Advanced Search: Build a Custom Dashboard
In the fields below, search for indicators by location, topics, population, classification, subgroup, or comparison. No fields are required, but we suggest selecting a location or two to start. In the additional search options section, select options to group and order search results. To learn more about how to customize a dashboard, see our help center.
Visit the Indicator List Page to see the full list of indicators and locations available on the site.
Search Results:
Indicator Gauge Icon Legend
Legend Colors
Red is bad, green is good, blue is not statistically different/neutral.
Compared to Distribution
the value is in the best half of communities.
the value is in the 2nd worst quarter of communities.
the value is in the worst quarter of communities.
Compared to Target
meets target; 
does not meet target.
Compared to a Single Value
lower than the comparison value;
higher than the comparison value;
not statistically different from comparison value.
Trend
non-significant change over time; 
significant change over time; 
no change over time.
Compared to Prior Value
higher than the previous measurement period;
lower than the previous measurement period;
no statistically different change from previous measurement period.
Economy / Housing & Homes
Overcrowded Households Zip Code: 95437
Overcrowded Households Zip Code: 95437
4.9%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,726 California zip codes.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(4.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Overcrowded Households Zip Code: 95445
Overcrowded Households Zip Code: 95445
0.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,726 California zip codes.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(4.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Overcrowded Households Zip Code: 95449
Overcrowded Households Zip Code: 95449
8.9%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,726 California zip codes.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(4.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Overcrowded Households Zip Code: 95454
Overcrowded Households Zip Code: 95454
0.4%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,726 California zip codes.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(4.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Overcrowded Households Zip Code: 95456
Overcrowded Households Zip Code: 95456
0.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,726 California zip codes.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(4.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Overcrowded Households Zip Code: 95459
Overcrowded Households Zip Code: 95459
5.8%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,726 California zip codes.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(4.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Overcrowded Households Zip Code: 95460
Overcrowded Households Zip Code: 95460
0.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,726 California zip codes.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(4.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Overcrowded Households Zip Code: 95463
Overcrowded Households Zip Code: 95463
0.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,726 California zip codes.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(4.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Overcrowded Households Zip Code: 95466
Overcrowded Households Zip Code: 95466
5.3%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,726 California zip codes.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(4.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Overcrowded Households Zip Code: 95468
Overcrowded Households Zip Code: 95468
6.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,726 California zip codes.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(4.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Overcrowded Households Zip Code: 95469
Overcrowded Households Zip Code: 95469
2.6%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,726 California zip codes.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(4.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Overcrowded Households Zip Code: 95470
Overcrowded Households Zip Code: 95470
1.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,726 California zip codes.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(4.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Overcrowded Households Zip Code: 95482
Overcrowded Households Zip Code: 95482
6.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,726 California zip codes.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(4.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Overcrowded Households Zip Code: 95488
Overcrowded Households Zip Code: 95488
0.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,726 California zip codes.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(4.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Overcrowded Households Zip Code: 95490
Overcrowded Households Zip Code: 95490
7.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,726 California zip codes.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(4.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Overcrowded Households Zip Code: 95494
Overcrowded Households Zip Code: 95494
0.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,726 California zip codes.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(4.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Overcrowded Households Zip Code: 95585
Overcrowded Households Zip Code: 95585
1.3%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,726 California zip codes.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(4.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Overcrowded Households Zip Code: 95587
Overcrowded Households Zip Code: 95587
0.0%
(2017-2021)
Compared to:
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,725 California zip codes.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(4.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Economy / Housing & Homes
Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent
Value
Compared to:
Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent County: Mendocino
Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent County: Mendocino
55.3%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,132 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
CA Value
(54.4%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
US Value
(49.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)
Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Place: Anchor Bay
Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Place: Anchor Bay
0.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,360 locales.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 26,241 U.S. Census Places.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(55.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
CA Value
(54.4%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
US Value
(49.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)
Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Place: Boonville
Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Place: Boonville
54.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,360 locales.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 26,241 U.S. Census Places.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(55.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
CA Value
(54.4%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
US Value
(49.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)
Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Place: Brooktrails
Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Place: Brooktrails
72.4%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,360 locales.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 26,241 U.S. Census Places.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(55.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
CA Value
(54.4%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
US Value
(49.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)
Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Place: Calpella
Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Place: Calpella
0.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,360 locales.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 26,241 U.S. Census Places.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(55.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
CA Value
(54.4%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
US Value
(49.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)
Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Place: Caspar
Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Place: Caspar
100.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,360 locales.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 26,241 U.S. Census Places.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(55.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
CA Value
(54.4%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
US Value
(49.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)
Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Place: Cleone
Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Place: Cleone
68.7%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,360 locales.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 26,241 U.S. Census Places.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(55.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
CA Value
(54.4%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
US Value
(49.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)
Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Place: Comptche
Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Place: Comptche
0.0%
(2017-2021)
Compared to:
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,367 locales.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 26,348 U.S. Census Places.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(55.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
CA Value
(54.2%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
US Value
(49.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)
Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Place: Covelo
Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Place: Covelo
84.1%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,360 locales.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 26,241 U.S. Census Places.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(55.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
CA Value
(54.4%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
US Value
(49.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)
Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Place: Fort Bragg
Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Place: Fort Bragg
66.9%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,360 locales.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 26,241 U.S. Census Places.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(55.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
CA Value
(54.4%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
US Value
(49.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)
Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Place: Hopland
Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Place: Hopland
70.9%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,360 locales.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 26,241 U.S. Census Places.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(55.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
CA Value
(54.4%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
US Value
(49.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)
Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Place: Laytonville
Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Place: Laytonville
17.9%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,360 locales.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 26,241 U.S. Census Places.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(55.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
CA Value
(54.4%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
US Value
(49.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)
Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Place: Leggett
Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Place: Leggett
100.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,360 locales.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 26,241 U.S. Census Places.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(55.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
CA Value
(54.4%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
US Value
(49.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)
Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Place: Little River
Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Place: Little River
100.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,360 locales.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 26,241 U.S. Census Places.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(55.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
CA Value
(54.4%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
US Value
(49.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)
Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Place: Manchester
Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Place: Manchester
21.7%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,360 locales.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 26,241 U.S. Census Places.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(55.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
CA Value
(54.4%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
US Value
(49.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)
Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Place: Mendocino
Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Place: Mendocino
0.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,360 locales.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 26,241 U.S. Census Places.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(55.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
CA Value
(54.4%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
US Value
(49.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)
Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Place: Philo
Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Place: Philo
0.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,360 locales.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 26,241 U.S. Census Places.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(55.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
CA Value
(54.4%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
US Value
(49.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)
Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Place: Point Arena
Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Place: Point Arena
37.9%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,360 locales.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 26,241 U.S. Census Places.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(55.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
CA Value
(54.4%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
US Value
(49.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)
Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Place: Potter Valley
Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Place: Potter Valley
48.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,360 locales.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 26,241 U.S. Census Places.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(55.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
CA Value
(54.4%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
US Value
(49.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)
Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Place: Redwood Valley
Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Place: Redwood Valley
75.6%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,360 locales.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 26,241 U.S. Census Places.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(55.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
CA Value
(54.4%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
US Value
(49.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)
Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Place: Talmage
Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Place: Talmage
68.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,360 locales.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 26,241 U.S. Census Places.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(55.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
CA Value
(54.4%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
US Value
(49.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)
Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Place: Ukiah
Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Place: Ukiah
56.7%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,360 locales.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 26,241 U.S. Census Places.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(55.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
CA Value
(54.4%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
US Value
(49.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)
Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Place: Willits
Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Place: Willits
57.7%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,360 locales.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 26,241 U.S. Census Places.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(55.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
CA Value
(54.4%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
US Value
(49.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)
Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Zip Code: 95410
Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Zip Code: 95410
0.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,654 California zip codes.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 30,131 U.S. zip codes.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(55.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)
Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Zip Code: 95415
Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Zip Code: 95415
51.3%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,654 California zip codes.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 30,131 U.S. zip codes.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(55.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)
Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Zip Code: 95417
Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Zip Code: 95417
0.0%
(2017-2021)
Compared to:
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,653 California zip codes.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 30,160 U.S. zip codes.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(55.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)
Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Zip Code: 95420
Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Zip Code: 95420
100.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,654 California zip codes.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 30,131 U.S. zip codes.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(55.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)
Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Zip Code: 95427
Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Zip Code: 95427
0.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,654 California zip codes.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 30,131 U.S. zip codes.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(55.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)
Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Zip Code: 95428
Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Zip Code: 95428
33.6%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,654 California zip codes.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 30,131 U.S. zip codes.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(55.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)
Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Zip Code: 95432
Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Zip Code: 95432
36.3%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,654 California zip codes.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 30,131 U.S. zip codes.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(55.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)
Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Zip Code: 95437
Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Zip Code: 95437
63.6%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,654 California zip codes.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 30,131 U.S. zip codes.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(55.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)
Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Zip Code: 95445
Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Zip Code: 95445
57.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,654 California zip codes.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 30,131 U.S. zip codes.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(55.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)
Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Zip Code: 95449
Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Zip Code: 95449
67.3%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,654 California zip codes.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 30,131 U.S. zip codes.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(55.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)
Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Zip Code: 95454
Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Zip Code: 95454
13.3%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,654 California zip codes.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 30,131 U.S. zip codes.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(55.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)
Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Zip Code: 95456
Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Zip Code: 95456
92.1%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,654 California zip codes.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 30,131 U.S. zip codes.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(55.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)
Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Zip Code: 95459
Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Zip Code: 95459
26.9%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,654 California zip codes.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 30,131 U.S. zip codes.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(55.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)
Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Zip Code: 95460
Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Zip Code: 95460
40.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,654 California zip codes.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 30,131 U.S. zip codes.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(55.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)
Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Zip Code: 95463
Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Zip Code: 95463
0.0%
(2014-2018)
Compared to:
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,656 California zip codes.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 30,430 U.S. zip codes.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(58.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)
Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Zip Code: 95466
Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Zip Code: 95466
36.6%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,654 California zip codes.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 30,131 U.S. zip codes.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(55.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)
Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Zip Code: 95468
Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Zip Code: 95468
30.6%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,654 California zip codes.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 30,131 U.S. zip codes.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(55.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)
Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Zip Code: 95469
Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Zip Code: 95469
60.9%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,654 California zip codes.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 30,131 U.S. zip codes.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(55.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)
Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Zip Code: 95470
Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Zip Code: 95470
57.1%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,654 California zip codes.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 30,131 U.S. zip codes.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(55.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)
Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Zip Code: 95482
Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Zip Code: 95482
53.7%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,654 California zip codes.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 30,131 U.S. zip codes.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(55.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)
Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Zip Code: 95488
Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Zip Code: 95488
100.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,654 California zip codes.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 30,131 U.S. zip codes.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(55.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)
Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Zip Code: 95490
Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Zip Code: 95490
55.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,654 California zip codes.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 30,131 U.S. zip codes.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(55.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)
Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Zip Code: 95494
Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Zip Code: 95494
27.8%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,654 California zip codes.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 30,131 U.S. zip codes.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(55.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)
Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Zip Code: 95585
Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Zip Code: 95585
58.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,654 California zip codes.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 30,131 U.S. zip codes.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(55.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)
Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06045010100
Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06045010100
33.6%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,025 California census tracts.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,039 U.S. census tracts.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(55.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)
Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06045010200
Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06045010200
48.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,025 California census tracts.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,039 U.S. census tracts.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(55.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)
Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06045010300
Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06045010300
51.9%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,025 California census tracts.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,039 U.S. census tracts.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(55.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)
Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06045010400
Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06045010400
71.1%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,025 California census tracts.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,039 U.S. census tracts.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(55.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)
Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06045010500
Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06045010500
61.9%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,025 California census tracts.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,039 U.S. census tracts.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(55.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)
Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06045010600
Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06045010600
64.6%
(2015-2019)
Compared to:
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 7,973 California census tracts.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 72,074 U.S. census tracts.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(55.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)
Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06045010601
Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06045010601
54.6%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,025 California census tracts.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,039 U.S. census tracts.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(55.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)
Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06045010602
Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06045010602
68.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,025 California census tracts.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,039 U.S. census tracts.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(55.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)
Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06045010700
Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06045010700
52.1%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,025 California census tracts.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,039 U.S. census tracts.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(55.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)
Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06045010801
Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06045010801
57.1%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,025 California census tracts.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,039 U.S. census tracts.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(55.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)
Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06045010802
Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06045010802
71.6%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,025 California census tracts.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,039 U.S. census tracts.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(55.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)
Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06045010900
Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06045010900
23.7%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,025 California census tracts.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,039 U.S. census tracts.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(55.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)
Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06045011001
Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06045011001
81.4%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,025 California census tracts.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,039 U.S. census tracts.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(55.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)
Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06045011002
Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06045011002
58.3%
(2015-2019)
Compared to:
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 7,973 California census tracts.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 72,074 U.S. census tracts.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(55.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)
Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06045011003
Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06045011003
74.4%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,025 California census tracts.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,039 U.S. census tracts.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(55.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)
Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06045011004
Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06045011004
40.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,025 California census tracts.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,039 U.S. census tracts.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(55.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)
Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06045011102
Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06045011102
36.6%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,025 California census tracts.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,039 U.S. census tracts.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(55.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)
Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06045011200
Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06045011200
42.1%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,025 California census tracts.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,039 U.S. census tracts.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(55.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)
Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06045011300
Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06045011300
51.8%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,025 California census tracts.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,039 U.S. census tracts.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(55.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)
Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06045011400
Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06045011400
59.3%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,025 California census tracts.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,039 U.S. census tracts.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(55.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)
Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06045011500
Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06045011500
73.1%
(2015-2019)
Compared to:
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 7,973 California census tracts.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 72,074 U.S. census tracts.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(55.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)
Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06045011501
Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06045011501
58.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,025 California census tracts.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,039 U.S. census tracts.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(55.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)
Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06045011502
Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06045011502
63.1%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,025 California census tracts.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,039 U.S. census tracts.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(55.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)
Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06045011600
Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06045011600
53.7%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,025 California census tracts.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,039 U.S. census tracts.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(55.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)
Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06045011700
Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06045011700
54.1%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,025 California census tracts.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,039 U.S. census tracts.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(55.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)
Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06045011800
Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Tract: 06045011800
67.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,025 California census tracts.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,039 U.S. census tracts.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(55.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)
Severe Housing Problems County: Mendocino
Severe Housing Problems County: Mendocino
23.7%
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
CA Value
(25.7%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
US Value
(16.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(25.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Economy / Income
Income Inequality County: Mendocino
Income Inequality County: Mendocino
0.481
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
CA Value
(0.490)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
US Value
(0.483)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Income Inequality Census Place: Albion
Income Inequality Census Place: Albion
0.621
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,453 locales.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,505 U.S. Census Places.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(0.481)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
CA Value
(0.490)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
US Value
(0.483)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Income Inequality Census Place: Anchor Bay
Income Inequality Census Place: Anchor Bay
0.218
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,453 locales.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,505 U.S. Census Places.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(0.481)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
CA Value
(0.490)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
US Value
(0.483)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Income Inequality Census Place: Boonville
Income Inequality Census Place: Boonville
0.451
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,453 locales.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,505 U.S. Census Places.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(0.481)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
CA Value
(0.490)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
US Value
(0.483)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Income Inequality Census Place: Brooktrails
Income Inequality Census Place: Brooktrails
0.273
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,453 locales.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,505 U.S. Census Places.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(0.481)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
CA Value
(0.490)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
US Value
(0.483)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Income Inequality Census Place: Calpella
Income Inequality Census Place: Calpella
0.372
