 15.2% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 15.9% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 17.1%.
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,730 California zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 95587 has a value of 15.2% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.5% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.1%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 31,435 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (14.8%), 95587 has a value of 15.2% which is higher and worse.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(14.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the US Value (15.5%), 95587 has a value of 15.2% which is lower and better.
US Value
(15.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults who Binge Drink Census Tract: 06045010100

Current Value:

Adults who Binge Drink Census Tract: 06045010100

15.6%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06045010100 has a value of 15.6% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 15.9% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 17.2%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 8,005 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06045010100 has a value of 15.6% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.3%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 68,167 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (14.8%), 06045010100 has a value of 15.6% which is higher and worse.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(14.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the US Value (15.5%), 06045010100 has a value of 15.6% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(15.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults who Binge Drink Census Tract: 06045010200

Current Value:

Adults who Binge Drink Census Tract: 06045010200

16.2%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06045010200 has a value of 16.2% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 15.9% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 17.2%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 8,005 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06045010200 has a value of 16.2% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.3%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 68,167 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (14.8%), 06045010200 has a value of 16.2% which is higher and worse.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(14.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the US Value (15.5%), 06045010200 has a value of 16.2% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(15.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults who Binge Drink Census Tract: 06045010300

Current Value:

Adults who Binge Drink Census Tract: 06045010300

16.0%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06045010300 has a value of 16.0% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 15.9% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 17.2%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 8,005 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06045010300 has a value of 16.0% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.3%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 68,167 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (14.8%), 06045010300 has a value of 16.0% which is higher and worse.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(14.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the US Value (15.5%), 06045010300 has a value of 16.0% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(15.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults who Binge Drink Census Tract: 06045010400

Current Value:

Adults who Binge Drink Census Tract: 06045010400

16.3%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06045010400 has a value of 16.3% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 15.9% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 17.2%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 8,005 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06045010400 has a value of 16.3% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.3%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 68,167 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (14.8%), 06045010400 has a value of 16.3% which is higher and worse.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(14.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the US Value (15.5%), 06045010400 has a value of 16.3% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(15.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults who Binge Drink Census Tract: 06045010500

Current Value:

Adults who Binge Drink Census Tract: 06045010500

15.5%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06045010500 has a value of 15.5% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 15.9% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 17.2%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 8,005 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06045010500 has a value of 15.5% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.3%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 68,167 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (14.8%), 06045010500 has a value of 15.5% which is higher and worse.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(14.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the US Value (15.5%), 06045010500 has a value of 15.5%.
US Value
(15.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults who Binge Drink Census Tract: 06045010600

Current Value:

Adults who Binge Drink Census Tract: 06045010600

16.4%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06045010600 has a value of 16.4% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 15.9% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 17.2%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 8,005 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06045010600 has a value of 16.4% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.3%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 68,167 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (14.8%), 06045010600 has a value of 16.4% which is higher and worse.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(14.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the US Value (15.5%), 06045010600 has a value of 16.4% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(15.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults who Binge Drink Census Tract: 06045010700

Current Value:

Adults who Binge Drink Census Tract: 06045010700

15.8%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06045010700 has a value of 15.8% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 15.9% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 17.2%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 8,005 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06045010700 has a value of 15.8% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.3%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 68,167 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (14.8%), 06045010700 has a value of 15.8% which is higher and worse.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(14.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the US Value (15.5%), 06045010700 has a value of 15.8% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(15.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults who Binge Drink Census Tract: 06045010801

Current Value:

Adults who Binge Drink Census Tract: 06045010801

17.4%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06045010801 has a value of 17.4% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 15.9% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 17.2%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 8,005 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06045010801 has a value of 17.4% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.3%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 68,167 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (14.8%), 06045010801 has a value of 17.4% which is higher and worse.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(14.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the US Value (15.5%), 06045010801 has a value of 17.4% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(15.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults who Binge Drink Census Tract: 06045010802

Current Value:

Adults who Binge Drink Census Tract: 06045010802

16.9%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06045010802 has a value of 16.9% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 15.9% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 17.2%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 8,005 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06045010802 has a value of 16.9% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.3%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 68,167 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (14.8%), 06045010802 has a value of 16.9% which is higher and worse.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(14.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the US Value (15.5%), 06045010802 has a value of 16.9% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(15.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults who Binge Drink Census Tract: 06045010900

Current Value:

Adults who Binge Drink Census Tract: 06045010900

16.4%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06045010900 has a value of 16.4% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 15.9% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 17.2%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 8,005 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06045010900 has a value of 16.4% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.3%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 68,167 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (14.8%), 06045010900 has a value of 16.4% which is higher and worse.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(14.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the US Value (15.5%), 06045010900 has a value of 16.4% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(15.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults who Binge Drink Census Tract: 06045011001

Current Value:

Adults who Binge Drink Census Tract: 06045011001

13.9%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06045011001 has a value of 13.9% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 15.9% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 17.2%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 8,005 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06045011001 has a value of 13.9% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.3%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 68,167 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (14.8%), 06045011001 has a value of 13.9% which is lower and better.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(14.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the US Value (15.5%), 06045011001 has a value of 13.9% which is lower and better.
US Value
(15.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults who Binge Drink Census Tract: 06045011002

Current Value:

Adults who Binge Drink Census Tract: 06045011002

15.2%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06045011002 has a value of 15.2% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 15.9% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 17.2%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 8,005 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06045011002 has a value of 15.2% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.3%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 68,167 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (14.8%), 06045011002 has a value of 15.2% which is higher and worse.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(14.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the US Value (15.5%), 06045011002 has a value of 15.2% which is lower and better.
US Value
(15.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults who Binge Drink Census Tract: 06045011102

Current Value:

Adults who Binge Drink Census Tract: 06045011102

15.7%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06045011102 has a value of 15.7% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 15.9% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 17.2%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 8,005 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06045011102 has a value of 15.7% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.3%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 68,167 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (14.8%), 06045011102 has a value of 15.7% which is higher and worse.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(14.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the US Value (15.5%), 06045011102 has a value of 15.7% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(15.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults who Binge Drink Census Tract: 06045011200

Current Value:

Adults who Binge Drink Census Tract: 06045011200

15.6%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06045011200 has a value of 15.6% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 15.9% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 17.2%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 8,005 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06045011200 has a value of 15.6% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.3%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 68,167 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (14.8%), 06045011200 has a value of 15.6% which is higher and worse.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(14.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the US Value (15.5%), 06045011200 has a value of 15.6% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(15.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults who Binge Drink Census Tract: 06045011300

