Skip to main content

Advanced Search: Build a Custom Dashboard

In the fields below, search for indicators by location, topics, population, classification, subgroup, or comparison. No fields are required, but we suggest selecting a location or two to start. In the additional search options section, select options to group and order search results. To learn more about how to customize a dashboard, see our help center.

Visit the Indicator List Page to see the full list of indicators and locations available on the site.

  • Map View
  • County : Mendocino Census Tracts
  • County : Mendocino Zip Codes
  • All Health Topics
  • All Community Topics
  • All Economy Topics
  • All Education Topics
  • All Environmental Health Topics
Search display options:

Search Results:

Indicator Gauge Icon Legend

Legend Colors

Red is bad, green is good, blue is not statistically different/neutral.

Compared to Distribution

an indicator guage with the arrow in the green the value is in the best half of communities.

an indicator guage with the arrow in the yellow the value is in the 2nd worst quarter of communities.

an indicator guage with the arrow in the red the value is in the worst quarter of communities.

Compared to Target

green circle with white tick inside it meets target; red circle with white cross inside it does not meet target.

Compared to a Single Value

green diamond with downward arrow inside it lower than the comparison value; red diamond with downward arrow inside it higher than the comparison value; blue diamond with downward arrow inside it not statistically different from comparison value.

Trend

green square outline with upward trending arrow inside it green square outline with downward trending arrow inside it non-significant change over time; green square with upward trending arrow inside it green square with downward trending arrow inside it significant change over time; blue square with equals sign no change over time.

Compared to Prior Value

green triangle with upward trending arrow inside it higher than the previous measurement period; green triangle with downward trending arrow inside it lower than the previous measurement period; blue equals sign no statistically different change  from previous measurement period.

More information about the gauges and icons

Education / Educational Attainment

Education / Educational Attainment

Education / Educational Attainment

People 25+ with a Bachelor's Degree or Higher

Value
Compared to:

Education / Educational Attainment

People 25+ with a Bachelor's Degree or Higher

Value
Compared to:

People 25+ with a Bachelor's Degree or Higher Census Tract: 06045011004

Current Value:

People 25+ with a Bachelor's Degree or Higher Census Tract: 06045011004

41.1%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06045011004 has a value of 41.1% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 31.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 16.9%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,076 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06045011004 has a value of 41.1% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 28.2% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 17.4%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,720 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (24.0%), 06045011004 has a value of 41.1% which is higher and better.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(24.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.

People 25+ with a Bachelor's Degree or Higher Census Tract: 06045011102

Current Value:

People 25+ with a Bachelor's Degree or Higher Census Tract: 06045011102

29.7%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06045011102 has a value of 29.7% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 31.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 16.9%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,076 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06045011102 has a value of 29.7% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 28.2% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 17.4%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,720 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (24.0%), 06045011102 has a value of 29.7% which is higher and better.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(24.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Over time, the 06045011102 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 25+ with a Bachelor's Degree or Higher Census Tract: 06045011200

Current Value:

People 25+ with a Bachelor's Degree or Higher Census Tract: 06045011200

35.6%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06045011200 has a value of 35.6% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 31.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 16.9%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,076 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06045011200 has a value of 35.6% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 28.2% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 17.4%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,720 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (24.0%), 06045011200 has a value of 35.6% which is higher and better.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(24.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Over time, the 06045011200 value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 25+ with a Bachelor's Degree or Higher Census Tract: 06045011300

Current Value:

People 25+ with a Bachelor's Degree or Higher Census Tract: 06045011300

12.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06045011300 has a value of 12.0% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 31.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 16.9%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,076 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06045011300 has a value of 12.0% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 28.2% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 17.4%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,720 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (24.0%), 06045011300 has a value of 12.0% which is lower and worse.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(24.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Over time, the 06045011300 value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 25+ with a Bachelor's Degree or Higher Census Tract: 06045011400

Current Value:

People 25+ with a Bachelor's Degree or Higher Census Tract: 06045011400

33.6%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06045011400 has a value of 33.6% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 31.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 16.9%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,076 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06045011400 has a value of 33.6% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 28.2% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 17.4%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,720 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (24.0%), 06045011400 has a value of 33.6% which is higher and better.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(24.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Over time, the 06045011400 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 25+ with a Bachelor's Degree or Higher Census Tract: 06045011500

Current Value:

People 25+ with a Bachelor's Degree or Higher Census Tract: 06045011500

16.1%
(2015-2019)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06045011500 has a value of 16.1% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 28.7% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 15.3%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 8,009 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06045011500 has a value of 16.1% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 25.7% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 15.7%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 72,386 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (24.4%), 06045011500 has a value of 16.1% which is lower and worse.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(24.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Over time, the 06045011500 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 25+ with a Bachelor's Degree or Higher Census Tract: 06045011501

Current Value:

People 25+ with a Bachelor's Degree or Higher Census Tract: 06045011501

32.7%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06045011501 has a value of 32.7% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 31.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 16.9%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,076 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06045011501 has a value of 32.7% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 28.2% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 17.4%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,720 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (24.0%), 06045011501 has a value of 32.7% which is higher and better.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(24.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.

People 25+ with a Bachelor's Degree or Higher Census Tract: 06045011502

Current Value:

People 25+ with a Bachelor's Degree or Higher Census Tract: 06045011502

9.7%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06045011502 has a value of 9.7% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 31.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 16.9%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,076 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06045011502 has a value of 9.7% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 28.2% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 17.4%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,720 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (24.0%), 06045011502 has a value of 9.7% which is lower and worse.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(24.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.

People 25+ with a Bachelor's Degree or Higher Census Tract: 06045011600

Current Value:

People 25+ with a Bachelor's Degree or Higher Census Tract: 06045011600

13.7%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06045011600 has a value of 13.7% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 31.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 16.9%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,076 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06045011600 has a value of 13.7% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 28.2% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 17.4%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,720 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (24.0%), 06045011600 has a value of 13.7% which is lower and worse.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(24.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Over time, the 06045011600 value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 25+ with a Bachelor's Degree or Higher Census Tract: 06045011700

Current Value:

People 25+ with a Bachelor's Degree or Higher Census Tract: 06045011700

39.7%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06045011700 has a value of 39.7% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 31.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 16.9%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,076 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06045011700 has a value of 39.7% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 28.2% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 17.4%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,720 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (24.0%), 06045011700 has a value of 39.7% which is higher and better.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(24.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Over time, the 06045011700 value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 25+ with a Bachelor's Degree or Higher Census Tract: 06045011800

Current Value:

People 25+ with a Bachelor's Degree or Higher Census Tract: 06045011800

20.7%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06045011800 has a value of 20.7% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 31.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 16.9%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,076 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06045011800 has a value of 20.7% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 28.2% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 17.4%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,720 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (24.0%), 06045011800 has a value of 20.7% which is lower and worse.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(24.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Over time, the 06045011800 value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Education / Educational Attainment

People 25+ with a High School Diploma or Higher

Value
Compared to:

Education / Educational Attainment

People 25+ with a High School Diploma or Higher

Value
Compared to:

People 25+ with a High School Diploma or Higher County: Mendocino

Current Value:

People 25+ with a High School Diploma or Higher County: Mendocino

86.8%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Mendocino has a value of 86.8% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 88.1% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 80.5%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Mendocino has a value of 86.8% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 89.5% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 85.3%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the CA Value (84.4%), Mendocino has a value of 86.8% which is higher and better.
CA Value
(84.4%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (89.1%), Mendocino has a value of 86.8% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(89.1%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Mendocino value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 25+ with a High School Diploma or Higher Census Place: Albion

Current Value:

People 25+ with a High School Diploma or Higher Census Place: Albion

100.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Albion has a value of 100.0% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50%  have a value higher than 90.0% while census places in the worst 25% have a value lower than 78.2%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,482 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Albion has a value of 100.0% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50%  have a value higher than 91.3% while census places in the worst 25% have a value lower than 84.9%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,880 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (86.8%), Albion has a value of 100.0% which is higher and better.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(86.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the CA Value (84.4%), Albion has a value of 100.0% which is higher and better.
CA Value
(84.4%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (89.1%), Albion has a value of 100.0% which is higher and better.
US Value
(89.1%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Albion value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 25+ with a High School Diploma or Higher Census Place: Anchor Bay

