Skip to main content

Advanced Search: Build a Custom Dashboard

In the fields below, search for indicators by location, topics, population, classification, subgroup, or comparison. No fields are required, but we suggest selecting a location or two to start. In the additional search options section, select options to group and order search results. To learn more about how to customize a dashboard, see our help center.

Visit the Indicator List Page to see the full list of indicators and locations available on the site.

  • Map View
  • County : Mendocino Census Tracts
  • County : Mendocino Zip Codes
  • All Health Topics
  • All Community Topics
  • All Economy Topics
  • All Education Topics
  • All Environmental Health Topics
Search display options:

Search Results:

Indicator Gauge Icon Legend

Legend Colors

Red is bad, green is good, blue is not statistically different/neutral.

Compared to Distribution

an indicator guage with the arrow in the green the value is in the best half of communities.

an indicator guage with the arrow in the yellow the value is in the 2nd worst quarter of communities.

an indicator guage with the arrow in the red the value is in the worst quarter of communities.

Compared to Target

green circle with white tick inside it meets target; red circle with white cross inside it does not meet target.

Compared to a Single Value

green diamond with downward arrow inside it lower than the comparison value; red diamond with downward arrow inside it higher than the comparison value; blue diamond with downward arrow inside it not statistically different from comparison value.

Trend

green square outline with upward trending arrow inside it green square outline with downward trending arrow inside it non-significant change over time; green square with upward trending arrow inside it green square with downward trending arrow inside it significant change over time; blue square with equals sign no change over time.

Compared to Prior Value

green triangle with upward trending arrow inside it higher than the previous measurement period; green triangle with downward trending arrow inside it lower than the previous measurement period; blue equals sign no statistically different change  from previous measurement period.

More information about the gauges and icons

Health / Tobacco Use

Health / Tobacco Use

Health / Tobacco Use

County: Mendocino

Value
Compared to:

Health / Tobacco Use

County: Mendocino

Value
Compared to:

County: Mendocino 7th Grade Students Who Report Vaping or Using E-Cigarettes

9.2%
(2017-2019)
Compared to:
Compared to the CA Value (4.0%), Mendocino has a value of 9.2% which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(4.0%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the prior value, Mendocino (9.2%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (6.1%).
Prior Value
(6.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Mendocino 9th Grade Students Who Report Vaping or Using E-Cigarettes

21.7%
(2017-2019)
Compared to:
Compared to the CA Value (8.7%), Mendocino has a value of 21.7% which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(8.7%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the prior value, Mendocino (21.7%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (13.4%).
Prior Value
(13.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Mendocino Adults who Smoke

Current Value:

County: Mendocino Adults who Smoke

7.5%
(2021-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Mendocino has a value of 7.5% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 7.9% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 9.5%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to the CA Value (6.1%), Mendocino has a value of 7.5% which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(6.1%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (14.0%), Mendocino has a value of 7.5% which is lower and better.
US Value
(14.0% in 2022)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System
Compared to the prior value, Mendocino (7.5%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (7.5%).
Prior Value
(7.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Mendocino value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (6.1%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(6.1%)
<div>TU-02: Reduce current cigarette smoking in adults <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong></div>

County: Mendocino Adults Who Used Electronic Cigarettes: Past 30 Days

Current Value:
4.5%
(2019-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the CA Value (3.3%), Mendocino has a value of 4.5% which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(3.3%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the prior value, Mendocino (4.5%) is less and better than the previously measured value (6.5%).
Prior Value
(6.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Mendocino Teens who Smoke: 11th Graders

Current Value:

County: Mendocino Teens who Smoke: 11th Graders

7.0%
(2017-2019)
Compared to:
Compared to the CA Value (2.0%), Mendocino has a value of 7.0% which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(2.0%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the prior value, Mendocino (7.0%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (3.0%).
Prior Value
(3.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Mendocino value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Health / Weight Status

Health / Weight Status

Health / Weight Status

County: Mendocino

Value
Compared to:

Health / Weight Status

County: Mendocino

Value
Compared to:

County: Mendocino 5th Grade Students who are at a Healthy Weight or Underweight

58.2%
(2018-2019)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Mendocino has a value of 58.2% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 59.4% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 55.5%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to the CA Value (58.7%), Mendocino has a value of 58.2% which is lower and worse.
CA Value
(58.7%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the prior value, Mendocino (58.2%) is greater and better than the previously measured value (52.4%).
Prior Value
(52.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Mendocino value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Mendocino 9th Grade Students who are at a Healthy Weight or Underweight

58.5%
(2018-2019)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Mendocino has a value of 58.5% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 62.4% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 57.6%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to the CA Value (62.2%), Mendocino has a value of 58.5% which is lower and worse.
CA Value
(62.2%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the prior value, Mendocino (58.5%) is less and worse than the previously measured value (60.2%).
Prior Value
(60.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Mendocino value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Mendocino Adults Who Are Obese

Current Value:

County: Mendocino Adults Who Are Obese

29.7%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Mendocino has a value of 29.7% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 32.3% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 38.8%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to the CA Value (28.8%), Mendocino has a value of 29.7% which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(28.8%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (33.6%), Mendocino has a value of 29.7% which is lower and better.
US Value
(33.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System
Compared to the prior value, Mendocino (29.7%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (21.6%).
Prior Value
(21.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Mendocino value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Mendocino Adults who are Overweight or Obese

Current Value:
64.2%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Mendocino has a value of 64.2% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 66.2% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 71.2%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to the CA Value (62.3%), Mendocino has a value of 64.2% which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(62.3%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (67.7%), Mendocino has a value of 64.2% which is lower and better.
US Value
(67.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System
Compared to the prior value, Mendocino (64.2%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (57.3%).
Prior Value
(57.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Mendocino value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Mendocino Children who are Overweight for Age

Current Value:
18.5%
(2019-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the CA Value (13.9%), Mendocino has a value of 18.5% which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(13.9%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the prior value, Mendocino (18.5%) is less and better than the previously measured value (20.8%).
Prior Value
(20.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

Health / Wellness & Lifestyle

Health / Wellness & Lifestyle

Health / Wellness & Lifestyle

County: Mendocino

Value
Compared to:

Health / Wellness & Lifestyle

County: Mendocino

Value
Compared to:

County: Mendocino Adult Self-Reported General Health Assessment: Good or Better

82.5%
(2021-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Mendocino has a value of 82.5% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 85.3% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 81.8%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to the CA Value (85.0%), Mendocino has a value of 82.5% which is lower and worse.
CA Value
(85.0%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the prior value, Mendocino (82.5%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (82.3%).
Prior Value
(82.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Mendocino value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Mendocino Frequent Physical Distress

