Advanced Search: Build a Custom Dashboard
In the fields below, search for indicators by location, topics, population, classification, subgroup, or comparison. No fields are required, but we suggest selecting a location or two to start. In the additional search options section, select options to group and order search results. To learn more about how to customize a dashboard, see our help center.
Visit the Indicator List Page to see the full list of indicators and locations available on the site.
Search Results:
Indicator Gauge Icon Legend
Legend Colors
Red is bad, green is good, blue is not statistically different/neutral.
Compared to Distribution
the value is in the best half of communities.
the value is in the 2nd worst quarter of communities.
the value is in the worst quarter of communities.
Compared to Target
meets target; 
does not meet target.
Compared to a Single Value
lower than the comparison value;
higher than the comparison value;
not statistically different from comparison value.
Trend
non-significant change over time; 
significant change over time; 
no change over time.
Compared to Prior Value
higher than the previous measurement period;
lower than the previous measurement period;
no statistically different change from previous measurement period.
Health / Disabilities
Persons with a Disability Census Tract: 06045010400
Persons with a Disability Census Tract: 06045010400
26.9%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Mendocino, CA County Value
(18.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons with a Disability Census Tract: 06045010500
Persons with a Disability Census Tract: 06045010500
17.7%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Mendocino, CA County Value
(18.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons with a Disability Census Tract: 06045010600
Persons with a Disability Census Tract: 06045010600
15.6%
(2015-2019)
Compared to:
Mendocino, CA County Value
(17.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons with a Disability Census Tract: 06045010601
Persons with a Disability Census Tract: 06045010601
20.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Mendocino, CA County Value
(18.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Persons with a Disability Census Tract: 06045010602
Persons with a Disability Census Tract: 06045010602
21.1%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Mendocino, CA County Value
(18.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Persons with a Disability Census Tract: 06045010700
Persons with a Disability Census Tract: 06045010700
20.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Mendocino, CA County Value
(18.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons with a Disability Census Tract: 06045010801
Persons with a Disability Census Tract: 06045010801
14.1%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Mendocino, CA County Value
(18.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons with a Disability Census Tract: 06045010802
Persons with a Disability Census Tract: 06045010802
19.4%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Mendocino, CA County Value
(18.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons with a Disability Census Tract: 06045010900
Persons with a Disability Census Tract: 06045010900
17.3%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Mendocino, CA County Value
(18.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons with a Disability Census Tract: 06045011001
Persons with a Disability Census Tract: 06045011001
19.3%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Mendocino, CA County Value
(18.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons with a Disability Census Tract: 06045011002
Persons with a Disability Census Tract: 06045011002
14.7%
(2015-2019)
Compared to:
Mendocino, CA County Value
(17.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons with a Disability Census Tract: 06045011003
Persons with a Disability Census Tract: 06045011003
32.9%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Mendocino, CA County Value
(18.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Persons with a Disability Census Tract: 06045011004
Persons with a Disability Census Tract: 06045011004
11.4%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Mendocino, CA County Value
(18.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Persons with a Disability Census Tract: 06045011102
Persons with a Disability Census Tract: 06045011102
12.8%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Mendocino, CA County Value
(18.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons with a Disability Census Tract: 06045011200
Persons with a Disability Census Tract: 06045011200
13.1%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Mendocino, CA County Value
(18.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons with a Disability Census Tract: 06045011300
Persons with a Disability Census Tract: 06045011300
25.8%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Mendocino, CA County Value
(18.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons with a Disability Census Tract: 06045011400
Persons with a Disability Census Tract: 06045011400
15.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Mendocino, CA County Value
(18.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons with a Disability Census Tract: 06045011500
Persons with a Disability Census Tract: 06045011500
16.0%
(2015-2019)
Compared to:
Mendocino, CA County Value
(17.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons with a Disability Census Tract: 06045011501
Persons with a Disability Census Tract: 06045011501
13.1%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Mendocino, CA County Value
(18.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Persons with a Disability Census Tract: 06045011502
Persons with a Disability Census Tract: 06045011502
16.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Mendocino, CA County Value
(18.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Persons with a Disability Census Tract: 06045011600
Persons with a Disability Census Tract: 06045011600
21.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Mendocino, CA County Value
(18.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons with a Disability Census Tract: 06045011700