Current Value:

People 25+ with a High School Diploma or Higher Census Place: Anchor Bay

100.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Anchor Bay has a value of 100.0% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50%  have a value higher than 90.0% while census places in the worst 25% have a value lower than 78.2%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,482 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Anchor Bay has a value of 100.0% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50%  have a value higher than 91.3% while census places in the worst 25% have a value lower than 84.9%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,880 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (86.8%), Anchor Bay has a value of 100.0% which is higher and better.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(86.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the CA Value (84.4%), Anchor Bay has a value of 100.0% which is higher and better.
CA Value
(84.4%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (89.1%), Anchor Bay has a value of 100.0% which is higher and better.
US Value
(89.1%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Anchor Bay value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 25+ with a High School Diploma or Higher Census Place: Boonville

Current Value:

People 25+ with a High School Diploma or Higher Census Place: Boonville

86.3%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Boonville has a value of 86.3% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places. Census places in the best 50%  have a value higher than 90.0% while census places in the worst 25% have a value lower than 78.2%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,482 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Boonville has a value of 86.3% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places. Census places in the best 50%  have a value higher than 91.3% while census places in the worst 25% have a value lower than 84.9%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,880 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (86.8%), Boonville has a value of 86.3% which is lower and worse.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(86.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the CA Value (84.4%), Boonville has a value of 86.3% which is higher and better.
CA Value
(84.4%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (89.1%), Boonville has a value of 86.3% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(89.1%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Boonville value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 25+ with a High School Diploma or Higher Census Place: Brooktrails

Current Value:

People 25+ with a High School Diploma or Higher Census Place: Brooktrails

86.6%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Brooktrails has a value of 86.6% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places. Census places in the best 50%  have a value higher than 90.0% while census places in the worst 25% have a value lower than 78.2%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,482 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Brooktrails has a value of 86.6% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places. Census places in the best 50%  have a value higher than 91.3% while census places in the worst 25% have a value lower than 84.9%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,880 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (86.8%), Brooktrails has a value of 86.6% which is lower and worse.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(86.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the CA Value (84.4%), Brooktrails has a value of 86.6% which is higher and better.
CA Value
(84.4%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (89.1%), Brooktrails has a value of 86.6% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(89.1%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Brooktrails value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 25+ with a High School Diploma or Higher Census Place: Calpella

Current Value:

People 25+ with a High School Diploma or Higher Census Place: Calpella

78.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Calpella has a value of 78.0% which is in the worst 25% of census places. Census places in the best 50%  have a value higher than 90.0% while census places in the worst 25% have a value lower than 78.2%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,482 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Calpella has a value of 78.0% which is in the worst 25% of census places. Census places in the best 50%  have a value higher than 91.3% while census places in the worst 25% have a value lower than 84.9%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,880 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (86.8%), Calpella has a value of 78.0% which is lower and worse.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(86.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the CA Value (84.4%), Calpella has a value of 78.0% which is lower and worse.
CA Value
(84.4%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (89.1%), Calpella has a value of 78.0% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(89.1%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Calpella value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 25+ with a High School Diploma or Higher Census Place: Caspar

Current Value:

People 25+ with a High School Diploma or Higher Census Place: Caspar

99.6%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Caspar has a value of 99.6% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50%  have a value higher than 90.0% while census places in the worst 25% have a value lower than 78.2%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,482 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Caspar has a value of 99.6% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50%  have a value higher than 91.3% while census places in the worst 25% have a value lower than 84.9%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,880 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (86.8%), Caspar has a value of 99.6% which is higher and better.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(86.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the CA Value (84.4%), Caspar has a value of 99.6% which is higher and better.
CA Value
(84.4%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (89.1%), Caspar has a value of 99.6% which is higher and better.
US Value
(89.1%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Caspar value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 25+ with a High School Diploma or Higher Census Place: Cleone

Current Value:

People 25+ with a High School Diploma or Higher Census Place: Cleone

64.4%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Cleone has a value of 64.4% which is in the worst 25% of census places. Census places in the best 50%  have a value higher than 90.0% while census places in the worst 25% have a value lower than 78.2%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,482 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Cleone has a value of 64.4% which is in the worst 25% of census places. Census places in the best 50%  have a value higher than 91.3% while census places in the worst 25% have a value lower than 84.9%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,880 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (86.8%), Cleone has a value of 64.4% which is lower and worse.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(86.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the CA Value (84.4%), Cleone has a value of 64.4% which is lower and worse.
CA Value
(84.4%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (89.1%), Cleone has a value of 64.4% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(89.1%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Cleone value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 25+ with a High School Diploma or Higher Census Place: Comptche

Current Value:

People 25+ with a High School Diploma or Higher Census Place: Comptche

100.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Comptche has a value of 100.0% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50%  have a value higher than 90.0% while census places in the worst 25% have a value lower than 78.2%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,482 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Comptche has a value of 100.0% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50%  have a value higher than 91.3% while census places in the worst 25% have a value lower than 84.9%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,880 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (86.8%), Comptche has a value of 100.0% which is higher and better.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(86.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the CA Value (84.4%), Comptche has a value of 100.0% which is higher and better.
CA Value
(84.4%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (89.1%), Comptche has a value of 100.0% which is higher and better.
US Value
(89.1%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Comptche value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 25+ with a High School Diploma or Higher Census Place: Covelo

Current Value:

People 25+ with a High School Diploma or Higher Census Place: Covelo

73.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Covelo has a value of 73.5% which is in the worst 25% of census places. Census places in the best 50%  have a value higher than 90.0% while census places in the worst 25% have a value lower than 78.2%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,482 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Covelo has a value of 73.5% which is in the worst 25% of census places. Census places in the best 50%  have a value higher than 91.3% while census places in the worst 25% have a value lower than 84.9%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,880 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (86.8%), Covelo has a value of 73.5% which is lower and worse.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(86.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the CA Value (84.4%), Covelo has a value of 73.5% which is lower and worse.
CA Value
(84.4%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (89.1%), Covelo has a value of 73.5% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(89.1%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Covelo value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 25+ with a High School Diploma or Higher Census Place: Fort Bragg

Current Value:

People 25+ with a High School Diploma or Higher Census Place: Fort Bragg

84.7%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Fort Bragg has a value of 84.7% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places. Census places in the best 50%  have a value higher than 90.0% while census places in the worst 25% have a value lower than 78.2%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,482 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Fort Bragg has a value of 84.7% which is in the worst 25% of census places. Census places in the best 50%  have a value higher than 91.3% while census places in the worst 25% have a value lower than 84.9%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,880 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (86.8%), Fort Bragg has a value of 84.7% which is lower and worse.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(86.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the CA Value (84.4%), Fort Bragg has a value of 84.7% which is higher and better.
CA Value
(84.4%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (89.1%), Fort Bragg has a value of 84.7% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(89.1%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Fort Bragg value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 25+ with a High School Diploma or Higher Census Place: Hopland

Current Value:

People 25+ with a High School Diploma or Higher Census Place: Hopland

70.4%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Hopland has a value of 70.4% which is in the worst 25% of census places. Census places in the best 50%  have a value higher than 90.0% while census places in the worst 25% have a value lower than 78.2%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,482 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Hopland has a value of 70.4% which is in the worst 25% of census places. Census places in the best 50%  have a value higher than 91.3% while census places in the worst 25% have a value lower than 84.9%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,880 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (86.8%), Hopland has a value of 70.4% which is lower and worse.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(86.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the CA Value (84.4%), Hopland has a value of 70.4% which is lower and worse.
CA Value
(84.4%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (89.1%), Hopland has a value of 70.4% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(89.1%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Hopland value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 25+ with a High School Diploma or Higher Census Place: Laytonville

Current Value:

People 25+ with a High School Diploma or Higher Census Place: Laytonville

92.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Laytonville has a value of 92.0% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50%  have a value higher than 90.0% while census places in the worst 25% have a value lower than 78.2%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,482 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Laytonville has a value of 92.0% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50%  have a value higher than 91.3% while census places in the worst 25% have a value lower than 84.9%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,880 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (86.8%), Laytonville has a value of 92.0% which is higher and better.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(86.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the CA Value (84.4%), Laytonville has a value of 92.0% which is higher and better.
CA Value
(84.4%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (89.1%), Laytonville has a value of 92.0% which is higher and better.
US Value
(89.1%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Laytonville value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 25+ with a High School Diploma or Higher Census Place: Leggett