Current Value:

Adults who Binge Drink Census Tract: 06045011300

16.8%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06045011300 has a value of 16.8% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 15.9% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 17.2%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 8,005 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06045011300 has a value of 16.8% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.3%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 68,167 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (14.8%), 06045011300 has a value of 16.8% which is higher and worse.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(14.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the US Value (15.5%), 06045011300 has a value of 16.8% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(15.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults who Binge Drink Census Tract: 06045011400

Current Value:

Adults who Binge Drink Census Tract: 06045011400

16.6%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06045011400 has a value of 16.6% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 15.9% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 17.2%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 8,005 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06045011400 has a value of 16.6% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.3%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 68,167 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (14.8%), 06045011400 has a value of 16.6% which is higher and worse.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(14.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the US Value (15.5%), 06045011400 has a value of 16.6% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(15.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults who Binge Drink Census Tract: 06045011500

Current Value:

Adults who Binge Drink Census Tract: 06045011500

17.0%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06045011500 has a value of 17.0% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 15.9% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 17.2%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 8,005 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06045011500 has a value of 17.0% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.3%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 68,167 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (14.8%), 06045011500 has a value of 17.0% which is higher and worse.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(14.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the US Value (15.5%), 06045011500 has a value of 17.0% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(15.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults who Binge Drink Census Tract: 06045011600

Current Value:

Adults who Binge Drink Census Tract: 06045011600

16.4%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06045011600 has a value of 16.4% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 15.9% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 17.2%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 8,005 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06045011600 has a value of 16.4% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.3%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 68,167 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (14.8%), 06045011600 has a value of 16.4% which is higher and worse.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(14.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the US Value (15.5%), 06045011600 has a value of 16.4% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(15.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults who Binge Drink Census Tract: 06045011700

Current Value:

Adults who Binge Drink Census Tract: 06045011700

15.6%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06045011700 has a value of 15.6% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 15.9% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 17.2%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 8,005 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06045011700 has a value of 15.6% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.3%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 68,167 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (14.8%), 06045011700 has a value of 15.6% which is higher and worse.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(14.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the US Value (15.5%), 06045011700 has a value of 15.6% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(15.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults who Binge Drink Census Tract: 06045011800

Current Value:

Adults who Binge Drink Census Tract: 06045011800

16.1%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06045011800 has a value of 16.1% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 15.9% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 17.2%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 8,005 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06045011800 has a value of 16.1% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.3%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 68,167 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (14.8%), 06045011800 has a value of 16.1% which is higher and worse.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(14.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the US Value (15.5%), 06045011800 has a value of 16.1% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(15.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Health / Alcohol & Drug Use

Age-Adjusted Annual Opioid Prescription Rate

Value
Compared to:

Health / Alcohol & Drug Use

Age-Adjusted Annual Opioid Prescription Rate

Value
Compared to:

Age-Adjusted Annual Opioid Prescription Rate County: Mendocino

Current Value:

Age-Adjusted Annual Opioid Prescription Rate County: Mendocino

435.0
Prescriptions per 1,000 residents
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Mendocino has a value of 435.0 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 371.0 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 437.5.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to the CA Value (291.0), Mendocino has a value of 435.0 which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(291.0)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the prior value, Mendocino (435.0) is less and better than the previously measured value (498.9).
Prior Value
(498.9)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Mendocino value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Age-Adjusted Annual Opioid Prescription Rate Zip Code: 95410

Current Value:

Age-Adjusted Annual Opioid Prescription Rate Zip Code: 95410

295.2
Prescriptions per 1,000 residents
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (435.0), 95410 has a value of 295.2 which is lower and better.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(435.0)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the CA Value (291.0), 95410 has a value of 295.2 which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(291.0)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the prior value, 95410 (295.2) is less and better than the previously measured value (500.5).
Prior Value
(500.5)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the 95410 value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Age-Adjusted Annual Opioid Prescription Rate Zip Code: 95415

Current Value:

Age-Adjusted Annual Opioid Prescription Rate Zip Code: 95415

151.4
Prescriptions per 1,000 residents
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (435.0), 95415 has a value of 151.4 which is lower and better.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(435.0)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the CA Value (291.0), 95415 has a value of 151.4 which is lower and better.
CA Value
(291.0)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the prior value, 95415 (151.4) is less and better than the previously measured value (206.5).
Prior Value
(206.5)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the 95415 value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Age-Adjusted Annual Opioid Prescription Rate Zip Code: 95417

Current Value:

Age-Adjusted Annual Opioid Prescription Rate Zip Code: 95417

181.2
Prescriptions per 1,000 residents
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (435.0), 95417 has a value of 181.2 which is lower and better.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(435.0)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the CA Value (291.0), 95417 has a value of 181.2 which is lower and better.
CA Value
(291.0)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the prior value, 95417 (181.2) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (166.7).
Prior Value
(166.7)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the 95417 value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Age-Adjusted Annual Opioid Prescription Rate Zip Code: 95420

Current Value:

Age-Adjusted Annual Opioid Prescription Rate Zip Code: 95420

770.9
Prescriptions per 1,000 residents
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (435.0), 95420 has a value of 770.9 which is higher and worse.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(435.0)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the CA Value (291.0), 95420 has a value of 770.9 which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(291.0)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the prior value, 95420 (770.9) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (104.8).
Prior Value
(104.8)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the 95420 value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Age-Adjusted Annual Opioid Prescription Rate Zip Code: 95427

Current Value:

Age-Adjusted Annual Opioid Prescription Rate Zip Code: 95427

281.0
Prescriptions per 1,000 residents
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (435.0), 95427 has a value of 281.0 which is lower and better.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(435.0)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the CA Value (291.0), 95427 has a value of 281.0 which is lower and better.
CA Value
(291.0)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the prior value, 95427 (281.0) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (206.3).
Prior Value
(206.3)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the 95427 value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Age-Adjusted Annual Opioid Prescription Rate Zip Code: 95428

Current Value:

Age-Adjusted Annual Opioid Prescription Rate Zip Code: 95428

452.4
Prescriptions per 1,000 residents
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (435.0), 95428 has a value of 452.4 which is higher and worse.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(435.0)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the CA Value (291.0), 95428 has a value of 452.4 which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(291.0)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the prior value, 95428 (452.4) is less and better than the previously measured value (570.2).
Prior Value
(570.2)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the 95428 value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Age-Adjusted Annual Opioid Prescription Rate Zip Code: 95429