Persons with a Disability Census Tract: 06045011700
17.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Mendocino, CA County Value
(18.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons with a Disability Census Tract: 06045011800
Persons with a Disability Census Tract: 06045011800
11.9%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Mendocino, CA County Value
(18.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons with a Hearing Difficulty County: Mendocino
Persons with a Hearing Difficulty County: Mendocino
4.4%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
CA Value
(2.9%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
US Value
(3.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons with a Hearing Difficulty Census Place: Albion
Persons with a Hearing Difficulty Census Place: Albion
0.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Mendocino, CA County Value
(4.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
CA Value
(2.9%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
US Value
(3.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons with a Hearing Difficulty Census Place: Anchor Bay
Persons with a Hearing Difficulty Census Place: Anchor Bay
3.3%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Mendocino, CA County Value
(4.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
CA Value
(2.9%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
US Value
(3.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons with a Hearing Difficulty Census Place: Boonville
Persons with a Hearing Difficulty Census Place: Boonville
5.4%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Mendocino, CA County Value
(4.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
CA Value
(2.9%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
US Value
(3.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons with a Hearing Difficulty Census Place: Brooktrails
Persons with a Hearing Difficulty Census Place: Brooktrails
5.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Mendocino, CA County Value
(4.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
CA Value
(2.9%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
US Value
(3.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons with a Hearing Difficulty Census Place: Calpella
Persons with a Hearing Difficulty Census Place: Calpella
0.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Mendocino, CA County Value
(4.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
CA Value
(2.9%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
US Value
(3.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons with a Hearing Difficulty Census Place: Caspar
Persons with a Hearing Difficulty Census Place: Caspar
0.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Mendocino, CA County Value
(4.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
CA Value
(2.9%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
US Value
(3.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons with a Hearing Difficulty Census Place: Cleone
Persons with a Hearing Difficulty Census Place: Cleone
6.3%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Mendocino, CA County Value
(4.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
CA Value
(2.9%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
US Value
(3.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons with a Hearing Difficulty Census Place: Comptche
Persons with a Hearing Difficulty Census Place: Comptche
11.7%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Mendocino, CA County Value
(4.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
CA Value
(2.9%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
US Value
(3.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons with a Hearing Difficulty Census Place: Covelo
Persons with a Hearing Difficulty Census Place: Covelo
4.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Mendocino, CA County Value
(4.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
CA Value
(2.9%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
US Value
(3.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons with a Hearing Difficulty Census Place: Fort Bragg
Persons with a Hearing Difficulty Census Place: Fort Bragg
6.8%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Mendocino, CA County Value
(4.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
CA Value
(2.9%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
US Value
(3.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons with a Hearing Difficulty Census Place: Hopland
Persons with a Hearing Difficulty Census Place: Hopland
3.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Mendocino, CA County Value
(4.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
CA Value
(2.9%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
US Value
(3.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons with a Hearing Difficulty Census Place: Laytonville
Persons with a Hearing Difficulty Census Place: Laytonville
5.8%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Mendocino, CA County Value
(4.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
CA Value
(2.9%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
US Value
(3.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons with a Hearing Difficulty Census Place: Leggett
Persons with a Hearing Difficulty Census Place: Leggett
28.3%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Mendocino, CA County Value
(4.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
CA Value
(2.9%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
US Value
(3.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons with a Hearing Difficulty Census Place: Little River
Persons with a Hearing Difficulty Census Place: Little River
14.3%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Mendocino, CA County Value
(4.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
CA Value
(2.9%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
US Value
(3.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons with a Hearing Difficulty Census Place: Manchester
Persons with a Hearing Difficulty Census Place: Manchester
0.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Mendocino, CA County Value