Current Value:

People 25+ with a High School Diploma or Higher Census Place: Leggett

65.8%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Leggett has a value of 65.8% which is in the worst 25% of census places. Census places in the best 50%  have a value higher than 90.0% while census places in the worst 25% have a value lower than 78.2%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,482 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Leggett has a value of 65.8% which is in the worst 25% of census places. Census places in the best 50%  have a value higher than 91.3% while census places in the worst 25% have a value lower than 84.9%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,880 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (86.8%), Leggett has a value of 65.8% which is lower and worse.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(86.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the CA Value (84.4%), Leggett has a value of 65.8% which is lower and worse.
CA Value
(84.4%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (89.1%), Leggett has a value of 65.8% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(89.1%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Leggett value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 25+ with a High School Diploma or Higher Census Place: Little River

Current Value:

People 25+ with a High School Diploma or Higher Census Place: Little River

94.3%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Little River has a value of 94.3% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50%  have a value higher than 90.0% while census places in the worst 25% have a value lower than 78.2%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,482 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Little River has a value of 94.3% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50%  have a value higher than 91.3% while census places in the worst 25% have a value lower than 84.9%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,880 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (86.8%), Little River has a value of 94.3% which is higher and better.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(86.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the CA Value (84.4%), Little River has a value of 94.3% which is higher and better.
CA Value
(84.4%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (89.1%), Little River has a value of 94.3% which is higher and better.
US Value
(89.1%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Little River value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 25+ with a High School Diploma or Higher Census Place: Manchester

Current Value:

People 25+ with a High School Diploma or Higher Census Place: Manchester

62.4%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Manchester has a value of 62.4% which is in the worst 25% of census places. Census places in the best 50%  have a value higher than 90.0% while census places in the worst 25% have a value lower than 78.2%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,482 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Manchester has a value of 62.4% which is in the worst 25% of census places. Census places in the best 50%  have a value higher than 91.3% while census places in the worst 25% have a value lower than 84.9%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,880 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (86.8%), Manchester has a value of 62.4% which is lower and worse.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(86.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the CA Value (84.4%), Manchester has a value of 62.4% which is lower and worse.
CA Value
(84.4%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (89.1%), Manchester has a value of 62.4% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(89.1%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Manchester value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 25+ with a High School Diploma or Higher Census Place: Mendocino

Current Value:

People 25+ with a High School Diploma or Higher Census Place: Mendocino

97.1%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Mendocino has a value of 97.1% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50%  have a value higher than 90.0% while census places in the worst 25% have a value lower than 78.2%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,482 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Mendocino has a value of 97.1% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50%  have a value higher than 91.3% while census places in the worst 25% have a value lower than 84.9%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,880 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (86.8%), Mendocino has a value of 97.1% which is higher and better.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(86.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the CA Value (84.4%), Mendocino has a value of 97.1% which is higher and better.
CA Value
(84.4%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (89.1%), Mendocino has a value of 97.1% which is higher and better.
US Value
(89.1%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Mendocino value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 25+ with a High School Diploma or Higher Census Place: Philo

Current Value:

People 25+ with a High School Diploma or Higher Census Place: Philo

100.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Philo has a value of 100.0% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50%  have a value higher than 90.0% while census places in the worst 25% have a value lower than 78.2%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,482 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Philo has a value of 100.0% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50%  have a value higher than 91.3% while census places in the worst 25% have a value lower than 84.9%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,880 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (86.8%), Philo has a value of 100.0% which is higher and better.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(86.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the CA Value (84.4%), Philo has a value of 100.0% which is higher and better.
CA Value
(84.4%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (89.1%), Philo has a value of 100.0% which is higher and better.
US Value
(89.1%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Philo value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 25+ with a High School Diploma or Higher Census Place: Point Arena

Current Value:

People 25+ with a High School Diploma or Higher Census Place: Point Arena

79.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Point Arena has a value of 79.5% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places. Census places in the best 50%  have a value higher than 90.0% while census places in the worst 25% have a value lower than 78.2%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,482 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Point Arena has a value of 79.5% which is in the worst 25% of census places. Census places in the best 50%  have a value higher than 91.3% while census places in the worst 25% have a value lower than 84.9%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,880 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (86.8%), Point Arena has a value of 79.5% which is lower and worse.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(86.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the CA Value (84.4%), Point Arena has a value of 79.5% which is lower and worse.
CA Value
(84.4%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (89.1%), Point Arena has a value of 79.5% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(89.1%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Point Arena value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 25+ with a High School Diploma or Higher Census Place: Potter Valley

Current Value:

People 25+ with a High School Diploma or Higher Census Place: Potter Valley

98.4%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Potter Valley has a value of 98.4% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50%  have a value higher than 90.0% while census places in the worst 25% have a value lower than 78.2%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,482 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Potter Valley has a value of 98.4% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50%  have a value higher than 91.3% while census places in the worst 25% have a value lower than 84.9%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,880 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (86.8%), Potter Valley has a value of 98.4% which is higher and better.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(86.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the CA Value (84.4%), Potter Valley has a value of 98.4% which is higher and better.
CA Value
(84.4%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (89.1%), Potter Valley has a value of 98.4% which is higher and better.
US Value
(89.1%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Potter Valley value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 25+ with a High School Diploma or Higher Census Place: Redwood Valley

Current Value:

People 25+ with a High School Diploma or Higher Census Place: Redwood Valley

82.6%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Redwood Valley has a value of 82.6% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places. Census places in the best 50%  have a value higher than 90.0% while census places in the worst 25% have a value lower than 78.2%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,482 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Redwood Valley has a value of 82.6% which is in the worst 25% of census places. Census places in the best 50%  have a value higher than 91.3% while census places in the worst 25% have a value lower than 84.9%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,880 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (86.8%), Redwood Valley has a value of 82.6% which is lower and worse.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(86.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the CA Value (84.4%), Redwood Valley has a value of 82.6% which is lower and worse.
CA Value
(84.4%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (89.1%), Redwood Valley has a value of 82.6% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(89.1%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Redwood Valley value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 25+ with a High School Diploma or Higher Census Place: Talmage

Current Value:

People 25+ with a High School Diploma or Higher Census Place: Talmage

90.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Talmage has a value of 90.0% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50%  have a value higher than 90.0% while census places in the worst 25% have a value lower than 78.2%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,482 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Talmage has a value of 90.0% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places. Census places in the best 50%  have a value higher than 91.3% while census places in the worst 25% have a value lower than 84.9%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,880 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (86.8%), Talmage has a value of 90.0% which is higher and better.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(86.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the CA Value (84.4%), Talmage has a value of 90.0% which is higher and better.
CA Value
(84.4%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (89.1%), Talmage has a value of 90.0% which is higher and better.
US Value
(89.1%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Talmage value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 25+ with a High School Diploma or Higher Census Place: Ukiah

Current Value:

People 25+ with a High School Diploma or Higher Census Place: Ukiah

83.7%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Ukiah has a value of 83.7% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places. Census places in the best 50%  have a value higher than 90.0% while census places in the worst 25% have a value lower than 78.2%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,482 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Ukiah has a value of 83.7% which is in the worst 25% of census places. Census places in the best 50%  have a value higher than 91.3% while census places in the worst 25% have a value lower than 84.9%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,880 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (86.8%), Ukiah has a value of 83.7% which is lower and worse.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(86.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the CA Value (84.4%), Ukiah has a value of 83.7% which is lower and worse.
CA Value
(84.4%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (89.1%), Ukiah has a value of 83.7% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(89.1%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Ukiah value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 25+ with a High School Diploma or Higher Census Place: Willits

Current Value:

People 25+ with a High School Diploma or Higher Census Place: Willits

84.1%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Willits has a value of 84.1% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places. Census places in the best 50%  have a value higher than 90.0% while census places in the worst 25% have a value lower than 78.2%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,482 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Willits has a value of 84.1% which is in the worst 25% of census places. Census places in the best 50%  have a value higher than 91.3% while census places in the worst 25% have a value lower than 84.9%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,880 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (86.8%), Willits has a value of 84.1% which is lower and worse.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(86.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the CA Value (84.4%), Willits has a value of 84.1% which is lower and worse.
CA Value
(84.4%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (89.1%), Willits has a value of 84.1% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(89.1%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Willits value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 25+ with a High School Diploma or Higher Zip Code: 95410