Current Value:

County: Mendocino Frequent Physical Distress

13.5%
(2019)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Mendocino has a value of 13.5% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.8% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 13.9%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Mendocino has a value of 13.5% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 13.6% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 15.5%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,121 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the CA Value (11.3%), Mendocino has a value of 13.5% which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(11.3%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (12.0%), Mendocino has a value of 13.5% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(12.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Mendocino (13.5%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (14.7%).
Prior Value
(14.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Mendocino Insufficient Sleep

Current Value:

County: Mendocino Insufficient Sleep

32.3%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Mendocino has a value of 32.3% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 32.8% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 34.5%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Mendocino has a value of 32.3% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.5% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 36.8%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,140 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the CA Value (31.1%), Mendocino has a value of 32.3% which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(31.1%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (33.0%), Mendocino has a value of 32.3% which is lower and better.
US Value
(33.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Mendocino (32.3%) is less and better than the previously measured value (33.3%).
Prior Value
(33.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (26.7%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(26.7%)

County: Mendocino Poor Physical Health: 14+ Days

Current Value:

County: Mendocino Poor Physical Health: 14+ Days

13.7%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Mendocino has a value of 13.7% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.3% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 13.6%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Mendocino has a value of 13.7% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 13.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.7%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (10.9%), Mendocino has a value of 13.7% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(10.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

County: Mendocino Self-Reported General Health Assessment: Good or Better

80.3%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Mendocino has a value of 80.3% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 85.5% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 83.8%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to the CA Value (86.0%), Mendocino has a value of 80.3% which is lower and worse.
CA Value
(86.0%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the prior value, Mendocino (80.3%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (87.9%).
Prior Value
(87.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Mendocino value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Mendocino Self-Reported General Health Assessment: Poor or Fair

19.7%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Mendocino has a value of 19.7% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 17.8% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 21.0%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Mendocino has a value of 19.7% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 18.5% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 22.5%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (16.1%), Mendocino has a value of 19.7% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(16.1%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Community / Civic Engagement

Community / Civic Engagement

Community / Civic Engagement

County: Mendocino

Value
Compared to:

Community / Civic Engagement

County: Mendocino

Value
Compared to:

County: Mendocino Voter Engagement

Current Value:

County: Mendocino Voter Engagement

82.3%
Percent of adults
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Mendocino has a value of 82.3% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 71.4% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 63.4%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to the CA Value (66.2%), Mendocino has a value of 82.3% which is higher and better.
CA Value
(66.2%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the prior value, Mendocino (82.3%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (69.8%).
Prior Value
(69.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Mendocino value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Mendocino Voter Turnout: Presidential Election

Current Value:
82.2%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Mendocino has a value of 82.2% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 82.9% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 79.4%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to the CA Value (80.7%), Mendocino has a value of 82.2% which is higher and better.
CA Value
(80.7%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the prior value, Mendocino (82.2%) is greater and better than the previously measured value (75.9%).
Prior Value
(75.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Mendocino value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (58.4%), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(58.4%)
<div>SDOH-07: Increase the proportion of the voting-age citizens who vote</div>

Community / Crime & Crime Prevention

Community / Crime & Crime Prevention

Community / Crime & Crime Prevention

County: Mendocino

Value
Compared to:

Community / Crime & Crime Prevention

County: Mendocino

Value
Compared to:

County: Mendocino Adult Arrest Rate

Current Value:

County: Mendocino Adult Arrest Rate

26.8
Arrests per 1,000 population 18+
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Mendocino has a value of 26.8 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.8 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 37.4.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to the CA Value (25.1), Mendocino has a value of 26.8 which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(25.1)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the prior value, Mendocino (26.8) is less and better than the previously measured value (43.8).
Prior Value
(43.8)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Mendocino value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Mendocino Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Homicide

Current Value:
8.7
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Mendocino has a value of 8.7 which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 5.2 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 7.6.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 32 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Mendocino has a value of 8.7 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 7.4 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.3.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 495 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the CA Value (5.1), Mendocino has a value of 8.7 which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(5.1)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (6.6), Mendocino has a value of 8.7 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(6.6)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (5.5), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(5.5)
<div>IVP-09: Reduce homicides <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong></div>

County: Mendocino Homicide Rate

Current Value:

County: Mendocino Homicide Rate

2.2
Homicides per 100,000 population
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Mendocino has a value of 2.2 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 3.8 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 6.2.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to the CA Value (5.6), Mendocino has a value of 2.2 which is lower and better.
CA Value
(5.6)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the prior value, Mendocino (2.2) is less and better than the previously measured value (8.8).
Prior Value
(8.8)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Mendocino value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Mendocino Homicides

Current Value:

County: Mendocino Homicides

2
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Mendocino (2) is less and better than the previously measured value (8).
Prior Value
(8)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Mendocino value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Mendocino Juvenile Arrest Rate

Current Value:

County: Mendocino Juvenile Arrest Rate

5.3
Arrests per 1,000 population aged 0-17
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Mendocino has a value of 5.3 which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 3.6 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 4.8.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 57 California counties.
Compared to the CA Value (2.8), Mendocino has a value of 5.3 which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(2.8)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the prior value, Mendocino (5.3) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (2.6).
Prior Value
(2.6)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Mendocino value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Mendocino Violent Crime Rate

Current Value:

County: Mendocino Violent Crime Rate

202.3
Crimes per 100,000 population
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Mendocino has a value of 202.3 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 449.4 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 621.3.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to the CA Value (493.1), Mendocino has a value of 202.3 which is lower and better.
CA Value
(493.1)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (380.7), Mendocino has a value of 202.3 which is lower and better.
US Value
(380.7)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Federal Bureau of Investigation
Compared to the prior value, Mendocino (202.3) is less and better than the previously measured value (520.9).
Prior Value
(520.9)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Mendocino value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Mendocino Violent Crime Rate: Rape

Current Value:

County: Mendocino Violent Crime Rate: Rape

21.1
Per 100,000 population
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Mendocino has a value of 21.1 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 43.8 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 63.2.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to the CA Value (36.6), Mendocino has a value of 21.1 which is lower and better.
CA Value
(36.6)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the prior value, Mendocino (21.1) is less and better than the previously measured value (58.4).
Prior Value
(58.4)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Mendocino value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Community / Demographics