(4.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
CA Value
(2.9%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
US Value
(3.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons with a Hearing Difficulty Census Place: Mendocino
Persons with a Hearing Difficulty Census Place: Mendocino
4.4%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Mendocino, CA County Value
(4.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
CA Value
(2.9%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
US Value
(3.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons with a Hearing Difficulty Census Place: Philo
Persons with a Hearing Difficulty Census Place: Philo
0.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Mendocino, CA County Value
(4.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
CA Value
(2.9%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
US Value
(3.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons with a Hearing Difficulty Census Place: Point Arena
Persons with a Hearing Difficulty Census Place: Point Arena
3.9%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Mendocino, CA County Value
(4.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
CA Value
(2.9%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
US Value
(3.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons with a Hearing Difficulty Census Place: Potter Valley
Persons with a Hearing Difficulty Census Place: Potter Valley
1.7%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Mendocino, CA County Value
(4.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
CA Value
(2.9%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
US Value
(3.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons with a Hearing Difficulty Census Place: Redwood Valley
Persons with a Hearing Difficulty Census Place: Redwood Valley
1.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Mendocino, CA County Value
(4.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
CA Value
(2.9%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
US Value
(3.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons with a Hearing Difficulty Census Place: Talmage
Persons with a Hearing Difficulty Census Place: Talmage
1.8%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Mendocino, CA County Value
(4.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
CA Value
(2.9%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
US Value
(3.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons with a Hearing Difficulty Census Place: Ukiah
Persons with a Hearing Difficulty Census Place: Ukiah
3.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Mendocino, CA County Value
(4.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
CA Value
(2.9%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
US Value
(3.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons with a Hearing Difficulty Census Place: Willits
Persons with a Hearing Difficulty Census Place: Willits
6.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Mendocino, CA County Value
(4.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
CA Value
(2.9%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
US Value
(3.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons with a Hearing Difficulty Zip Code: 95410
Persons with a Hearing Difficulty Zip Code: 95410
4.3%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Mendocino, CA County Value
(4.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons with a Hearing Difficulty Zip Code: 95415
Persons with a Hearing Difficulty Zip Code: 95415
3.9%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Mendocino, CA County Value
(4.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons with a Hearing Difficulty Zip Code: 95417
Persons with a Hearing Difficulty Zip Code: 95417
0.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Mendocino, CA County Value
(4.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons with a Hearing Difficulty Zip Code: 95420
Persons with a Hearing Difficulty Zip Code: 95420
0.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Mendocino, CA County Value
(4.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons with a Hearing Difficulty Zip Code: 95427
Persons with a Hearing Difficulty Zip Code: 95427
2.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Mendocino, CA County Value
(4.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons with a Hearing Difficulty Zip Code: 95428
Persons with a Hearing Difficulty Zip Code: 95428
6.8%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Mendocino, CA County Value
(4.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons with a Hearing Difficulty Zip Code: 95429
Persons with a Hearing Difficulty Zip Code: 95429
5.1%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Mendocino, CA County Value
(4.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons with a Hearing Difficulty Zip Code: 95432
Persons with a Hearing Difficulty Zip Code: 95432
3.9%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Mendocino, CA County Value
(4.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons with a Hearing Difficulty Zip Code: 95437
Persons with a Hearing Difficulty Zip Code: 95437
6.4%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Mendocino, CA County Value
(4.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons with a Hearing Difficulty Zip Code: 95445
Persons with a Hearing Difficulty Zip Code: 95445
3.9%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Mendocino, CA County Value
(4.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons with a Hearing Difficulty Zip Code: 95449
Persons with a Hearing Difficulty Zip Code: 95449
2.7%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Mendocino, CA County Value
(4.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons with a Hearing Difficulty Zip Code: 95454
Persons with a Hearing Difficulty Zip Code: 95454
2.7%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Mendocino, CA County Value
(4.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons with a Hearing Difficulty Zip Code: 95456
Persons with a Hearing Difficulty Zip Code: 95456
13.3%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Mendocino, CA County Value
