Skip to main content

Advanced Search: Build a Custom Dashboard

In the fields below, search for indicators by location, topics, population, classification, subgroup, or comparison. No fields are required, but we suggest selecting a location or two to start. In the additional search options section, select options to group and order search results. To learn more about how to customize a dashboard, see our help center.

Visit the Indicator List Page to see the full list of indicators and locations available on the site.

  • Map View
  • County : Mendocino Census Tracts
  • County : Mendocino Zip Codes
  • All Health Topics
  • All Community Topics
  • All Economy Topics
  • All Education Topics
  • All Environmental Health Topics
Search display options:

Search Results:

Indicator Gauge Icon Legend

Legend Colors

Red is bad, green is good, blue is not statistically different/neutral.

Compared to Distribution

an indicator guage with the arrow in the green the value is in the best half of communities.

an indicator guage with the arrow in the yellow the value is in the 2nd worst quarter of communities.

an indicator guage with the arrow in the red the value is in the worst quarter of communities.

Compared to Target

green circle with white tick inside it meets target; red circle with white cross inside it does not meet target.

Compared to a Single Value

green diamond with downward arrow inside it lower than the comparison value; red diamond with downward arrow inside it higher than the comparison value; blue diamond with downward arrow inside it not statistically different from comparison value.

Trend

green square outline with upward trending arrow inside it green square outline with downward trending arrow inside it non-significant change over time; green square with upward trending arrow inside it green square with downward trending arrow inside it significant change over time; blue square with equals sign no change over time.

Compared to Prior Value

green triangle with upward trending arrow inside it higher than the previous measurement period; green triangle with downward trending arrow inside it lower than the previous measurement period; blue equals sign no statistically different change  from previous measurement period.

More information about the gauges and icons

Economy / Poverty

Economy / Poverty

Economy / Poverty

Families Living Below Poverty Level

Value
Compared to:

Economy / Poverty

Families Living Below Poverty Level

Value
Compared to:

Families Living Below Poverty Level Census Tract: 06045010602

Current Value:

Families Living Below Poverty Level Census Tract: 06045010602

5.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06045010602 has a value of 5.2% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 6.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.9%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,039 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06045010602 has a value of 5.2% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 6.9% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 13.8%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,428 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (11.5%), 06045010602 has a value of 5.2% which is lower and better.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(11.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.

Families Living Below Poverty Level Census Tract: 06045010700

Current Value:

Families Living Below Poverty Level Census Tract: 06045010700

8.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06045010700 has a value of 8.5% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 6.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.9%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,039 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06045010700 has a value of 8.5% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 6.9% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 13.8%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,428 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (11.5%), 06045010700 has a value of 8.5% which is lower and better.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(11.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Over time, the 06045010700 value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Families Living Below Poverty Level Census Tract: 06045010801

Current Value:

Families Living Below Poverty Level Census Tract: 06045010801

23.6%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06045010801 has a value of 23.6% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 6.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.9%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,039 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06045010801 has a value of 23.6% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 6.9% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 13.8%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,428 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (11.5%), 06045010801 has a value of 23.6% which is higher and worse.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(11.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Over time, the 06045010801 value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Families Living Below Poverty Level Census Tract: 06045010802

Current Value:

Families Living Below Poverty Level Census Tract: 06045010802

6.7%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06045010802 has a value of 6.7% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 6.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.9%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,039 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06045010802 has a value of 6.7% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 6.9% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 13.8%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,428 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (11.5%), 06045010802 has a value of 6.7% which is lower and better.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(11.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Over time, the 06045010802 value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Families Living Below Poverty Level Census Tract: 06045010900

Current Value:

Families Living Below Poverty Level Census Tract: 06045010900

6.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06045010900 has a value of 6.0% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 6.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.9%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,039 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06045010900 has a value of 6.0% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 6.9% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 13.8%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,428 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (11.5%), 06045010900 has a value of 6.0% which is lower and better.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(11.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Over time, the 06045010900 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Families Living Below Poverty Level Census Tract: 06045011001

Current Value:

Families Living Below Poverty Level Census Tract: 06045011001

13.8%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06045011001 has a value of 13.8% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 6.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.9%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,039 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06045011001 has a value of 13.8% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 6.9% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 13.8%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,428 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (11.5%), 06045011001 has a value of 13.8% which is higher and worse.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(11.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Over time, the 06045011001 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Families Living Below Poverty Level Census Tract: 06045011002

Current Value:

Families Living Below Poverty Level Census Tract: 06045011002

12.0%
(2015-2019)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06045011002 has a value of 12.0% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 7.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.7%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 7,976 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06045011002 has a value of 12.0% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 7.8% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 15.1%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 72,170 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (13.0%), 06045011002 has a value of 12.0% which is lower and better.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(13.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Over time, the 06045011002 value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Families Living Below Poverty Level Census Tract: 06045011003

Current Value:

Families Living Below Poverty Level Census Tract: 06045011003

8.8%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06045011003 has a value of 8.8% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 6.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.9%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,039 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06045011003 has a value of 8.8% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 6.9% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 13.8%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,428 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (11.5%), 06045011003 has a value of 8.8% which is lower and better.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(11.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.

Families Living Below Poverty Level Census Tract: 06045011004

Current Value:

Families Living Below Poverty Level Census Tract: 06045011004

5.3%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06045011004 has a value of 5.3% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 6.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.9%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,039 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06045011004 has a value of 5.3% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 6.9% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 13.8%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,428 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (11.5%), 06045011004 has a value of 5.3% which is lower and better.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(11.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.

Families Living Below Poverty Level Census Tract: 06045011102

Current Value:

Families Living Below Poverty Level Census Tract: 06045011102

2.1%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06045011102 has a value of 2.1% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 6.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.9%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,039 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06045011102 has a value of 2.1% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 6.9% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 13.8%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,428 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (11.5%), 06045011102 has a value of 2.1% which is lower and better.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(11.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Over time, the 06045011102 value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Families Living Below Poverty Level Census Tract: 06045011200

Current Value:

Families Living Below Poverty Level Census Tract: 06045011200

18.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06045011200 has a value of 18.0% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 6.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.9%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,039 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06045011200 has a value of 18.0% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 6.9% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 13.8%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,428 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (11.5%), 06045011200 has a value of 18.0% which is higher and worse.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(11.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Over time, the 06045011200 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Families Living Below Poverty Level Census Tract: 06045011300

Current Value:

Families Living Below Poverty Level Census Tract: 06045011300

15.6%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06045011300 has a value of 15.6% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 6.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.9%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,039 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06045011300 has a value of 15.6% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 6.9% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 13.8%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,428 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (11.5%), 06045011300 has a value of 15.6% which is higher and worse.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(11.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Over time, the 06045011300 value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Families Living Below Poverty Level Census Tract: 06045011400

Current Value:

Families Living Below Poverty Level Census Tract: 06045011400

10.1%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06045011400 has a value of 10.1% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 6.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.9%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,039 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06045011400 has a value of 10.1% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 6.9% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 13.8%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,428 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (11.5%), 06045011400 has a value of 10.1% which is lower and better.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(11.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Over time, the 06045011400 value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Families Living Below Poverty Level Census Tract: 06045011500

Current Value:

Families Living Below Poverty Level Census Tract: 06045011500

18.4%
(2015-2019)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06045011500 has a value of 18.4% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 7.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.7%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 7,976 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06045011500 has a value of 18.4% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 7.8% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 15.1%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 72,170 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (13.0%), 06045011500 has a value of 18.4% which is higher and worse.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(13.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Over time, the 06045011500 value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Families Living Below Poverty Level Census Tract: 06045011501

Current Value:

Families Living Below Poverty Level Census Tract: 06045011501

1.6%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06045011501 has a value of 1.6% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 6.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.9%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,039 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06045011501 has a value of 1.6% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 6.9% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 13.8%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,428 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (11.5%), 06045011501 has a value of 1.6% which is lower and better.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(11.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.

Families Living Below Poverty Level Census Tract: 06045011502

Current Value:

Families Living Below Poverty Level Census Tract: 06045011502

7.1%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06045011502 has a value of 7.1% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 6.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.9%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,039 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06045011502 has a value of 7.1% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 6.9% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 13.8%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,428 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (11.5%), 06045011502 has a value of 7.1% which is lower and better.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(11.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.

Families Living Below Poverty Level Census Tract: 06045011600

Current Value:

Families Living Below Poverty Level Census Tract: 06045011600

18.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06045011600 has a value of 18.0% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 6.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.9%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,039 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06045011600 has a value of 18.0% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 6.9% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 13.8%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,428 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (11.5%), 06045011600 has a value of 18.0% which is higher and worse.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(11.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Over time, the 06045011600 value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Families Living Below Poverty Level Census Tract: 06045011700

Current Value:

Families Living Below Poverty Level Census Tract: 06045011700

14.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06045011700 has a value of 14.2% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 6.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.9%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,039 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06045011700 has a value of 14.2% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 6.9% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 13.8%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,428 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (11.5%), 06045011700 has a value of 14.2% which is higher and worse.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(11.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Over time, the 06045011700 value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Families Living Below Poverty Level Census Tract: 06045011800

Current Value:

Families Living Below Poverty Level Census Tract: 06045011800

10.1%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06045011800 has a value of 10.1% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 6.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.9%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,039 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06045011800 has a value of 10.1% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 6.9% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 13.8%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,428 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (11.5%), 06045011800 has a value of 10.1% which is lower and better.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(11.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Over time, the 06045011800 value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Economy / Poverty

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level

Value
Compared to:

Economy / Poverty

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level

Value
Compared to:

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level County: Mendocino

Current Value:

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level County: Mendocino

12.9%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Mendocino has a value of 12.9% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.2% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.0%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Mendocino has a value of 12.9% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 9.7% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.8%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the CA Value (11.0%), Mendocino has a value of 12.9% which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(11.0%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (10.0%), Mendocino has a value of 12.9% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(10.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Mendocino value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level Census Place: Albion

Current Value:

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level Census Place: Albion

0.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Albion has a value of 0.0% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 8.4% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.0%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,441 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Albion has a value of 0.0% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 8.1% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.6%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,319 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (12.9%), Albion has a value of 0.0% which is lower and better.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(12.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the CA Value (11.0%), Albion has a value of 0.0% which is lower and better.
CA Value
(11.0%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (10.0%), Albion has a value of 0.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(10.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Albion value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level Census Place: Anchor Bay

Current Value:

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level Census Place: Anchor Bay

15.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Anchor Bay has a value of 15.5% which is in the worst 25% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 8.4% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.0%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,441 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Anchor Bay has a value of 15.5% which is in the worst 25% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 8.1% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.6%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,319 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (12.9%), Anchor Bay has a value of 15.5% which is higher and worse.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(12.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the CA Value (11.0%), Anchor Bay has a value of 15.5% which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(11.0%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (10.0%), Anchor Bay has a value of 15.5% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(10.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Anchor Bay value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level Census Place: Boonville

Current Value:

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level Census Place: Boonville

6.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Boonville has a value of 6.0% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 8.4% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.0%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,441 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Boonville has a value of 6.0% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 8.1% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.6%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,319 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (12.9%), Boonville has a value of 6.0% which is lower and better.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(12.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the CA Value (11.0%), Boonville has a value of 6.0% which is lower and better.
CA Value
(11.0%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (10.0%), Boonville has a value of 6.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(10.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Boonville value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level Census Place: Brooktrails

Current Value:

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level Census Place: Brooktrails

0.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Brooktrails has a value of 0.0% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 8.4% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.0%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,441 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Brooktrails has a value of 0.0% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 8.1% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.6%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,319 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (12.9%), Brooktrails has a value of 0.0% which is lower and better.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(12.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the CA Value (11.0%), Brooktrails has a value of 0.0% which is lower and better.
CA Value
(11.0%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (10.0%), Brooktrails has a value of 0.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(10.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Brooktrails value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level Census Place: Calpella

Current Value:

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level Census Place: Calpella

0.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Calpella has a value of 0.0% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 8.4% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.0%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,441 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Calpella has a value of 0.0% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 8.1% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.6%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,319 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (12.9%), Calpella has a value of 0.0% which is lower and better.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(12.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the CA Value (11.0%), Calpella has a value of 0.0% which is lower and better.
CA Value
(11.0%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (10.0%), Calpella has a value of 0.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(10.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Calpella value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level Census Place: Caspar

Current Value:

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level Census Place: Caspar

12.4%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Caspar has a value of 12.4% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 8.4% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.0%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,441 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Caspar has a value of 12.4% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 8.1% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.6%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,319 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (12.9%), Caspar has a value of 12.4% which is lower and better.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(12.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the CA Value (11.0%), Caspar has a value of 12.4% which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(11.0%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (10.0%), Caspar has a value of 12.4% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(10.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Caspar value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level Census Place: Cleone

Current Value:

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level Census Place: Cleone

0.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Cleone has a value of 0.0% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 8.4% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.0%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,441 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Cleone has a value of 0.0% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 8.1% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.6%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,319 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (12.9%), Cleone has a value of 0.0% which is lower and better.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(12.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the CA Value (11.0%), Cleone has a value of 0.0% which is lower and better.
CA Value
(11.0%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (10.0%), Cleone has a value of 0.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(10.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Cleone value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level Census Place: Comptche

Current Value:

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level Census Place: Comptche