Current Value:

Age-Adjusted Annual Opioid Prescription Rate Zip Code: 95429

59.8
Prescriptions per 1,000 residents
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (435.0), 95429 has a value of 59.8 which is lower and better.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(435.0)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the CA Value (291.0), 95429 has a value of 59.8 which is lower and better.
CA Value
(291.0)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the prior value, 95429 (59.8) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (40.3).
Prior Value
(40.3)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the 95429 value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Age-Adjusted Annual Opioid Prescription Rate Zip Code: 95432

Current Value:

Age-Adjusted Annual Opioid Prescription Rate Zip Code: 95432

341.0
Prescriptions per 1,000 residents
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (435.0), 95432 has a value of 341.0 which is lower and better.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(435.0)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the CA Value (291.0), 95432 has a value of 341.0 which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(291.0)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the prior value, 95432 (341.0) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (202.2).
Prior Value
(202.2)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the 95432 value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Age-Adjusted Annual Opioid Prescription Rate Zip Code: 95437

Current Value:

Age-Adjusted Annual Opioid Prescription Rate Zip Code: 95437

396.7
Prescriptions per 1,000 residents
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (435.0), 95437 has a value of 396.7 which is lower and better.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(435.0)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the CA Value (291.0), 95437 has a value of 396.7 which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(291.0)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the prior value, 95437 (396.7) is less and better than the previously measured value (471.1).
Prior Value
(471.1)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the 95437 value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Age-Adjusted Annual Opioid Prescription Rate Zip Code: 95445

Current Value:

Age-Adjusted Annual Opioid Prescription Rate Zip Code: 95445

664.3
Prescriptions per 1,000 residents
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (435.0), 95445 has a value of 664.3 which is higher and worse.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(435.0)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the CA Value (291.0), 95445 has a value of 664.3 which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(291.0)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the prior value, 95445 (664.3) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (559.8).
Prior Value
(559.8)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the 95445 value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Age-Adjusted Annual Opioid Prescription Rate Zip Code: 95449

Current Value:

Age-Adjusted Annual Opioid Prescription Rate Zip Code: 95449

505.3
Prescriptions per 1,000 residents
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (435.0), 95449 has a value of 505.3 which is higher and worse.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(435.0)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the CA Value (291.0), 95449 has a value of 505.3 which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(291.0)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the prior value, 95449 (505.3) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (618.9).
Prior Value
(618.9)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the 95449 value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Age-Adjusted Annual Opioid Prescription Rate Zip Code: 95454

Current Value:

Age-Adjusted Annual Opioid Prescription Rate Zip Code: 95454

528.7
Prescriptions per 1,000 residents
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (435.0), 95454 has a value of 528.7 which is higher and worse.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(435.0)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the CA Value (291.0), 95454 has a value of 528.7 which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(291.0)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the prior value, 95454 (528.7) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (562.3).
Prior Value
(562.3)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the 95454 value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Age-Adjusted Annual Opioid Prescription Rate Zip Code: 95456

Current Value:

Age-Adjusted Annual Opioid Prescription Rate Zip Code: 95456

239.5
Prescriptions per 1,000 residents
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (435.0), 95456 has a value of 239.5 which is lower and better.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(435.0)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the CA Value (291.0), 95456 has a value of 239.5 which is lower and better.
CA Value
(291.0)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the prior value, 95456 (239.5) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (290.3).
Prior Value
(290.3)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the 95456 value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Age-Adjusted Annual Opioid Prescription Rate Zip Code: 95459

Current Value:

Age-Adjusted Annual Opioid Prescription Rate Zip Code: 95459

277.7
Prescriptions per 1,000 residents
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (435.0), 95459 has a value of 277.7 which is lower and better.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(435.0)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the CA Value (291.0), 95459 has a value of 277.7 which is lower and better.
CA Value
(291.0)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the prior value, 95459 (277.7) is less and better than the previously measured value (550.6).
Prior Value
(550.6)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the 95459 value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Age-Adjusted Annual Opioid Prescription Rate Zip Code: 95460

Current Value:

Age-Adjusted Annual Opioid Prescription Rate Zip Code: 95460

336.9
Prescriptions per 1,000 residents
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (435.0), 95460 has a value of 336.9 which is lower and better.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(435.0)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the CA Value (291.0), 95460 has a value of 336.9 which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(291.0)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the prior value, 95460 (336.9) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (350.7).
Prior Value
(350.7)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the 95460 value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Age-Adjusted Annual Opioid Prescription Rate Zip Code: 95466

Current Value:

Age-Adjusted Annual Opioid Prescription Rate Zip Code: 95466

255.9
Prescriptions per 1,000 residents
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (435.0), 95466 has a value of 255.9 which is lower and better.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(435.0)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the CA Value (291.0), 95466 has a value of 255.9 which is lower and better.
CA Value
(291.0)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the prior value, 95466 (255.9) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (227.6).
Prior Value
(227.6)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the 95466 value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Age-Adjusted Annual Opioid Prescription Rate Zip Code: 95468

Current Value:

Age-Adjusted Annual Opioid Prescription Rate Zip Code: 95468

453.8
Prescriptions per 1,000 residents
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (435.0), 95468 has a value of 453.8 which is higher and worse.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(435.0)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the CA Value (291.0), 95468 has a value of 453.8 which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(291.0)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the prior value, 95468 (453.8) is less and better than the previously measured value (573.1).
Prior Value
(573.1)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the 95468 value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Age-Adjusted Annual Opioid Prescription Rate Zip Code: 95469

Current Value:

Age-Adjusted Annual Opioid Prescription Rate Zip Code: 95469

430.3
Prescriptions per 1,000 residents
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (435.0), 95469 has a value of 430.3 which is lower and better.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(435.0)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the CA Value (291.0), 95469 has a value of 430.3 which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(291.0)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the prior value, 95469 (430.3) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (341.7).
Prior Value
(341.7)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the 95469 value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Age-Adjusted Annual Opioid Prescription Rate Zip Code: 95470

Current Value:

Age-Adjusted Annual Opioid Prescription Rate Zip Code: 95470

460.7
Prescriptions per 1,000 residents
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (435.0), 95470 has a value of 460.7 which is higher and worse.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(435.0)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the CA Value (291.0), 95470 has a value of 460.7 which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(291.0)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the prior value, 95470 (460.7) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (462.5).
Prior Value
(462.5)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the 95470 value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Age-Adjusted Annual Opioid Prescription Rate Zip Code: 95482