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,453 locales.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,505 U.S. Census Places.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(0.481)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
CA Value
(0.490)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
US Value
(0.483)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Income Inequality Census Place: Caspar
Income Inequality Census Place: Caspar
0.416
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,453 locales.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,505 U.S. Census Places.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(0.481)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
CA Value
(0.490)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
US Value
(0.483)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Income Inequality Census Place: Cleone
Income Inequality Census Place: Cleone
0.444
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,453 locales.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,505 U.S. Census Places.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(0.481)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
CA Value
(0.490)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
US Value
(0.483)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Income Inequality Census Place: Comptche
Income Inequality Census Place: Comptche
0.240
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,453 locales.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,505 U.S. Census Places.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(0.481)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
CA Value
(0.490)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
US Value
(0.483)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Income Inequality Census Place: Covelo
Income Inequality Census Place: Covelo
0.450
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,453 locales.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,505 U.S. Census Places.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(0.481)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
CA Value
(0.490)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
US Value
(0.483)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Income Inequality Census Place: Fort Bragg
Income Inequality Census Place: Fort Bragg
0.480
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,453 locales.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,505 U.S. Census Places.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(0.481)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
CA Value
(0.490)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
US Value
(0.483)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Income Inequality Census Place: Hopland
Income Inequality Census Place: Hopland
0.380
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,453 locales.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,505 U.S. Census Places.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(0.481)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
CA Value
(0.490)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
US Value
(0.483)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Income Inequality Census Place: Laytonville
Income Inequality Census Place: Laytonville
0.235
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,453 locales.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,505 U.S. Census Places.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(0.481)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
CA Value
(0.490)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
US Value
(0.483)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Income Inequality Census Place: Leggett
Income Inequality Census Place: Leggett
0.350
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,453 locales.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,505 U.S. Census Places.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(0.481)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
CA Value
(0.490)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
US Value
(0.483)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Income Inequality Census Place: Little River
Income Inequality Census Place: Little River
0.624
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,453 locales.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,505 U.S. Census Places.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(0.481)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
CA Value
(0.490)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
US Value
(0.483)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Income Inequality Census Place: Manchester
Income Inequality Census Place: Manchester
0.366
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,453 locales.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,505 U.S. Census Places.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(0.481)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
CA Value
(0.490)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
US Value
(0.483)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Income Inequality Census Place: Mendocino
Income Inequality Census Place: Mendocino
0.304
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,453 locales.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,505 U.S. Census Places.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(0.481)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
CA Value
(0.490)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
US Value
(0.483)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Income Inequality Census Place: Philo
Income Inequality Census Place: Philo
0.412
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,453 locales.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,505 U.S. Census Places.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(0.481)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
CA Value
(0.490)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
US Value
(0.483)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Income Inequality Census Place: Point Arena
Income Inequality Census Place: Point Arena
0.394
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,453 locales.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,505 U.S. Census Places.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(0.481)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
CA Value
(0.490)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
US Value
(0.483)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Income Inequality Census Place: Potter Valley
Income Inequality Census Place: Potter Valley
0.372
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,453 locales.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,505 U.S. Census Places.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(0.481)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
CA Value
(0.490)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
US Value
(0.483)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Income Inequality Census Place: Redwood Valley
Income Inequality Census Place: Redwood Valley
0.482
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,453 locales.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,505 U.S. Census Places.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(0.481)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
CA Value
(0.490)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
US Value
(0.483)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Income Inequality Census Place: Talmage
Income Inequality Census Place: Talmage
0.636
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,453 locales.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,505 U.S. Census Places.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(0.481)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
CA Value
(0.490)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
US Value
(0.483)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Income Inequality Census Place: Ukiah
Income Inequality Census Place: Ukiah
0.505
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,453 locales.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,505 U.S. Census Places.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(0.481)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
CA Value
(0.490)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
US Value
(0.483)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Income Inequality Census Place: Willits
Income Inequality Census Place: Willits
0.502
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,453 locales.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,505 U.S. Census Places.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(0.481)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
CA Value
(0.490)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
US Value
(0.483)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Income Inequality Zip Code: 95410
Income Inequality Zip Code: 95410
0.550
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,698 California zip codes.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 32,244 U.S. zip codes.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(0.481)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Income Inequality Zip Code: 95415
Income Inequality Zip Code: 95415
0.511
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,698 California zip codes.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 32,244 U.S. zip codes.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(0.481)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Income Inequality Zip Code: 95417
Income Inequality Zip Code: 95417
0.398
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,698 California zip codes.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 32,244 U.S. zip codes.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(0.481)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Income Inequality Zip Code: 95420
Income Inequality Zip Code: 95420
0.383
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,698 California zip codes.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 32,244 U.S. zip codes.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(0.481)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Income Inequality Zip Code: 95427
Income Inequality Zip Code: 95427