0.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Comptche has a value of 0.0% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 8.4% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.0%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,441 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Comptche has a value of 0.0% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 8.1% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.6%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,319 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (12.9%), Comptche has a value of 0.0% which is lower and better.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(12.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the CA Value (11.0%), Comptche has a value of 0.0% which is lower and better.
CA Value
(11.0%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (10.0%), Comptche has a value of 0.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(10.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Comptche value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level Census Place: Covelo

Current Value:

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level Census Place: Covelo

10.4%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Covelo has a value of 10.4% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 8.4% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.0%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,441 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Covelo has a value of 10.4% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 8.1% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.6%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,319 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (12.9%), Covelo has a value of 10.4% which is lower and better.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(12.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the CA Value (11.0%), Covelo has a value of 10.4% which is lower and better.
CA Value
(11.0%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (10.0%), Covelo has a value of 10.4% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(10.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Covelo value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level Census Place: Fort Bragg

Current Value:

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level Census Place: Fort Bragg

9.6%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Fort Bragg has a value of 9.6% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 8.4% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.0%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,441 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Fort Bragg has a value of 9.6% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 8.1% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.6%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,319 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (12.9%), Fort Bragg has a value of 9.6% which is lower and better.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(12.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the CA Value (11.0%), Fort Bragg has a value of 9.6% which is lower and better.
CA Value
(11.0%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (10.0%), Fort Bragg has a value of 9.6% which is lower and better.
US Value
(10.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Fort Bragg value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level Census Place: Hopland

Current Value:

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level Census Place: Hopland

21.9%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Hopland has a value of 21.9% which is in the worst 25% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 8.4% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.0%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,441 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Hopland has a value of 21.9% which is in the worst 25% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 8.1% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.6%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,319 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (12.9%), Hopland has a value of 21.9% which is higher and worse.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(12.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the CA Value (11.0%), Hopland has a value of 21.9% which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(11.0%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (10.0%), Hopland has a value of 21.9% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(10.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Hopland value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level Census Place: Laytonville

Current Value:

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level Census Place: Laytonville

0.8%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Laytonville has a value of 0.8% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 8.4% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.0%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,441 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Laytonville has a value of 0.8% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 8.1% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.6%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,319 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (12.9%), Laytonville has a value of 0.8% which is lower and better.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(12.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the CA Value (11.0%), Laytonville has a value of 0.8% which is lower and better.
CA Value
(11.0%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (10.0%), Laytonville has a value of 0.8% which is lower and better.
US Value
(10.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Laytonville value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level Census Place: Leggett

Current Value:

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level Census Place: Leggett

0.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Leggett has a value of 0.0% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 8.4% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.0%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,441 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Leggett has a value of 0.0% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 8.1% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.6%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,319 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (12.9%), Leggett has a value of 0.0% which is lower and better.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(12.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the CA Value (11.0%), Leggett has a value of 0.0% which is lower and better.
CA Value
(11.0%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (10.0%), Leggett has a value of 0.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(10.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Leggett value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level Census Place: Little River

Current Value:

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level Census Place: Little River

0.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Little River has a value of 0.0% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 8.4% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.0%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,441 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Little River has a value of 0.0% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 8.1% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.6%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,319 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (12.9%), Little River has a value of 0.0% which is lower and better.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(12.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the CA Value (11.0%), Little River has a value of 0.0% which is lower and better.
CA Value
(11.0%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (10.0%), Little River has a value of 0.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(10.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Little River value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level Census Place: Manchester

Current Value:

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level Census Place: Manchester

0.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Manchester has a value of 0.0% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 8.4% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.0%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,441 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Manchester has a value of 0.0% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 8.1% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.6%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,319 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (12.9%), Manchester has a value of 0.0% which is lower and better.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(12.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the CA Value (11.0%), Manchester has a value of 0.0% which is lower and better.
CA Value
(11.0%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (10.0%), Manchester has a value of 0.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(10.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Manchester value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level Census Place: Mendocino

Current Value:

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level Census Place: Mendocino

0.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Mendocino has a value of 0.0% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 8.4% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.0%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,441 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Mendocino has a value of 0.0% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 8.1% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.6%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,319 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (12.9%), Mendocino has a value of 0.0% which is lower and better.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(12.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the CA Value (11.0%), Mendocino has a value of 0.0% which is lower and better.
CA Value
(11.0%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (10.0%), Mendocino has a value of 0.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(10.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Mendocino value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level Census Place: Philo

Current Value:

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level Census Place: Philo

31.3%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Philo has a value of 31.3% which is in the worst 25% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 8.4% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.0%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,441 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Philo has a value of 31.3% which is in the worst 25% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 8.1% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.6%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,319 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (12.9%), Philo has a value of 31.3% which is higher and worse.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(12.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the CA Value (11.0%), Philo has a value of 31.3% which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(11.0%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (10.0%), Philo has a value of 31.3% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(10.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Philo value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level Census Place: Point Arena

Current Value:

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level Census Place: Point Arena

7.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Point Arena has a value of 7.2% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 8.4% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.0%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,441 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Point Arena has a value of 7.2% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 8.1% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.6%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,319 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (12.9%), Point Arena has a value of 7.2% which is lower and better.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(12.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the CA Value (11.0%), Point Arena has a value of 7.2% which is lower and better.
CA Value
(11.0%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (10.0%), Point Arena has a value of 7.2% which is lower and better.
US Value
(10.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Point Arena value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level Census Place: Potter Valley

Current Value:

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level Census Place: Potter Valley

3.1%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Potter Valley has a value of 3.1% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 8.4% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.0%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,441 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Potter Valley has a value of 3.1% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 8.1% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.6%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,319 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (12.9%), Potter Valley has a value of 3.1% which is lower and better.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(12.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the CA Value (11.0%), Potter Valley has a value of 3.1% which is lower and better.
CA Value
(11.0%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (10.0%), Potter Valley has a value of 3.1% which is lower and better.
US Value
(10.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Potter Valley value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level Census Place: Redwood Valley

Current Value:

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level Census Place: Redwood Valley

12.8%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Redwood Valley has a value of 12.8% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 8.4% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.0%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,441 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Redwood Valley has a value of 12.8% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 8.1% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.6%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,319 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (12.9%), Redwood Valley has a value of 12.8% which is lower and better.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(12.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the CA Value (11.0%), Redwood Valley has a value of 12.8% which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(11.0%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (10.0%), Redwood Valley has a value of 12.8% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(10.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Redwood Valley value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level Census Place: Talmage

Current Value:

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level Census Place: Talmage

35.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Talmage has a value of 35.5% which is in the worst 25% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 8.4% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.0%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,441 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Talmage has a value of 35.5% which is in the worst 25% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 8.1% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.6%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,319 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (12.9%), Talmage has a value of 35.5% which is higher and worse.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(12.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the CA Value (11.0%), Talmage has a value of 35.5% which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(11.0%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (10.0%), Talmage has a value of 35.5% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(10.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Talmage value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level Census Place: Ukiah

Current Value:

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level Census Place: Ukiah

22.3%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Ukiah has a value of 22.3% which is in the worst 25% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 8.4% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.0%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,441 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Ukiah has a value of 22.3% which is in the worst 25% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 8.1% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.6%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,319 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (12.9%), Ukiah has a value of 22.3% which is higher and worse.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(12.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the CA Value (11.0%), Ukiah has a value of 22.3% which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(11.0%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (10.0%), Ukiah has a value of 22.3% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(10.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Ukiah value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level Census Place: Willits

Current Value:

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level Census Place: Willits

15.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Willits has a value of 15.0% which is in the worst 25% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 8.4% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.0%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,441 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Willits has a value of 15.0% which is in the worst 25% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 8.1% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.6%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,319 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (12.9%), Willits has a value of 15.0% which is higher and worse.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(12.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the CA Value (11.0%), Willits has a value of 15.0% which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(11.0%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (10.0%), Willits has a value of 15.0% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(10.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Willits value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level Zip Code: 95410

Current Value:

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level Zip Code: 95410

5.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Zip Codes, 95410 has a value of 5.2% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 9.3% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.6%.
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,697 California zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 95410 has a value of 5.2% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 7.9% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 13.2%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 32,127 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (12.9%), 95410 has a value of 5.2% which is lower and better.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(12.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Over time, the 95410 value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level Zip Code: 95415

Current Value:

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level Zip Code: 95415

4.7%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Zip Codes, 95415 has a value of 4.7% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 9.3% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.6%.
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,697 California zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 95415 has a value of 4.7% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 7.9% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 13.2%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 32,127 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (12.9%), 95415 has a value of 4.7% which is lower and better.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(12.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Over time, the 95415 value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level Zip Code: 95417

Current Value:

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level Zip Code: 95417

50.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Zip Codes, 95417 has a value of 50.0% which is in the worst 25% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 9.3% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.6%.
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,697 California zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 95417 has a value of 50.0% which is in the worst 25% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 7.9% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 13.2%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 32,127 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (12.9%), 95417 has a value of 50.0% which is higher and worse.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(12.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Over time, the 95417 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level Zip Code: 95420

Current Value:

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level Zip Code: 95420

5.7%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Zip Codes, 95420 has a value of 5.7% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 9.3% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.6%.
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,697 California zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 95420 has a value of 5.7% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 7.9% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 13.2%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 32,127 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (12.9%), 95420 has a value of 5.7% which is lower and better.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(12.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Over time, the 95420 value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level Zip Code: 95427

Current Value:

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level Zip Code: 95427

0.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Zip Codes, 95427 has a value of 0.0% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 9.3% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.6%.
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,697 California zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 95427 has a value of 0.0% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 7.9% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 13.2%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 32,127 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (12.9%), 95427 has a value of 0.0% which is lower and better.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(12.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Over time, the 95427 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level Zip Code: 95428

Current Value:

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level Zip Code: 95428

12.1%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Zip Codes, 95428 has a value of 12.1% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 9.3% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.6%.
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,697 California zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 95428 has a value of 12.1% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 7.9% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 13.2%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 32,127 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (12.9%), 95428 has a value of 12.1% which is lower and better.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(12.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Over time, the 95428 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level Zip Code: 95429

Current Value:

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level Zip Code: 95429

64.7%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Zip Codes, 95429 has a value of 64.7% which is in the worst 25% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 9.3% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.6%.
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,697 California zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 95429 has a value of 64.7% which is in the worst 25% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 7.9% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 13.2%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 32,127 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (12.9%), 95429 has a value of 64.7% which is higher and worse.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(12.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Over time, the 95429 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level Zip Code: 95432

Current Value:

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level Zip Code: 95432

4.9%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Zip Codes, 95432 has a value of 4.9% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 9.3% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.6%.
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,697 California zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 95432 has a value of 4.9% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 7.9% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 13.2%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 32,127 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (12.9%), 95432 has a value of 4.9% which is lower and better.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(12.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Over time, the 95432 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level Zip Code: 95437

Current Value:

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level Zip Code: 95437

11.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Zip Codes, 95437 has a value of 11.5% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 9.3% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.6%.
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,697 California zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 95437 has a value of 11.5% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 7.9% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 13.2%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 32,127 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (12.9%), 95437 has a value of 11.5% which is lower and better.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(12.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Over time, the 95437 value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level Zip Code: 95445

Current Value:

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level Zip Code: 95445

6.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Zip Codes, 95445 has a value of 6.0% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 9.3% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.6%.
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,697 California zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 95445 has a value of 6.0% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 7.9% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 13.2%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 32,127 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (12.9%), 95445 has a value of 6.0% which is lower and better.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(12.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Over time, the 95445 value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level Zip Code: 95449

Current Value:

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level Zip Code: 95449

17.3%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Zip Codes, 95449 has a value of 17.3% which is in the worst 25% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 9.3% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.6%.
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,697 California zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 95449 has a value of 17.3% which is in the worst 25% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 7.9% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 13.2%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 32,127 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (12.9%), 95449 has a value of 17.3% which is higher and worse.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(12.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Over time, the 95449 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level Zip Code: 95454

Current Value:

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level Zip Code: 95454

53.3%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Zip Codes, 95454 has a value of 53.3% which is in the worst 25% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 9.3% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.6%.
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,697 California zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 95454 has a value of 53.3% which is in the worst 25% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 7.9% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 13.2%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 32,127 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (12.9%), 95454 has a value of 53.3% which is higher and worse.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(12.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Over time, the 95454 value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level Zip Code: 95456

Current Value:

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level Zip Code: 95456

4.4%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Zip Codes, 95456 has a value of 4.4% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 9.3% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.6%.
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,697 California zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 95456 has a value of 4.4% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 7.9% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 13.2%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 32,127 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (12.9%), 95456 has a value of 4.4% which is lower and better.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(12.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Over time, the 95456 value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level Zip Code: 95459

Current Value:

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level Zip Code: 95459

9.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Zip Codes, 95459 has a value of 9.0% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 9.3% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.6%.
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,697 California zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 95459 has a value of 9.0% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 7.9% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 13.2%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 32,127 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (12.9%), 95459 has a value of 9.0% which is lower and better.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(12.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Over time, the 95459 value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level Zip Code: 95460

Current Value:

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level Zip Code: 95460

6.1%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Zip Codes, 95460 has a value of 6.1% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 9.3% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.6%.
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,697 California zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 95460 has a value of 6.1% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 7.9% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 13.2%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 32,127 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (12.9%), 95460 has a value of 6.1% which is lower and better.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(12.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Over time, the 95460 value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level Zip Code: 95463

Current Value:

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level Zip Code: 95463

0.0%
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Zip Codes, 95463 has a value of 0.0% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 8.7% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 13.7%.
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,689 California zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 95463 has a value of 0.0% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 7.2% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.3%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 31,878 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (11.8%), 95463 has a value of 0.0% which is lower and better.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(11.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Over time, the 95463 value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level Zip Code: 95466

