Skip to main content

Advanced Search: Build a Custom Dashboard

In the fields below, search for indicators by location, topics, population, classification, subgroup, or comparison. No fields are required, but we suggest selecting a location or two to start. In the additional search options section, select options to group and order search results. To learn more about how to customize a dashboard, see our help center.

Visit the Indicator List Page to see the full list of indicators and locations available on the site.

  • Map View
  • County : Mendocino Census Tracts
  • County : Mendocino Zip Codes
  • All Health Topics
  • All Community Topics
  • All Economy Topics
  • All Education Topics
  • All Environmental Health Topics
Search display options:

Search Results:

Indicator Gauge Icon Legend

Legend Colors

Red is bad, green is good, blue is not statistically different/neutral.

Compared to Distribution

an indicator guage with the arrow in the green the value is in the best half of communities.

an indicator guage with the arrow in the yellow the value is in the 2nd worst quarter of communities.

an indicator guage with the arrow in the red the value is in the worst quarter of communities.

Compared to Target

green circle with white tick inside it meets target; red circle with white cross inside it does not meet target.

Compared to a Single Value

green diamond with downward arrow inside it lower than the comparison value; red diamond with downward arrow inside it higher than the comparison value; blue diamond with downward arrow inside it not statistically different from comparison value.

Trend

green square outline with upward trending arrow inside it green square outline with downward trending arrow inside it non-significant change over time; green square with upward trending arrow inside it green square with downward trending arrow inside it significant change over time; blue square with equals sign no change over time.

Compared to Prior Value

green triangle with upward trending arrow inside it higher than the previous measurement period; green triangle with downward trending arrow inside it lower than the previous measurement period; blue equals sign no statistically different change  from previous measurement period.

More information about the gauges and icons

Health / Health Care Access & Quality

Health / Health Care Access & Quality

Health / Health Care Access & Quality

Adults without Health Insurance

Value
Compared to:

Health / Health Care Access & Quality

Adults without Health Insurance

Value
Compared to:

Adults without Health Insurance Census Place: Point Arena

Current Value:

Adults without Health Insurance Census Place: Point Arena

9.1%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Point Arena has a value of 9.1% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 8.1% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 13.5%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,472 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Point Arena has a value of 9.1% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 8.9% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.5%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,528 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (10.1%), Point Arena has a value of 9.1% which is lower and better.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(10.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the US Value (10.8%), Point Arena has a value of 9.1% which is lower and better.
US Value
(10.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults without Health Insurance Census Place: Potter Valley

Current Value:

Adults without Health Insurance Census Place: Potter Valley

7.2%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Potter Valley has a value of 7.2% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 8.1% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 13.5%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,472 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Potter Valley has a value of 7.2% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 8.9% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.5%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,528 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (10.1%), Potter Valley has a value of 7.2% which is lower and better.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(10.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the US Value (10.8%), Potter Valley has a value of 7.2% which is lower and better.
US Value
(10.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults without Health Insurance Census Place: Redwood Valley

Current Value:

Adults without Health Insurance Census Place: Redwood Valley

7.6%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Redwood Valley has a value of 7.6% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 8.1% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 13.5%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,472 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Redwood Valley has a value of 7.6% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 8.9% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.5%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,528 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (10.1%), Redwood Valley has a value of 7.6% which is lower and better.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(10.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the US Value (10.8%), Redwood Valley has a value of 7.6% which is lower and better.
US Value
(10.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults without Health Insurance Census Place: Talmage

Current Value:

Adults without Health Insurance Census Place: Talmage

8.2%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Talmage has a value of 8.2% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 8.1% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 13.5%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,472 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Talmage has a value of 8.2% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 8.9% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.5%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,528 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (10.1%), Talmage has a value of 8.2% which is lower and better.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(10.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the US Value (10.8%), Talmage has a value of 8.2% which is lower and better.
US Value
(10.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults without Health Insurance Census Place: Ukiah

Current Value:

Adults without Health Insurance Census Place: Ukiah

11.1%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Ukiah has a value of 11.1% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 8.1% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 13.5%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,472 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Ukiah has a value of 11.1% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 8.9% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.5%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,528 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (10.1%), Ukiah has a value of 11.1% which is higher and worse.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(10.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the US Value (10.8%), Ukiah has a value of 11.1% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(10.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults without Health Insurance Census Place: Willits

Current Value:

Adults without Health Insurance Census Place: Willits

10.3%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Willits has a value of 10.3% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 8.1% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 13.5%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,472 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Willits has a value of 10.3% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 8.9% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.5%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,528 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (10.1%), Willits has a value of 10.3% which is higher and worse.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(10.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the US Value (10.8%), Willits has a value of 10.3% which is lower and better.
US Value
(10.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults without Health Insurance Zip Code: 95410

Current Value:

Adults without Health Insurance Zip Code: 95410

4.9%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Zip Codes, 95410 has a value of 4.9% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 8.0% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 13.2%.
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,730 California zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 95410 has a value of 4.9% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 8.7% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.2%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 31,435 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (10.1%), 95410 has a value of 4.9% which is lower and better.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(10.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the US Value (10.8%), 95410 has a value of 4.9% which is lower and better.
US Value
(10.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults without Health Insurance Zip Code: 95415

Current Value:

Adults without Health Insurance Zip Code: 95415

14.0%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Zip Codes, 95415 has a value of 14.0% which is in the worst 25% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 8.0% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 13.2%.
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,730 California zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 95415 has a value of 14.0% which is in the worst 25% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 8.7% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.2%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 31,435 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (10.1%), 95415 has a value of 14.0% which is higher and worse.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(10.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the US Value (10.8%), 95415 has a value of 14.0% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(10.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults without Health Insurance Zip Code: 95417

Current Value:

Adults without Health Insurance Zip Code: 95417

8.0%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Zip Codes, 95417 has a value of 8.0% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 8.0% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 13.2%.
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,730 California zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 95417 has a value of 8.0% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 8.7% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.2%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 31,435 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (10.1%), 95417 has a value of 8.0% which is lower and better.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(10.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the US Value (10.8%), 95417 has a value of 8.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(10.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults without Health Insurance Zip Code: 95420

Current Value:

Adults without Health Insurance Zip Code: 95420

4.6%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Zip Codes, 95420 has a value of 4.6% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 8.0% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 13.2%.
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,730 California zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 95420 has a value of 4.6% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 8.7% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.2%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 31,435 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (10.1%), 95420 has a value of 4.6% which is lower and better.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(10.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the US Value (10.8%), 95420 has a value of 4.6% which is lower and better.
US Value
(10.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults without Health Insurance Zip Code: 95427

Current Value:

Adults without Health Insurance Zip Code: 95427

7.2%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Zip Codes, 95427 has a value of 7.2% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 8.0% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 13.2%.
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,730 California zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 95427 has a value of 7.2% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 8.7% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.2%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 31,435 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (10.1%), 95427 has a value of 7.2% which is lower and better.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(10.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the US Value (10.8%), 95427 has a value of 7.2% which is lower and better.
US Value
(10.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults without Health Insurance Zip Code: 95428

Current Value:

Adults without Health Insurance Zip Code: 95428

11.0%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Zip Codes, 95428 has a value of 11.0% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 8.0% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 13.2%.
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,730 California zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 95428 has a value of 11.0% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 8.7% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.2%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 31,435 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (10.1%), 95428 has a value of 11.0% which is higher and worse.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(10.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the US Value (10.8%), 95428 has a value of 11.0% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(10.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults without Health Insurance Zip Code: 95429

Current Value:

Adults without Health Insurance Zip Code: 95429

7.8%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Zip Codes, 95429 has a value of 7.8% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 8.0% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 13.2%.
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,730 California zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 95429 has a value of 7.8% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 8.7% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.2%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 31,435 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (10.1%), 95429 has a value of 7.8% which is lower and better.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(10.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the US Value (10.8%), 95429 has a value of 7.8% which is lower and better.
US Value
(10.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults without Health Insurance Zip Code: 95432

Current Value:

Adults without Health Insurance Zip Code: 95432

6.0%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Zip Codes, 95432 has a value of 6.0% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 8.0% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 13.2%.
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,730 California zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 95432 has a value of 6.0% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 8.7% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.2%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 31,435 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (10.1%), 95432 has a value of 6.0% which is lower and better.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(10.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the US Value (10.8%), 95432 has a value of 6.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(10.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults without Health Insurance Zip Code: 95437

Current Value:

Adults without Health Insurance Zip Code: 95437

9.3%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Zip Codes, 95437 has a value of 9.3% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 8.0% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 13.2%.
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,730 California zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 95437 has a value of 9.3% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 8.7% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.2%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 31,435 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (10.1%), 95437 has a value of 9.3% which is lower and better.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(10.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the US Value (10.8%), 95437 has a value of 9.3% which is lower and better.
US Value
(10.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults without Health Insurance Zip Code: 95445

Current Value:

Adults without Health Insurance Zip Code: 95445

7.4%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Zip Codes, 95445 has a value of 7.4% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 8.0% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 13.2%.
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,730 California zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 95445 has a value of 7.4% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 8.7% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.2%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 31,435 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (10.1%), 95445 has a value of 7.4% which is lower and better.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(10.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the US Value (10.8%), 95445 has a value of 7.4% which is lower and better.
US Value
(10.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults without Health Insurance Zip Code: 95449

Current Value:

Adults without Health Insurance Zip Code: 95449

11.8%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Zip Codes, 95449 has a value of 11.8% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 8.0% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 13.2%.
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,730 California zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 95449 has a value of 11.8% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 8.7% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.2%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 31,435 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (10.1%), 95449 has a value of 11.8% which is higher and worse.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(10.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the US Value (10.8%), 95449 has a value of 11.8% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(10.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults without Health Insurance Zip Code: 95454