Community / Demographics

Community / Demographics

County: Mendocino

Value
Compared to:

Community / Demographics

County: Mendocino

Value
Compared to:

County: Mendocino Average Household Size

Current Value:

County: Mendocino Average Household Size

2.60
Persons per household
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the CA Value (2.90), Mendocino has a value of 2.60.
CA Value
(2.90)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (2.60), Mendocino has a value of 2.60.
US Value
(2.60)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Mendocino value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Mendocino Foreign Born Persons

Current Value:

County: Mendocino Foreign Born Persons

11.3%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the CA Value (26.5%), Mendocino has a value of 11.3%.
CA Value
(26.5%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (13.7%), Mendocino has a value of 11.3%.
US Value
(13.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Mendocino value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Mendocino Population Over Age 65 (Count)

Current Value:

County: Mendocino Population Over Age 65 (Count)

21,197
People
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Over time, the Mendocino value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Mendocino Veteran Population

Current Value:

County: Mendocino Veteran Population

6.6%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the CA Value (4.7%), Mendocino has a value of 6.6%.
CA Value
(4.7%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (6.6%), Mendocino has a value of 6.6%.
US Value
(6.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Mendocino value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Community / Domestic Violence & Abuse

Community / Domestic Violence & Abuse

Community / Domestic Violence & Abuse

County: Mendocino

Value
Compared to:

Community / Domestic Violence & Abuse

County: Mendocino

Value
Compared to:

County: Mendocino Domestic Violence Calls

Current Value:

County: Mendocino Domestic Violence Calls

3.6
Calls per 1,000 population 18-69
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the CA Value (6.4), Mendocino has a value of 3.6 which is lower and better.
CA Value
(6.4)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the prior value, Mendocino (3.6) is less and better than the previously measured value (9.1).
Prior Value
(9.1)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Mendocino value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Community / Public Safety

Community / Public Safety

Community / Public Safety

County: Mendocino

Value
Compared to:

Community / Public Safety

County: Mendocino

Value
Compared to:

County: Mendocino Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Motor Vehicle Traffic Collisions

28.6
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2019-2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Mendocino has a value of 28.6 which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 15.4 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 20.1.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 57 California counties.
Compared to the CA Value (10.7), Mendocino has a value of 28.6 which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(10.7)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (12.0), Mendocino has a value of 28.6 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(12.0 in 2020)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Compared to the prior value, Mendocino (28.6) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (29.3).
Prior Value
(29.3)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (10.1), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(10.1)

County: Mendocino Alcohol-Impaired Driving Deaths

Current Value:
31.6%
Percent of driving deaths with alcohol involvement
(2017-2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Mendocino has a value of 31.6% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 30.5% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 36.6%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Mendocino has a value of 31.6% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 26.3% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.8%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,116 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the CA Value (26.7%), Mendocino has a value of 31.6% which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(26.7%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (26.3%), Mendocino has a value of 31.6% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(26.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Mendocino (31.6%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (34.3%).
Prior Value
(34.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Mendocino value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Mendocino Bicycle-Involved Collision Rate

Current Value:
0.0
Collisions per 100,000 population
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Mendocino has a value of 0.0 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.1 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 26.0.
CA Counties
(2022)
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to the CA Value (0.3), Mendocino has a value of 0.0 which is lower and better.
CA Value
(0.3)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the prior value, Mendocino (0.0) is less and better than the previously measured value (15.6).
Prior Value
(15.6)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Mendocino value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Community / Social Environment

Community / Social Environment

Community / Social Environment

County: Mendocino

Value
Compared to:

Community / Social Environment

County: Mendocino

Value
Compared to:

County: Mendocino Children in Single-Parent Households

Current Value:
28.7%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Mendocino has a value of 28.7% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 22.2% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 25.3%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Mendocino has a value of 28.7% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 22.2% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 28.7%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,132 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the CA Value (22.4%), Mendocino has a value of 28.7% which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(22.4%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (24.9%), Mendocino has a value of 28.7% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(24.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Mendocino value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Mendocino People 65+ Living Alone

Current Value:

County: Mendocino People 65+ Living Alone

30.8%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Mendocino has a value of 30.8% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 22.6% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 25.5%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Mendocino has a value of 30.8% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 27.2% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 30.2%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the CA Value (22.0%), Mendocino has a value of 30.8% which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(22.0%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (26.4%), Mendocino has a value of 30.8% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(26.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Mendocino value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Mendocino People 65+ Living Alone (Count)

Current Value:
6,535
People
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Over time, the Mendocino value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Mendocino Social Associations

Current Value:

County: Mendocino Social Associations

7.3
Membership associations per 10,000 population
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Mendocino has a value of 7.3 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 6.0 while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 4.6.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Mendocino has a value of 7.3 which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 10.8 while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 7.9.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the CA Value (6.0), Mendocino has a value of 7.3 which is higher and better.
CA Value
(6.0)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (9.1), Mendocino has a value of 7.3 which is lower and worse.
US Value
(9.1)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Mendocino (7.3) is less and worse than the previously measured value (7.6).
Prior Value
(7.6)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Mendocino value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Mendocino Substantiated Child Abuse Rate

Current Value:

County: Mendocino Substantiated Child Abuse Rate

17.5
Cases per 1,000 children
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the CA Value (6.1), Mendocino has a value of 17.5 which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(6.1)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (8.2), Mendocino has a value of 17.5 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(8.2 in 2021)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Children's Bureau
Compared to the prior value, Mendocino (17.5) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (14.2).
Prior Value
(14.2)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Mendocino value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (8.7), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(8.7)

Community / Transportation

Community / Transportation

Community / Transportation

County: Mendocino

Value
Compared to:

Community / Transportation

County: Mendocino

Value
Compared to:

County: Mendocino Mean Travel Time to Work

Current Value:

County: Mendocino Mean Travel Time to Work

21.7
Minutes
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Mendocino has a value of 21.7 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 26.6 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 31.0.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Mendocino has a value of 21.7 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 24.0 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 27.8.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,131 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the CA Value (29.2), Mendocino has a value of 21.7 which is lower and better.
CA Value
(29.2)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (26.7), Mendocino has a value of 21.7 which is lower and better.
US Value
(26.7)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Mendocino value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Mendocino Solo Drivers with a Long Commute