Current Value:

People 25+ with a High School Diploma or Higher Zip Code: 95410

96.6%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Zip Codes, 95410 has a value of 96.6% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 90.1% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 80.0%.
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,761 California zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 95410 has a value of 96.6% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 91.5% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 85.7%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 32,998 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (86.8%), 95410 has a value of 96.6% which is higher and better.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(86.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Over time, the 95410 value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 25+ with a High School Diploma or Higher Zip Code: 95415

Current Value:

People 25+ with a High School Diploma or Higher Zip Code: 95415

85.3%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Zip Codes, 95415 has a value of 85.3% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 90.1% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 80.0%.
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,761 California zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 95415 has a value of 85.3% which is in the worst 25% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 91.5% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 85.7%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 32,998 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (86.8%), 95415 has a value of 85.3% which is lower and worse.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(86.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Over time, the 95415 value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 25+ with a High School Diploma or Higher Zip Code: 95417

Current Value:

People 25+ with a High School Diploma or Higher Zip Code: 95417

88.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Zip Codes, 95417 has a value of 88.0% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 90.1% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 80.0%.
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,761 California zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 95417 has a value of 88.0% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 91.5% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 85.7%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 32,998 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (86.8%), 95417 has a value of 88.0% which is higher and better.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(86.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Over time, the 95417 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 25+ with a High School Diploma or Higher Zip Code: 95420

Current Value:

People 25+ with a High School Diploma or Higher Zip Code: 95420

99.6%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Zip Codes, 95420 has a value of 99.6% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 90.1% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 80.0%.
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,761 California zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 95420 has a value of 99.6% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 91.5% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 85.7%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 32,998 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (86.8%), 95420 has a value of 99.6% which is higher and better.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(86.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Over time, the 95420 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 25+ with a High School Diploma or Higher Zip Code: 95427

Current Value:

People 25+ with a High School Diploma or Higher Zip Code: 95427

91.8%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Zip Codes, 95427 has a value of 91.8% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 90.1% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 80.0%.
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,761 California zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 95427 has a value of 91.8% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 91.5% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 85.7%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 32,998 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (86.8%), 95427 has a value of 91.8% which is higher and better.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(86.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Over time, the 95427 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 25+ with a High School Diploma or Higher Zip Code: 95428

Current Value:

People 25+ with a High School Diploma or Higher Zip Code: 95428

79.7%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Zip Codes, 95428 has a value of 79.7% which is in the worst 25% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 90.1% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 80.0%.
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,761 California zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 95428 has a value of 79.7% which is in the worst 25% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 91.5% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 85.7%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 32,998 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (86.8%), 95428 has a value of 79.7% which is lower and worse.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(86.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Over time, the 95428 value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 25+ with a High School Diploma or Higher Zip Code: 95429

Current Value:

People 25+ with a High School Diploma or Higher Zip Code: 95429

100.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Zip Codes, 95429 has a value of 100.0% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 90.1% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 80.0%.
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,761 California zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 95429 has a value of 100.0% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 91.5% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 85.7%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 32,998 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (86.8%), 95429 has a value of 100.0% which is higher and better.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(86.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Over time, the 95429 value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 25+ with a High School Diploma or Higher Zip Code: 95432

Current Value:

People 25+ with a High School Diploma or Higher Zip Code: 95432

98.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Zip Codes, 95432 has a value of 98.2% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 90.1% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 80.0%.
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,761 California zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 95432 has a value of 98.2% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 91.5% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 85.7%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 32,998 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (86.8%), 95432 has a value of 98.2% which is higher and better.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(86.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Over time, the 95432 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 25+ with a High School Diploma or Higher Zip Code: 95437

Current Value:

People 25+ with a High School Diploma or Higher Zip Code: 95437

88.7%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Zip Codes, 95437 has a value of 88.7% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 90.1% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 80.0%.
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,761 California zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 95437 has a value of 88.7% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 91.5% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 85.7%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 32,998 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (86.8%), 95437 has a value of 88.7% which is higher and better.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(86.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Over time, the 95437 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 25+ with a High School Diploma or Higher Zip Code: 95445

Current Value:

People 25+ with a High School Diploma or Higher Zip Code: 95445

92.3%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Zip Codes, 95445 has a value of 92.3% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 90.1% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 80.0%.
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,761 California zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 95445 has a value of 92.3% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 91.5% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 85.7%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 32,998 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (86.8%), 95445 has a value of 92.3% which is higher and better.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(86.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Over time, the 95445 value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 25+ with a High School Diploma or Higher Zip Code: 95449

Current Value:

People 25+ with a High School Diploma or Higher Zip Code: 95449

69.7%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Zip Codes, 95449 has a value of 69.7% which is in the worst 25% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 90.1% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 80.0%.
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,761 California zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 95449 has a value of 69.7% which is in the worst 25% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 91.5% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 85.7%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 32,998 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (86.8%), 95449 has a value of 69.7% which is lower and worse.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(86.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Over time, the 95449 value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 25+ with a High School Diploma or Higher Zip Code: 95454

Current Value:

People 25+ with a High School Diploma or Higher Zip Code: 95454

80.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Zip Codes, 95454 has a value of 80.2% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 90.1% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 80.0%.
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,761 California zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 95454 has a value of 80.2% which is in the worst 25% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 91.5% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 85.7%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 32,998 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (86.8%), 95454 has a value of 80.2% which is lower and worse.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(86.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Over time, the 95454 value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 25+ with a High School Diploma or Higher Zip Code: 95456

Current Value:

People 25+ with a High School Diploma or Higher Zip Code: 95456

94.9%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Zip Codes, 95456 has a value of 94.9% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 90.1% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 80.0%.
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,761 California zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 95456 has a value of 94.9% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 91.5% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 85.7%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 32,998 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (86.8%), 95456 has a value of 94.9% which is higher and better.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(86.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Over time, the 95456 value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 25+ with a High School Diploma or Higher Zip Code: 95459

Current Value:

People 25+ with a High School Diploma or Higher Zip Code: 95459

75.8%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Zip Codes, 95459 has a value of 75.8% which is in the worst 25% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 90.1% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 80.0%.
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,761 California zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 95459 has a value of 75.8% which is in the worst 25% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 91.5% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 85.7%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 32,998 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (86.8%), 95459 has a value of 75.8% which is lower and worse.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(86.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Over time, the 95459 value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 25+ with a High School Diploma or Higher Zip Code: 95460

Current Value:

People 25+ with a High School Diploma or Higher Zip Code: 95460

94.3%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Zip Codes, 95460 has a value of 94.3% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 90.1% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 80.0%.
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,761 California zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 95460 has a value of 94.3% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 91.5% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 85.7%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 32,998 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (86.8%), 95460 has a value of 94.3% which is higher and better.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(86.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Over time, the 95460 value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 25+ with a High School Diploma or Higher Zip Code: 95463

Current Value:

People 25+ with a High School Diploma or Higher Zip Code: 95463

100.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Zip Codes, 95463 has a value of 100.0% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 90.1% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 80.0%.
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,761 California zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 95463 has a value of 100.0% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 91.5% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 85.7%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 32,998 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (86.8%), 95463 has a value of 100.0% which is higher and better.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(86.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Over time, the 95463 value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 25+ with a High School Diploma or Higher Zip Code: 95466

Current Value:

People 25+ with a High School Diploma or Higher Zip Code: 95466

84.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Zip Codes, 95466 has a value of 84.0% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 90.1% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 80.0%.
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,761 California zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 95466 has a value of 84.0% which is in the worst 25% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 91.5% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 85.7%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 32,998 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (86.8%), 95466 has a value of 84.0% which is lower and worse.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(86.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Over time, the 95466 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 25+ with a High School Diploma or Higher Zip Code: 95468

Current Value:

People 25+ with a High School Diploma or Higher Zip Code: 95468

91.1%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Zip Codes, 95468 has a value of 91.1% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 90.1% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 80.0%.
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,761 California zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 95468 has a value of 91.1% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 91.5% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 85.7%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 32,998 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (86.8%), 95468 has a value of 91.1% which is higher and better.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(86.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Over time, the 95468 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 25+ with a High School Diploma or Higher Zip Code: 95469