Current Value:

Adults without Health Insurance Zip Code: 95454

7.8%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Zip Codes, 95454 has a value of 7.8% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 8.0% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 13.2%.
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,730 California zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 95454 has a value of 7.8% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 8.7% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.2%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 31,435 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (10.1%), 95454 has a value of 7.8% which is lower and better.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(10.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the US Value (10.8%), 95454 has a value of 7.8% which is lower and better.
US Value
(10.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults without Health Insurance Zip Code: 95456

Current Value:

Adults without Health Insurance Zip Code: 95456

4.4%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Zip Codes, 95456 has a value of 4.4% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 8.0% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 13.2%.
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,730 California zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 95456 has a value of 4.4% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 8.7% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.2%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 31,435 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (10.1%), 95456 has a value of 4.4% which is lower and better.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(10.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the US Value (10.8%), 95456 has a value of 4.4% which is lower and better.
US Value
(10.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults without Health Insurance Zip Code: 95459

Current Value:

Adults without Health Insurance Zip Code: 95459

7.8%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Zip Codes, 95459 has a value of 7.8% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 8.0% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 13.2%.
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,730 California zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 95459 has a value of 7.8% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 8.7% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.2%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 31,435 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (10.1%), 95459 has a value of 7.8% which is lower and better.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(10.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the US Value (10.8%), 95459 has a value of 7.8% which is lower and better.
US Value
(10.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults without Health Insurance Zip Code: 95460

Current Value:

Adults without Health Insurance Zip Code: 95460

4.6%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Zip Codes, 95460 has a value of 4.6% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 8.0% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 13.2%.
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,730 California zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 95460 has a value of 4.6% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 8.7% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.2%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 31,435 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (10.1%), 95460 has a value of 4.6% which is lower and better.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(10.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the US Value (10.8%), 95460 has a value of 4.6% which is lower and better.
US Value
(10.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults without Health Insurance Zip Code: 95463

Current Value:

Adults without Health Insurance Zip Code: 95463

8.1%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Zip Codes, 95463 has a value of 8.1% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 8.0% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 13.2%.
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,730 California zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 95463 has a value of 8.1% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 8.7% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.2%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 31,435 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (10.1%), 95463 has a value of 8.1% which is lower and better.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(10.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the US Value (10.8%), 95463 has a value of 8.1% which is lower and better.
US Value
(10.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults without Health Insurance Zip Code: 95466

Current Value:

Adults without Health Insurance Zip Code: 95466

12.1%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Zip Codes, 95466 has a value of 12.1% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 8.0% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 13.2%.
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,730 California zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 95466 has a value of 12.1% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 8.7% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.2%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 31,435 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (10.1%), 95466 has a value of 12.1% which is higher and worse.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(10.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the US Value (10.8%), 95466 has a value of 12.1% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(10.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults without Health Insurance Zip Code: 95468

Current Value:

Adults without Health Insurance Zip Code: 95468

7.6%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Zip Codes, 95468 has a value of 7.6% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 8.0% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 13.2%.
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,730 California zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 95468 has a value of 7.6% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 8.7% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.2%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 31,435 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (10.1%), 95468 has a value of 7.6% which is lower and better.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(10.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the US Value (10.8%), 95468 has a value of 7.6% which is lower and better.
US Value
(10.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults without Health Insurance Zip Code: 95469

Current Value:

Adults without Health Insurance Zip Code: 95469

6.9%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Zip Codes, 95469 has a value of 6.9% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 8.0% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 13.2%.
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,730 California zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 95469 has a value of 6.9% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 8.7% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.2%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 31,435 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (10.1%), 95469 has a value of 6.9% which is lower and better.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(10.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the US Value (10.8%), 95469 has a value of 6.9% which is lower and better.
US Value
(10.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults without Health Insurance Zip Code: 95470

Current Value:

Adults without Health Insurance Zip Code: 95470

7.9%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Zip Codes, 95470 has a value of 7.9% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 8.0% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 13.2%.
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,730 California zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 95470 has a value of 7.9% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 8.7% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.2%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 31,435 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (10.1%), 95470 has a value of 7.9% which is lower and better.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(10.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the US Value (10.8%), 95470 has a value of 7.9% which is lower and better.
US Value
(10.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults without Health Insurance Zip Code: 95482

Current Value:

Adults without Health Insurance Zip Code: 95482

11.1%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Zip Codes, 95482 has a value of 11.1% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 8.0% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 13.2%.
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,730 California zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 95482 has a value of 11.1% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 8.7% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.2%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 31,435 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (10.1%), 95482 has a value of 11.1% which is higher and worse.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(10.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the US Value (10.8%), 95482 has a value of 11.1% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(10.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults without Health Insurance Zip Code: 95488

Current Value:

Adults without Health Insurance Zip Code: 95488

6.7%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Zip Codes, 95488 has a value of 6.7% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 8.0% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 13.2%.
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,730 California zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 95488 has a value of 6.7% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 8.7% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.2%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 31,435 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (10.1%), 95488 has a value of 6.7% which is lower and better.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(10.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the US Value (10.8%), 95488 has a value of 6.7% which is lower and better.
US Value
(10.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults without Health Insurance Zip Code: 95490

Current Value:

Adults without Health Insurance Zip Code: 95490

8.6%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Zip Codes, 95490 has a value of 8.6% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 8.0% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 13.2%.
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,730 California zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 95490 has a value of 8.6% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 8.7% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.2%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 31,435 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (10.1%), 95490 has a value of 8.6% which is lower and better.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(10.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the US Value (10.8%), 95490 has a value of 8.6% which is lower and better.
US Value
(10.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults without Health Insurance Zip Code: 95494

Current Value:

Adults without Health Insurance Zip Code: 95494

10.0%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Zip Codes, 95494 has a value of 10.0% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 8.0% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 13.2%.
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,730 California zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 95494 has a value of 10.0% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 8.7% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.2%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 31,435 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (10.1%), 95494 has a value of 10.0% which is lower and better.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(10.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the US Value (10.8%), 95494 has a value of 10.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(10.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults without Health Insurance Zip Code: 95585

Current Value:

Adults without Health Insurance Zip Code: 95585

8.1%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Zip Codes, 95585 has a value of 8.1% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 8.0% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 13.2%.
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,730 California zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 95585 has a value of 8.1% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 8.7% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.2%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 31,435 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (10.1%), 95585 has a value of 8.1% which is lower and better.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(10.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the US Value (10.8%), 95585 has a value of 8.1% which is lower and better.
US Value
(10.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults without Health Insurance Zip Code: 95587

Current Value:

Adults without Health Insurance Zip Code: 95587

7.1%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Zip Codes, 95587 has a value of 7.1% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 8.0% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 13.2%.
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,730 California zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 95587 has a value of 7.1% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 8.7% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.2%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 31,435 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (10.1%), 95587 has a value of 7.1% which is lower and better.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(10.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the US Value (10.8%), 95587 has a value of 7.1% which is lower and better.
US Value
(10.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults without Health Insurance Census Tract: 06045010100

Current Value:

Adults without Health Insurance Census Tract: 06045010100

10.9%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06045010100 has a value of 10.9% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 9.2% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 16.1%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 8,005 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06045010100 has a value of 10.9% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 9.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.0%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 68,167 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (10.1%), 06045010100 has a value of 10.9% which is higher and worse.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(10.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the US Value (10.8%), 06045010100 has a value of 10.9% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(10.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults without Health Insurance Census Tract: 06045010200

Current Value:

Adults without Health Insurance Census Tract: 06045010200

7.7%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06045010200 has a value of 7.7% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 9.2% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 16.1%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 8,005 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06045010200 has a value of 7.7% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 9.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.0%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 68,167 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (10.1%), 06045010200 has a value of 7.7% which is lower and better.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(10.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the US Value (10.8%), 06045010200 has a value of 7.7% which is lower and better.
US Value
(10.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults without Health Insurance Census Tract: 06045010300

Current Value:

Adults without Health Insurance Census Tract: 06045010300

7.8%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06045010300 has a value of 7.8% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 9.2% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 16.1%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 8,005 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06045010300 has a value of 7.8% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 9.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.0%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 68,167 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (10.1%), 06045010300 has a value of 7.8% which is lower and better.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(10.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the US Value (10.8%), 06045010300 has a value of 7.8% which is lower and better.
US Value
(10.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults without Health Insurance Census Tract: 06045010400

Current Value:

Adults without Health Insurance Census Tract: 06045010400

9.9%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06045010400 has a value of 9.9% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 9.2% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 16.1%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 8,005 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06045010400 has a value of 9.9% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 9.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.0%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 68,167 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (10.1%), 06045010400 has a value of 9.9% which is lower and better.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(10.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the US Value (10.8%), 06045010400 has a value of 9.9% which is lower and better.
US Value
(10.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults without Health Insurance Census Tract: 06045010500

Current Value:

Adults without Health Insurance Census Tract: 06045010500

13.4%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06045010500 has a value of 13.4% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 9.2% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 16.1%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 8,005 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06045010500 has a value of 13.4% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 9.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.0%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 68,167 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (10.1%), 06045010500 has a value of 13.4% which is higher and worse.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(10.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the US Value (10.8%), 06045010500 has a value of 13.4% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(10.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults without Health Insurance Census Tract: 06045010600

Current Value:

Adults without Health Insurance Census Tract: 06045010600

7.3%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06045010600 has a value of 7.3% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 9.2% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 16.1%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 8,005 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06045010600 has a value of 7.3% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 9.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.0%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 68,167 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (10.1%), 06045010600 has a value of 7.3% which is lower and better.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(10.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the US Value (10.8%), 06045010600 has a value of 7.3% which is lower and better.
US Value
(10.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults without Health Insurance Census Tract: 06045010700

Current Value:

Adults without Health Insurance Census Tract: 06045010700

10.2%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06045010700 has a value of 10.2% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 9.2% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 16.1%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 8,005 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06045010700 has a value of 10.2% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 9.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.0%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 68,167 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (10.1%), 06045010700 has a value of 10.2% which is higher and worse.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(10.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the US Value (10.8%), 06045010700 has a value of 10.2% which is lower and better.
US Value
(10.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults without Health Insurance Census Tract: 06045010801

Current Value:

Adults without Health Insurance Census Tract: 06045010801

7.9%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06045010801 has a value of 7.9% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 9.2% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 16.1%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 8,005 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06045010801 has a value of 7.9% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 9.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.0%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 68,167 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (10.1%), 06045010801 has a value of 7.9% which is lower and better.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(10.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the US Value (10.8%), 06045010801 has a value of 7.9% which is lower and better.
US Value
(10.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults without Health Insurance Census Tract: 06045010802

Current Value:

Adults without Health Insurance Census Tract: 06045010802

6.9%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06045010802 has a value of 6.9% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 9.2% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 16.1%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 8,005 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06045010802 has a value of 6.9% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 9.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.0%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 68,167 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (10.1%), 06045010802 has a value of 6.9% which is lower and better.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(10.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the US Value (10.8%), 06045010802 has a value of 6.9% which is lower and better.
US Value
(10.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults without Health Insurance Census Tract: 06045010900

Current Value:

Adults without Health Insurance Census Tract: 06045010900

11.9%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06045010900 has a value of 11.9% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 9.2% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 16.1%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 8,005 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06045010900 has a value of 11.9% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 9.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.0%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 68,167 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (10.1%), 06045010900 has a value of 11.9% which is higher and worse.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(10.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the US Value (10.8%), 06045010900 has a value of 11.9% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(10.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults without Health Insurance Census Tract: 06045011001

Current Value:

Adults without Health Insurance Census Tract: 06045011001

4.8%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06045011001 has a value of 4.8% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 9.2% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 16.1%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 8,005 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06045011001 has a value of 4.8% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 9.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.0%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 68,167 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (10.1%), 06045011001 has a value of 4.8% which is lower and better.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(10.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the US Value (10.8%), 06045011001 has a value of 4.8% which is lower and better.
US Value
(10.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults without Health Insurance Census Tract: 06045011002

Current Value:

Adults without Health Insurance Census Tract: 06045011002

4.8%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06045011002 has a value of 4.8% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 9.2% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 16.1%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 8,005 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06045011002 has a value of 4.8% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 9.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.0%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 68,167 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (10.1%), 06045011002 has a value of 4.8% which is lower and better.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(10.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the US Value (10.8%), 06045011002 has a value of 4.8% which is lower and better.
US Value
(10.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults without Health Insurance Census Tract: 06045011102

Current Value:

Adults without Health Insurance Census Tract: 06045011102

7.5%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06045011102 has a value of 7.5% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 9.2% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 16.1%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 8,005 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06045011102 has a value of 7.5% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 9.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.0%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 68,167 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (10.1%), 06045011102 has a value of 7.5% which is lower and better.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(10.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the US Value (10.8%), 06045011102 has a value of 7.5% which is lower and better.
US Value
(10.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults without Health Insurance Census Tract: 06045011200

Current Value:

Adults without Health Insurance Census Tract: 06045011200

12.0%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06045011200 has a value of 12.0% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 9.2% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 16.1%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 8,005 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06045011200 has a value of 12.0% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 9.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.0%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 68,167 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (10.1%), 06045011200 has a value of 12.0% which is higher and worse.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(10.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the US Value (10.8%), 06045011200 has a value of 12.0% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(10.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults without Health Insurance Census Tract: 06045011300

Current Value:

Adults without Health Insurance Census Tract: 06045011300

12.2%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06045011300 has a value of 12.2% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 9.2% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 16.1%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 8,005 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06045011300 has a value of 12.2% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 9.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.0%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 68,167 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (10.1%), 06045011300 has a value of 12.2% which is higher and worse.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(10.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the US Value (10.8%), 06045011300 has a value of 12.2% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(10.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults without Health Insurance Census Tract: 06045011400

Current Value:

Adults without Health Insurance Census Tract: 06045011400

5.9%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06045011400 has a value of 5.9% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 9.2% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 16.1%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 8,005 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06045011400 has a value of 5.9% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 9.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.0%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 68,167 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (10.1%), 06045011400 has a value of 5.9% which is lower and better.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(10.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the US Value (10.8%), 06045011400 has a value of 5.9% which is lower and better.
US Value
(10.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults without Health Insurance Census Tract: 06045011500

Current Value:

Adults without Health Insurance Census Tract: 06045011500

12.5%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06045011500 has a value of 12.5% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 9.2% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 16.1%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 8,005 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06045011500 has a value of 12.5% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 9.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.0%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 68,167 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (10.1%), 06045011500 has a value of 12.5% which is higher and worse.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(10.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the US Value (10.8%), 06045011500 has a value of 12.5% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(10.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults without Health Insurance Census Tract: 06045011600

Current Value:

Adults without Health Insurance Census Tract: 06045011600

14.5%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06045011600 has a value of 14.5% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 9.2% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 16.1%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 8,005 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06045011600 has a value of 14.5% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 9.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.0%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 68,167 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (10.1%), 06045011600 has a value of 14.5% which is higher and worse.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(10.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the US Value (10.8%), 06045011600 has a value of 14.5% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(10.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults without Health Insurance Census Tract: 06045011700

Current Value:

Adults without Health Insurance Census Tract: 06045011700

7.7%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06045011700 has a value of 7.7% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 9.2% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 16.1%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 8,005 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06045011700 has a value of 7.7% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 9.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.0%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 68,167 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (10.1%), 06045011700 has a value of 7.7% which is lower and better.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(10.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the US Value (10.8%), 06045011700 has a value of 7.7% which is lower and better.
US Value
(10.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults without Health Insurance Census Tract: 06045011800

Current Value:

Adults without Health Insurance Census Tract: 06045011800

11.0%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06045011800 has a value of 11.0% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 9.2% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 16.1%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 8,005 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06045011800 has a value of 11.0% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 9.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.0%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 68,167 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (10.1%), 06045011800 has a value of 11.0% which is higher and worse.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(10.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the US Value (10.8%), 06045011800 has a value of 11.0% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(10.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Health / Health Care Access & Quality

Children and Teens Delayed or had Difficulty Obtaining Care

Value
Compared to:

Health / Health Care Access & Quality

Children and Teens Delayed or had Difficulty Obtaining Care

Value
Compared to:

Children and Teens Delayed or had Difficulty Obtaining Care County: Mendocino

Current Value:

Children and Teens Delayed or had Difficulty Obtaining Care County: Mendocino

6.5%
(2019-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the CA Value (8.7%), Mendocino has a value of 6.5% which is lower and better.
CA Value
(8.7%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the prior value, Mendocino (6.5%) is less and better than the previously measured value (8.2%).
Prior Value
(8.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Mendocino value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Children and Teens Delayed or had Difficulty Obtaining Care Zip Code: 95437

Current Value:

Children and Teens Delayed or had Difficulty Obtaining Care Zip Code: 95437

6.7%
(2019-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (6.5%), 95437 has a value of 6.7% which is higher and worse.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(6.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the prior value, 95437 (6.7%) is less and better than the previously measured value (8.7%).
Prior Value
(8.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

Children and Teens Delayed or had Difficulty Obtaining Care Zip Code: 95470

Current Value:

Children and Teens Delayed or had Difficulty Obtaining Care Zip Code: 95470

7.6%
(2015-2016)
Compared to:
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (8.2%), 95470 has a value of 7.6% which is lower and better.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(8.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.

Children and Teens Delayed or had Difficulty Obtaining Care Zip Code: 95482

Current Value:

Children and Teens Delayed or had Difficulty Obtaining Care Zip Code: 95482

7.3%
(2019-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (6.5%), 95482 has a value of 7.3% which is higher and worse.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(6.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the prior value, 95482 (7.3%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (7.7%).
Prior Value
(7.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

Children and Teens Delayed or had Difficulty Obtaining Care Zip Code: 95490

Current Value:

Children and Teens Delayed or had Difficulty Obtaining Care Zip Code: 95490

6.0%
(2019-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (6.5%), 95490 has a value of 6.0% which is lower and better.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(6.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the prior value, 95490 (6.0%) is less and better than the previously measured value (8.7%).
Prior Value
(8.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

Health / Health Care Access & Quality

Children with Health Insurance

Value
Compared to:

Health / Health Care Access & Quality

Children with Health Insurance

Value
Compared to:

Children with Health Insurance County: Mendocino

Current Value:

Children with Health Insurance County: Mendocino

94.8%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Mendocino has a value of 94.8% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 97.1% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 96.2%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 42 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Mendocino has a value of 94.8% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 96.3% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 93.6%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 828 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the CA Value (96.8%), Mendocino has a value of 94.8% which is lower and worse.
CA Value
(96.8%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (94.9%), Mendocino has a value of 94.8% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(94.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Mendocino (94.8%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (85.2%).
Prior Value
(85.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Mendocino value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Health / Health Care Access & Quality

Medicare Healthcare Costs

Value
Compared to:

Health / Health Care Access & Quality

Medicare Healthcare Costs

Value
Compared to:

Medicare Healthcare Costs County: Mendocino

Current Value:

Medicare Healthcare Costs County: Mendocino

$7,003
Dollars per enrollee
(2015)
Compared to:
Compared to the CA Value ($9,100), Mendocino has a value of $7,003.
CA Value
($9,100)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value ($9,729), Mendocino has a value of $7,003.
US Value
($9,729)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Mendocino ($7,003) is greater  than the previously measured value ($6,713).
Prior Value
($6,713)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Mendocino value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Health / Health Care Access & Quality