Current Value:

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level Zip Code: 95466

18.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Zip Codes, 95466 has a value of 18.5% which is in the worst 25% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 9.3% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.6%.
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,697 California zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 95466 has a value of 18.5% which is in the worst 25% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 7.9% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 13.2%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 32,127 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (12.9%), 95466 has a value of 18.5% which is higher and worse.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(12.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Over time, the 95466 value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level Zip Code: 95468

Current Value:

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level Zip Code: 95468

5.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Zip Codes, 95468 has a value of 5.2% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 9.3% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.6%.
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,697 California zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 95468 has a value of 5.2% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 7.9% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 13.2%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 32,127 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (12.9%), 95468 has a value of 5.2% which is lower and better.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(12.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Over time, the 95468 value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level Zip Code: 95469

Current Value:

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level Zip Code: 95469

2.7%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Zip Codes, 95469 has a value of 2.7% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 9.3% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.6%.
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,697 California zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 95469 has a value of 2.7% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 7.9% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 13.2%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 32,127 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (12.9%), 95469 has a value of 2.7% which is lower and better.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(12.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Over time, the 95469 value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level Zip Code: 95470

Current Value:

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level Zip Code: 95470

16.4%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Zip Codes, 95470 has a value of 16.4% which is in the worst 25% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 9.3% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.6%.
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,697 California zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 95470 has a value of 16.4% which is in the worst 25% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 7.9% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 13.2%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 32,127 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (12.9%), 95470 has a value of 16.4% which is higher and worse.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(12.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Over time, the 95470 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level Zip Code: 95482

Current Value:

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level Zip Code: 95482

16.8%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Zip Codes, 95482 has a value of 16.8% which is in the worst 25% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 9.3% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.6%.
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,697 California zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 95482 has a value of 16.8% which is in the worst 25% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 7.9% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 13.2%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 32,127 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (12.9%), 95482 has a value of 16.8% which is higher and worse.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(12.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Over time, the 95482 value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level Zip Code: 95488

Current Value:

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level Zip Code: 95488

0.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Zip Codes, 95488 has a value of 0.0% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 9.3% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.6%.
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,697 California zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 95488 has a value of 0.0% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 7.9% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 13.2%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 32,127 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (12.9%), 95488 has a value of 0.0% which is lower and better.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(12.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Over time, the 95488 value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level Zip Code: 95490

Current Value:

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level Zip Code: 95490

8.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Zip Codes, 95490 has a value of 8.5% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 9.3% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.6%.
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,697 California zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 95490 has a value of 8.5% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 7.9% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 13.2%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 32,127 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (12.9%), 95490 has a value of 8.5% which is lower and better.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(12.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Over time, the 95490 value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level Zip Code: 95494

Current Value:

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level Zip Code: 95494

0.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Zip Codes, 95494 has a value of 0.0% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 9.3% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.6%.
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,697 California zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 95494 has a value of 0.0% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 7.9% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 13.2%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 32,127 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (12.9%), 95494 has a value of 0.0% which is lower and better.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(12.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Over time, the 95494 value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level Zip Code: 95585

Current Value:

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level Zip Code: 95585

7.1%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Zip Codes, 95585 has a value of 7.1% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 9.3% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.6%.
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,697 California zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 95585 has a value of 7.1% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 7.9% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 13.2%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 32,127 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (12.9%), 95585 has a value of 7.1% which is lower and better.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(12.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Over time, the 95585 value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level Zip Code: 95587

Current Value:

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level Zip Code: 95587

0.0%
(2017-2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Zip Codes, 95587 has a value of 0.0% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 8.8% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.0%.
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,693 California zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 95587 has a value of 0.0% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 7.4% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.6%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 32,128 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (12.7%), 95587 has a value of 0.0% which is lower and better.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(12.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Over time, the 95587 value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level Census Tract: 06045010100

Current Value:

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level Census Tract: 06045010100

11.3%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06045010100 has a value of 11.3% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 9.2% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 16.7%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,016 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06045010100 has a value of 11.3% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 8.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 15.0%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,202 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (12.9%), 06045010100 has a value of 11.3% which is lower and better.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(12.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Over time, the 06045010100 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level Census Tract: 06045010200

Current Value:

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level Census Tract: 06045010200

41.3%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06045010200 has a value of 41.3% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 9.2% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 16.7%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,016 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06045010200 has a value of 41.3% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 8.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 15.0%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,202 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (12.9%), 06045010200 has a value of 41.3% which is higher and worse.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(12.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Over time, the 06045010200 value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level Census Tract: 06045010300

Current Value:

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level Census Tract: 06045010300

8.9%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06045010300 has a value of 8.9% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 9.2% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 16.7%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,016 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06045010300 has a value of 8.9% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 8.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 15.0%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,202 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (12.9%), 06045010300 has a value of 8.9% which is lower and better.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(12.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Over time, the 06045010300 value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level Census Tract: 06045010400

Current Value:

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level Census Tract: 06045010400

6.1%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06045010400 has a value of 6.1% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 9.2% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 16.7%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,016 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06045010400 has a value of 6.1% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 8.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 15.0%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,202 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (12.9%), 06045010400 has a value of 6.1% which is lower and better.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(12.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Over time, the 06045010400 value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level Census Tract: 06045010500

Current Value:

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level Census Tract: 06045010500

12.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06045010500 has a value of 12.5% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 9.2% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 16.7%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,016 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06045010500 has a value of 12.5% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 8.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 15.0%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,202 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (12.9%), 06045010500 has a value of 12.5% which is lower and better.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(12.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Over time, the 06045010500 value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level Census Tract: 06045010600

Current Value:

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level Census Tract: 06045010600

11.2%
(2015-2019)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06045010600 has a value of 11.2% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 8.9% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 15.9%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 7,956 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06045010600 has a value of 11.2% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 7.9% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 13.9%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 72,011 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (9.7%), 06045010600 has a value of 11.2% which is higher and worse.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(9.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Over time, the 06045010600 value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level Census Tract: 06045010601

Current Value:

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level Census Tract: 06045010601

6.3%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06045010601 has a value of 6.3% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 9.2% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 16.7%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,016 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06045010601 has a value of 6.3% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 8.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 15.0%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,202 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (12.9%), 06045010601 has a value of 6.3% which is lower and better.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(12.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level Census Tract: 06045010602

Current Value:

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level Census Tract: 06045010602

2.3%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06045010602 has a value of 2.3% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 9.2% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 16.7%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,016 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06045010602 has a value of 2.3% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 8.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 15.0%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,202 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (12.9%), 06045010602 has a value of 2.3% which is lower and better.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(12.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level Census Tract: 06045010700

Current Value:

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level Census Tract: 06045010700