Current Value:

People 25+ with a High School Diploma or Higher Zip Code: 95469

96.4%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Zip Codes, 95469 has a value of 96.4% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 90.1% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 80.0%.
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,761 California zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 95469 has a value of 96.4% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 91.5% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 85.7%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 32,998 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (86.8%), 95469 has a value of 96.4% which is higher and better.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(86.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Over time, the 95469 value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 25+ with a High School Diploma or Higher Zip Code: 95470

Current Value:

People 25+ with a High School Diploma or Higher Zip Code: 95470

89.7%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Zip Codes, 95470 has a value of 89.7% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 90.1% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 80.0%.
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,761 California zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 95470 has a value of 89.7% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 91.5% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 85.7%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 32,998 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (86.8%), 95470 has a value of 89.7% which is higher and better.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(86.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Over time, the 95470 value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 25+ with a High School Diploma or Higher Zip Code: 95482

Current Value:

People 25+ with a High School Diploma or Higher Zip Code: 95482

84.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Zip Codes, 95482 has a value of 84.0% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 90.1% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 80.0%.
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,761 California zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 95482 has a value of 84.0% which is in the worst 25% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 91.5% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 85.7%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 32,998 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (86.8%), 95482 has a value of 84.0% which is lower and worse.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(86.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Over time, the 95482 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 25+ with a High School Diploma or Higher Zip Code: 95488

Current Value:

People 25+ with a High School Diploma or Higher Zip Code: 95488

100.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Zip Codes, 95488 has a value of 100.0% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 90.1% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 80.0%.
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,761 California zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 95488 has a value of 100.0% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 91.5% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 85.7%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 32,998 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (86.8%), 95488 has a value of 100.0% which is higher and better.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(86.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Over time, the 95488 value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 25+ with a High School Diploma or Higher Zip Code: 95490

Current Value:

People 25+ with a High School Diploma or Higher Zip Code: 95490

88.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Zip Codes, 95490 has a value of 88.2% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 90.1% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 80.0%.
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,761 California zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 95490 has a value of 88.2% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 91.5% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 85.7%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 32,998 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (86.8%), 95490 has a value of 88.2% which is higher and better.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(86.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Over time, the 95490 value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 25+ with a High School Diploma or Higher Zip Code: 95494

Current Value:

People 25+ with a High School Diploma or Higher Zip Code: 95494

100.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Zip Codes, 95494 has a value of 100.0% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 90.1% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 80.0%.
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,761 California zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 95494 has a value of 100.0% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 91.5% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 85.7%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 32,998 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (86.8%), 95494 has a value of 100.0% which is higher and better.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(86.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Over time, the 95494 value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 25+ with a High School Diploma or Higher Zip Code: 95585

Current Value:

People 25+ with a High School Diploma or Higher Zip Code: 95585

84.3%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Zip Codes, 95585 has a value of 84.3% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 90.1% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 80.0%.
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,761 California zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 95585 has a value of 84.3% which is in the worst 25% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 91.5% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 85.7%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 32,998 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (86.8%), 95585 has a value of 84.3% which is lower and worse.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(86.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Over time, the 95585 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 25+ with a High School Diploma or Higher Zip Code: 95587

Current Value:

People 25+ with a High School Diploma or Higher Zip Code: 95587

100.0%
(2017-2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Zip Codes, 95587 has a value of 100.0% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 89.9% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 79.7%.
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,759 California zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 95587 has a value of 100.0% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 91.3% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 85.2%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 33,000 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (86.6%), 95587 has a value of 100.0% which is higher and better.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(86.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Over time, the 95587 value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 25+ with a High School Diploma or Higher Census Tract: 06045010100

Current Value:

People 25+ with a High School Diploma or Higher Census Tract: 06045010100

80.4%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06045010100 has a value of 80.4% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 88.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 75.8%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,076 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06045010100 has a value of 80.4% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 91.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 84.6%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,720 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (86.8%), 06045010100 has a value of 80.4% which is lower and worse.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(86.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Over time, the 06045010100 value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 25+ with a High School Diploma or Higher Census Tract: 06045010200

Current Value:

People 25+ with a High School Diploma or Higher Census Tract: 06045010200

85.6%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06045010200 has a value of 85.6% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 88.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 75.8%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,076 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06045010200 has a value of 85.6% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 91.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 84.6%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,720 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (86.8%), 06045010200 has a value of 85.6% which is lower and worse.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(86.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Over time, the 06045010200 value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 25+ with a High School Diploma or Higher Census Tract: 06045010300

Current Value:

People 25+ with a High School Diploma or Higher Census Tract: 06045010300

90.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06045010300 has a value of 90.0% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 88.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 75.8%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,076 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06045010300 has a value of 90.0% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 91.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 84.6%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,720 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (86.8%), 06045010300 has a value of 90.0% which is higher and better.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(86.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Over time, the 06045010300 value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 25+ with a High School Diploma or Higher Census Tract: 06045010400

Current Value:

People 25+ with a High School Diploma or Higher Census Tract: 06045010400

90.3%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06045010400 has a value of 90.3% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 88.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 75.8%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,076 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06045010400 has a value of 90.3% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 91.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 84.6%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,720 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (86.8%), 06045010400 has a value of 90.3% which is higher and better.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(86.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Over time, the 06045010400 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 25+ with a High School Diploma or Higher Census Tract: 06045010500

Current Value:

People 25+ with a High School Diploma or Higher Census Tract: 06045010500

82.3%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06045010500 has a value of 82.3% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 88.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 75.8%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,076 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06045010500 has a value of 82.3% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 91.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 84.6%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,720 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (86.8%), 06045010500 has a value of 82.3% which is lower and worse.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(86.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Over time, the 06045010500 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 25+ with a High School Diploma or Higher Census Tract: 06045010600

Current Value:

People 25+ with a High School Diploma or Higher Census Tract: 06045010600

89.4%
(2015-2019)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06045010600 has a value of 89.4% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 87.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 74.1%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 8,009 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06045010600 has a value of 89.4% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 90.2% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 82.9%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 72,386 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (86.5%), 06045010600 has a value of 89.4% which is higher and better.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(86.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.

People 25+ with a High School Diploma or Higher Census Tract: 06045010601

Current Value:

People 25+ with a High School Diploma or Higher Census Tract: 06045010601

88.8%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06045010601 has a value of 88.8% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 88.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 75.8%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,076 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06045010601 has a value of 88.8% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 91.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 84.6%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,720 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (86.8%), 06045010601 has a value of 88.8% which is higher and better.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(86.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.

People 25+ with a High School Diploma or Higher Census Tract: 06045010602

Current Value:

People 25+ with a High School Diploma or Higher Census Tract: 06045010602

89.3%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06045010602 has a value of 89.3% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 88.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 75.8%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,076 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06045010602 has a value of 89.3% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 91.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 84.6%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,720 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (86.8%), 06045010602 has a value of 89.3% which is higher and better.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(86.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.