(4.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons with a Hearing Difficulty Zip Code: 95459
Persons with a Hearing Difficulty Zip Code: 95459
2.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Mendocino, CA County Value
(4.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons with a Hearing Difficulty Zip Code: 95460
Persons with a Hearing Difficulty Zip Code: 95460
7.6%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Mendocino, CA County Value
(4.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons with a Hearing Difficulty Zip Code: 95463
Persons with a Hearing Difficulty Zip Code: 95463
11.4%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Mendocino, CA County Value
(4.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons with a Hearing Difficulty Zip Code: 95466
Persons with a Hearing Difficulty Zip Code: 95466
0.7%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Mendocino, CA County Value
(4.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons with a Hearing Difficulty Zip Code: 95468
Persons with a Hearing Difficulty Zip Code: 95468
5.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Mendocino, CA County Value
(4.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons with a Hearing Difficulty Zip Code: 95469
Persons with a Hearing Difficulty Zip Code: 95469
5.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Mendocino, CA County Value
(4.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons with a Hearing Difficulty Zip Code: 95470
Persons with a Hearing Difficulty Zip Code: 95470
2.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Mendocino, CA County Value
(4.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons with a Hearing Difficulty Zip Code: 95482
Persons with a Hearing Difficulty Zip Code: 95482
3.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Mendocino, CA County Value
(4.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons with a Hearing Difficulty Zip Code: 95488
Persons with a Hearing Difficulty Zip Code: 95488
0.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Mendocino, CA County Value
(4.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons with a Hearing Difficulty Zip Code: 95490
Persons with a Hearing Difficulty Zip Code: 95490
5.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Mendocino, CA County Value
(4.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons with a Hearing Difficulty Zip Code: 95494
Persons with a Hearing Difficulty Zip Code: 95494
4.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Mendocino, CA County Value
(4.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons with a Hearing Difficulty Zip Code: 95585
Persons with a Hearing Difficulty Zip Code: 95585
14.1%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Mendocino, CA County Value
(4.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons with a Hearing Difficulty Zip Code: 95587
Persons with a Hearing Difficulty Zip Code: 95587
50.0%
(2017-2021)
Compared to:
Mendocino, CA County Value
(4.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons with a Hearing Difficulty Census Tract: 06045010100
Persons with a Hearing Difficulty Census Tract: 06045010100
7.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Mendocino, CA County Value
(4.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons with a Hearing Difficulty Census Tract: 06045010200
Persons with a Hearing Difficulty Census Tract: 06045010200
3.9%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Mendocino, CA County Value
(4.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons with a Hearing Difficulty Census Tract: 06045010300
Persons with a Hearing Difficulty Census Tract: 06045010300
8.1%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Mendocino, CA County Value
(4.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons with a Hearing Difficulty Census Tract: 06045010400
Persons with a Hearing Difficulty Census Tract: 06045010400
12.4%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Mendocino, CA County Value
(4.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons with a Hearing Difficulty Census Tract: 06045010500
Persons with a Hearing Difficulty Census Tract: 06045010500
3.8%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Mendocino, CA County Value
(4.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons with a Hearing Difficulty Census Tract: 06045010600
Persons with a Hearing Difficulty Census Tract: 06045010600
4.4%
(2015-2019)
Compared to:
Mendocino, CA County Value
(5.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons with a Hearing Difficulty Census Tract: 06045010601
Persons with a Hearing Difficulty Census Tract: 06045010601
7.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Mendocino, CA County Value
(4.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Persons with a Hearing Difficulty Census Tract: 06045010602
Persons with a Hearing Difficulty Census Tract: 06045010602
4.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Mendocino, CA County Value
(4.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Persons with a Hearing Difficulty Census Tract: 06045010700
Persons with a Hearing Difficulty Census Tract: 06045010700
5.9%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Mendocino, CA County Value
(4.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons with a Hearing Difficulty Census Tract: 06045010801
Persons with a Hearing Difficulty Census Tract: 06045010801
2.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Mendocino, CA County Value
(4.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons with a Hearing Difficulty Census Tract: 06045010802
Persons with a Hearing Difficulty Census Tract: 06045010802
4.8%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Mendocino, CA County Value
(4.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons with a Hearing Difficulty Census Tract: 06045010900
Persons with a Hearing Difficulty Census Tract: 06045010900
4.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Mendocino, CA County Value
(4.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons with a Hearing Difficulty Census Tract: 06045011001
Persons with a Hearing Difficulty Census Tract: 06045011001
7.4%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Mendocino, CA County Value