Current Value:
24.9%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Mendocino has a value of 24.9% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 35.7% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 42.8%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Mendocino has a value of 24.9% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 32.4% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 41.8%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the CA Value (41.6%), Mendocino has a value of 24.9% which is lower and better.
CA Value
(41.6%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (36.4%), Mendocino has a value of 24.9% which is lower and better.
US Value
(36.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Mendocino (24.9%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (23.3%).
Prior Value
(23.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Mendocino value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Mendocino Workers Commuting by Public Transportation

Current Value:
0.3%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Mendocino has a value of 0.3% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 0.8% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 0.5%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Mendocino has a value of 0.3% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 0.3% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 0.1%.
U.S. Counties
(2015-2019)
The distribution is based on data from 3,142 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the CA Value (3.6%), Mendocino has a value of 0.3% which is lower and worse.
CA Value
(3.6%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (3.8%), Mendocino has a value of 0.3% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(3.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Mendocino value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (5.3%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(5.3%)

County: Mendocino Workers who Drive Alone to Work

Current Value:
72.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Mendocino has a value of 72.5% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 73.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 76.4%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Mendocino has a value of 72.5% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 79.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 82.3%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the CA Value (68.4%), Mendocino has a value of 72.5% which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(68.4%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (71.7%), Mendocino has a value of 72.5% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(71.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Mendocino value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Economy / Employment

Economy / Employment

Economy / Employment

County: Mendocino

Value
Compared to:

Economy / Employment

County: Mendocino

Value
Compared to:

County: Mendocino Employer Establishments

Current Value:

County: Mendocino Employer Establishments

2,437
Number of Establishments
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Mendocino (2,437) is greater  than the previously measured value (2,432).
Prior Value
(2,432)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Mendocino value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Mendocino Female Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force

Current Value:
53.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Mendocino has a value of 53.0% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 54.4% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 50.5%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Mendocino has a value of 53.0% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 54.4% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 49.6%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the CA Value (57.8%), Mendocino has a value of 53.0% which is lower and worse.
CA Value
(57.8%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (58.5%), Mendocino has a value of 53.0% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(58.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Mendocino value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Mendocino Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force

Current Value:
51.3%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Mendocino has a value of 51.3% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 55.2% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 49.7%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Mendocino has a value of 51.3% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 55.7% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 50.3%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the CA Value (59.3%), Mendocino has a value of 51.3% which is lower and worse.
CA Value
(59.3%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (59.6%), Mendocino has a value of 51.3% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(59.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Mendocino value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Mendocino Size of Labor Force

Current Value:

County: Mendocino Size of Labor Force

37,342
Persons
(January 2024)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Mendocino (37,342) is greater and better than the previously measured value (37,008).
Prior Value
(37,008)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Mendocino value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Mendocino Total Employment

Current Value:

County: Mendocino Total Employment

22,081
Paid Employees
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Mendocino (22,081) is less  than the previously measured value (23,335).
Prior Value
(23,335)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Mendocino value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Mendocino Total Employment Change

Current Value:

County: Mendocino Total Employment Change

-5.4%
(2020-2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Mendocino has a value of -5.4% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than -4.5% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than -6.4%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Mendocino has a value of -5.4% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than -2.6% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than -5.5%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,140 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the CA Value (-5.6%), Mendocino has a value of -5.4% which is higher and better.
CA Value
(-5.6%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (-4.3%), Mendocino has a value of -5.4% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(-4.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Mendocino (-5.4%) is less and worse than the previously measured value (-0.9%).
Prior Value
(-0.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Mendocino value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Mendocino Unemployed Workers in Civilian Labor Force

Current Value:
6.2%
(January 2024)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Mendocino has a value of 6.2% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 6.2% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 8.2%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Mendocino has a value of 6.2% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 3.9% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 4.8%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on non-seasonally-adjusted data from 3,140 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the CA Value (5.7%), Mendocino has a value of 6.2% which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(5.7%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (4.1%), Mendocino has a value of 6.2% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(4.1%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Mendocino (6.2%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (5.3%).
Prior Value
(5.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Mendocino value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Economy / Food Insecurity

Economy / Food Insecurity

Economy / Food Insecurity

County: Mendocino

Value
Compared to:

Economy / Food Insecurity

County: Mendocino

Value
Compared to:

County: Mendocino Adults Receiving Food Stamp Benefits

Current Value:
36.7%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Mendocino has a value of 36.7% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 34.2% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 24.1%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to the CA Value (31.7%), Mendocino has a value of 36.7% which is higher and better.
CA Value
(31.7%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the prior value, Mendocino (36.7%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (28.3%).
Prior Value
(28.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Mendocino Child Food Insecurity Rate

Current Value:

County: Mendocino Child Food Insecurity Rate

16.8%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Mendocino has a value of 16.8% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 14.2% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 17.6%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Mendocino has a value of 16.8% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 13.7% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 17.5%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,140 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the CA Value (13.5%), Mendocino has a value of 16.8% which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(13.5%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (12.8%), Mendocino has a value of 16.8% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(12.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Mendocino (16.8%) is less and better than the previously measured value (20.0%).
Prior Value
(20.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Mendocino value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Mendocino Food Insecure Children Likely Ineligible for Assistance

23%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Mendocino has a value of 23% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 29% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 34%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Mendocino has a value of 23% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 22% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 30%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,134 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the CA Value (34%), Mendocino has a value of 23% which is lower and better.
CA Value
(34%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (25%), Mendocino has a value of 23% which is lower and better.
US Value
(25%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Mendocino (23%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (19%).
Prior Value
(19%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Mendocino value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Mendocino Food Insecurity Rate

Current Value:

County: Mendocino Food Insecurity Rate

12.8%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Mendocino has a value of 12.8% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.3% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.5%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Mendocino has a value of 12.8% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.2% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 13.8%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,140 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the CA Value (10.5%), Mendocino has a value of 12.8% which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(10.5%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (10.4%), Mendocino has a value of 12.8% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(10.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Mendocino (12.8%) is less and better than the previously measured value (13.9%).
Prior Value
(13.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Mendocino value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Mendocino Households Receiving SNAP with Children

Current Value:
40.4%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the CA Value (53.1%), Mendocino has a value of 40.4%.
CA Value
(53.1%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (47.9%), Mendocino has a value of 40.4%.
US Value
(47.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Mendocino value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Mendocino Households Receiving SNAP with Children (Count)

Current Value:
1,828
Households
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Over time, the Mendocino value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Mendocino Projected Child Food Insecurity Rate