0.504
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,698 California zip codes.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 32,244 U.S. zip codes.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(0.481)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Income Inequality Zip Code: 95428
Income Inequality Zip Code: 95428
0.508
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,698 California zip codes.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 32,244 U.S. zip codes.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(0.481)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Income Inequality Zip Code: 95429
Income Inequality Zip Code: 95429
0.551
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,698 California zip codes.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 32,244 U.S. zip codes.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(0.481)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Income Inequality Zip Code: 95432
Income Inequality Zip Code: 95432
0.506
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,698 California zip codes.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 32,244 U.S. zip codes.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(0.481)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Income Inequality Zip Code: 95437
Income Inequality Zip Code: 95437
0.462
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,698 California zip codes.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 32,244 U.S. zip codes.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(0.481)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Income Inequality Zip Code: 95445
Income Inequality Zip Code: 95445
0.461
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,698 California zip codes.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 32,244 U.S. zip codes.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(0.481)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Income Inequality Zip Code: 95449
Income Inequality Zip Code: 95449
0.406
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,698 California zip codes.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 32,244 U.S. zip codes.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(0.481)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Income Inequality Zip Code: 95454
Income Inequality Zip Code: 95454
0.372
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,698 California zip codes.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 32,244 U.S. zip codes.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(0.481)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Income Inequality Zip Code: 95456
Income Inequality Zip Code: 95456
0.623
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,698 California zip codes.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 32,244 U.S. zip codes.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(0.481)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Income Inequality Zip Code: 95459
Income Inequality Zip Code: 95459
0.482
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,698 California zip codes.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 32,244 U.S. zip codes.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(0.481)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Income Inequality Zip Code: 95460
Income Inequality Zip Code: 95460
0.443
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,698 California zip codes.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 32,244 U.S. zip codes.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(0.481)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Income Inequality Zip Code: 95463
Income Inequality Zip Code: 95463
0.258
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,698 California zip codes.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 32,244 U.S. zip codes.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(0.481)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Income Inequality Zip Code: 95466
Income Inequality Zip Code: 95466
0.507
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,698 California zip codes.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 32,244 U.S. zip codes.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(0.481)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Income Inequality Zip Code: 95468
Income Inequality Zip Code: 95468
0.383
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,698 California zip codes.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 32,244 U.S. zip codes.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(0.481)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Income Inequality Zip Code: 95469
Income Inequality Zip Code: 95469
0.399
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,698 California zip codes.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 32,244 U.S. zip codes.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(0.481)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Income Inequality Zip Code: 95470
Income Inequality Zip Code: 95470
0.524
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,698 California zip codes.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 32,244 U.S. zip codes.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(0.481)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Income Inequality Zip Code: 95482
Income Inequality Zip Code: 95482
0.482
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,698 California zip codes.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 32,244 U.S. zip codes.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(0.481)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Income Inequality Zip Code: 95488
Income Inequality Zip Code: 95488
0.430
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,698 California zip codes.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 32,244 U.S. zip codes.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(0.481)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Income Inequality Zip Code: 95490
Income Inequality Zip Code: 95490
0.423
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,698 California zip codes.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 32,244 U.S. zip codes.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(0.481)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Income Inequality Zip Code: 95494
Income Inequality Zip Code: 95494
0.309
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,698 California zip codes.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 32,244 U.S. zip codes.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(0.481)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Income Inequality Zip Code: 95585
Income Inequality Zip Code: 95585
0.484
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,698 California zip codes.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 32,244 U.S. zip codes.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(0.481)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Income Inequality Zip Code: 95587
Income Inequality Zip Code: 95587
0.698
(2015-2019)
Compared to:
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,698 California zip codes.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 32,065 U.S. zip codes.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(0.470)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Income Inequality Census Tract: 06045010100
Income Inequality Census Tract: 06045010100
0.501
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,037 California census tracts.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,409 U.S. census tracts.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(0.481)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Income Inequality Census Tract: 06045010200
Income Inequality Census Tract: 06045010200
0.487
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,037 California census tracts.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,409 U.S. census tracts.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(0.481)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Income Inequality Census Tract: 06045010300
Income Inequality Census Tract: 06045010300
0.474
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,037 California census tracts.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,409 U.S. census tracts.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(0.481)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Income Inequality Census Tract: 06045010400
Income Inequality Census Tract: 06045010400
0.463
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,037 California census tracts.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,409 U.S. census tracts.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(0.481)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Income Inequality Census Tract: 06045010500
Income Inequality Census Tract: 06045010500
0.458
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,037 California census tracts.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,409 U.S. census tracts.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(0.481)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Income Inequality Census Tract: 06045010600
Income Inequality Census Tract: 06045010600
0.409
(2015-2019)
Compared to:
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 7,973 California census tracts.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 72,143 U.S. census tracts.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(0.470)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Income Inequality Census Tract: 06045010601
Income Inequality Census Tract: 06045010601
0.463
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,037 California census tracts.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,409 U.S. census tracts.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(0.481)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Income Inequality Census Tract: 06045010602
Income Inequality Census Tract: 06045010602
0.319
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,037 California census tracts.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,409 U.S. census tracts.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(0.481)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