13.1%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06045010700 has a value of 13.1% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 9.2% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 16.7%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,016 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06045010700 has a value of 13.1% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 8.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 15.0%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,202 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (12.9%), 06045010700 has a value of 13.1% which is higher and worse.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(12.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Over time, the 06045010700 value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level Census Tract: 06045010801

Current Value:

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level Census Tract: 06045010801

17.9%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06045010801 has a value of 17.9% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 9.2% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 16.7%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,016 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06045010801 has a value of 17.9% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 8.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 15.0%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,202 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (12.9%), 06045010801 has a value of 17.9% which is higher and worse.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(12.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Over time, the 06045010801 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level Census Tract: 06045010802

Current Value:

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level Census Tract: 06045010802

7.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06045010802 has a value of 7.2% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 9.2% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 16.7%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,016 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06045010802 has a value of 7.2% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 8.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 15.0%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,202 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (12.9%), 06045010802 has a value of 7.2% which is lower and better.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(12.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Over time, the 06045010802 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level Census Tract: 06045010900

Current Value:

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level Census Tract: 06045010900

5.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06045010900 has a value of 5.5% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 9.2% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 16.7%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,016 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06045010900 has a value of 5.5% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 8.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 15.0%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,202 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (12.9%), 06045010900 has a value of 5.5% which is lower and better.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(12.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Over time, the 06045010900 value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level Census Tract: 06045011001

Current Value:

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level Census Tract: 06045011001

5.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06045011001 has a value of 5.0% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 9.2% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 16.7%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,016 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06045011001 has a value of 5.0% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 8.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 15.0%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,202 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (12.9%), 06045011001 has a value of 5.0% which is lower and better.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(12.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Over time, the 06045011001 value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level Census Tract: 06045011002

Current Value:

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level Census Tract: 06045011002

13.7%
(2015-2019)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06045011002 has a value of 13.7% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 8.9% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 15.9%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 7,956 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06045011002 has a value of 13.7% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 7.9% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 13.9%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 72,011 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (9.7%), 06045011002 has a value of 13.7% which is higher and worse.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(9.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Over time, the 06045011002 value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level Census Tract: 06045011003

Current Value:

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level Census Tract: 06045011003

17.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06045011003 has a value of 17.2% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 9.2% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 16.7%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,016 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06045011003 has a value of 17.2% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 8.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 15.0%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,202 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (12.9%), 06045011003 has a value of 17.2% which is higher and worse.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(12.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level Census Tract: 06045011004

Current Value:

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level Census Tract: 06045011004

6.1%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06045011004 has a value of 6.1% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 9.2% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 16.7%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,016 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06045011004 has a value of 6.1% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 8.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 15.0%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,202 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (12.9%), 06045011004 has a value of 6.1% which is lower and better.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(12.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level Census Tract: 06045011102

Current Value:

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level Census Tract: 06045011102

6.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06045011102 has a value of 6.0% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 9.2% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 16.7%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,016 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06045011102 has a value of 6.0% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 8.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 15.0%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,202 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (12.9%), 06045011102 has a value of 6.0% which is lower and better.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(12.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Over time, the 06045011102 value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level Census Tract: 06045011200

Current Value:

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level Census Tract: 06045011200

7.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06045011200 has a value of 7.2% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 9.2% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 16.7%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,016 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06045011200 has a value of 7.2% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 8.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 15.0%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,202 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (12.9%), 06045011200 has a value of 7.2% which is lower and better.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(12.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Over time, the 06045011200 value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level Census Tract: 06045011300

Current Value:

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level Census Tract: 06045011300

15.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06045011300 has a value of 15.5% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 9.2% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 16.7%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,016 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06045011300 has a value of 15.5% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 8.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 15.0%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,202 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (12.9%), 06045011300 has a value of 15.5% which is higher and worse.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(12.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Over time, the 06045011300 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level Census Tract: 06045011400

Current Value:

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level Census Tract: 06045011400

5.1%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06045011400 has a value of 5.1% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 9.2% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 16.7%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,016 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06045011400 has a value of 5.1% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 8.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 15.0%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,202 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (12.9%), 06045011400 has a value of 5.1% which is lower and better.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(12.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Over time, the 06045011400 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level Census Tract: 06045011500

Current Value:

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level Census Tract: 06045011500

11.3%
(2015-2019)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06045011500 has a value of 11.3% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 8.9% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 15.9%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 7,956 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06045011500 has a value of 11.3% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 7.9% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 13.9%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 72,011 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (9.7%), 06045011500 has a value of 11.3% which is higher and worse.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(9.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Over time, the 06045011500 value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level Census Tract: 06045011501

Current Value:

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level Census Tract: 06045011501

38.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06045011501 has a value of 38.2% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 9.2% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 16.7%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,016 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06045011501 has a value of 38.2% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 8.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 15.0%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,202 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (12.9%), 06045011501 has a value of 38.2% which is higher and worse.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(12.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level Census Tract: 06045011502

Current Value:

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level Census Tract: 06045011502

8.8%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06045011502 has a value of 8.8% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 9.2% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 16.7%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,016 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06045011502 has a value of 8.8% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 8.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 15.0%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,202 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (12.9%), 06045011502 has a value of 8.8% which is lower and better.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(12.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level Census Tract: 06045011600

Current Value:

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level Census Tract: 06045011600

31.4%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06045011600 has a value of 31.4% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 9.2% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 16.7%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,016 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06045011600 has a value of 31.4% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 8.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 15.0%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,202 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (12.9%), 06045011600 has a value of 31.4% which is higher and worse.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(12.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Over time, the 06045011600 value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level Census Tract: 06045011700

Current Value:

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level Census Tract: 06045011700

15.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06045011700 has a value of 15.5% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 9.2% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 16.7%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,016 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06045011700 has a value of 15.5% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 8.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 15.0%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,202 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (12.9%), 06045011700 has a value of 15.5% which is higher and worse.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(12.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Over time, the 06045011700 value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level Census Tract: 06045011800

Current Value:

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level Census Tract: 06045011800

14.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06045011800 has a value of 14.2% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 9.2% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 16.7%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,016 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06045011800 has a value of 14.2% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 8.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 15.0%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,202 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (12.9%), 06045011800 has a value of 14.2% which is higher and worse.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(12.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Over time, the 06045011800 value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Economy / Poverty

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level (Count)

Value
Compared to:

Economy / Poverty

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level (Count)

Value
Compared to:

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level (Count) County: Mendocino

Current Value:

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level (Count) County: Mendocino

2,702
People
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Over time, the Mendocino value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level (Count) Zip Code: 95410

Current Value:

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level (Count) Zip Code: 95410

14
People
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Over time, the 95410 value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level (Count) Zip Code: 95415

Current Value:

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level (Count) Zip Code: 95415

16
People
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Over time, the 95415 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level (Count) Zip Code: 95417

Current Value:

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level (Count) Zip Code: 95417