Current Value:
22.3%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Mendocino has a value of 22.3% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 19.6% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 21.7%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Mendocino has a value of 22.3% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 18.9% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 23.4%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,142 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the CA Value (16.8%), Mendocino has a value of 22.3% which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(16.8%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the prior value, Mendocino (22.3%) is less and better than the previously measured value (30.1%).
Prior Value
(30.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Mendocino Projected Food Insecurity Rate

Current Value:

County: Mendocino Projected Food Insecurity Rate

15.6%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Mendocino has a value of 15.6% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 13.2% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 15.4%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Mendocino has a value of 15.6% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 14.1% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 16.9%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,142 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the CA Value (12.1%), Mendocino has a value of 15.6% which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(12.1%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the prior value, Mendocino (15.6%) is less and better than the previously measured value (19.4%).
Prior Value
(19.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Mendocino Students Eligible for the Free Lunch Program

Current Value:
64.9%
(2022-2023)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Mendocino has a value of 64.9% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 51.7% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 61.2%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Mendocino has a value of 64.9% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 47.6% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 63.2%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,710 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the CA Value (52.6%), Mendocino has a value of 64.9% which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(52.6%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (42.8%), Mendocino has a value of 64.9% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(42.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Mendocino (64.9%) is less and better than the previously measured value (65.1%).
Prior Value
(65.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Mendocino value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Economy / Government Assistance

Economy / Government Assistance

Economy / Government Assistance

County: Mendocino

Value
Compared to:

Economy / Government Assistance

County: Mendocino

Value
Compared to:

County: Mendocino Households with Cash Public Assistance Income

Current Value:
3.7%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Mendocino has a value of 3.7% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 3.4% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 4.3%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 57 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Mendocino has a value of 3.7% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 2.1% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 3.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,923 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the CA Value (3.7%), Mendocino has a value of 3.7%.
CA Value
(3.7%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (2.7%), Mendocino has a value of 3.7% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(2.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Mendocino value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Economy / Homelessness

Economy / Homelessness

Economy / Homelessness

County: Mendocino

Value
Compared to:

Economy / Homelessness

County: Mendocino

Value
Compared to:

County: Mendocino Point-in-Time Count of Unaccompanied Youth Under 25 Experiencing Homelessness

45
Persons
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Mendocino (45) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (21).
Prior Value
(21)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Mendocino value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Mendocino Point-in-Time Count of Veterans Experiencing Homelessness

19
Persons
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Mendocino (19) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (13).
Prior Value
(13)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Mendocino value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Mendocino Sheltered Homeless

Current Value:

County: Mendocino Sheltered Homeless

270
Persons
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Mendocino (270) is less and better than the previously measured value (318).
Prior Value
(318)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Mendocino value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Mendocino Total Homeless Population

Current Value:

County: Mendocino Total Homeless Population

830
Persons
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Mendocino (830) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (318).
Prior Value
(318)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Mendocino value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Mendocino Unsheltered Homeless

Current Value:

County: Mendocino Unsheltered Homeless

560
Persons
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Mendocino (560) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (0).
Prior Value
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Mendocino value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Economy / Housing & Homes

Economy / Housing & Homes

Economy / Housing & Homes

County: Mendocino

Value
Compared to:

Economy / Housing & Homes

County: Mendocino

Value
Compared to:

County: Mendocino Homeowner Vacancy Rate

Current Value:

County: Mendocino Homeowner Vacancy Rate

0.9%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Mendocino has a value of 0.9% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 1.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 1.8%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Mendocino has a value of 0.9% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 1.1% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 1.7%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,132 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the CA Value (0.9%), Mendocino has a value of 0.9%.
CA Value
(0.9%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (1.1%), Mendocino has a value of 0.9% which is lower and better.
US Value
(1.1%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Mendocino value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Mendocino Homeownership

Current Value:

County: Mendocino Homeownership

50.9%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Mendocino has a value of 50.9% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 54.4% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 50.6%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Mendocino has a value of 50.9% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 60.4% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 54.6%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the CA Value (51.4%), Mendocino has a value of 50.9% which is lower and worse.
CA Value
(51.4%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (57.8%), Mendocino has a value of 50.9% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(57.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Mendocino value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Mendocino Median Household Gross Rent

Current Value:

County: Mendocino Median Household Gross Rent

$1,240
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Mendocino has a value of $1,240 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than $1,289 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than $1,919.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 57 California counties.
Compared to the CA Value ($1,856), Mendocino has a value of $1,240 which is lower and better.
CA Value
($1,856)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value ($1,268), Mendocino has a value of $1,240 which is lower and better.
US Value
($1,268)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Mendocino value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Mendocino Median Monthly Owner Costs for Households without a Mortgage

$670
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Mendocino has a value of $670 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than $652 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than $773.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to the CA Value ($732), Mendocino has a value of $670 which is lower and better.
CA Value
($732)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value ($584), Mendocino has a value of $670 which is higher and worse.
US Value
($584)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Mendocino value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Mendocino Mortgaged Owners Median Monthly Household Costs

Current Value:
$2,214
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Mendocino has a value of $2,214 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than $2,128 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than $2,724.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 54 California counties.
Compared to the CA Value ($2,759), Mendocino has a value of $2,214 which is lower and better.
CA Value
($2,759)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value ($1,828), Mendocino has a value of $2,214 which is higher and worse.
US Value
($1,828)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Mendocino value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Mendocino Mortgaged Owners Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Housing

47.1%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Mendocino has a value of 47.1% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 37.2% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.9%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 42 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Mendocino has a value of 47.1% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 25.2% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 29.9%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 828 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the CA Value (37.6%), Mendocino has a value of 47.1% which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(37.6%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (27.8%), Mendocino has a value of 47.1% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(27.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Mendocino (47.1%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (29.8%).
Prior Value
(29.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Mendocino value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (25.5%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)

County: Mendocino Overcrowded Households

Current Value:

County: Mendocino Overcrowded Households

4.9%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Mendocino has a value of 4.9% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 5.4% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 7.7%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to the CA Value (8.2%), Mendocino has a value of 4.9% which is lower and better.
CA Value
(8.2%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (3.3%), Mendocino has a value of 4.9% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(3.3% in 2016-2020)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Mendocino value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Mendocino Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent

55.3%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Mendocino has a value of 55.3% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 53.1% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 55.8%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Mendocino has a value of 55.3% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 44.3% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 49.8%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,132 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the CA Value (54.4%), Mendocino has a value of 55.3% which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(54.4%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (49.9%), Mendocino has a value of 55.3% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(49.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Mendocino value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (25.5%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)