People 25+ with a High School Diploma or Higher Census Tract: 06045010700

Current Value:

People 25+ with a High School Diploma or Higher Census Tract: 06045010700

86.9%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06045010700 has a value of 86.9% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 88.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 75.8%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,076 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06045010700 has a value of 86.9% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 91.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 84.6%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,720 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (86.8%), 06045010700 has a value of 86.9% which is higher and better.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(86.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Over time, the 06045010700 value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 25+ with a High School Diploma or Higher Census Tract: 06045010801

Current Value:

People 25+ with a High School Diploma or Higher Census Tract: 06045010801

90.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06045010801 has a value of 90.2% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 88.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 75.8%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,076 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06045010801 has a value of 90.2% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 91.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 84.6%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,720 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (86.8%), 06045010801 has a value of 90.2% which is higher and better.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(86.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Over time, the 06045010801 value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 25+ with a High School Diploma or Higher Census Tract: 06045010802

Current Value:

People 25+ with a High School Diploma or Higher Census Tract: 06045010802

96.6%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06045010802 has a value of 96.6% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 88.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 75.8%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,076 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06045010802 has a value of 96.6% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 91.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 84.6%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,720 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (86.8%), 06045010802 has a value of 96.6% which is higher and better.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(86.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Over time, the 06045010802 value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 25+ with a High School Diploma or Higher Census Tract: 06045010900

Current Value:

People 25+ with a High School Diploma or Higher Census Tract: 06045010900

78.1%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06045010900 has a value of 78.1% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 88.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 75.8%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,076 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06045010900 has a value of 78.1% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 91.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 84.6%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,720 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (86.8%), 06045010900 has a value of 78.1% which is lower and worse.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(86.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Over time, the 06045010900 value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 25+ with a High School Diploma or Higher Census Tract: 06045011001

Current Value:

People 25+ with a High School Diploma or Higher Census Tract: 06045011001

96.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06045011001 has a value of 96.2% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 88.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 75.8%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,076 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06045011001 has a value of 96.2% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 91.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 84.6%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,720 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (86.8%), 06045011001 has a value of 96.2% which is higher and better.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(86.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Over time, the 06045011001 value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 25+ with a High School Diploma or Higher Census Tract: 06045011002

Current Value:

People 25+ with a High School Diploma or Higher Census Tract: 06045011002

93.0%
(2015-2019)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06045011002 has a value of 93.0% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 87.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 74.1%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 8,009 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06045011002 has a value of 93.0% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 90.2% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 82.9%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 72,386 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (86.5%), 06045011002 has a value of 93.0% which is higher and better.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(86.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.

People 25+ with a High School Diploma or Higher Census Tract: 06045011003

Current Value:

People 25+ with a High School Diploma or Higher Census Tract: 06045011003

93.7%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06045011003 has a value of 93.7% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 88.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 75.8%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,076 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06045011003 has a value of 93.7% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 91.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 84.6%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,720 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (86.8%), 06045011003 has a value of 93.7% which is higher and better.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(86.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.

People 25+ with a High School Diploma or Higher Census Tract: 06045011004

Current Value:

People 25+ with a High School Diploma or Higher Census Tract: 06045011004

94.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06045011004 has a value of 94.5% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 88.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 75.8%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,076 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06045011004 has a value of 94.5% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 91.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 84.6%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,720 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (86.8%), 06045011004 has a value of 94.5% which is higher and better.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(86.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.

People 25+ with a High School Diploma or Higher Census Tract: 06045011102

Current Value:

People 25+ with a High School Diploma or Higher Census Tract: 06045011102

89.4%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06045011102 has a value of 89.4% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 88.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 75.8%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,076 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06045011102 has a value of 89.4% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 91.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 84.6%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,720 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (86.8%), 06045011102 has a value of 89.4% which is higher and better.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(86.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Over time, the 06045011102 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 25+ with a High School Diploma or Higher Census Tract: 06045011200

Current Value:

People 25+ with a High School Diploma or Higher Census Tract: 06045011200

87.7%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06045011200 has a value of 87.7% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 88.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 75.8%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,076 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06045011200 has a value of 87.7% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 91.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 84.6%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,720 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (86.8%), 06045011200 has a value of 87.7% which is higher and better.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(86.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Over time, the 06045011200 value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 25+ with a High School Diploma or Higher Census Tract: 06045011300

Current Value:

People 25+ with a High School Diploma or Higher Census Tract: 06045011300

80.7%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06045011300 has a value of 80.7% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 88.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 75.8%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,076 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06045011300 has a value of 80.7% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 91.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 84.6%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,720 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (86.8%), 06045011300 has a value of 80.7% which is lower and worse.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(86.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Over time, the 06045011300 value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 25+ with a High School Diploma or Higher Census Tract: 06045011400

Current Value:

People 25+ with a High School Diploma or Higher Census Tract: 06045011400

90.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06045011400 has a value of 90.5% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 88.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 75.8%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,076 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06045011400 has a value of 90.5% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 91.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 84.6%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,720 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (86.8%), 06045011400 has a value of 90.5% which is higher and better.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(86.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Over time, the 06045011400 value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 25+ with a High School Diploma or Higher Census Tract: 06045011500

Current Value:

People 25+ with a High School Diploma or Higher Census Tract: 06045011500

76.0%
(2015-2019)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06045011500 has a value of 76.0% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 87.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 74.1%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 8,009 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06045011500 has a value of 76.0% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 90.2% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 82.9%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 72,386 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (86.5%), 06045011500 has a value of 76.0% which is lower and worse.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(86.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.

People 25+ with a High School Diploma or Higher Census Tract: 06045011501

Current Value:

People 25+ with a High School Diploma or Higher Census Tract: 06045011501

90.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06045011501 has a value of 90.0% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 88.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 75.8%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,076 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06045011501 has a value of 90.0% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 91.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 84.6%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,720 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (86.8%), 06045011501 has a value of 90.0% which is higher and better.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(86.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.

People 25+ with a High School Diploma or Higher Census Tract: 06045011502

Current Value:

People 25+ with a High School Diploma or Higher Census Tract: 06045011502

72.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06045011502 has a value of 72.5% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 88.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 75.8%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,076 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06045011502 has a value of 72.5% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 91.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 84.6%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,720 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (86.8%), 06045011502 has a value of 72.5% which is lower and worse.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(86.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.

People 25+ with a High School Diploma or Higher Census Tract: 06045011600

Current Value:

People 25+ with a High School Diploma or Higher Census Tract: 06045011600

80.6%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06045011600 has a value of 80.6% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 88.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 75.8%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,076 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06045011600 has a value of 80.6% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 91.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 84.6%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,720 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (86.8%), 06045011600 has a value of 80.6% which is lower and worse.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(86.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Over time, the 06045011600 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 25+ with a High School Diploma or Higher Census Tract: 06045011700

Current Value:

People 25+ with a High School Diploma or Higher Census Tract: 06045011700

93.8%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06045011700 has a value of 93.8% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 88.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 75.8%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,076 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06045011700 has a value of 93.8% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 91.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 84.6%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,720 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (86.8%), 06045011700 has a value of 93.8% which is higher and better.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(86.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Over time, the 06045011700 value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 25+ with a High School Diploma or Higher Census Tract: 06045011800

Current Value:

People 25+ with a High School Diploma or Higher Census Tract: 06045011800

72.4%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06045011800 has a value of 72.4% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 88.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 75.8%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,076 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06045011800 has a value of 72.4% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 91.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 84.6%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,720 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (86.8%), 06045011800 has a value of 72.4% which is lower and worse.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(86.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Over time, the 06045011800 value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Education / School Environment

Education / School Environment

Education / School Environment

Student-to-Teacher Ratio

Value
Compared to:

Education / School Environment

Student-to-Teacher Ratio

Value
Compared to:

Student-to-Teacher Ratio County: Mendocino

Current Value:

Student-to-Teacher Ratio County: Mendocino

18.1
Students per teacher
(2022-2023)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Mendocino has a value of 18.1 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 21.0 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 21.9.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Mendocino has a value of 18.1 which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 13.9 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 15.7.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,125 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the CA Value (21.9), Mendocino has a value of 18.1 which is lower and better.
CA Value
(21.9)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (15.4), Mendocino has a value of 18.1 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(15.4)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Mendocino (18.1) is less and better than the previously measured value (18.5).
Prior Value
(18.5)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Mendocino value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Education / Student Performance K-12

Education / Student Performance K-12

Education / Student Performance K-12

11th Grade Students Proficient in English/Language Arts

Value
Compared to:

Education / Student Performance K-12

11th Grade Students Proficient in English/Language Arts

Value
Compared to:

11th Grade Students Proficient in English/Language Arts County: Mendocino

Current Value:

11th Grade Students Proficient in English/Language Arts County: Mendocino

41.5%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Mendocino has a value of 41.5% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 50.3% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 43.3%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 57 California counties.
Compared to the CA Value (54.8%), Mendocino has a value of 41.5% which is lower and worse.
CA Value
(54.8%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the prior value, Mendocino (41.5%) is less and worse than the previously measured value (55.6%).
Prior Value
(55.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Mendocino value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Education / Student Performance K-12

11th Grade Students Proficient in Math

Value
Compared to:

Education / Student Performance K-12

11th Grade Students Proficient in Math

Value
Compared to:

11th Grade Students Proficient in Math County: Mendocino

Current Value:

11th Grade Students Proficient in Math County: Mendocino

16.5%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Mendocino has a value of 16.5% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 21.1% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 16.5%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 57 California counties.
Compared to the CA Value (27.0%), Mendocino has a value of 16.5% which is lower and worse.
CA Value
(27.0%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the prior value, Mendocino (16.5%) is less and worse than the previously measured value (22.3%).
Prior Value
(22.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Mendocino value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Education / Student Performance K-12

3rd Grade Students Proficient in English/Language Arts

Value
Compared to:

Education / Student Performance K-12

3rd Grade Students Proficient in English/Language Arts

Value
Compared to:

3rd Grade Students Proficient in English/Language Arts County: Mendocino

Current Value:

3rd Grade Students Proficient in English/Language Arts County: Mendocino

26%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Mendocino has a value of 26% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 37% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 31%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 57 California counties.
Compared to the CA Value (42%), Mendocino has a value of 26% which is lower and worse.
CA Value
(42%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the prior value, Mendocino (26%) is less and worse than the previously measured value (35%).
Prior Value
(35%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Mendocino value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Education / Student Performance K-12

3rd Grade Students Proficient in Math

Value
Compared to:

Education / Student Performance K-12

3rd Grade Students Proficient in Math

Value
Compared to:

3rd Grade Students Proficient in Math County: Mendocino

Current Value:

3rd Grade Students Proficient in Math County: Mendocino

29%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Mendocino has a value of 29% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 38% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 32%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 57 California counties.
Compared to the CA Value (44%), Mendocino has a value of 29% which is lower and worse.
CA Value
(44%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the prior value, Mendocino (29%) is greater and better than the previously measured value (26%).
Prior Value
(26%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Mendocino value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Education / Student Performance K-12

4th Grade Students Proficient in English/Language Arts

Value
Compared to:

Education / Student Performance K-12

4th Grade Students Proficient in English/Language Arts

Value
Compared to:

4th Grade Students Proficient in English/Language Arts County: Mendocino

Current Value:

4th Grade Students Proficient in English/Language Arts County: Mendocino

29%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Mendocino has a value of 29% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 40% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 33%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 57 California counties.
Compared to the CA Value (44%), Mendocino has a value of 29% which is lower and worse.
CA Value
(44%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the prior value, Mendocino (29%) is less and worse than the previously measured value (35%).
Prior Value
(35%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Mendocino value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Education / Student Performance K-12

4th Grade Students Proficient in Math

Value
Compared to:

Education / Student Performance K-12

4th Grade Students Proficient in Math

Value
Compared to:

4th Grade Students Proficient in Math County: Mendocino

Current Value:

4th Grade Students Proficient in Math County: Mendocino

24%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Mendocino has a value of 24% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 33% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 27%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 57 California counties.
Compared to the CA Value (38%), Mendocino has a value of 24% which is lower and worse.
CA Value
(38%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the prior value, Mendocino (24%) is less and worse than the previously measured value (32%).
Prior Value
(32%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Mendocino value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Education / Student Performance K-12

5th Grade Students Proficient in English/Language Arts

Value
Compared to:

Education / Student Performance K-12

5th Grade Students Proficient in English/Language Arts

Value
Compared to:

5th Grade Students Proficient in English/Language Arts County: Mendocino

Current Value:

5th Grade Students Proficient in English/Language Arts County: Mendocino

28.3%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Mendocino has a value of 28.3% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 41.8% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 36.7%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 57 California counties.
Compared to the CA Value (47.1%), Mendocino has a value of 28.3% which is lower and worse.
CA Value
(47.1%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the prior value, Mendocino (28.3%) is less and worse than the previously measured value (33.9%).
Prior Value
(33.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Mendocino value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Education / Student Performance K-12

5th Grade Students Proficient in Math

Value
Compared to:

Education / Student Performance K-12

5th Grade Students Proficient in Math

Value
Compared to:

5th Grade Students Proficient in Math County: Mendocino

Current Value:

5th Grade Students Proficient in Math County: Mendocino

16.8%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Mendocino has a value of 16.8% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 24.9% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 20.0%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 57 California counties.
Compared to the CA Value (31.6%), Mendocino has a value of 16.8% which is lower and worse.
CA Value
(31.6%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the prior value, Mendocino (16.8%) is greater and better than the previously measured value (11.9%).
Prior Value
(11.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Mendocino value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Education / Student Performance K-12

6th Grade Students Proficient in English/Language Arts

Value
Compared to:

Education / Student Performance K-12

6th Grade Students Proficient in English/Language Arts

Value
Compared to:

6th Grade Students Proficient in English/Language Arts County: Mendocino

Current Value:

6th Grade Students Proficient in English/Language Arts County: Mendocino

31.1%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Mendocino has a value of 31.1% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 38.6% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 34.1%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 57 California counties.
Compared to the CA Value (45.1%), Mendocino has a value of 31.1% which is lower and worse.
CA Value
(45.1%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the prior value, Mendocino (31.1%) is greater and better than the previously measured value (19.1%).
Prior Value
(19.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Mendocino value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Education / Student Performance K-12

6th Grade Students Proficient in Math

Value
Compared to:

Education / Student Performance K-12

6th Grade Students Proficient in Math

Value
Compared to:

6th Grade Students Proficient in Math County: Mendocino

Current Value:

6th Grade Students Proficient in Math County: Mendocino

18.2%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Mendocino has a value of 18.2% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 26.9% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 22.5%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 57 California counties.
Compared to the CA Value (32.5%), Mendocino has a value of 18.2% which is lower and worse.
CA Value
(32.5%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the prior value, Mendocino (18.2%) is greater and better than the previously measured value (9.7%).
Prior Value
(9.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Mendocino value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Education / Student Performance K-12

7th Grade Students Proficient in English/Language Arts

Value
Compared to:

Education / Student Performance K-12

7th Grade Students Proficient in English/Language Arts

Value
Compared to:

7th Grade Students Proficient in English/Language Arts County: Mendocino

Current Value:

7th Grade Students Proficient in English/Language Arts County: Mendocino

35.9%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Mendocino has a value of 35.9% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 44.1% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 38.9%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 57 California counties.
Compared to the CA Value (49.2%), Mendocino has a value of 35.9% which is lower and worse.
CA Value
(49.2%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the prior value, Mendocino (35.9%) is greater and better than the previously measured value (33.5%).
Prior Value
(33.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Mendocino value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Education / Student Performance K-12

7th Grade Students Proficient in Math

Value
Compared to:

Education / Student Performance K-12

7th Grade Students Proficient in Math

Value
Compared to:

7th Grade Students Proficient in Math County: Mendocino

Current Value:

7th Grade Students Proficient in Math County: Mendocino

19.4%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Mendocino has a value of 19.4% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 28.1% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 23.3%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 57 California counties.
Compared to the CA Value (32.0%), Mendocino has a value of 19.4% which is lower and worse.
CA Value
(32.0%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the prior value, Mendocino (19.4%) is greater and better than the previously measured value (15.1%).
Prior Value
(15.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Mendocino value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Education / Student Performance K-12

8th Grade Students Proficient in English/Language Arts

Value
Compared to:

Education / Student Performance K-12

8th Grade Students Proficient in English/Language Arts

Value
Compared to:

8th Grade Students Proficient in English/Language Arts County: Mendocino

Current Value:

8th Grade Students Proficient in English/Language Arts County: Mendocino

30.6%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Mendocino has a value of 30.6% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 41.2% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 37.4%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 57 California counties.
Compared to the CA Value (46.6%), Mendocino has a value of 30.6% which is lower and worse.
CA Value
(46.6%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the prior value, Mendocino (30.6%) is greater and better than the previously measured value (30.5%).
Prior Value
(30.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Mendocino value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Education / Student Performance K-12

8th Grade Students Proficient in Math

Value
Compared to:

Education / Student Performance K-12

8th Grade Students Proficient in Math

Value
Compared to:

8th Grade Students Proficient in Math County: Mendocino

Current Value:

8th Grade Students Proficient in Math County: Mendocino

15.4%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Mendocino has a value of 15.4% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 24.3% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 18.7%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 57 California counties.
Compared to the CA Value (29.2%), Mendocino has a value of 15.4% which is lower and worse.
CA Value
(29.2%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the prior value, Mendocino (15.4%) is greater and better than the previously measured value (13.2%).
Prior Value
(13.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Mendocino value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Education / Student Performance K-12