Current Value:

Age-Adjusted Annual Opioid Prescription Rate Zip Code: 95482

428.8
Prescriptions per 1,000 residents
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (435.0), 95482 has a value of 428.8 which is lower and better.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(435.0)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the CA Value (291.0), 95482 has a value of 428.8 which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(291.0)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the prior value, 95482 (428.8) is less and better than the previously measured value (498.8).
Prior Value
(498.8)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the 95482 value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Age-Adjusted Annual Opioid Prescription Rate Zip Code: 95488

Current Value:

Age-Adjusted Annual Opioid Prescription Rate Zip Code: 95488

68.5
Prescriptions per 1,000 residents
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (435.0), 95488 has a value of 68.5 which is lower and better.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(435.0)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the CA Value (291.0), 95488 has a value of 68.5 which is lower and better.
CA Value
(291.0)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the prior value, 95488 (68.5) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (16.6).
Prior Value
(16.6)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the 95488 value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Age-Adjusted Annual Opioid Prescription Rate Zip Code: 95490

Current Value:

Age-Adjusted Annual Opioid Prescription Rate Zip Code: 95490

574.2
Prescriptions per 1,000 residents
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (435.0), 95490 has a value of 574.2 which is higher and worse.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(435.0)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the CA Value (291.0), 95490 has a value of 574.2 which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(291.0)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the prior value, 95490 (574.2) is less and better than the previously measured value (706.9).
Prior Value
(706.9)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the 95490 value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Age-Adjusted Annual Opioid Prescription Rate Zip Code: 95494

Current Value:

Age-Adjusted Annual Opioid Prescription Rate Zip Code: 95494

140.9
Prescriptions per 1,000 residents
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (435.0), 95494 has a value of 140.9 which is lower and better.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(435.0)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the CA Value (291.0), 95494 has a value of 140.9 which is lower and better.
CA Value
(291.0)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the prior value, 95494 (140.9) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (168.3).
Prior Value
(168.3)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the 95494 value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Age-Adjusted Annual Opioid Prescription Rate Zip Code: 95585

Current Value:

Age-Adjusted Annual Opioid Prescription Rate Zip Code: 95585

209.4
Prescriptions per 1,000 residents
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (435.0), 95585 has a value of 209.4 which is lower and better.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(435.0)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the CA Value (291.0), 95585 has a value of 209.4 which is lower and better.
CA Value
(291.0)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the prior value, 95585 (209.4) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (271.7).
Prior Value
(271.7)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the 95585 value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Age-Adjusted Annual Opioid Prescription Rate Zip Code: 95587

Current Value:

Age-Adjusted Annual Opioid Prescription Rate Zip Code: 95587

92.1
Prescriptions per 1,000 residents
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (435.0), 95587 has a value of 92.1 which is lower and better.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(435.0)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the CA Value (291.0), 95587 has a value of 92.1 which is lower and better.
CA Value
(291.0)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the prior value, 95587 (92.1) is less and better than the previously measured value (382.1).
Prior Value
(382.1)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the 95587 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Health / Alcohol & Drug Use

Age-Adjusted Buprenorphine Prescription Rate

Value
Compared to:

Health / Alcohol & Drug Use

Age-Adjusted Buprenorphine Prescription Rate

Value
Compared to:

Age-Adjusted Buprenorphine Prescription Rate County: Mendocino

Current Value:

Age-Adjusted Buprenorphine Prescription Rate County: Mendocino

101.5
Prescriptions per 1,000 residents
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the CA Value (19.8), Mendocino has a value of 101.5.
CA Value
(19.8)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the prior value, Mendocino (101.5) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (97.2).
Prior Value
(97.2)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Mendocino value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Age-Adjusted Buprenorphine Prescription Rate Zip Code: 95410

Current Value:

Age-Adjusted Buprenorphine Prescription Rate Zip Code: 95410

40.5
Prescriptions per 1,000 residents
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (101.5), 95410 has a value of 40.5.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(101.5)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the CA Value (19.8), 95410 has a value of 40.5.
CA Value
(19.8)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the prior value, 95410 (40.5) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (77.9).
Prior Value
(77.9)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the 95410 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Age-Adjusted Buprenorphine Prescription Rate Zip Code: 95415

Current Value:

Age-Adjusted Buprenorphine Prescription Rate Zip Code: 95415

34.3
Prescriptions per 1,000 residents
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (101.5), 95415 has a value of 34.3.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(101.5)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the CA Value (19.8), 95415 has a value of 34.3.
CA Value
(19.8)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the prior value, 95415 (34.3) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (39.9).
Prior Value
(39.9)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the 95415 value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Age-Adjusted Buprenorphine Prescription Rate Zip Code: 95417

Current Value:

Age-Adjusted Buprenorphine Prescription Rate Zip Code: 95417

0.0
Prescriptions per 1,000 residents
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (101.5), 95417 has a value of 0.0.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(101.5)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the CA Value (19.8), 95417 has a value of 0.0.
CA Value
(19.8)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the prior value, 95417 (0.0) is less  than the previously measured value (0.3).
Prior Value
(0.3)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the 95417 value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Age-Adjusted Buprenorphine Prescription Rate Zip Code: 95420

Current Value:

Age-Adjusted Buprenorphine Prescription Rate Zip Code: 95420

308.1
Prescriptions per 1,000 residents
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (101.5), 95420 has a value of 308.1.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(101.5)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the CA Value (19.8), 95420 has a value of 308.1.
CA Value
(19.8)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the prior value, 95420 (308.1) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (7.4).
Prior Value
(7.4)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the 95420 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Age-Adjusted Buprenorphine Prescription Rate Zip Code: 95427

Current Value:

Age-Adjusted Buprenorphine Prescription Rate Zip Code: 95427

29.0
Prescriptions per 1,000 residents
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (101.5), 95427 has a value of 29.0.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(101.5)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the CA Value (19.8), 95427 has a value of 29.0.
CA Value
(19.8)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the prior value, 95427 (29.0) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (56.7).
Prior Value
(56.7)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the 95427 value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Age-Adjusted Buprenorphine Prescription Rate Zip Code: 95428

Current Value:

Age-Adjusted Buprenorphine Prescription Rate Zip Code: 95428

109.5
Prescriptions per 1,000 residents
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (101.5), 95428 has a value of 109.5.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(101.5)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the CA Value (19.8), 95428 has a value of 109.5.
CA Value
(19.8)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the prior value, 95428 (109.5) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (86.6).
Prior Value
(86.6)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the 95428 value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Age-Adjusted Buprenorphine Prescription Rate Zip Code: 95429

Current Value:

Age-Adjusted Buprenorphine Prescription Rate Zip Code: 95429

114.2
Prescriptions per 1,000 residents
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (101.5), 95429 has a value of 114.2.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(101.5)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the CA Value (19.8), 95429 has a value of 114.2.
CA Value
(19.8)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the prior value, 95429 (114.2) is greater  than the previously measured value (18.7).
Prior Value
(18.7)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the 95429 value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Age-Adjusted Buprenorphine Prescription Rate Zip Code: 95432

Current Value:

Age-Adjusted Buprenorphine Prescription Rate Zip Code: 95432

26.3
Prescriptions per 1,000 residents
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (101.5), 95432 has a value of 26.3.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(101.5)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the CA Value (19.8), 95432 has a value of 26.3.
CA Value
(19.8)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the prior value, 95432 (26.3) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (82.9).
Prior Value
(82.9)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the 95432 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Age-Adjusted Buprenorphine Prescription Rate Zip Code: 95437

Current Value:

Age-Adjusted Buprenorphine Prescription Rate Zip Code: 95437

113.9
Prescriptions per 1,000 residents
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (101.5), 95437 has a value of 113.9.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(101.5)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the CA Value (19.8), 95437 has a value of 113.9.
CA Value
(19.8)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the prior value, 95437 (113.9) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (111.0).
Prior Value
(111.0)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the 95437 value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Age-Adjusted Buprenorphine Prescription Rate Zip Code: 95445

Current Value:

Age-Adjusted Buprenorphine Prescription Rate Zip Code: 95445

461.3
Prescriptions per 1,000 residents
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (101.5), 95445 has a value of 461.3.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(101.5)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the CA Value (19.8), 95445 has a value of 461.3.
CA Value
(19.8)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the prior value, 95445 (461.3) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (275.0).
Prior Value
(275.0)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the 95445 value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Age-Adjusted Buprenorphine Prescription Rate Zip Code: 95449

Current Value:

Age-Adjusted Buprenorphine Prescription Rate Zip Code: 95449

109.2
Prescriptions per 1,000 residents
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (101.5), 95449 has a value of 109.2.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(101.5)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the CA Value (19.8), 95449 has a value of 109.2.
CA Value
(19.8)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the prior value, 95449 (109.2) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (78.6).
Prior Value
(78.6)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the 95449 value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Age-Adjusted Buprenorphine Prescription Rate Zip Code: 95454

Current Value:

Age-Adjusted Buprenorphine Prescription Rate Zip Code: 95454

190.1
Prescriptions per 1,000 residents
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (101.5), 95454 has a value of 190.1.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(101.5)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the CA Value (19.8), 95454 has a value of 190.1.
CA Value
(19.8)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the prior value, 95454 (190.1) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (155.5).
Prior Value
(155.5)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the 95454 value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Age-Adjusted Buprenorphine Prescription Rate Zip Code: 95456

Current Value:

Age-Adjusted Buprenorphine Prescription Rate Zip Code: 95456

215.3
Prescriptions per 1,000 residents
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (101.5), 95456 has a value of 215.3.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(101.5)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the CA Value (19.8), 95456 has a value of 215.3.
CA Value
(19.8)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the prior value, 95456 (215.3) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (85.6).
Prior Value
(85.6)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the 95456 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Age-Adjusted Buprenorphine Prescription Rate Zip Code: 95459

Current Value:

Age-Adjusted Buprenorphine Prescription Rate Zip Code: 95459

56.3
Prescriptions per 1,000 residents
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (101.5), 95459 has a value of 56.3.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(101.5)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the CA Value (19.8), 95459 has a value of 56.3.
CA Value
(19.8)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the prior value, 95459 (56.3) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (39.3).
Prior Value
(39.3)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the 95459 value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Age-Adjusted Buprenorphine Prescription Rate Zip Code: 95460

Current Value:

Age-Adjusted Buprenorphine Prescription Rate Zip Code: 95460

102.0
Prescriptions per 1,000 residents
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (101.5), 95460 has a value of 102.0.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(101.5)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the CA Value (19.8), 95460 has a value of 102.0.
CA Value
(19.8)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the prior value, 95460 (102.0) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (67.1).
Prior Value
(67.1)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the 95460 value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Age-Adjusted Buprenorphine Prescription Rate Zip Code: 95466

Current Value:

Age-Adjusted Buprenorphine Prescription Rate Zip Code: 95466

52.2
Prescriptions per 1,000 residents
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (101.5), 95466 has a value of 52.2.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(101.5)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the CA Value (19.8), 95466 has a value of 52.2.
CA Value
(19.8)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the prior value, 95466 (52.2) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (44.0).
Prior Value
(44.0)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the 95466 value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Age-Adjusted Buprenorphine Prescription Rate Zip Code: 95468

Current Value:

Age-Adjusted Buprenorphine Prescription Rate Zip Code: 95468

230.8
Prescriptions per 1,000 residents
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (101.5), 95468 has a value of 230.8.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(101.5)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the CA Value (19.8), 95468 has a value of 230.8.
CA Value
(19.8)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the prior value, 95468 (230.8) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (190.0).
Prior Value
(190.0)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the 95468 value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Age-Adjusted Buprenorphine Prescription Rate Zip Code: 95469

Current Value:

Age-Adjusted Buprenorphine Prescription Rate Zip Code: 95469

106.3
Prescriptions per 1,000 residents
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (101.5), 95469 has a value of 106.3.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(101.5)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the CA Value (19.8), 95469 has a value of 106.3.
CA Value
(19.8)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the prior value, 95469 (106.3) is greater  than the previously measured value (48.4).
Prior Value
(48.4)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the 95469 value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Age-Adjusted Buprenorphine Prescription Rate Zip Code: 95470

Current Value:

Age-Adjusted Buprenorphine Prescription Rate Zip Code: 95470

87.7
Prescriptions per 1,000 residents
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (101.5), 95470 has a value of 87.7.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(101.5)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the CA Value (19.8), 95470 has a value of 87.7.
CA Value
(19.8)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the prior value, 95470 (87.7) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (75.8).
Prior Value
(75.8)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the 95470 value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Age-Adjusted Buprenorphine Prescription Rate Zip Code: 95482