County: Mendocino Severe Housing Problems

Current Value:

County: Mendocino Severe Housing Problems

23.7%
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Mendocino has a value of 23.7% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 21.8% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 24.1%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Mendocino has a value of 23.7% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.2% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.7%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the CA Value (25.7%), Mendocino has a value of 23.7% which is lower and better.
CA Value
(25.7%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (16.7%), Mendocino has a value of 23.7% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(16.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Mendocino (23.7%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (25.0%).
Prior Value
(25.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Mendocino value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Economy / Income

Economy / Income

Economy / Income

County: Mendocino

Value
Compared to:

Economy / Income

County: Mendocino

Value
Compared to:

County: Mendocino Income Inequality

Current Value:

County: Mendocino Income Inequality

0.481
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Mendocino has a value of 0.481 which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 0.461 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 0.481.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Mendocino has a value of 0.481 which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 0.445 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 0.470.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the CA Value (0.490), Mendocino has a value of 0.481 which is lower and better.
CA Value
(0.490)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (0.483), Mendocino has a value of 0.481 which is lower and better.
US Value
(0.483)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Mendocino value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Mendocino Median Household Income

Current Value:

County: Mendocino Median Household Income

$61,335
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Mendocino has a value of $61,335 which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than $76,148 while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than $63,996.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Mendocino has a value of $61,335 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than $60,831 while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than $52,521.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,132 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the CA Value ($91,905), Mendocino has a value of $61,335 which is lower and worse.
CA Value
($91,905)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value ($75,149), Mendocino has a value of $61,335 which is lower and worse.
US Value
($75,149)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Mendocino value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Mendocino Per Capita Income

Current Value:

County: Mendocino Per Capita Income

$34,977
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Mendocino has a value of $34,977 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than $37,717 while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than $32,012.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Mendocino has a value of $34,977 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than $32,340 while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than $28,112.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the CA Value ($45,591), Mendocino has a value of $34,977 which is lower and worse.
CA Value
($45,591)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value ($41,261), Mendocino has a value of $34,977 which is lower and worse.
US Value
($41,261)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Mendocino value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Economy / Poverty

Economy / Poverty

Economy / Poverty

County: Mendocino

Value
Compared to:

Economy / Poverty

County: Mendocino

Value
Compared to:

County: Mendocino Children Living Below Poverty Level

Current Value:
20.6%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Mendocino has a value of 20.6% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 15.8% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 21.0%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Mendocino has a value of 20.6% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 17.4% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 24.3%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,132 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the CA Value (15.6%), Mendocino has a value of 20.6% which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(15.6%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (16.7%), Mendocino has a value of 20.6% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(16.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Mendocino value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Mendocino Families Living Below Poverty Level

Current Value:
11.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Mendocino has a value of 11.5% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 8.9% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 10.8%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Mendocino has a value of 11.5% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 9.2% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.8%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,104 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the CA Value (8.5%), Mendocino has a value of 11.5% which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(8.5%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (8.8%), Mendocino has a value of 11.5% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(8.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Mendocino value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Mendocino People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level

Current Value:
12.9%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Mendocino has a value of 12.9% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.2% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.0%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Mendocino has a value of 12.9% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 9.7% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.8%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the CA Value (11.0%), Mendocino has a value of 12.9% which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(11.0%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (10.0%), Mendocino has a value of 12.9% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(10.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Mendocino value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Mendocino People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level (Count)

Current Value:
2,702
People
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Over time, the Mendocino value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Mendocino People Living 200% Above Poverty Level

Current Value:
64.4%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Mendocino has a value of 64.4% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 68.7% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 63.7%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Mendocino has a value of 64.4% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 66.8% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 59.9%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the CA Value (72.0%), Mendocino has a value of 64.4% which is lower and worse.
CA Value
(72.0%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (71.2%), Mendocino has a value of 64.4% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(71.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Mendocino value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Mendocino People Living Below Poverty Level

Current Value:
16.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Mendocino has a value of 16.2% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 13.1% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 16.2%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Mendocino has a value of 16.2% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 13.4% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 17.5%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the CA Value (12.1%), Mendocino has a value of 16.2% which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(12.1%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (12.5%), Mendocino has a value of 16.2% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(12.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Mendocino value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (8.0%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(8.0%)

County: Mendocino Youth not in School or Working

Current Value:

County: Mendocino Youth not in School or Working

2.1%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Mendocino has a value of 2.1% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 1.4% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 2.4%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Mendocino has a value of 2.1% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 1.3% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 2.7%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,130 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the CA Value (1.5%), Mendocino has a value of 2.1% which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(1.5%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (1.8%), Mendocino has a value of 2.1% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(1.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Mendocino value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Education / Childcare & Early Childhood Education

Education / Childcare & Early Childhood Education

Education / Childcare & Early Childhood Education

County: Mendocino

Value
Compared to:

Education / Childcare & Early Childhood Education

County: Mendocino

Value
Compared to:

County: Mendocino Child Care Centers

Current Value:

County: Mendocino Child Care Centers

8.5
Per 1,000 population under age 5
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Mendocino has a value of 8.5 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 8.1 while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 5.4.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to the CA Value (8.1), Mendocino has a value of 8.5 which is higher and better.
CA Value
(8.1)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (7.0), Mendocino has a value of 8.5 which is higher and better.
US Value
(7.0)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Mendocino (8.5) is greater and better than the previously measured value (7.4).
Prior Value
(7.4)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

Education / Educational Attainment

Education / Educational Attainment

Education / Educational Attainment

County: Mendocino

Value
Compared to:

Education / Educational Attainment

County: Mendocino

Value
Compared to:

County: Mendocino People 25+ with a Bachelor's Degree or Higher

Current Value:
24.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Mendocino has a value of 24.0% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 24.3% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 19.0%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Mendocino has a value of 24.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 20.9% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 16.5%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the CA Value (35.9%), Mendocino has a value of 24.0% which is lower and worse.
CA Value
(35.9%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (34.3%), Mendocino has a value of 24.0% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(34.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Mendocino value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Mendocino People 25+ with a High School Diploma or Higher

Current Value:
86.8%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Mendocino has a value of 86.8% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 88.1% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 80.5%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Mendocino has a value of 86.8% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 89.5% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 85.3%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the CA Value (84.4%), Mendocino has a value of 86.8% which is higher and better.
CA Value
(84.4%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (89.1%), Mendocino has a value of 86.8% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(89.1%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Mendocino value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Education / School Environment