High School Graduation

Value
Compared to:

Education / Student Performance K-12

High School Graduation

Value
Compared to:

High School Graduation County: Mendocino

Current Value:

High School Graduation County: Mendocino

87.4%
(2022-2023)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Mendocino has a value of 87.4% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 87.4% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 84.5%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 57 California counties.
Compared to the CA Value (86.2%), Mendocino has a value of 87.4% which is higher and better.
CA Value
(86.2%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (86.5%), Mendocino has a value of 87.4% which is higher and better.
US Value
(86.5% in 2020)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is National Center for Education Statistics
Compared to the prior value, Mendocino (87.4%) is greater and better than the previously measured value (84.0%).
Prior Value
(84.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Mendocino value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (90.7%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(90.7%)

Environmental Health / Air

Environmental Health / Air

Environmental Health / Air

Annual Ozone Air Quality

Value
Compared to:

Environmental Health / Air

Annual Ozone Air Quality

Value
Compared to:

Annual Ozone Air Quality County: Mendocino

Current Value:

Annual Ozone Air Quality County: Mendocino

1
(2019-2021)
Compared to:
Compared to Air Quality Index, Mendocino has a value of 1 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 2 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 3.
Air Quality Index
The American Lung Association (ALA) assigns grades A-F to counties (A=1; B=2; C=3; D=4; F=5), based on average annual number of days that ozone levels exceeded U.S. standards during the three year measurement period. The five-point grading scale was used for the distribution (Green = <2; Yellow = 2 - 3; Red = >3). The air quality data is collected by the EPA and summarized by the ALA.
Compared to the prior value, Mendocino (1) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (1).
Prior Value
(1)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Mendocino value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Environmental Health / Air

Annual Particle Pollution

Value
Compared to:

Environmental Health / Air

Annual Particle Pollution

Value
Compared to:

Annual Particle Pollution County: Mendocino

Current Value:

Annual Particle Pollution County: Mendocino

5
(2019-2021)
Compared to:
Compared to Air Quality Index, Mendocino has a value of 5 which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 2 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 3.
Air Quality Index
The American Lung Association (ALA) assigns grades A-F to counties (A=1; B=2; C=3; D=4; F=5), based on average annual number of days that particle pollution levels exceeded U.S. standards during the three year measurement period. The five-point grading scale was used for the distribution (Green = <2; Yellow = 2 - 3; Red = >3). The air quality data is collected by the EPA and summarized by the ALA.
Compared to the prior value, Mendocino (5) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (5).
Prior Value
(5)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Mendocino value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Environmental Health / Built Environment

Environmental Health / Built Environment

Environmental Health / Built Environment

Access to Exercise Opportunities

Value
Compared to:

Environmental Health / Built Environment

Access to Exercise Opportunities

Value
Compared to:

Access to Exercise Opportunities County: Mendocino

Current Value:

Access to Exercise Opportunities County: Mendocino

66.7%
(2024)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Mendocino has a value of 66.7% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 85.7% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 76.2%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Mendocino has a value of 66.7% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 64.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 47.1%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,096 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the CA Value (94.2%), Mendocino has a value of 66.7% which is lower and worse.
CA Value
(94.2%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (84.1%), Mendocino has a value of 66.7% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(84.1%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Mendocino (66.7%) is greater and better than the previously measured value (65.9%).
Prior Value
(65.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

Environmental Health / Built Environment

Access to Parks

Value
Compared to:

Environmental Health / Built Environment

Access to Parks

Value
Compared to:

Access to Parks County: Mendocino

Current Value:

Access to Parks County: Mendocino

45.4%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Mendocino has a value of 45.4% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 69.6% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 55.4%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to the CA Value (82.4%), Mendocino has a value of 45.4% which is lower and worse.
CA Value
(82.4%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the prior value, Mendocino (45.4%) is greater and better than the previously measured value (42.1%).
Prior Value
(42.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

Environmental Health / Built Environment

Food Environment Index

Value
Compared to:

Environmental Health / Built Environment

Food Environment Index

Value
Compared to:

Food Environment Index County: Mendocino

Current Value:

Food Environment Index County: Mendocino

7.5
(2024)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Mendocino has a value of 7.5 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 8.0 while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 7.4.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Mendocino has a value of 7.5 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 7.7 while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 6.9.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,108 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the CA Value (8.6), Mendocino has a value of 7.5 which is lower and worse.
CA Value
(8.6)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (7.7), Mendocino has a value of 7.5 which is lower and worse.
US Value
(7.7)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Mendocino (7.5) is greater and better than the previously measured value (7.4).
Prior Value
(7.4)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Mendocino value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Environmental Health / Built Environment

Liquor Store Density

Value
Compared to:

Environmental Health / Built Environment

Liquor Store Density

Value
Compared to:

Liquor Store Density County: Mendocino

Current Value:

Liquor Store Density County: Mendocino

8.8
Stores per 100,000 population
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Mendocino has a value of 8.8 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 9.5 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 13.2.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 44 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Mendocino has a value of 8.8 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.0 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.4.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 1,477 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the CA Value (11.0), Mendocino has a value of 8.8 which is lower and better.
CA Value
(11.0)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (10.7), Mendocino has a value of 8.8 which is lower and better.
US Value
(10.7)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Mendocino (8.8) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (8.8).
Prior Value
(8.8)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Mendocino value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Environmental Health / Built Environment

Proximity to Highways

Value
Compared to:

Environmental Health / Built Environment

Proximity to Highways

Value
Compared to:

Proximity to Highways County: Mendocino

Current Value:

Proximity to Highways County: Mendocino

2.7%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Mendocino has a value of 2.7% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 3.4% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 5.6%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to the CA Value (6.6%), Mendocino has a value of 2.7% which is lower and better.
CA Value
(6.6%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the prior value, Mendocino (2.7%) is less and better than the previously measured value (3.3%).
Prior Value
(3.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

Environmental Health / Weather & Climate

Environmental Health / Weather & Climate

Environmental Health / Weather & Climate

Daily Dose of UV Irradiance

Value
Compared to:

Environmental Health / Weather & Climate

Daily Dose of UV Irradiance

Value
Compared to:

Daily Dose of UV Irradiance County: Mendocino

Current Value:

Daily Dose of UV Irradiance County: Mendocino

4,477.0
Joule per square meter
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Mendocino has a value of 4,477.0 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 4,532.0 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 4,680.5.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to the CA Value (4,541.0), Mendocino has a value of 4,477.0 which is lower and better.
CA Value
(4,541.0)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the prior value, Mendocino (4,477.0) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (4,114.0).
Prior Value
(4,114.0)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Mendocino value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Environmental Health / Weather & Climate

Number of Extreme Heat Days

Value
Compared to:

Environmental Health / Weather & Climate

Number of Extreme Heat Days

Value
Compared to:

Number of Extreme Heat Days County: Mendocino

Current Value:

Number of Extreme Heat Days County: Mendocino

32
Days
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Mendocino (32) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (29).
Prior Value
(29)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Mendocino value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Environmental Health / Weather & Climate

Number of Extreme Heat Events

Value
Compared to:

Environmental Health / Weather & Climate

Number of Extreme Heat Events

Value
Compared to:

Number of Extreme Heat Events County: Mendocino

Current Value:

Number of Extreme Heat Events County: Mendocino

25
Events
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Mendocino (25) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (25).
Prior Value
(25)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Mendocino value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Environmental Health / Weather & Climate

Number of Extreme Precipitation Days

Value
Compared to:

Environmental Health / Weather & Climate

Number of Extreme Precipitation Days

Value
Compared to:

Number of Extreme Precipitation Days County: Mendocino

Current Value:

Number of Extreme Precipitation Days County: Mendocino

11
Days
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Mendocino (11) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (1).
Prior Value
(1)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Mendocino value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Environmental Health / Weather & Climate

Weeks of Moderate Drought or Worse

Value
Compared to:

Environmental Health / Weather & Climate

Weeks of Moderate Drought or Worse

Value
Compared to:

Weeks of Moderate Drought or Worse County: Mendocino

Current Value:

Weeks of Moderate Drought or Worse County: Mendocino

47
Weeks per year
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Mendocino (47) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (43).
Prior Value
(43)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Mendocino value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.