14
People
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Over time, the 95417 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level (Count) Zip Code: 95420

Current Value:

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level (Count) Zip Code: 95420

7
People
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Over time, the 95420 value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level (Count) Zip Code: 95427

Current Value:

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level (Count) Zip Code: 95427

0
People
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Over time, the 95427 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level (Count) Zip Code: 95428

Current Value:

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level (Count) Zip Code: 95428

59
People
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Over time, the 95428 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level (Count) Zip Code: 95429

Current Value:

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level (Count) Zip Code: 95429

55
People
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Over time, the 95429 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level (Count) Zip Code: 95432

Current Value:

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level (Count) Zip Code: 95432

13
People
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Over time, the 95432 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level (Count) Zip Code: 95437

Current Value:

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level (Count) Zip Code: 95437

478
People
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Over time, the 95437 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level (Count) Zip Code: 95445

Current Value:

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level (Count) Zip Code: 95445

43
People
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Over time, the 95445 value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level (Count) Zip Code: 95449

Current Value:

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level (Count) Zip Code: 95449

53
People
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Over time, the 95449 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level (Count) Zip Code: 95454

Current Value:

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level (Count) Zip Code: 95454

326
People
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Over time, the 95454 value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level (Count) Zip Code: 95456

Current Value:

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level (Count) Zip Code: 95456

14
People
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Over time, the 95456 value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level (Count) Zip Code: 95459

Current Value:

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level (Count) Zip Code: 95459

16
People
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Over time, the 95459 value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level (Count) Zip Code: 95460

Current Value:

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level (Count) Zip Code: 95460

58
People
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Over time, the 95460 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level (Count) Zip Code: 95463

Current Value:

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level (Count) Zip Code: 95463

0
People
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
Over time, the 95463 value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level (Count) Zip Code: 95466

Current Value:

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level (Count) Zip Code: 95466

42
People
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Over time, the 95466 value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level (Count) Zip Code: 95468

Current Value:

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level (Count) Zip Code: 95468

31
People
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Over time, the 95468 value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level (Count) Zip Code: 95469

Current Value:

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level (Count) Zip Code: 95469

10
People
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Over time, the 95469 value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level (Count) Zip Code: 95470

Current Value:

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level (Count) Zip Code: 95470

158
People
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Over time, the 95470 value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level (Count) Zip Code: 95482

Current Value:

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level (Count) Zip Code: 95482

977
People
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Over time, the 95482 value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level (Count) Zip Code: 95488

Current Value:

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level (Count) Zip Code: 95488

0
People
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Over time, the 95488 value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level (Count) Zip Code: 95490

Current Value:

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level (Count) Zip Code: 95490

303
People
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Over time, the 95490 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level (Count) Zip Code: 95494

Current Value:

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level (Count) Zip Code: 95494

0
People
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Over time, the 95494 value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level (Count) Zip Code: 95585

Current Value:

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level (Count) Zip Code: 95585

12
People
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Over time, the 95585 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level (Count) Zip Code: 95587

Current Value:

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level (Count) Zip Code: 95587

0
People
(2017-2021)
Compared to:
Over time, the 95587 value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level (Count) Census Tract: 06045010100

Current Value:

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level (Count) Census Tract: 06045010100

59
People
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Over time, the 06045010100 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level (Count) Census Tract: 06045010200

Current Value:

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level (Count) Census Tract: 06045010200

427
People
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Over time, the 06045010200 value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level (Count) Census Tract: 06045010300

Current Value:

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level (Count) Census Tract: 06045010300

125
People
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Over time, the 06045010300 value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level (Count) Census Tract: 06045010400

Current Value:

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level (Count) Census Tract: 06045010400

55
People
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Over time, the 06045010400 value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level (Count) Census Tract: 06045010500

Current Value:

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level (Count) Census Tract: 06045010500

119
People
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Over time, the 06045010500 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level (Count) Census Tract: 06045010700

Current Value:

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level (Count) Census Tract: 06045010700

223
People
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Over time, the 06045010700 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level (Count) Census Tract: 06045010801

Current Value:

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level (Count) Census Tract: 06045010801

158
People
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Over time, the 06045010801 value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level (Count) Census Tract: 06045010802

Current Value:

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level (Count) Census Tract: 06045010802

28
People
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Over time, the 06045010802 value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level (Count) Census Tract: 06045010900

Current Value:

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level (Count) Census Tract: 06045010900

60
People
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Over time, the 06045010900 value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level (Count) Census Tract: 06045011001

Current Value:

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level (Count) Census Tract: 06045011001

39
People
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Over time, the 06045011001 value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level (Count) Census Tract: 06045011102

Current Value:

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level (Count) Census Tract: 06045011102

92
People
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Over time, the 06045011102 value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level (Count) Census Tract: 06045011200

Current Value:

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level (Count) Census Tract: 06045011200

58
People
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Over time, the 06045011200 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level (Count) Census Tract: 06045011300

Current Value:

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level (Count) Census Tract: 06045011300

135
People
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Over time, the 06045011300 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level (Count) Census Tract: 06045011400

Current Value:

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level (Count) Census Tract: 06045011400

46
People
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Over time, the 06045011400 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level (Count) Census Tract: 06045011600

Current Value:

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level (Count) Census Tract: 06045011600

269
People
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Over time, the 06045011600 value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level (Count) Census Tract: 06045011700

Current Value:

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level (Count) Census Tract: 06045011700

163
People
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Over time, the 06045011700 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level (Count) Census Tract: 06045011800

Current Value:

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level (Count) Census Tract: 06045011800

53
People
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Over time, the 06045011800 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Economy / Poverty

People Living 200% Above Poverty Level

Value
Compared to:

Economy / Poverty

People Living 200% Above Poverty Level

Value
Compared to:

People Living 200% Above Poverty Level County: Mendocino

Current Value:

People Living 200% Above Poverty Level County: Mendocino

64.4%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Mendocino has a value of 64.4% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 68.7% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 63.7%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Mendocino has a value of 64.4% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 66.8% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 59.9%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the CA Value (72.0%), Mendocino has a value of 64.4% which is lower and worse.
CA Value
(72.0%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (71.2%), Mendocino has a value of 64.4% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(71.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Mendocino value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People Living 200% Above Poverty Level Census Place: Albion

Current Value:

People Living 200% Above Poverty Level Census Place: Albion

23.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Albion has a value of 23.5% which is in the worst 25% of census places. Census places in the best 50%  have a value higher than 72.6% while census places in the worst 25% have a value lower than 57.0%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,481 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Albion has a value of 23.5% which is in the worst 25% of census places. Census places in the best 50%  have a value higher than 68.0% while census places in the worst 25% have a value lower than 54.5%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,869 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (64.4%), Albion has a value of 23.5% which is lower and worse.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(64.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the CA Value (72.0%), Albion has a value of 23.5% which is lower and worse.
CA Value
(72.0%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (71.2%), Albion has a value of 23.5% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(71.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Albion value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People Living 200% Above Poverty Level Census Place: Anchor Bay