Education / School Environment

Education / School Environment

County: Mendocino

Value
Compared to:

Education / School Environment

County: Mendocino

Value
Compared to:

County: Mendocino Student-to-Teacher Ratio

Current Value:

County: Mendocino Student-to-Teacher Ratio

18.1
Students per teacher
(2022-2023)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Mendocino has a value of 18.1 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 21.0 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 21.9.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Mendocino has a value of 18.1 which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 13.9 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 15.7.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,125 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the CA Value (21.9), Mendocino has a value of 18.1 which is lower and better.
CA Value
(21.9)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (15.4), Mendocino has a value of 18.1 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(15.4)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Mendocino (18.1) is less and better than the previously measured value (18.5).
Prior Value
(18.5)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Mendocino value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Education / Student Performance K-12

Education / Student Performance K-12

Education / Student Performance K-12

County: Mendocino

Value
Compared to:

Education / Student Performance K-12

County: Mendocino

Value
Compared to:

County: Mendocino 11th Grade Students Proficient in English/Language Arts

41.5%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Mendocino has a value of 41.5% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 50.3% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 43.3%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 57 California counties.
Compared to the CA Value (54.8%), Mendocino has a value of 41.5% which is lower and worse.
CA Value
(54.8%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the prior value, Mendocino (41.5%) is less and worse than the previously measured value (55.6%).
Prior Value
(55.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Mendocino value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Mendocino 11th Grade Students Proficient in Math

Current Value:
16.5%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Mendocino has a value of 16.5% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 21.1% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 16.5%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 57 California counties.
Compared to the CA Value (27.0%), Mendocino has a value of 16.5% which is lower and worse.
CA Value
(27.0%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the prior value, Mendocino (16.5%) is less and worse than the previously measured value (22.3%).
Prior Value
(22.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Mendocino value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Mendocino 3rd Grade Students Proficient in English/Language Arts

26%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Mendocino has a value of 26% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 37% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 31%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 57 California counties.
Compared to the CA Value (42%), Mendocino has a value of 26% which is lower and worse.
CA Value
(42%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the prior value, Mendocino (26%) is less and worse than the previously measured value (35%).
Prior Value
(35%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Mendocino value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Mendocino 3rd Grade Students Proficient in Math

Current Value:
29%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Mendocino has a value of 29% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 38% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 32%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 57 California counties.
Compared to the CA Value (44%), Mendocino has a value of 29% which is lower and worse.
CA Value
(44%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the prior value, Mendocino (29%) is greater and better than the previously measured value (26%).
Prior Value
(26%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Mendocino value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Mendocino 4th Grade Students Proficient in English/Language Arts

29%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Mendocino has a value of 29% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 40% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 33%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 57 California counties.
Compared to the CA Value (44%), Mendocino has a value of 29% which is lower and worse.
CA Value
(44%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the prior value, Mendocino (29%) is less and worse than the previously measured value (35%).
Prior Value
(35%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Mendocino value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Mendocino 4th Grade Students Proficient in Math

Current Value:
24%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Mendocino has a value of 24% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 33% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 27%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 57 California counties.
Compared to the CA Value (38%), Mendocino has a value of 24% which is lower and worse.
CA Value
(38%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the prior value, Mendocino (24%) is less and worse than the previously measured value (32%).
Prior Value
(32%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Mendocino value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Mendocino 5th Grade Students Proficient in English/Language Arts

28.3%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Mendocino has a value of 28.3% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 41.8% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 36.7%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 57 California counties.
Compared to the CA Value (47.1%), Mendocino has a value of 28.3% which is lower and worse.
CA Value
(47.1%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the prior value, Mendocino (28.3%) is less and worse than the previously measured value (33.9%).
Prior Value
(33.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Mendocino value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Mendocino 5th Grade Students Proficient in Math

Current Value:
16.8%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Mendocino has a value of 16.8% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 24.9% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 20.0%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 57 California counties.
Compared to the CA Value (31.6%), Mendocino has a value of 16.8% which is lower and worse.
CA Value
(31.6%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the prior value, Mendocino (16.8%) is greater and better than the previously measured value (11.9%).
Prior Value
(11.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Mendocino value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Mendocino 6th Grade Students Proficient in English/Language Arts

31.1%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Mendocino has a value of 31.1% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 38.6% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 34.1%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 57 California counties.
Compared to the CA Value (45.1%), Mendocino has a value of 31.1% which is lower and worse.
CA Value
(45.1%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the prior value, Mendocino (31.1%) is greater and better than the previously measured value (19.1%).
Prior Value
(19.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Mendocino value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Mendocino 6th Grade Students Proficient in Math

Current Value:
18.2%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Mendocino has a value of 18.2% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 26.9% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 22.5%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 57 California counties.
Compared to the CA Value (32.5%), Mendocino has a value of 18.2% which is lower and worse.
CA Value
(32.5%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the prior value, Mendocino (18.2%) is greater and better than the previously measured value (9.7%).
Prior Value
(9.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Mendocino value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Mendocino 7th Grade Students Proficient in English/Language Arts

35.9%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Mendocino has a value of 35.9% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 44.1% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 38.9%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 57 California counties.
Compared to the CA Value (49.2%), Mendocino has a value of 35.9% which is lower and worse.
CA Value
(49.2%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the prior value, Mendocino (35.9%) is greater and better than the previously measured value (33.5%).
Prior Value
(33.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Mendocino value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Mendocino 7th Grade Students Proficient in Math

Current Value:
19.4%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Mendocino has a value of 19.4% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 28.1% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 23.3%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 57 California counties.
Compared to the CA Value (32.0%), Mendocino has a value of 19.4% which is lower and worse.
CA Value
(32.0%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the prior value, Mendocino (19.4%) is greater and better than the previously measured value (15.1%).
Prior Value
(15.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Mendocino value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Mendocino 8th Grade Students Proficient in English/Language Arts

30.6%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Mendocino has a value of 30.6% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 41.2% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 37.4%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 57 California counties.
Compared to the CA Value (46.6%), Mendocino has a value of 30.6% which is lower and worse.
CA Value
(46.6%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the prior value, Mendocino (30.6%) is greater and better than the previously measured value (30.5%).
Prior Value
(30.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Mendocino value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Mendocino 8th Grade Students Proficient in Math

Current Value:
15.4%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Mendocino has a value of 15.4% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 24.3% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 18.7%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 57 California counties.
Compared to the CA Value (29.2%), Mendocino has a value of 15.4% which is lower and worse.
CA Value
(29.2%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the prior value, Mendocino (15.4%) is greater and better than the previously measured value (13.2%).
Prior Value
(13.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Mendocino value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Mendocino High School Graduation