Current Value:

Age-Adjusted Buprenorphine Prescription Rate Zip Code: 95482

94.0
Prescriptions per 1,000 residents
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (101.5), 95482 has a value of 94.0.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(101.5)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the CA Value (19.8), 95482 has a value of 94.0.
CA Value
(19.8)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the prior value, 95482 (94.0) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (89.0).
Prior Value
(89.0)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the 95482 value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Age-Adjusted Buprenorphine Prescription Rate Zip Code: 95488

Current Value:

Age-Adjusted Buprenorphine Prescription Rate Zip Code: 95488

45.2
Prescriptions per 1,000 residents
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (101.5), 95488 has a value of 45.2.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(101.5)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the CA Value (19.8), 95488 has a value of 45.2.
CA Value
(19.8)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the prior value, 95488 (45.2) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (12.3).
Prior Value
(12.3)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the 95488 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Age-Adjusted Buprenorphine Prescription Rate Zip Code: 95490

Current Value:

Age-Adjusted Buprenorphine Prescription Rate Zip Code: 95490

141.7
Prescriptions per 1,000 residents
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (101.5), 95490 has a value of 141.7.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(101.5)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the CA Value (19.8), 95490 has a value of 141.7.
CA Value
(19.8)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the prior value, 95490 (141.7) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (128.7).
Prior Value
(128.7)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the 95490 value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Age-Adjusted Buprenorphine Prescription Rate Zip Code: 95494

Current Value:

Age-Adjusted Buprenorphine Prescription Rate Zip Code: 95494

27.1
Prescriptions per 1,000 residents
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (101.5), 95494 has a value of 27.1.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(101.5)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the CA Value (19.8), 95494 has a value of 27.1.
CA Value
(19.8)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the prior value, 95494 (27.1) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (9.3).
Prior Value
(9.3)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the 95494 value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Age-Adjusted Buprenorphine Prescription Rate Zip Code: 95585

Current Value:

Age-Adjusted Buprenorphine Prescription Rate Zip Code: 95585

82.7
Prescriptions per 1,000 residents
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (101.5), 95585 has a value of 82.7.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(101.5)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the CA Value (19.8), 95585 has a value of 82.7.
CA Value
(19.8)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the prior value, 95585 (82.7) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (83.6).
Prior Value
(83.6)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the 95585 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Age-Adjusted Buprenorphine Prescription Rate Zip Code: 95587

Current Value:

Age-Adjusted Buprenorphine Prescription Rate Zip Code: 95587

11.1
Prescriptions per 1,000 residents
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (101.5), 95587 has a value of 11.1.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(101.5)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the CA Value (19.8), 95587 has a value of 11.1.
CA Value
(19.8)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the prior value, 95587 (11.1) is less  than the previously measured value (37.5).
Prior Value
(37.5)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the 95587 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Health / Alcohol & Drug Use

Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to All Opioid Overdose

Value
Compared to:

Health / Alcohol & Drug Use

Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to All Opioid Overdose

Value
Compared to:

Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to All Opioid Overdose County: Mendocino

Current Value:

Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to All Opioid Overdose County: Mendocino

54.9
Rate per 100,000 residents
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Mendocino has a value of 54.9 which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 17.7 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 25.4.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to the CA Value (18.7), Mendocino has a value of 54.9 which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(18.7)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the prior value, Mendocino (54.9) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (54.7).
Prior Value
(54.7)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Mendocino value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Health / Alcohol & Drug Use

Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Drug Use

Value
Compared to:

Health / Alcohol & Drug Use

Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Drug Use

Value
Compared to:

Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Drug Use County: Mendocino

Current Value:

Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Drug Use County: Mendocino

56.2
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2019-2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Mendocino has a value of 56.2 which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 22.3 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 31.0.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 57 California counties.
Compared to the CA Value (21.4), Mendocino has a value of 56.2 which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(21.4)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the prior value, Mendocino (56.2) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (42.0).
Prior Value
(42.0)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Mendocino value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Health / Alcohol & Drug Use

Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Fentanyl Overdose

Value
Compared to:

Health / Alcohol & Drug Use

Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Fentanyl Overdose

Value
Compared to:

Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Fentanyl Overdose County: Mendocino

Current Value:

Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Fentanyl Overdose County: Mendocino

47.7
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Mendocino has a value of 47.7 which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 14.8 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 22.3.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to the CA Value (16.6), Mendocino has a value of 47.7 which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(16.6)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the prior value, Mendocino (47.7) is less and better than the previously measured value (49.1).
Prior Value
(49.1)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Mendocino value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Health / Alcohol & Drug Use

Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Heroin Overdose

Value
Compared to:

Health / Alcohol & Drug Use

Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Heroin Overdose

Value
Compared to:

Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Heroin Overdose County: Mendocino

Current Value:

Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Heroin Overdose County: Mendocino

8.6
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2019)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Mendocino has a value of 8.6 which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 1.1 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 2.6.
CA Counties
(2018)
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to the CA Value (2.4), Mendocino has a value of 8.6 which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(2.4)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the prior value, Mendocino (8.6) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (3.4).
Prior Value
(3.4)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Mendocino value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (4.2), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(4.2)

Health / Alcohol & Drug Use

Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Prescription Opioid Overdose

Value
Compared to:

Health / Alcohol & Drug Use

Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Prescription Opioid Overdose

Value
Compared to:

Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Prescription Opioid Overdose County: Mendocino

Current Value:

Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Prescription Opioid Overdose County: Mendocino

54.9
Rate per 100,000 residents
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Mendocino has a value of 54.9 which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.6 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 24.9.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to the CA Value (18.1), Mendocino has a value of 54.9 which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(18.1)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the prior value, Mendocino (54.9) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (53.2).
Prior Value
(53.2)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Mendocino value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Synthetic Opioid Overdose (excluding Methadone) County: Mendocino

Current Value:

Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Synthetic Opioid Overdose (excluding Methadone) County: Mendocino

49.9
Rate per 100,000 residents
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Mendocino has a value of 49.9 which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 14.8 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 22.3.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to the CA Value (16.7), Mendocino has a value of 49.9 which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(16.7)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the prior value, Mendocino (49.9) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (49.1).
Prior Value
(49.1)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Mendocino value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (8.9), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(8.9)
<div>IVP-22: Reduce overdose deaths involving synthetic opioids other than methadone</div>