(4.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons with a Hearing Difficulty Census Tract: 06045011002
Persons with a Hearing Difficulty Census Tract: 06045011002
8.3%
(2015-2019)
Compared to:
Mendocino, CA County Value
(5.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons with a Hearing Difficulty Census Tract: 06045011003
Persons with a Hearing Difficulty Census Tract: 06045011003
2.3%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Mendocino, CA County Value
(4.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Persons with a Hearing Difficulty Census Tract: 06045011004
Persons with a Hearing Difficulty Census Tract: 06045011004
7.1%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Mendocino, CA County Value
(4.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Persons with a Hearing Difficulty Census Tract: 06045011102
Persons with a Hearing Difficulty Census Tract: 06045011102
4.1%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Mendocino, CA County Value
(4.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons with a Hearing Difficulty Census Tract: 06045011200
Persons with a Hearing Difficulty Census Tract: 06045011200
3.4%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Mendocino, CA County Value
(4.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons with a Hearing Difficulty Census Tract: 06045011300
Persons with a Hearing Difficulty Census Tract: 06045011300
2.4%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Mendocino, CA County Value
(4.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons with a Hearing Difficulty Census Tract: 06045011400
Persons with a Hearing Difficulty Census Tract: 06045011400
6.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Mendocino, CA County Value
(4.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons with a Hearing Difficulty Census Tract: 06045011500
Persons with a Hearing Difficulty Census Tract: 06045011500
3.4%
(2015-2019)
Compared to:
Mendocino, CA County Value
(5.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons with a Hearing Difficulty Census Tract: 06045011501
Persons with a Hearing Difficulty Census Tract: 06045011501
1.3%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Mendocino, CA County Value
(4.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Persons with a Hearing Difficulty Census Tract: 06045011502
Persons with a Hearing Difficulty Census Tract: 06045011502
4.3%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Mendocino, CA County Value
(4.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Persons with a Hearing Difficulty Census Tract: 06045011600
Persons with a Hearing Difficulty Census Tract: 06045011600
3.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Mendocino, CA County Value
(4.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons with a Hearing Difficulty Census Tract: 06045011700
Persons with a Hearing Difficulty Census Tract: 06045011700
2.7%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Mendocino, CA County Value
(4.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons with a Hearing Difficulty Census Tract: 06045011800
Persons with a Hearing Difficulty Census Tract: 06045011800
2.9%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Mendocino, CA County Value
(4.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons with a Self-Care Difficulty County: Mendocino
Persons with a Self-Care Difficulty County: Mendocino
4.1%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
CA Value
(2.7%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
US Value
(2.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons with a Self-Care Difficulty Census Place: Albion
Persons with a Self-Care Difficulty Census Place: Albion
0.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Mendocino, CA County Value
(4.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
CA Value
(2.7%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
US Value
(2.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons with a Self-Care Difficulty Census Place: Anchor Bay
Persons with a Self-Care Difficulty Census Place: Anchor Bay
0.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Mendocino, CA County Value
(4.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
CA Value
(2.7%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
US Value
(2.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons with a Self-Care Difficulty Census Place: Boonville
Persons with a Self-Care Difficulty Census Place: Boonville
4.7%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Mendocino, CA County Value
(4.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
CA Value
(2.7%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
US Value
(2.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons with a Self-Care Difficulty Census Place: Brooktrails
Persons with a Self-Care Difficulty Census Place: Brooktrails
3.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Mendocino, CA County Value
(4.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
CA Value
(2.7%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
US Value
(2.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons with a Self-Care Difficulty Census Place: Calpella
Persons with a Self-Care Difficulty Census Place: Calpella
8.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Mendocino, CA County Value
(4.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
CA Value
(2.7%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
US Value
(2.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons with a Self-Care Difficulty Census Place: Caspar
Persons with a Self-Care Difficulty Census Place: Caspar
0.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Mendocino, CA County Value
(4.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
CA Value
(2.7%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
US Value
(2.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons with a Self-Care Difficulty Census Place: Cleone
Persons with a Self-Care Difficulty Census Place: Cleone
2.9%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Mendocino, CA County Value
(4.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
CA Value
(2.7%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
US Value
(2.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons with a Self-Care Difficulty Census Place: Comptche