Current Value:

County: Mendocino High School Graduation

87.4%
(2022-2023)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Mendocino has a value of 87.4% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 87.4% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 84.5%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 57 California counties.
Compared to the CA Value (86.2%), Mendocino has a value of 87.4% which is higher and better.
CA Value
(86.2%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (86.5%), Mendocino has a value of 87.4% which is higher and better.
US Value
(86.5% in 2020)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is National Center for Education Statistics
Compared to the prior value, Mendocino (87.4%) is greater and better than the previously measured value (84.0%).
Prior Value
(84.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Mendocino value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (90.7%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(90.7%)

Environmental Health / Air

Environmental Health / Air

Environmental Health / Air

County: Mendocino

Value
Compared to:

Environmental Health / Air

County: Mendocino

Value
Compared to:

County: Mendocino Annual Ozone Air Quality

Current Value:

County: Mendocino Annual Ozone Air Quality

1
(2019-2021)
Compared to:
Compared to Air Quality Index, Mendocino has a value of 1 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 2 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 3.
Air Quality Index
The American Lung Association (ALA) assigns grades A-F to counties (A=1; B=2; C=3; D=4; F=5), based on average annual number of days that ozone levels exceeded U.S. standards during the three year measurement period. The five-point grading scale was used for the distribution (Green = <2; Yellow = 2 - 3; Red = >3). The air quality data is collected by the EPA and summarized by the ALA.
Compared to the prior value, Mendocino (1) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (1).
Prior Value
(1)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Mendocino value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Mendocino Annual Particle Pollution

Current Value:

County: Mendocino Annual Particle Pollution

5
(2019-2021)
Compared to:
Compared to Air Quality Index, Mendocino has a value of 5 which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 2 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 3.
Air Quality Index
The American Lung Association (ALA) assigns grades A-F to counties (A=1; B=2; C=3; D=4; F=5), based on average annual number of days that particle pollution levels exceeded U.S. standards during the three year measurement period. The five-point grading scale was used for the distribution (Green = <2; Yellow = 2 - 3; Red = >3). The air quality data is collected by the EPA and summarized by the ALA.
Compared to the prior value, Mendocino (5) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (5).
Prior Value
(5)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Mendocino value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Environmental Health / Built Environment

Environmental Health / Built Environment

Environmental Health / Built Environment

County: Mendocino

Value
Compared to:

Environmental Health / Built Environment

County: Mendocino

Value
Compared to:

County: Mendocino Access to Exercise Opportunities

Current Value:
66.7%
(2024)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Mendocino has a value of 66.7% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 85.7% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 76.2%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Mendocino has a value of 66.7% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 64.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 47.1%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,096 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the CA Value (94.2%), Mendocino has a value of 66.7% which is lower and worse.
CA Value
(94.2%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (84.1%), Mendocino has a value of 66.7% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(84.1%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Mendocino (66.7%) is greater and better than the previously measured value (65.9%).
Prior Value
(65.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Mendocino Access to Parks

Current Value:

County: Mendocino Access to Parks

45.4%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Mendocino has a value of 45.4% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 69.6% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 55.4%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to the CA Value (82.4%), Mendocino has a value of 45.4% which is lower and worse.
CA Value
(82.4%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the prior value, Mendocino (45.4%) is greater and better than the previously measured value (42.1%).
Prior Value
(42.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Mendocino Food Environment Index

Current Value:

County: Mendocino Food Environment Index

7.5
(2024)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Mendocino has a value of 7.5 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 8.0 while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 7.4.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Mendocino has a value of 7.5 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 7.7 while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 6.9.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,108 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the CA Value (8.6), Mendocino has a value of 7.5 which is lower and worse.
CA Value
(8.6)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (7.7), Mendocino has a value of 7.5 which is lower and worse.
US Value
(7.7)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Mendocino (7.5) is greater and better than the previously measured value (7.4).
Prior Value
(7.4)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Mendocino value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Mendocino Liquor Store Density

Current Value:

County: Mendocino Liquor Store Density

8.8
Stores per 100,000 population
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Mendocino has a value of 8.8 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 9.5 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 13.2.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 44 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Mendocino has a value of 8.8 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.0 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.4.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 1,477 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the CA Value (11.0), Mendocino has a value of 8.8 which is lower and better.
CA Value
(11.0)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (10.7), Mendocino has a value of 8.8 which is lower and better.
US Value
(10.7)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Mendocino (8.8) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (8.8).
Prior Value
(8.8)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Mendocino value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Mendocino Proximity to Highways

Current Value:

County: Mendocino Proximity to Highways

2.7%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Mendocino has a value of 2.7% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 3.4% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 5.6%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to the CA Value (6.6%), Mendocino has a value of 2.7% which is lower and better.
CA Value
(6.6%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the prior value, Mendocino (2.7%) is less and better than the previously measured value (3.3%).
Prior Value
(3.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

Environmental Health / Weather & Climate

Environmental Health / Weather & Climate

Environmental Health / Weather & Climate

County: Mendocino

Value
Compared to:

Environmental Health / Weather & Climate

County: Mendocino

Value
Compared to:

County: Mendocino Daily Dose of UV Irradiance

Current Value:

County: Mendocino Daily Dose of UV Irradiance

4,477.0
Joule per square meter
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Mendocino has a value of 4,477.0 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 4,532.0 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 4,680.5.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to the CA Value (4,541.0), Mendocino has a value of 4,477.0 which is lower and better.
CA Value
(4,541.0)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the prior value, Mendocino (4,477.0) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (4,114.0).
Prior Value
(4,114.0)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Mendocino value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Mendocino Number of Extreme Heat Days

Current Value:

County: Mendocino Number of Extreme Heat Days

32
Days
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Mendocino (32) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (29).
Prior Value
(29)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Mendocino value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Mendocino Number of Extreme Heat Events

Current Value:

County: Mendocino Number of Extreme Heat Events

25
Events
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Mendocino (25) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (25).
Prior Value
(25)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Mendocino value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Mendocino Number of Extreme Precipitation Days

Current Value:
11
Days
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Mendocino (11) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (1).
Prior Value
(1)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Mendocino value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Mendocino Weeks of Moderate Drought or Worse

Current Value:
47
Weeks per year
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Mendocino (47) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (43).
Prior Value
(43)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Mendocino value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.