Health / Alcohol & Drug Use

Age-Adjusted Drug and Opioid-Involved Overdose Death Rate

Value
Compared to:

Health / Alcohol & Drug Use

Age-Adjusted Drug and Opioid-Involved Overdose Death Rate

Value
Compared to:

Age-Adjusted Drug and Opioid-Involved Overdose Death Rate County: Mendocino

Current Value:

Age-Adjusted Drug and Opioid-Involved Overdose Death Rate County: Mendocino

41.3
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Mendocino has a value of 41.3 which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 17.8 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 22.0.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 48 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Mendocino has a value of 41.3 which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 25.3 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 35.8.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 1,303 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the CA Value (16.5), Mendocino has a value of 41.3 which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(16.5)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (23.5), Mendocino has a value of 41.3 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(23.5)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Mendocino (41.3) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (44.2).
Prior Value
(44.2)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

Health / Alcohol & Drug Use

Age-Adjusted ED Visit Rate due to All Drug Overdose

Value
Compared to:

Health / Alcohol & Drug Use

Age-Adjusted ED Visit Rate due to All Drug Overdose

Value
Compared to:

Age-Adjusted ED Visit Rate due to All Drug Overdose County: Mendocino

Current Value:

Age-Adjusted ED Visit Rate due to All Drug Overdose County: Mendocino

195.9
Rate per 100,000 residents
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Mendocino has a value of 195.9 which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 141.5 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 183.3.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to the CA Value (143.7), Mendocino has a value of 195.9 which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(143.7)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the prior value, Mendocino (195.9) is less and better than the previously measured value (246.7).
Prior Value
(246.7)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Mendocino value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Health / Alcohol & Drug Use

Age-Adjusted ED Visit Rate due to Heroin Overdose

Value
Compared to:

Health / Alcohol & Drug Use

Age-Adjusted ED Visit Rate due to Heroin Overdose

Value
Compared to:

Age-Adjusted ED Visit Rate due to Heroin Overdose County: Mendocino

Current Value:

Age-Adjusted ED Visit Rate due to Heroin Overdose County: Mendocino

4.3
Rate per 100,000 residents
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Mendocino has a value of 4.3 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 3.1 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 5.9.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to the CA Value (3.6), Mendocino has a value of 4.3 which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(3.6)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the prior value, Mendocino (4.3) is less and better than the previously measured value (10.2).
Prior Value
(10.2)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Mendocino value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Health / Alcohol & Drug Use

Age-Adjusted ED Visit Rate due to Opioid Overdose (excluding Heroin)

Value
Compared to:

Health / Alcohol & Drug Use

Age-Adjusted ED Visit Rate due to Opioid Overdose (excluding Heroin)

Value
Compared to:

Age-Adjusted ED Visit Rate due to Opioid Overdose (excluding Heroin) County: Mendocino

Current Value:

Age-Adjusted ED Visit Rate due to Opioid Overdose (excluding Heroin) County: Mendocino

88.2
Rate per 100,000 residents
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Mendocino has a value of 88.2 which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 48.2 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 70.0.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to the CA Value (54.9), Mendocino has a value of 88.2 which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(54.9)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the prior value, Mendocino (88.2) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (25.3).
Prior Value
(25.3)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Mendocino value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Health / Alcohol & Drug Use

Age-Adjusted Hospitalization Rate due to All Drug Overdose

Value
Compared to:

Health / Alcohol & Drug Use

Age-Adjusted Hospitalization Rate due to All Drug Overdose

Value
Compared to:

Age-Adjusted Hospitalization Rate due to All Drug Overdose County: Mendocino

Current Value:

Age-Adjusted Hospitalization Rate due to All Drug Overdose County: Mendocino

50.2
Rate per 100,000 residents
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Mendocino has a value of 50.2 which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 37.5 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 45.9.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to the CA Value (48.3), Mendocino has a value of 50.2 which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(48.3)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the prior value, Mendocino (50.2) is less and better than the previously measured value (77.6).
Prior Value
(77.6)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Mendocino value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Health / Alcohol & Drug Use

Age-Adjusted Hospitalization Rate due to Heroin Overdose

Value
Compared to:

Health / Alcohol & Drug Use

Age-Adjusted Hospitalization Rate due to Heroin Overdose

Value
Compared to:

Age-Adjusted Hospitalization Rate due to Heroin Overdose County: Mendocino

Current Value:

Age-Adjusted Hospitalization Rate due to Heroin Overdose County: Mendocino

0.0
Rate per 100,000 residents
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Mendocino has a value of 0.0 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 0.3 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 0.8.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to the CA Value (0.7), Mendocino has a value of 0.0 which is lower and better.
CA Value
(0.7)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the prior value, Mendocino (0.0) is less and better than the previously measured value (5.6).
Prior Value
(5.6)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Mendocino value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Age-Adjusted Hospitalization Rate due to Opioid Overdose (excluding Heroin) County: Mendocino

Current Value:

Age-Adjusted Hospitalization Rate due to Opioid Overdose (excluding Heroin) County: Mendocino

12.9
Rate per 100,000 residents
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Mendocino has a value of 12.9 which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 8.0 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 11.8.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to the CA Value (12.1), Mendocino has a value of 12.9 which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(12.1)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the prior value, Mendocino (12.9) is less and better than the previously measured value (25.3).
Prior Value
(25.3)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Mendocino value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Age-Adjusted Long Acting or Extended Release Opioid Prescription Rate to Opioid Naive Residents County: Mendocino

Current Value:

Age-Adjusted Long Acting or Extended Release Opioid Prescription Rate to Opioid Naive Residents County: Mendocino

3.0
Per 100,000 population
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Mendocino has a value of 3.0 which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 1.7 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 2.4.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to the CA Value (1.2), Mendocino has a value of 3.0 which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(1.2)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the prior value, Mendocino (3.0) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (3.6).
Prior Value
(3.6)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Mendocino value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Health / Alcohol & Drug Use

Death Rate due to Drug Poisoning

Value
Compared to:

Health / Alcohol & Drug Use

Death Rate due to Drug Poisoning

Value
Compared to:

Death Rate due to Drug Poisoning County: Mendocino

Current Value:

Death Rate due to Drug Poisoning County: Mendocino

43.8
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Mendocino has a value of 43.8 which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 18.0 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 22.6.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 52 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Mendocino has a value of 43.8 which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 21.7 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 30.8.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 1,797 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the CA Value (17.3), Mendocino has a value of 43.8 which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(17.3)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (23.0), Mendocino has a value of 43.8 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(23.0)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Mendocino (43.8) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (37.7).
Prior Value
(37.7)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Mendocino value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (20.7), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(20.7)
<div>SU-03: Reduce drug overdose deaths <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong></div>

Health / Alcohol & Drug Use

Opioid Prescription Patients

Value
Compared to:

Health / Alcohol & Drug Use

Opioid Prescription Patients

Value
Compared to:

Opioid Prescription Patients County: Mendocino

Current Value:

Opioid Prescription Patients County: Mendocino

3.7%
(Q3 2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Mendocino has a value of 3.7% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 2.7% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 3.6%.
CA Counties
(Q2 2022)
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to the prior value, Mendocino (3.7%) is less and better than the previously measured value (3.8%).
Prior Value
(3.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Mendocino value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Opioid Prescription Patients Zip Code: 95410

Current Value:

Opioid Prescription Patients Zip Code: 95410

3.2%
(Q3 2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Zip Codes, 95410 has a value of 3.2% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 2.3% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 3.4%.
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,736 California zip codes.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (3.7%), 95410 has a value of 3.2% which is lower and better.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(3.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the prior value, 95410 (3.2%) is less and better than the previously measured value (3.7%).
Prior Value
(3.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the 95410 value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Opioid Prescription Patients Zip Code: 95415

Current Value:

Opioid Prescription Patients Zip Code: 95415

1.7%
(Q3 2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Zip Codes, 95415 has a value of 1.7% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 2.3% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 3.4%.
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,736 California zip codes.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (3.7%), 95415 has a value of 1.7% which is lower and better.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(3.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the prior value, 95415 (1.7%) is less and better than the previously measured value (1.9%).
Prior Value
(1.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the 95415 value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Opioid Prescription Patients Zip Code: 95417

Current Value:

Opioid Prescription Patients Zip Code: 95417

3.7%
(Q3 2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Zip Codes, 95417 has a value of 3.7% which is in the worst 25% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 2.3% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 3.4%.
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,736 California zip codes.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (3.7%), 95417 has a value of 3.7%.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(3.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the prior value, 95417 (3.7%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (3.0%).
Prior Value
(3.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the 95417 value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Opioid Prescription Patients Zip Code: 95420

Current Value:

Opioid Prescription Patients Zip Code: 95420

1.5%
(Q3 2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Zip Codes, 95420 has a value of 1.5% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 2.3% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 3.4%.
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,736 California zip codes.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (3.7%), 95420 has a value of 1.5% which is lower and better.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(3.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the prior value, 95420 (1.5%) is less and better than the previously measured value (1.8%).
Prior Value
(1.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the 95420 value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Opioid Prescription Patients Zip Code: 95427

Current Value:

Opioid Prescription Patients Zip Code: 95427

5.5%
(Q3 2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Zip Codes, 95427 has a value of 5.5% which is in the worst 25% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 2.3% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 3.4%.
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,736 California zip codes.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (3.7%), 95427 has a value of 5.5% which is higher and worse.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(3.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the prior value, 95427 (5.5%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (4.7%).
Prior Value
(4.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the 95427 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Opioid Prescription Patients Zip Code: 95428

Current Value:

Opioid Prescription Patients Zip Code: 95428

4.1%
(Q3 2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Zip Codes, 95428 has a value of 4.1% which is in the worst 25% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 2.3% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 3.4%.
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,736 California zip codes.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (3.7%), 95428 has a value of 4.1% which is higher and worse.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(3.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the prior value, 95428 (4.1%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (4.0%).
Prior Value
(4.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the 95428 value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Opioid Prescription Patients Zip Code: 95429

Current Value:

Opioid Prescription Patients Zip Code: 95429

2.6%
(Q3 2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Zip Codes, 95429 has a value of 2.6% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 2.3% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 3.4%.
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,736 California zip codes.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (3.7%), 95429 has a value of 2.6% which is lower and better.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(3.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the prior value, 95429 (2.6%) is less and better than the previously measured value (3.2%).
Prior Value
(3.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the 95429 value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Opioid Prescription Patients Zip Code: 95432

Current Value:

Opioid Prescription Patients Zip Code: 95432

1.7%
(Q3 2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Zip Codes, 95432 has a value of 1.7% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 2.3% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 3.4%.
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,736 California zip codes.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (3.7%), 95432 has a value of 1.7% which is lower and better.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(3.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the prior value, 95432 (1.7%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (1.5%).
Prior Value
(1.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the 95432 value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Opioid Prescription Patients Zip Code: 95437

Current Value:

Opioid Prescription Patients Zip Code: 95437

4.2%
(Q3 2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Zip Codes, 95437 has a value of 4.2% which is in the worst 25% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 2.3% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 3.4%.
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,736 California zip codes.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (3.7%), 95437 has a value of 4.2% which is higher and worse.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(3.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the prior value, 95437 (4.2%) is less and better than the previously measured value (4.3%).
Prior Value
(4.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the 95437 value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Opioid Prescription Patients Zip Code: 95445

Current Value:

Opioid Prescription Patients Zip Code: 95445

3.1%
(Q3 2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Zip Codes, 95445 has a value of 3.1% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 2.3% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 3.4%.
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,736 California zip codes.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (3.7%), 95445 has a value of 3.1% which is lower and better.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(3.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the prior value, 95445 (3.1%) is less and better than the previously measured value (3.4%).
Prior Value
(3.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the 95445 value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Opioid Prescription Patients Zip Code: 95449

Current Value:

Opioid Prescription Patients Zip Code: 95449

2.8%
(Q3 2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Zip Codes, 95449 has a value of 2.8% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 2.3% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 3.4%.
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,736 California zip codes.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (3.7%), 95449 has a value of 2.8% which is lower and better.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(3.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the prior value, 95449 (2.8%) is less and better than the previously measured value (3.1%).
Prior Value
(3.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the 95449 value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Opioid Prescription Patients Zip Code: 95454

Current Value:

Opioid Prescription Patients Zip Code: 95454

4.9%
(Q3 2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Zip Codes, 95454 has a value of 4.9% which is in the worst 25% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 2.3% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 3.4%.
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,736 California zip codes.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (3.7%), 95454 has a value of 4.9% which is higher and worse.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(3.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the prior value, 95454 (4.9%) is less and better than the previously measured value (5.0%).
Prior Value
(5.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the 95454 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.