Persons with a Self-Care Difficulty Census Place: Comptche
0.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Mendocino, CA County Value
(4.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
CA Value
(2.7%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
US Value
(2.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons with a Self-Care Difficulty Census Place: Covelo
Persons with a Self-Care Difficulty Census Place: Covelo
2.3%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Mendocino, CA County Value
(4.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
CA Value
(2.7%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
US Value
(2.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons with a Self-Care Difficulty Census Place: Fort Bragg
Persons with a Self-Care Difficulty Census Place: Fort Bragg
6.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Mendocino, CA County Value
(4.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
CA Value
(2.7%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
US Value
(2.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons with a Self-Care Difficulty Census Place: Hopland
Persons with a Self-Care Difficulty Census Place: Hopland
1.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Mendocino, CA County Value
(4.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
CA Value
(2.7%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
US Value
(2.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons with a Self-Care Difficulty Census Place: Laytonville
Persons with a Self-Care Difficulty Census Place: Laytonville
3.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Mendocino, CA County Value
(4.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
CA Value
(2.7%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
US Value
(2.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons with a Self-Care Difficulty Census Place: Leggett
Persons with a Self-Care Difficulty Census Place: Leggett
28.3%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Mendocino, CA County Value
(4.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
CA Value
(2.7%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
US Value
(2.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons with a Self-Care Difficulty Census Place: Little River
Persons with a Self-Care Difficulty Census Place: Little River
0.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Mendocino, CA County Value
(4.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
CA Value
(2.7%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
US Value
(2.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons with a Self-Care Difficulty Census Place: Manchester
Persons with a Self-Care Difficulty Census Place: Manchester
0.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Mendocino, CA County Value
(4.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
CA Value
(2.7%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
US Value
(2.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons with a Self-Care Difficulty Census Place: Mendocino
Persons with a Self-Care Difficulty Census Place: Mendocino
0.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Mendocino, CA County Value
(4.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
CA Value
(2.7%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
US Value
(2.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons with a Self-Care Difficulty Census Place: Philo
Persons with a Self-Care Difficulty Census Place: Philo
0.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Mendocino, CA County Value
(4.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
CA Value
(2.7%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
US Value
(2.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons with a Self-Care Difficulty Census Place: Point Arena
Persons with a Self-Care Difficulty Census Place: Point Arena
0.9%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Mendocino, CA County Value
(4.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
CA Value
(2.7%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
US Value
(2.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons with a Self-Care Difficulty Census Place: Potter Valley
Persons with a Self-Care Difficulty Census Place: Potter Valley
1.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Mendocino, CA County Value
(4.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
CA Value
(2.7%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
US Value
(2.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons with a Self-Care Difficulty Census Place: Redwood Valley
Persons with a Self-Care Difficulty Census Place: Redwood Valley
0.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Mendocino, CA County Value
(4.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
CA Value
(2.7%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
US Value
(2.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons with a Self-Care Difficulty Census Place: Talmage
Persons with a Self-Care Difficulty Census Place: Talmage
6.1%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Mendocino, CA County Value
(4.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
CA Value
(2.7%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
US Value
(2.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons with a Self-Care Difficulty Census Place: Ukiah
Persons with a Self-Care Difficulty Census Place: Ukiah
4.7%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Mendocino, CA County Value
(4.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
CA Value
(2.7%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
US Value
(2.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons with a Self-Care Difficulty Census Place: Willits
Persons with a Self-Care Difficulty Census Place: Willits
11.4%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Mendocino, CA County Value
(4.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
CA Value
(2.7%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
US Value
(2.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons with a Self-Care Difficulty Zip Code: 95410
Persons with a Self-Care Difficulty Zip Code: 95410