Non-Physician Primary Care Provider Rate

Value
Compared to:

Health / Health Care Access & Quality

Non-Physician Primary Care Provider Rate

Value
Compared to:

Non-Physician Primary Care Provider Rate County: Mendocino

Current Value:

Non-Physician Primary Care Provider Rate County: Mendocino

111
Providers per 100,000 population
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Mendocino has a value of 111 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 86 while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 67.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Mendocino has a value of 111 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 94 while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 65.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the CA Value (87), Mendocino has a value of 111 which is higher and better.
CA Value
(87)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the prior value, Mendocino (111) is greater and better than the previously measured value (105).
Prior Value
(105)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Mendocino value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Health / Health Care Access & Quality

People Delayed or had Difficulty Obtaining Care

Value
Compared to:

Health / Health Care Access & Quality

People Delayed or had Difficulty Obtaining Care

Value
Compared to:

People Delayed or had Difficulty Obtaining Care County: Mendocino

Current Value:

People Delayed or had Difficulty Obtaining Care County: Mendocino

21.7%
(2021-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Mendocino has a value of 21.7% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 17.5% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 19.2%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to the CA Value (16.5%), Mendocino has a value of 21.7% which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(16.5%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the prior value, Mendocino (21.7%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (22.4%).
Prior Value
(22.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Mendocino value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (5.9%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(5.9%)

Health / Health Care Access & Quality

Persons with Health Insurance

Value
Compared to:

Health / Health Care Access & Quality

Persons with Health Insurance

Value
Compared to:

Persons with Health Insurance County: Mendocino

Current Value:

Persons with Health Insurance County: Mendocino

90.3%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Mendocino has a value of 90.3% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 92.4% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 91.0%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Mendocino has a value of 90.3% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 89.6% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 85.4%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,140 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the CA Value (91.9%), Mendocino has a value of 90.3% which is lower and worse.
CA Value
(91.9%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the prior value, Mendocino (90.3%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (88.8%).
Prior Value
(88.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Mendocino value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (92.4%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(92.4%)
<div>AHS-01: Increase the proportion of people with health insurance <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong></div>

Health / Health Care Access & Quality

Persons with Private Health Insurance Only

Value
Compared to:

Health / Health Care Access & Quality

Persons with Private Health Insurance Only

Value
Compared to:

Persons with Private Health Insurance Only County: Mendocino

Current Value:

Persons with Private Health Insurance Only County: Mendocino

37.3%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the CA Value (53.5%), Mendocino has a value of 37.3%.
CA Value
(53.5%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (54.8%), Mendocino has a value of 37.3%.
US Value
(54.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Mendocino (37.3%) is greater  than the previously measured value (35.2%).
Prior Value
(35.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Mendocino value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Health / Health Care Access & Quality

Persons with Public Health Insurance Only

Value
Compared to:

Health / Health Care Access & Quality

Persons with Public Health Insurance Only

Value
Compared to:

Persons with Public Health Insurance Only County: Mendocino

Current Value:

Persons with Public Health Insurance Only County: Mendocino

41.2%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the CA Value (29.8%), Mendocino has a value of 41.2%.
CA Value
(29.8%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (24.8%), Mendocino has a value of 41.2%.
US Value
(24.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Mendocino (41.2%) is greater  than the previously measured value (40.3%).
Prior Value
(40.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Mendocino value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Health / Health Care Access & Quality

Preventable Hospital Stays: Medicare Population

Value
Compared to:

Health / Health Care Access & Quality

Preventable Hospital Stays: Medicare Population

Value
Compared to:

Preventable Hospital Stays: Medicare Population County: Mendocino

Current Value:

Preventable Hospital Stays: Medicare Population County: Mendocino

1,823.0
Discharges per 100,000 Medicare enrollees
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Mendocino has a value of 1,823.0 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 2,111.5 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 2,576.5.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Mendocino has a value of 1,823.0 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 2,729.0 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 3,374.5.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the CA Value (2,275.0), Mendocino has a value of 1,823.0 which is lower and better.
CA Value
(2,275.0)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (2,677.0), Mendocino has a value of 1,823.0 which is lower and better.
US Value
(2,677.0)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Mendocino (1,823.0) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (1,593.0).
Prior Value
(1,593.0)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Mendocino value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Health / Health Care Access & Quality

Primary Care Provider Rate

Value
Compared to:

Health / Health Care Access & Quality

Primary Care Provider Rate

Value
Compared to:

Primary Care Provider Rate County: Mendocino

Current Value:

Primary Care Provider Rate County: Mendocino

78
Providers per 100,000 population
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Mendocino has a value of 78 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 68 while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 46.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 57 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Mendocino has a value of 78 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 47 while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 29.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,984 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the CA Value (81), Mendocino has a value of 78 which is lower and worse.
CA Value
(81)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the prior value, Mendocino (78) is less and worse than the previously measured value (88).
Prior Value
(88)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Mendocino value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Health / Health Information Technology

Health / Health Information Technology

Health / Health Information Technology

Households with an Internet Subscription

Value
Compared to:

Health / Health Information Technology

Households with an Internet Subscription

Value
Compared to:

Households with an Internet Subscription County: Mendocino

Current Value:

Households with an Internet Subscription County: Mendocino

86.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Mendocino has a value of 86.0% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 89.8% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 86.0%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Mendocino has a value of 86.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 83.9% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 79.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the CA Value (91.6%), Mendocino has a value of 86.0% which is lower and worse.
CA Value
(91.6%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (88.5%), Mendocino has a value of 86.0% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(88.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Mendocino value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Households with an Internet Subscription Census Place: Albion

Current Value:

Households with an Internet Subscription Census Place: Albion

100.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Albion has a value of 100.0% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50%  have a value higher than 91.5% while census places in the worst 25% have a value lower than 84.4%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,480 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Albion has a value of 100.0% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50%  have a value higher than 86.4% while census places in the worst 25% have a value lower than 78.3%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,859 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (86.0%), Albion has a value of 100.0% which is higher and better.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(86.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the CA Value (91.6%), Albion has a value of 100.0% which is higher and better.
CA Value
(91.6%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (88.5%), Albion has a value of 100.0% which is higher and better.
US Value
(88.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Albion value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Households with an Internet Subscription Census Place: Anchor Bay

Current Value:

Households with an Internet Subscription Census Place: Anchor Bay

100.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Anchor Bay has a value of 100.0% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50%  have a value higher than 91.5% while census places in the worst 25% have a value lower than 84.4%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,480 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Anchor Bay has a value of 100.0% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50%  have a value higher than 86.4% while census places in the worst 25% have a value lower than 78.3%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,859 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (86.0%), Anchor Bay has a value of 100.0% which is higher and better.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(86.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the CA Value (91.6%), Anchor Bay has a value of 100.0% which is higher and better.
CA Value
(91.6%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (88.5%), Anchor Bay has a value of 100.0% which is higher and better.
US Value
(88.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Anchor Bay value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Households with an Internet Subscription Census Place: Boonville

Current Value:

Households with an Internet Subscription Census Place: Boonville

94.9%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Boonville has a value of 94.9% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50%  have a value higher than 91.5% while census places in the worst 25% have a value lower than 84.4%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,480 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Boonville has a value of 94.9% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50%  have a value higher than 86.4% while census places in the worst 25% have a value lower than 78.3%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,859 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (86.0%), Boonville has a value of 94.9% which is higher and better.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(86.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the CA Value (91.6%), Boonville has a value of 94.9% which is higher and better.
CA Value
(91.6%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (88.5%), Boonville has a value of 94.9% which is higher and better.
US Value
(88.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Boonville value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Households with an Internet Subscription Census Place: Brooktrails

Current Value:

Households with an Internet Subscription Census Place: Brooktrails

93.6%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Brooktrails has a value of 93.6% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50%  have a value higher than 91.5% while census places in the worst 25% have a value lower than 84.4%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,480 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Brooktrails has a value of 93.6% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50%  have a value higher than 86.4% while census places in the worst 25% have a value lower than 78.3%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,859 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (86.0%), Brooktrails has a value of 93.6% which is higher and better.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(86.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the CA Value (91.6%), Brooktrails has a value of 93.6% which is higher and better.
CA Value
(91.6%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (88.5%), Brooktrails has a value of 93.6% which is higher and better.
US Value
(88.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Brooktrails value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Households with an Internet Subscription Census Place: Calpella

Current Value:

Households with an Internet Subscription Census Place: Calpella

100.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Calpella has a value of 100.0% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50%  have a value higher than 91.5% while census places in the worst 25% have a value lower than 84.4%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,480 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Calpella has a value of 100.0% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50%  have a value higher than 86.4% while census places in the worst 25% have a value lower than 78.3%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,859 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (86.0%), Calpella has a value of 100.0% which is higher and better.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(86.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the CA Value (91.6%), Calpella has a value of 100.0% which is higher and better.
CA Value
(91.6%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (88.5%), Calpella has a value of 100.0% which is higher and better.
US Value
(88.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Calpella value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Households with an Internet Subscription Census Place: Caspar

Current Value:

Households with an Internet Subscription Census Place: Caspar

100.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Caspar has a value of 100.0% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50%  have a value higher than 91.5% while census places in the worst 25% have a value lower than 84.4%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,480 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Caspar has a value of 100.0% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50%  have a value higher than 86.4% while census places in the worst 25% have a value lower than 78.3%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,859 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (86.0%), Caspar has a value of 100.0% which is higher and better.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(86.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the CA Value (91.6%), Caspar has a value of 100.0% which is higher and better.
CA Value
(91.6%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (88.5%), Caspar has a value of 100.0% which is higher and better.
US Value
(88.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Caspar value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Households with an Internet Subscription Census Place: Cleone

Current Value:

Households with an Internet Subscription Census Place: Cleone

80.4%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Cleone has a value of 80.4% which is in the worst 25% of census places. Census places in the best 50%  have a value higher than 91.5% while census places in the worst 25% have a value lower than 84.4%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,480 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Cleone has a value of 80.4% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places. Census places in the best 50%  have a value higher than 86.4% while census places in the worst 25% have a value lower than 78.3%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,859 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (86.0%), Cleone has a value of 80.4% which is lower and worse.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(86.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the CA Value (91.6%), Cleone has a value of 80.4% which is lower and worse.
CA Value
(91.6%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (88.5%), Cleone has a value of 80.4% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(88.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Cleone value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Households with an Internet Subscription Census Place: Comptche

Current Value:

Households with an Internet Subscription Census Place: Comptche

100.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Comptche has a value of 100.0% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50%  have a value higher than 91.5% while census places in the worst 25% have a value lower than 84.4%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,480 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Comptche has a value of 100.0% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50%  have a value higher than 86.4% while census places in the worst 25% have a value lower than 78.3%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,859 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (86.0%), Comptche has a value of 100.0% which is higher and better.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(86.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the CA Value (91.6%), Comptche has a value of 100.0% which is higher and better.
CA Value
(91.6%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (88.5%), Comptche has a value of 100.0% which is higher and better.
US Value
(88.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Comptche value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Households with an Internet Subscription Census Place: Covelo

Current Value:

Households with an Internet Subscription Census Place: Covelo

65.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Covelo has a value of 65.2% which is in the worst 25% of census places. Census places in the best 50%  have a value higher than 91.5% while census places in the worst 25% have a value lower than 84.4%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,480 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Covelo has a value of 65.2% which is in the worst 25% of census places. Census places in the best 50%  have a value higher than 86.4% while census places in the worst 25% have a value lower than 78.3%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,859 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (86.0%), Covelo has a value of 65.2% which is lower and worse.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(86.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the CA Value (91.6%), Covelo has a value of 65.2% which is lower and worse.
CA Value
(91.6%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (88.5%), Covelo has a value of 65.2% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(88.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Covelo value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Households with an Internet Subscription Census Place: Fort Bragg

Current Value:

Households with an Internet Subscription Census Place: Fort Bragg

89.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Fort Bragg has a value of 89.5% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places. Census places in the best 50%  have a value higher than 91.5% while census places in the worst 25% have a value lower than 84.4%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,480 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Fort Bragg has a value of 89.5% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50%  have a value higher than 86.4% while census places in the worst 25% have a value lower than 78.3%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,859 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (86.0%), Fort Bragg has a value of 89.5% which is higher and better.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(86.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the CA Value (91.6%), Fort Bragg has a value of 89.5% which is lower and worse.
CA Value
(91.6%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (88.5%), Fort Bragg has a value of 89.5% which is higher and better.
US Value
(88.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Fort Bragg value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Households with an Internet Subscription Census Place: Hopland

Current Value:

Households with an Internet Subscription Census Place: Hopland

83.1%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Hopland has a value of 83.1% which is in the worst 25% of census places. Census places in the best 50%  have a value higher than 91.5% while census places in the worst 25% have a value lower than 84.4%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,480 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Hopland has a value of 83.1% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places. Census places in the best 50%  have a value higher than 86.4% while census places in the worst 25% have a value lower than 78.3%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,859 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (86.0%), Hopland has a value of 83.1% which is lower and worse.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(86.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the CA Value (91.6%), Hopland has a value of 83.1% which is lower and worse.
CA Value
(91.6%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (88.5%), Hopland has a value of 83.1% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(88.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Hopland value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Households with an Internet Subscription Census Place: Laytonville

Current Value:

Households with an Internet Subscription Census Place: Laytonville

77.6%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Laytonville has a value of 77.6% which is in the worst 25% of census places. Census places in the best 50%  have a value higher than 91.5% while census places in the worst 25% have a value lower than 84.4%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,480 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Laytonville has a value of 77.6% which is in the worst 25% of census places. Census places in the best 50%  have a value higher than 86.4% while census places in the worst 25% have a value lower than 78.3%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,859 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (86.0%), Laytonville has a value of 77.6% which is lower and worse.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(86.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the CA Value (91.6%), Laytonville has a value of 77.6% which is lower and worse.
CA Value
(91.6%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (88.5%), Laytonville has a value of 77.6% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(88.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Laytonville value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Households with an Internet Subscription Census Place: Leggett

Current Value:

Households with an Internet Subscription Census Place: Leggett

57.9%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Leggett has a value of 57.9% which is in the worst 25% of census places. Census places in the best 50%  have a value higher than 91.5% while census places in the worst 25% have a value lower than 84.4%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,480 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Leggett has a value of 57.9% which is in the worst 25% of census places. Census places in the best 50%  have a value higher than 86.4% while census places in the worst 25% have a value lower than 78.3%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,859 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (86.0%), Leggett has a value of 57.9% which is lower and worse.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(86.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the CA Value (91.6%), Leggett has a value of 57.9% which is lower and worse.
CA Value
(91.6%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (88.5%), Leggett has a value of 57.9% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(88.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Leggett value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Households with an Internet Subscription Census Place: Little River

Current Value:

Households with an Internet Subscription Census Place: Little River

100.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Little River has a value of 100.0% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50%  have a value higher than 91.5% while census places in the worst 25% have a value lower than 84.4%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,480 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Little River has a value of 100.0% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50%  have a value higher than 86.4% while census places in the worst 25% have a value lower than 78.3%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,859 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (86.0%), Little River has a value of 100.0% which is higher and better.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(86.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the CA Value (91.6%), Little River has a value of 100.0% which is higher and better.
CA Value
(91.6%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (88.5%), Little River has a value of 100.0% which is higher and better.
US Value
(88.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Little River value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Households with an Internet Subscription Census Place: Manchester

Current Value:

Households with an Internet Subscription Census Place: Manchester

88.3%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Manchester has a value of 88.3% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places. Census places in the best 50%  have a value higher than 91.5% while census places in the worst 25% have a value lower than 84.4%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,480 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Manchester has a value of 88.3% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50%  have a value higher than 86.4% while census places in the worst 25% have a value lower than 78.3%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,859 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (86.0%), Manchester has a value of 88.3% which is higher and better.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(86.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the CA Value (91.6%), Manchester has a value of 88.3% which is lower and worse.
CA Value
(91.6%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (88.5%), Manchester has a value of 88.3% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(88.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Manchester value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Households with an Internet Subscription Census Place: Mendocino

Current Value:

Households with an Internet Subscription Census Place: Mendocino

100.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Mendocino has a value of 100.0% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50%  have a value higher than 91.5% while census places in the worst 25% have a value lower than 84.4%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,480 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Mendocino has a value of 100.0% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50%  have a value higher than 86.4% while census places in the worst 25% have a value lower than 78.3%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,859 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (86.0%), Mendocino has a value of 100.0% which is higher and better.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(86.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the CA Value (91.6%), Mendocino has a value of 100.0% which is higher and better.
CA Value
(91.6%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (88.5%), Mendocino has a value of 100.0% which is higher and better.
US Value
(88.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Mendocino value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Households with an Internet Subscription Census Place: Philo

Current Value:

Households with an Internet Subscription Census Place: Philo

100.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Philo has a value of 100.0% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50%  have a value higher than 91.5% while census places in the worst 25% have a value lower than 84.4%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,480 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Philo has a value of 100.0% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50%  have a value higher than 86.4% while census places in the worst 25% have a value lower than 78.3%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,859 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (86.0%), Philo has a value of 100.0% which is higher and better.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(86.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the CA Value (91.6%), Philo has a value of 100.0% which is higher and better.
CA Value
(91.6%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (88.5%), Philo has a value of 100.0% which is higher and better.
US Value
(88.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Philo value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Households with an Internet Subscription Census Place: Point Arena

Current Value:

Households with an Internet Subscription Census Place: Point Arena

88.1%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Point Arena has a value of 88.1% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places. Census places in the best 50%  have a value higher than 91.5% while census places in the worst 25% have a value lower than 84.4%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,480 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Point Arena has a value of 88.1% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50%  have a value higher than 86.4% while census places in the worst 25% have a value lower than 78.3%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,859 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (86.0%), Point Arena has a value of 88.1% which is higher and better.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(86.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the CA Value (91.6%), Point Arena has a value of 88.1% which is lower and worse.
CA Value
(91.6%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (88.5%), Point Arena has a value of 88.1% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(88.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Point Arena value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Households with an Internet Subscription Census Place: Potter Valley

Current Value:

Households with an Internet Subscription Census Place: Potter Valley

85.4%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Potter Valley has a value of 85.4% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places. Census places in the best 50%  have a value higher than 91.5% while census places in the worst 25% have a value lower than 84.4%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,480 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Potter Valley has a value of 85.4% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places. Census places in the best 50%  have a value higher than 86.4% while census places in the worst 25% have a value lower than 78.3%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,859 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (86.0%), Potter Valley has a value of 85.4% which is lower and worse.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(86.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the CA Value (91.6%), Potter Valley has a value of 85.4% which is lower and worse.
CA Value
(91.6%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (88.5%), Potter Valley has a value of 85.4% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(88.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Potter Valley value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Households with an Internet Subscription Census Place: Redwood Valley

Current Value:

Households with an Internet Subscription Census Place: Redwood Valley

89.1%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Redwood Valley has a value of 89.1% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places. Census places in the best 50%  have a value higher than 91.5% while census places in the worst 25% have a value lower than 84.4%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,480 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Redwood Valley has a value of 89.1% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50%  have a value higher than 86.4% while census places in the worst 25% have a value lower than 78.3%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,859 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (86.0%), Redwood Valley has a value of 89.1% which is higher and better.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(86.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the CA Value (91.6%), Redwood Valley has a value of 89.1% which is lower and worse.
CA Value
(91.6%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (88.5%), Redwood Valley has a value of 89.1% which is higher and better.
US Value
(88.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Redwood Valley value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Households with an Internet Subscription Census Place: Talmage