Current Value:

People Living 200% Above Poverty Level Census Place: Anchor Bay

84.3%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Anchor Bay has a value of 84.3% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50%  have a value higher than 72.6% while census places in the worst 25% have a value lower than 57.0%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,481 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Anchor Bay has a value of 84.3% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50%  have a value higher than 68.0% while census places in the worst 25% have a value lower than 54.5%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,869 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (64.4%), Anchor Bay has a value of 84.3% which is higher and better.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(64.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the CA Value (72.0%), Anchor Bay has a value of 84.3% which is higher and better.
CA Value
(72.0%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (71.2%), Anchor Bay has a value of 84.3% which is higher and better.
US Value
(71.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Anchor Bay value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People Living 200% Above Poverty Level Census Place: Boonville

Current Value:

People Living 200% Above Poverty Level Census Place: Boonville

62.9%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Boonville has a value of 62.9% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places. Census places in the best 50%  have a value higher than 72.6% while census places in the worst 25% have a value lower than 57.0%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,481 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Boonville has a value of 62.9% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places. Census places in the best 50%  have a value higher than 68.0% while census places in the worst 25% have a value lower than 54.5%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,869 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (64.4%), Boonville has a value of 62.9% which is lower and worse.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(64.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the CA Value (72.0%), Boonville has a value of 62.9% which is lower and worse.
CA Value
(72.0%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (71.2%), Boonville has a value of 62.9% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(71.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Boonville value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People Living 200% Above Poverty Level Census Place: Brooktrails

Current Value:

People Living 200% Above Poverty Level Census Place: Brooktrails

84.4%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Brooktrails has a value of 84.4% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50%  have a value higher than 72.6% while census places in the worst 25% have a value lower than 57.0%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,481 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Brooktrails has a value of 84.4% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50%  have a value higher than 68.0% while census places in the worst 25% have a value lower than 54.5%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,869 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (64.4%), Brooktrails has a value of 84.4% which is higher and better.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(64.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the CA Value (72.0%), Brooktrails has a value of 84.4% which is higher and better.
CA Value
(72.0%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (71.2%), Brooktrails has a value of 84.4% which is higher and better.
US Value
(71.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Brooktrails value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People Living 200% Above Poverty Level Census Place: Calpella

Current Value:

People Living 200% Above Poverty Level Census Place: Calpella

93.3%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Calpella has a value of 93.3% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50%  have a value higher than 72.6% while census places in the worst 25% have a value lower than 57.0%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,481 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Calpella has a value of 93.3% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50%  have a value higher than 68.0% while census places in the worst 25% have a value lower than 54.5%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,869 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (64.4%), Calpella has a value of 93.3% which is higher and better.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(64.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the CA Value (72.0%), Calpella has a value of 93.3% which is higher and better.
CA Value
(72.0%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (71.2%), Calpella has a value of 93.3% which is higher and better.
US Value
(71.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Calpella value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People Living 200% Above Poverty Level Census Place: Caspar

Current Value:

People Living 200% Above Poverty Level Census Place: Caspar

89.7%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Caspar has a value of 89.7% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50%  have a value higher than 72.6% while census places in the worst 25% have a value lower than 57.0%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,481 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Caspar has a value of 89.7% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50%  have a value higher than 68.0% while census places in the worst 25% have a value lower than 54.5%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,869 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (64.4%), Caspar has a value of 89.7% which is higher and better.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(64.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the CA Value (72.0%), Caspar has a value of 89.7% which is higher and better.
CA Value
(72.0%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (71.2%), Caspar has a value of 89.7% which is higher and better.
US Value
(71.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Caspar value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People Living 200% Above Poverty Level Census Place: Cleone

Current Value:

People Living 200% Above Poverty Level Census Place: Cleone

47.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Cleone has a value of 47.2% which is in the worst 25% of census places. Census places in the best 50%  have a value higher than 72.6% while census places in the worst 25% have a value lower than 57.0%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,481 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Cleone has a value of 47.2% which is in the worst 25% of census places. Census places in the best 50%  have a value higher than 68.0% while census places in the worst 25% have a value lower than 54.5%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,869 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (64.4%), Cleone has a value of 47.2% which is lower and worse.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(64.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the CA Value (72.0%), Cleone has a value of 47.2% which is lower and worse.
CA Value
(72.0%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (71.2%), Cleone has a value of 47.2% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(71.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Cleone value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People Living 200% Above Poverty Level Census Place: Comptche

Current Value:

People Living 200% Above Poverty Level Census Place: Comptche

62.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Comptche has a value of 62.5% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places. Census places in the best 50%  have a value higher than 72.6% while census places in the worst 25% have a value lower than 57.0%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,481 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Comptche has a value of 62.5% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places. Census places in the best 50%  have a value higher than 68.0% while census places in the worst 25% have a value lower than 54.5%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,869 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (64.4%), Comptche has a value of 62.5% which is lower and worse.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(64.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the CA Value (72.0%), Comptche has a value of 62.5% which is lower and worse.
CA Value
(72.0%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (71.2%), Comptche has a value of 62.5% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(71.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Comptche value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People Living 200% Above Poverty Level Census Place: Covelo

Current Value:

People Living 200% Above Poverty Level Census Place: Covelo

24.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Covelo has a value of 24.5% which is in the worst 25% of census places. Census places in the best 50%  have a value higher than 72.6% while census places in the worst 25% have a value lower than 57.0%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,481 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Covelo has a value of 24.5% which is in the worst 25% of census places. Census places in the best 50%  have a value higher than 68.0% while census places in the worst 25% have a value lower than 54.5%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,869 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (64.4%), Covelo has a value of 24.5% which is lower and worse.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(64.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the CA Value (72.0%), Covelo has a value of 24.5% which is lower and worse.
CA Value
(72.0%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (71.2%), Covelo has a value of 24.5% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(71.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Covelo value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People Living 200% Above Poverty Level Census Place: Fort Bragg

Current Value:

People Living 200% Above Poverty Level Census Place: Fort Bragg

51.7%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Fort Bragg has a value of 51.7% which is in the worst 25% of census places. Census places in the best 50%  have a value higher than 72.6% while census places in the worst 25% have a value lower than 57.0%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,481 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Fort Bragg has a value of 51.7% which is in the worst 25% of census places. Census places in the best 50%  have a value higher than 68.0% while census places in the worst 25% have a value lower than 54.5%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,869 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (64.4%), Fort Bragg has a value of 51.7% which is lower and worse.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(64.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the CA Value (72.0%), Fort Bragg has a value of 51.7% which is lower and worse.
CA Value
(72.0%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (71.2%), Fort Bragg has a value of 51.7% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(71.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Fort Bragg value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.