0.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Mendocino, CA County Value
(4.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons with a Self-Care Difficulty Zip Code: 95415
Persons with a Self-Care Difficulty Zip Code: 95415
3.4%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Mendocino, CA County Value
(4.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons with a Self-Care Difficulty Zip Code: 95417
Persons with a Self-Care Difficulty Zip Code: 95417
0.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Mendocino, CA County Value
(4.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons with a Self-Care Difficulty Zip Code: 95420
Persons with a Self-Care Difficulty Zip Code: 95420
0.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Mendocino, CA County Value
(4.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons with a Self-Care Difficulty Zip Code: 95427
Persons with a Self-Care Difficulty Zip Code: 95427
2.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Mendocino, CA County Value
(4.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons with a Self-Care Difficulty Zip Code: 95428
Persons with a Self-Care Difficulty Zip Code: 95428
3.7%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Mendocino, CA County Value
(4.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons with a Self-Care Difficulty Zip Code: 95429
Persons with a Self-Care Difficulty Zip Code: 95429
0.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Mendocino, CA County Value
(4.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons with a Self-Care Difficulty Zip Code: 95432
Persons with a Self-Care Difficulty Zip Code: 95432
6.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Mendocino, CA County Value
(4.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons with a Self-Care Difficulty Zip Code: 95437
Persons with a Self-Care Difficulty Zip Code: 95437
5.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Mendocino, CA County Value
(4.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons with a Self-Care Difficulty Zip Code: 95445
Persons with a Self-Care Difficulty Zip Code: 95445
1.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Mendocino, CA County Value
(4.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons with a Self-Care Difficulty Zip Code: 95449
Persons with a Self-Care Difficulty Zip Code: 95449
3.1%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Mendocino, CA County Value
(4.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons with a Self-Care Difficulty Zip Code: 95454
Persons with a Self-Care Difficulty Zip Code: 95454
1.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Mendocino, CA County Value
(4.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons with a Self-Care Difficulty Zip Code: 95456
Persons with a Self-Care Difficulty Zip Code: 95456
10.7%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Mendocino, CA County Value
(4.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons with a Self-Care Difficulty Zip Code: 95459
Persons with a Self-Care Difficulty Zip Code: 95459
1.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Mendocino, CA County Value
(4.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons with a Self-Care Difficulty Zip Code: 95460
Persons with a Self-Care Difficulty Zip Code: 95460
0.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Mendocino, CA County Value
(4.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons with a Self-Care Difficulty Zip Code: 95463
Persons with a Self-Care Difficulty Zip Code: 95463
0.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Mendocino, CA County Value
(4.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons with a Self-Care Difficulty Zip Code: 95466
Persons with a Self-Care Difficulty Zip Code: 95466
4.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Mendocino, CA County Value
(4.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons with a Self-Care Difficulty Zip Code: 95468
Persons with a Self-Care Difficulty Zip Code: 95468
2.9%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Mendocino, CA County Value
(4.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons with a Self-Care Difficulty Zip Code: 95469
Persons with a Self-Care Difficulty Zip Code: 95469
1.9%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Mendocino, CA County Value
(4.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons with a Self-Care Difficulty Zip Code: 95470
Persons with a Self-Care Difficulty Zip Code: 95470
1.1%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Mendocino, CA County Value
(4.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons with a Self-Care Difficulty Zip Code: 95482
Persons with a Self-Care Difficulty Zip Code: 95482
4.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Mendocino, CA County Value
(4.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons with a Self-Care Difficulty Zip Code: 95488
Persons with a Self-Care Difficulty Zip Code: 95488
0.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Mendocino, CA County Value
(4.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons with a Self-Care Difficulty Zip Code: 95490
Persons with a Self-Care Difficulty Zip Code: 95490
6.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Mendocino, CA County Value
(4.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons with a Self-Care Difficulty Zip Code: 95494
Persons with a Self-Care Difficulty Zip Code: 95494
0.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Mendocino, CA County Value
(4.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons with a Self-Care Difficulty Zip Code: 95585
Persons with a Self-Care Difficulty Zip Code: 95585
4.4%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Mendocino, CA County Value
(4.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons with a Self-Care Difficulty Zip Code: 95587
Persons with a Self-Care Difficulty Zip Code: 95587
0.0%
(2017-2021)
Compared to:
Mendocino, CA County Value
(3.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons with a Self-Care Difficulty Census Tract: 06045010100
Persons with a Self-Care Difficulty Census Tract: 06045010100
3.6%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Mendocino, CA County Value
(4.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