Current Value:

Households with an Internet Subscription Census Place: Talmage

96.9%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Talmage has a value of 96.9% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50%  have a value higher than 91.5% while census places in the worst 25% have a value lower than 84.4%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,480 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Talmage has a value of 96.9% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50%  have a value higher than 86.4% while census places in the worst 25% have a value lower than 78.3%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,859 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (86.0%), Talmage has a value of 96.9% which is higher and better.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(86.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the CA Value (91.6%), Talmage has a value of 96.9% which is higher and better.
CA Value
(91.6%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (88.5%), Talmage has a value of 96.9% which is higher and better.
US Value
(88.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Talmage value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Households with an Internet Subscription Census Place: Ukiah

Current Value:

Households with an Internet Subscription Census Place: Ukiah

86.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Ukiah has a value of 86.5% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places. Census places in the best 50%  have a value higher than 91.5% while census places in the worst 25% have a value lower than 84.4%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,480 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Ukiah has a value of 86.5% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50%  have a value higher than 86.4% while census places in the worst 25% have a value lower than 78.3%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,859 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (86.0%), Ukiah has a value of 86.5% which is higher and better.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(86.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the CA Value (91.6%), Ukiah has a value of 86.5% which is lower and worse.
CA Value
(91.6%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (88.5%), Ukiah has a value of 86.5% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(88.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Ukiah value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Households with an Internet Subscription Census Place: Willits

Current Value:

Households with an Internet Subscription Census Place: Willits

77.4%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Willits has a value of 77.4% which is in the worst 25% of census places. Census places in the best 50%  have a value higher than 91.5% while census places in the worst 25% have a value lower than 84.4%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,480 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Willits has a value of 77.4% which is in the worst 25% of census places. Census places in the best 50%  have a value higher than 86.4% while census places in the worst 25% have a value lower than 78.3%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,859 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (86.0%), Willits has a value of 77.4% which is lower and worse.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(86.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the CA Value (91.6%), Willits has a value of 77.4% which is lower and worse.
CA Value
(91.6%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (88.5%), Willits has a value of 77.4% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(88.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Willits value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Households with an Internet Subscription Zip Code: 95410

Current Value:

Households with an Internet Subscription Zip Code: 95410

86.1%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Zip Codes, 95410 has a value of 86.1% which is in the worst 25% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 91.7% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 86.7%.
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,706 California zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 95410 has a value of 86.1% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 86.5% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 79.5%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 32,314 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (86.0%), 95410 has a value of 86.1% which is higher and better.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(86.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Over time, the 95410 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Households with an Internet Subscription Zip Code: 95415

Current Value:

Households with an Internet Subscription Zip Code: 95415

93.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Zip Codes, 95415 has a value of 93.5% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 91.7% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 86.7%.
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,706 California zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 95415 has a value of 93.5% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 86.5% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 79.5%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 32,314 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (86.0%), 95415 has a value of 93.5% which is higher and better.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(86.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Over time, the 95415 value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Households with an Internet Subscription Zip Code: 95417

Current Value:

Households with an Internet Subscription Zip Code: 95417

77.8%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Zip Codes, 95417 has a value of 77.8% which is in the worst 25% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 91.7% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 86.7%.
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,706 California zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 95417 has a value of 77.8% which is in the worst 25% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 86.5% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 79.5%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 32,314 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (86.0%), 95417 has a value of 77.8% which is lower and worse.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(86.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Over time, the 95417 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Households with an Internet Subscription Zip Code: 95420

Current Value:

Households with an Internet Subscription Zip Code: 95420

100.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Zip Codes, 95420 has a value of 100.0% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 91.7% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 86.7%.
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,706 California zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 95420 has a value of 100.0% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 86.5% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 79.5%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 32,314 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (86.0%), 95420 has a value of 100.0% which is higher and better.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(86.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Over time, the 95420 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Households with an Internet Subscription Zip Code: 95427

Current Value:

Households with an Internet Subscription Zip Code: 95427

100.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Zip Codes, 95427 has a value of 100.0% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 91.7% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 86.7%.
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,706 California zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 95427 has a value of 100.0% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 86.5% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 79.5%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 32,314 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (86.0%), 95427 has a value of 100.0% which is higher and better.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(86.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Over time, the 95427 value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Households with an Internet Subscription Zip Code: 95428

Current Value:

Households with an Internet Subscription Zip Code: 95428

63.3%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Zip Codes, 95428 has a value of 63.3% which is in the worst 25% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 91.7% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 86.7%.
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,706 California zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 95428 has a value of 63.3% which is in the worst 25% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 86.5% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 79.5%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 32,314 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (86.0%), 95428 has a value of 63.3% which is lower and worse.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(86.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Over time, the 95428 value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Households with an Internet Subscription Zip Code: 95429

Current Value:

Households with an Internet Subscription Zip Code: 95429

47.1%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Zip Codes, 95429 has a value of 47.1% which is in the worst 25% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 91.7% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 86.7%.
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,706 California zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 95429 has a value of 47.1% which is in the worst 25% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 86.5% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 79.5%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 32,314 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (86.0%), 95429 has a value of 47.1% which is lower and worse.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(86.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Over time, the 95429 value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Households with an Internet Subscription Zip Code: 95432

Current Value:

Households with an Internet Subscription Zip Code: 95432

100.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Zip Codes, 95432 has a value of 100.0% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 91.7% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 86.7%.
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,706 California zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 95432 has a value of 100.0% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 86.5% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 79.5%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 32,314 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (86.0%), 95432 has a value of 100.0% which is higher and better.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(86.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Over time, the 95432 value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Households with an Internet Subscription Zip Code: 95437

Current Value:

Households with an Internet Subscription Zip Code: 95437

86.7%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Zip Codes, 95437 has a value of 86.7% which is in the worst 25% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 91.7% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 86.7%.
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,706 California zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 95437 has a value of 86.7% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 86.5% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 79.5%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 32,314 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (86.0%), 95437 has a value of 86.7% which is higher and better.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(86.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Over time, the 95437 value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Households with an Internet Subscription Zip Code: 95445

Current Value:

Households with an Internet Subscription Zip Code: 95445

91.9%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Zip Codes, 95445 has a value of 91.9% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 91.7% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 86.7%.
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,706 California zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 95445 has a value of 91.9% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 86.5% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 79.5%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 32,314 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (86.0%), 95445 has a value of 91.9% which is higher and better.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(86.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Over time, the 95445 value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Households with an Internet Subscription Zip Code: 95449

Current Value:

Households with an Internet Subscription Zip Code: 95449

85.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Zip Codes, 95449 has a value of 85.0% which is in the worst 25% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 91.7% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 86.7%.
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,706 California zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 95449 has a value of 85.0% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 86.5% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 79.5%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 32,314 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (86.0%), 95449 has a value of 85.0% which is lower and worse.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(86.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Over time, the 95449 value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Households with an Internet Subscription Zip Code: 95454

Current Value:

Households with an Internet Subscription Zip Code: 95454

69.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Zip Codes, 95454 has a value of 69.2% which is in the worst 25% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 91.7% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 86.7%.
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,706 California zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 95454 has a value of 69.2% which is in the worst 25% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 86.5% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 79.5%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 32,314 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (86.0%), 95454 has a value of 69.2% which is lower and worse.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(86.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Over time, the 95454 value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Households with an Internet Subscription Zip Code: 95456

Current Value:

Households with an Internet Subscription Zip Code: 95456

74.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Zip Codes, 95456 has a value of 74.0% which is in the worst 25% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 91.7% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 86.7%.
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,706 California zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 95456 has a value of 74.0% which is in the worst 25% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 86.5% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 79.5%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 32,314 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (86.0%), 95456 has a value of 74.0% which is lower and worse.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(86.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Over time, the 95456 value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Households with an Internet Subscription Zip Code: 95459

Current Value:

Households with an Internet Subscription Zip Code: 95459

86.4%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Zip Codes, 95459 has a value of 86.4% which is in the worst 25% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 91.7% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 86.7%.
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,706 California zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 95459 has a value of 86.4% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 86.5% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 79.5%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 32,314 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (86.0%), 95459 has a value of 86.4% which is higher and better.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(86.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Over time, the 95459 value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Households with an Internet Subscription Zip Code: 95460

Current Value:

Households with an Internet Subscription Zip Code: 95460

90.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Zip Codes, 95460 has a value of 90.2% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 91.7% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 86.7%.
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,706 California zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 95460 has a value of 90.2% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 86.5% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 79.5%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 32,314 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (86.0%), 95460 has a value of 90.2% which is higher and better.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(86.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Over time, the 95460 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Households with an Internet Subscription Zip Code: 95463

Current Value:

Households with an Internet Subscription Zip Code: 95463

100.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Zip Codes, 95463 has a value of 100.0% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 91.7% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 86.7%.
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,706 California zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 95463 has a value of 100.0% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 86.5% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 79.5%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 32,314 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (86.0%), 95463 has a value of 100.0% which is higher and better.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(86.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Over time, the 95463 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Households with an Internet Subscription Zip Code: 95466

Current Value:

Households with an Internet Subscription Zip Code: 95466

89.8%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Zip Codes, 95466 has a value of 89.8% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 91.7% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 86.7%.
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,706 California zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 95466 has a value of 89.8% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 86.5% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 79.5%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 32,314 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (86.0%), 95466 has a value of 89.8% which is higher and better.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(86.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Over time, the 95466 value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Households with an Internet Subscription Zip Code: 95468

Current Value:

Households with an Internet Subscription Zip Code: 95468

84.1%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Zip Codes, 95468 has a value of 84.1% which is in the worst 25% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 91.7% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 86.7%.
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,706 California zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 95468 has a value of 84.1% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 86.5% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 79.5%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 32,314 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (86.0%), 95468 has a value of 84.1% which is lower and worse.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(86.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Over time, the 95468 value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Households with an Internet Subscription Zip Code: 95469

Current Value:

Households with an Internet Subscription Zip Code: 95469

91.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Zip Codes, 95469 has a value of 91.0% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 91.7% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 86.7%.
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,706 California zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 95469 has a value of 91.0% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 86.5% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 79.5%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 32,314 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (86.0%), 95469 has a value of 91.0% which is higher and better.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(86.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Over time, the 95469 value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Households with an Internet Subscription Zip Code: 95470

Current Value:

Households with an Internet Subscription Zip Code: 95470

91.9%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Zip Codes, 95470 has a value of 91.9% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 91.7% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 86.7%.
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,706 California zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 95470 has a value of 91.9% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 86.5% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 79.5%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 32,314 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (86.0%), 95470 has a value of 91.9% which is higher and better.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(86.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Over time, the 95470 value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Households with an Internet Subscription Zip Code: 95482

Current Value:

Households with an Internet Subscription Zip Code: 95482

87.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Zip Codes, 95482 has a value of 87.0% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 91.7% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 86.7%.
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,706 California zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 95482 has a value of 87.0% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 86.5% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 79.5%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 32,314 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (86.0%), 95482 has a value of 87.0% which is higher and better.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(86.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Over time, the 95482 value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Households with an Internet Subscription Zip Code: 95488

Current Value:

Households with an Internet Subscription Zip Code: 95488

100.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Zip Codes, 95488 has a value of 100.0% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 91.7% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 86.7%.
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,706 California zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 95488 has a value of 100.0% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 86.5% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 79.5%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 32,314 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (86.0%), 95488 has a value of 100.0% which is higher and better.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(86.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Over time, the 95488 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Households with an Internet Subscription Zip Code: 95490

Current Value:

Households with an Internet Subscription Zip Code: 95490

83.9%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Zip Codes, 95490 has a value of 83.9% which is in the worst 25% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 91.7% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 86.7%.
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,706 California zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 95490 has a value of 83.9% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 86.5% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 79.5%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 32,314 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (86.0%), 95490 has a value of 83.9% which is lower and worse.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(86.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Over time, the 95490 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Households with an Internet Subscription Zip Code: 95494

Current Value:

Households with an Internet Subscription Zip Code: 95494

100.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Zip Codes, 95494 has a value of 100.0% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 91.7% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 86.7%.
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,706 California zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 95494 has a value of 100.0% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 86.5% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 79.5%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 32,314 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (86.0%), 95494 has a value of 100.0% which is higher and better.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(86.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Over time, the 95494 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Households with an Internet Subscription Zip Code: 95585

Current Value:

Households with an Internet Subscription Zip Code: 95585

74.7%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Zip Codes, 95585 has a value of 74.7% which is in the worst 25% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 91.7% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 86.7%.
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,706 California zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 95585 has a value of 74.7% which is in the worst 25% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 86.5% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 79.5%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 32,314 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (86.0%), 95585 has a value of 74.7% which is lower and worse.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(86.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Over time, the 95585 value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Households with an Internet Subscription Zip Code: 95587

Current Value:

Households with an Internet Subscription Zip Code: 95587

100.0%
(2017-2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Zip Codes, 95587 has a value of 100.0% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 90.4% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 84.5%.
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,725 California zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 95587 has a value of 100.0% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 84.8% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 76.9%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 32,682 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (84.1%), 95587 has a value of 100.0% which is higher and better.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(84.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Over time, the 95587 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Households with an Internet Subscription Census Tract: 06045010100

Current Value:

Households with an Internet Subscription Census Tract: 06045010100

62.9%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06045010100 has a value of 62.9% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 92.8% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 87.8%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,039 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06045010100 has a value of 62.9% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 89.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 83.0%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,467 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (86.0%), 06045010100 has a value of 62.9% which is lower and worse.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(86.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Over time, the 06045010100 value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Households with an Internet Subscription Census Tract: 06045010200

Current Value:

Households with an Internet Subscription Census Tract: 06045010200

74.9%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06045010200 has a value of 74.9% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 92.8% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 87.8%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,039 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06045010200 has a value of 74.9% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 89.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 83.0%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,467 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (86.0%), 06045010200 has a value of 74.9% which is lower and worse.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(86.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Over time, the 06045010200 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Households with an Internet Subscription Census Tract: 06045010300

Current Value:

Households with an Internet Subscription Census Tract: 06045010300

85.1%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06045010300 has a value of 85.1% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 92.8% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 87.8%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,039 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06045010300 has a value of 85.1% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 89.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 83.0%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,467 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (86.0%), 06045010300 has a value of 85.1% which is lower and worse.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(86.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Over time, the 06045010300 value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Households with an Internet Subscription Census Tract: 06045010400

Current Value:

Households with an Internet Subscription Census Tract: 06045010400

87.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06045010400 has a value of 87.5% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 92.8% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 87.8%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,039 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06045010400 has a value of 87.5% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 89.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 83.0%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,467 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (86.0%), 06045010400 has a value of 87.5% which is higher and better.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(86.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Over time, the 06045010400 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Households with an Internet Subscription Census Tract: 06045010500

Current Value:

Households with an Internet Subscription Census Tract: 06045010500

87.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06045010500 has a value of 87.5% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 92.8% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 87.8%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,039 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06045010500 has a value of 87.5% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 89.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 83.0%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,467 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (86.0%), 06045010500 has a value of 87.5% which is higher and better.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(86.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Over time, the 06045010500 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Households with an Internet Subscription Census Tract: 06045010600

Current Value:

Households with an Internet Subscription Census Tract: 06045010600

80.9%
(2015-2019)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06045010600 has a value of 80.9% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 88.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 81.0%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 7,981 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06045010600 has a value of 80.9% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 83.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 75.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 72,221 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (81.8%), 06045010600 has a value of 80.9% which is lower and worse.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(81.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.

Households with an Internet Subscription Census Tract: 06045010601

Current Value:

Households with an Internet Subscription Census Tract: 06045010601

89.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06045010601 has a value of 89.5% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 92.8% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 87.8%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,039 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06045010601 has a value of 89.5% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 89.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 83.0%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,467 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (86.0%), 06045010601 has a value of 89.5% which is higher and better.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(86.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.

Households with an Internet Subscription Census Tract: 06045010602

Current Value:

Households with an Internet Subscription Census Tract: 06045010602

85.3%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06045010602 has a value of 85.3% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 92.8% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 87.8%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,039 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06045010602 has a value of 85.3% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 89.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 83.0%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,467 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (86.0%), 06045010602 has a value of 85.3% which is lower and worse.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(86.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.

Households with an Internet Subscription Census Tract: 06045010700

Current Value:

Households with an Internet Subscription Census Tract: 06045010700

80.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06045010700 has a value of 80.5% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 92.8% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 87.8%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,039 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06045010700 has a value of 80.5% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 89.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 83.0%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,467 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (86.0%), 06045010700 has a value of 80.5% which is lower and worse.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(86.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Over time, the 06045010700 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Households with an Internet Subscription Census Tract: 06045010801

Current Value:

Households with an Internet Subscription Census Tract: 06045010801

91.7%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06045010801 has a value of 91.7% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 92.8% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 87.8%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,039 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06045010801 has a value of 91.7% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 89.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 83.0%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,467 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (86.0%), 06045010801 has a value of 91.7% which is higher and better.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(86.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Over time, the 06045010801 value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Households with an Internet Subscription Census Tract: 06045010802

Current Value:

Households with an Internet Subscription Census Tract: 06045010802

89.4%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06045010802 has a value of 89.4% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 92.8% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 87.8%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,039 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06045010802 has a value of 89.4% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 89.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 83.0%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,467 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (86.0%), 06045010802 has a value of 89.4% which is higher and better.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(86.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Over time, the 06045010802 value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Households with an Internet Subscription Census Tract: 06045010900

Current Value:

Households with an Internet Subscription Census Tract: 06045010900

86.1%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06045010900 has a value of 86.1% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 92.8% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 87.8%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,039 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06045010900 has a value of 86.1% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 89.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 83.0%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,467 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (86.0%), 06045010900 has a value of 86.1% which is higher and better.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(86.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Over time, the 06045010900 value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Households with an Internet Subscription Census Tract: 06045011001

Current Value:

Households with an Internet Subscription Census Tract: 06045011001

83.9%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06045011001 has a value of 83.9% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 92.8% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 87.8%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,039 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06045011001 has a value of 83.9% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 89.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 83.0%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,467 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (86.0%), 06045011001 has a value of 83.9% which is lower and worse.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(86.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Over time, the 06045011001 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Households with an Internet Subscription Census Tract: 06045011002

Current Value:

Households with an Internet Subscription Census Tract: 06045011002

80.7%
(2015-2019)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06045011002 has a value of 80.7% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 88.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 81.0%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 7,981 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06045011002 has a value of 80.7% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 83.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 75.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 72,221 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (81.8%), 06045011002 has a value of 80.7% which is lower and worse.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(81.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.

Households with an Internet Subscription Census Tract: 06045011003

Current Value:

Households with an Internet Subscription Census Tract: 06045011003

89.4%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06045011003 has a value of 89.4% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 92.8% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 87.8%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,039 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06045011003 has a value of 89.4% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 89.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 83.0%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,467 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (86.0%), 06045011003 has a value of 89.4% which is higher and better.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(86.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.

Households with an Internet Subscription Census Tract: 06045011004

Current Value:

Households with an Internet Subscription Census Tract: 06045011004

90.6%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06045011004 has a value of 90.6% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 92.8% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 87.8%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,039 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06045011004 has a value of 90.6% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 89.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 83.0%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,467 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (86.0%), 06045011004 has a value of 90.6% which is higher and better.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(86.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.

Households with an Internet Subscription Census Tract: 06045011102

Current Value:

Households with an Internet Subscription Census Tract: 06045011102

88.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06045011102 has a value of 88.5% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 92.8% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 87.8%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,039 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06045011102 has a value of 88.5% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 89.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 83.0%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,467 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (86.0%), 06045011102 has a value of 88.5% which is higher and better.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(86.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Over time, the 06045011102 value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Households with an Internet Subscription Census Tract: 06045011200

Current Value:

Households with an Internet Subscription Census Tract: 06045011200

94.4%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06045011200 has a value of 94.4% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 92.8% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 87.8%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,039 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06045011200 has a value of 94.4% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 89.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 83.0%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,467 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (86.0%), 06045011200 has a value of 94.4% which is higher and better.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(86.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Over time, the 06045011200 value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Households with an Internet Subscription Census Tract: 06045011300

Current Value:

Households with an Internet Subscription Census Tract: 06045011300

88.1%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06045011300 has a value of 88.1% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 92.8% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 87.8%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,039 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06045011300 has a value of 88.1% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 89.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 83.0%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,467 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (86.0%), 06045011300 has a value of 88.1% which is higher and better.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(86.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Over time, the 06045011300 value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Households with an Internet Subscription Census Tract: 06045011400

Current Value:

Households with an Internet Subscription Census Tract: 06045011400

93.7%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06045011400 has a value of 93.7% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 92.8% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 87.8%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,039 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06045011400 has a value of 93.7% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 89.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 83.0%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,467 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (86.0%), 06045011400 has a value of 93.7% which is higher and better.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(86.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Over time, the 06045011400 value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Households with an Internet Subscription Census Tract: 06045011500

Current Value:

Households with an Internet Subscription Census Tract: 06045011500

85.1%
(2015-2019)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06045011500 has a value of 85.1% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 88.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 81.0%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 7,981 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06045011500 has a value of 85.1% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 83.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 75.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 72,221 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (81.8%), 06045011500 has a value of 85.1% which is higher and better.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(81.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.

Households with an Internet Subscription Census Tract: 06045011501

Current Value:

Households with an Internet Subscription Census Tract: 06045011501

78.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06045011501 has a value of 78.2% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 92.8% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 87.8%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,039 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06045011501 has a value of 78.2% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 89.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 83.0%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,467 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (86.0%), 06045011501 has a value of 78.2% which is lower and worse.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(86.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.

Households with an Internet Subscription Census Tract: 06045011502

Current Value:

Households with an Internet Subscription Census Tract: 06045011502

91.7%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06045011502 has a value of 91.7% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 92.8% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 87.8%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,039 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06045011502 has a value of 91.7% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 89.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 83.0%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,467 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (86.0%), 06045011502 has a value of 91.7% which is higher and better.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(86.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.

Households with an Internet Subscription Census Tract: 06045011600

Current Value:

Households with an Internet Subscription Census Tract: 06045011600

82.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06045011600 has a value of 82.0% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 92.8% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 87.8%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,039 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06045011600 has a value of 82.0% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 89.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 83.0%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,467 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (86.0%), 06045011600 has a value of 82.0% which is lower and worse.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(86.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Over time, the 06045011600 value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Households with an Internet Subscription Census Tract: 06045011700

Current Value:

Households with an Internet Subscription Census Tract: 06045011700

92.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06045011700 has a value of 92.0% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 92.8% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 87.8%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,039 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06045011700 has a value of 92.0% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 89.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 83.0%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,467 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (86.0%), 06045011700 has a value of 92.0% which is higher and better.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(86.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Over time, the 06045011700 value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Households with an Internet Subscription Census Tract: 06045011800

Current Value:

Households with an Internet Subscription Census Tract: 06045011800

85.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06045011800 has a value of 85.0% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 92.8% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 87.8%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,039 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06045011800 has a value of 85.0% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 89.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 83.0%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,467 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (86.0%), 06045011800 has a value of 85.0% which is lower and worse.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(86.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Over time, the 06045011800 value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Health / Health Information Technology

Households with One or More Types of Computing Devices

Value
Compared to:

Health / Health Information Technology

Households with One or More Types of Computing Devices

Value
Compared to:

Households with One or More Types of Computing Devices County: Mendocino

Current Value:

Households with One or More Types of Computing Devices County: Mendocino

91.1%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Mendocino has a value of 91.1% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 94.7% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 93.0%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Mendocino has a value of 91.1% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 91.1% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 88.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the CA Value (95.9%), Mendocino has a value of 91.1% which is lower and worse.
CA Value
(95.9%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (94.0%), Mendocino has a value of 91.1% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(94.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Mendocino value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Households with One or More Types of Computing Devices Census Place: Albion

Current Value:

Households with One or More Types of Computing Devices Census Place: Albion

100.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Albion has a value of 100.0% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50%  have a value higher than 96.2% while census places in the worst 25% have a value lower than 92.7%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,469 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Albion has a value of 100.0% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50%  have a value higher than 93.0% while census places in the worst 25% have a value lower than 87.7%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,675 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (91.1%), Albion has a value of 100.0% which is higher and better.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(91.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the CA Value (95.9%), Albion has a value of 100.0% which is higher and better.
CA Value
(95.9%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (94.0%), Albion has a value of 100.0% which is higher and better.
US Value
(94.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Albion value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Households with One or More Types of Computing Devices Census Place: Anchor Bay

Current Value:

Households with One or More Types of Computing Devices Census Place: Anchor Bay

100.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Anchor Bay has a value of 100.0% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50%  have a value higher than 96.2% while census places in the worst 25% have a value lower than 92.7%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,469 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Anchor Bay has a value of 100.0% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50%  have a value higher than 93.0% while census places in the worst 25% have a value lower than 87.7%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,675 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (91.1%), Anchor Bay has a value of 100.0% which is higher and better.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(91.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the CA Value (95.9%), Anchor Bay has a value of 100.0% which is higher and better.
CA Value
(95.9%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (94.0%), Anchor Bay has a value of 100.0% which is higher and better.
US Value
(94.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Anchor Bay value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Households with One or More Types of Computing Devices Census Place: Boonville

Current Value:

Households with One or More Types of Computing Devices Census Place: Boonville

98.8%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Boonville has a value of 98.8% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50%  have a value higher than 96.2% while census places in the worst 25% have a value lower than 92.7%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,469 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Boonville has a value of 98.8% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50%  have a value higher than 93.0% while census places in the worst 25% have a value lower than 87.7%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,675 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (91.1%), Boonville has a value of 98.8% which is higher and better.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(91.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the CA Value (95.9%), Boonville has a value of 98.8% which is higher and better.
CA Value
(95.9%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (94.0%), Boonville has a value of 98.8% which is higher and better.
US Value
(94.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Boonville value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Households with One or More Types of Computing Devices Census Place: Brooktrails

Current Value:

Households with One or More Types of Computing Devices Census Place: Brooktrails

100.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Brooktrails has a value of 100.0% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50%  have a value higher than 96.2% while census places in the worst 25% have a value lower than 92.7%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,469 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Brooktrails has a value of 100.0% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50%  have a value higher than 93.0% while census places in the worst 25% have a value lower than 87.7%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,675 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (91.1%), Brooktrails has a value of 100.0% which is higher and better.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(91.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the CA Value (95.9%), Brooktrails has a value of 100.0% which is higher and better.
CA Value
(95.9%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (94.0%), Brooktrails has a value of 100.0% which is higher and better.
US Value
(94.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Brooktrails value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Households with One or More Types of Computing Devices Census Place: Calpella

Current Value:

Households with One or More Types of Computing Devices Census Place: Calpella

100.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Calpella has a value of 100.0% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50%  have a value higher than 96.2% while census places in the worst 25% have a value lower than 92.7%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,469 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Calpella has a value of 100.0% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50%  have a value higher than 93.0% while census places in the worst 25% have a value lower than 87.7%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,675 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (91.1%), Calpella has a value of 100.0% which is higher and better.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(91.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the CA Value (95.9%), Calpella has a value of 100.0% which is higher and better.
CA Value
(95.9%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (94.0%), Calpella has a value of 100.0% which is higher and better.
US Value
(94.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Calpella value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Households with One or More Types of Computing Devices Census Place: Caspar

Current Value:

Households with One or More Types of Computing Devices Census Place: Caspar

100.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Caspar has a value of 100.0% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50%  have a value higher than 96.2% while census places in the worst 25% have a value lower than 92.7%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,469 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Caspar has a value of 100.0% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50%  have a value higher than 93.0% while census places in the worst 25% have a value lower than 87.7%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,675 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (91.1%), Caspar has a value of 100.0% which is higher and better.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(91.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the CA Value (95.9%), Caspar has a value of 100.0% which is higher and better.
CA Value
(95.9%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (94.0%), Caspar has a value of 100.0% which is higher and better.
US Value
(94.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Caspar value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Households with One or More Types of Computing Devices Census Place: Cleone

Current Value:

Households with One or More Types of Computing Devices Census Place: Cleone

89.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Cleone has a value of 89.0% which is in the worst 25% of census places. Census places in the best 50%  have a value higher than 96.2% while census places in the worst 25% have a value lower than 92.7%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,469 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Cleone has a value of 89.0% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places. Census places in the best 50%  have a value higher than 93.0% while census places in the worst 25% have a value lower than 87.7%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,675 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (91.1%), Cleone has a value of 89.0% which is lower and worse.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(91.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the CA Value (95.9%), Cleone has a value of 89.0% which is lower and worse.
CA Value
(95.9%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (94.0%), Cleone has a value of 89.0% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(94.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Cleone value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.