Skip to main content

Advanced Search: Build a Custom Dashboard

In the fields below, search for indicators by location, topics, population, classification, subgroup, or comparison. No fields are required, but we suggest selecting a location or two to start. In the additional search options section, select options to group and order search results. To learn more about how to customize a dashboard, see our help center.

Visit the Indicator List Page to see the full list of indicators and locations available on the site.

  • Map View
  • County : Mendocino Census Tracts
  • County : Mendocino Zip Codes
  • All Health Topics
  • All Community Topics
  • All Economy Topics
  • All Education Topics
  • All Environmental Health Topics
Search display options:

Search Results:

Indicator Gauge Icon Legend

Legend Colors

Red is bad, green is good, blue is not statistically different/neutral.

Compared to Distribution

an indicator guage with the arrow in the green the value is in the best half of communities.

an indicator guage with the arrow in the yellow the value is in the 2nd worst quarter of communities.

an indicator guage with the arrow in the red the value is in the worst quarter of communities.

Compared to Target

green circle with white tick inside it meets target; red circle with white cross inside it does not meet target.

Compared to a Single Value

green diamond with downward arrow inside it lower than the comparison value; red diamond with downward arrow inside it higher than the comparison value; blue diamond with downward arrow inside it not statistically different from comparison value.

Trend

green square outline with upward trending arrow inside it green square outline with downward trending arrow inside it non-significant change over time; green square with upward trending arrow inside it green square with downward trending arrow inside it significant change over time; blue square with equals sign no change over time.

Compared to Prior Value

green triangle with upward trending arrow inside it higher than the previous measurement period; green triangle with downward trending arrow inside it lower than the previous measurement period; blue equals sign no statistically different change  from previous measurement period.

More information about the gauges and icons

Economy / Income

Economy / Income

Economy / Income

Per Capita Income

Value
Compared to:

Economy / Income

Per Capita Income

Value
Compared to:

Per Capita Income Zip Code: 95428

Current Value:

Per Capita Income Zip Code: 95428

$24,761
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Zip Codes, 95428 has a value of $24,761 which is in the worst 25% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than $40,001 while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than $28,313.
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,739 California zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 95428 has a value of $24,761 which is in the worst 25% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than $33,715 while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than $27,268.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 32,613 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value ($34,977), 95428 has a value of $24,761 which is lower and worse.
Mendocino, CA County Value
($34,977)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Over time, the 95428 value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Per Capita Income Zip Code: 95429

Current Value:

Per Capita Income Zip Code: 95429

$30,047
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Zip Codes, 95429 has a value of $30,047 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than $40,001 while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than $28,313.
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,739 California zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 95429 has a value of $30,047 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than $33,715 while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than $27,268.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 32,613 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value ($34,977), 95429 has a value of $30,047 which is lower and worse.
Mendocino, CA County Value
($34,977)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Over time, the 95429 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Per Capita Income Zip Code: 95432

Current Value:

Per Capita Income Zip Code: 95432

$37,984
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Zip Codes, 95432 has a value of $37,984 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than $40,001 while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than $28,313.
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,739 California zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 95432 has a value of $37,984 which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than $33,715 while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than $27,268.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 32,613 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value ($34,977), 95432 has a value of $37,984 which is higher and better.
Mendocino, CA County Value
($34,977)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Over time, the 95432 value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Per Capita Income Zip Code: 95437

Current Value:

Per Capita Income Zip Code: 95437

$33,848
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Zip Codes, 95437 has a value of $33,848 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than $40,001 while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than $28,313.
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,739 California zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 95437 has a value of $33,848 which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than $33,715 while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than $27,268.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 32,613 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value ($34,977), 95437 has a value of $33,848 which is lower and worse.
Mendocino, CA County Value
($34,977)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Over time, the 95437 value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Per Capita Income Zip Code: 95445

Current Value:

Per Capita Income Zip Code: 95445

$52,298
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Zip Codes, 95445 has a value of $52,298 which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than $40,001 while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than $28,313.
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,739 California zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 95445 has a value of $52,298 which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than $33,715 while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than $27,268.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 32,613 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value ($34,977), 95445 has a value of $52,298 which is higher and better.
Mendocino, CA County Value
($34,977)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Over time, the 95445 value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Per Capita Income Zip Code: 95449

Current Value:

Per Capita Income Zip Code: 95449

$30,543
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Zip Codes, 95449 has a value of $30,543 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than $40,001 while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than $28,313.
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,739 California zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 95449 has a value of $30,543 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than $33,715 while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than $27,268.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 32,613 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value ($34,977), 95449 has a value of $30,543 which is lower and worse.
Mendocino, CA County Value
($34,977)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Over time, the 95449 value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Per Capita Income Zip Code: 95454

Current Value:

Per Capita Income Zip Code: 95454

$18,966
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Zip Codes, 95454 has a value of $18,966 which is in the worst 25% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than $40,001 while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than $28,313.
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,739 California zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 95454 has a value of $18,966 which is in the worst 25% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than $33,715 while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than $27,268.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 32,613 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value ($34,977), 95454 has a value of $18,966 which is lower and worse.
Mendocino, CA County Value
($34,977)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Over time, the 95454 value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Per Capita Income Zip Code: 95456

Current Value:

Per Capita Income Zip Code: 95456

$38,085
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Zip Codes, 95456 has a value of $38,085 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than $40,001 while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than $28,313.
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,739 California zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 95456 has a value of $38,085 which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than $33,715 while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than $27,268.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 32,613 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value ($34,977), 95456 has a value of $38,085 which is higher and better.
Mendocino, CA County Value
($34,977)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Over time, the 95456 value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Per Capita Income Zip Code: 95459

Current Value:

Per Capita Income Zip Code: 95459

$40,710
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Zip Codes, 95459 has a value of $40,710 which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than $40,001 while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than $28,313.
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,739 California zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 95459 has a value of $40,710 which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than $33,715 while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than $27,268.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 32,613 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value ($34,977), 95459 has a value of $40,710 which is higher and better.
Mendocino, CA County Value
($34,977)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Over time, the 95459 value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Per Capita Income Zip Code: 95460

Current Value:

Per Capita Income Zip Code: 95460

$46,194
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Zip Codes, 95460 has a value of $46,194 which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than $40,001 while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than $28,313.
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,739 California zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 95460 has a value of $46,194 which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than $33,715 while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than $27,268.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 32,613 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value ($34,977), 95460 has a value of $46,194 which is higher and better.
Mendocino, CA County Value
($34,977)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Over time, the 95460 value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Per Capita Income Zip Code: 95463

Current Value:

Per Capita Income Zip Code: 95463

$41,443
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Zip Codes, 95463 has a value of $41,443 which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than $40,001 while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than $28,313.
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,739 California zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 95463 has a value of $41,443 which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than $33,715 while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than $27,268.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 32,613 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value ($34,977), 95463 has a value of $41,443 which is higher and better.
Mendocino, CA County Value
($34,977)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Over time, the 95463 value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Per Capita Income Zip Code: 95466

Current Value:

Per Capita Income Zip Code: 95466

$34,239
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Zip Codes, 95466 has a value of $34,239 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than $40,001 while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than $28,313.
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,739 California zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 95466 has a value of $34,239 which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than $33,715 while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than $27,268.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 32,613 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value ($34,977), 95466 has a value of $34,239 which is lower and worse.
Mendocino, CA County Value
($34,977)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Over time, the 95466 value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Per Capita Income Zip Code: 95468

Current Value:

Per Capita Income Zip Code: 95468

$41,599
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Zip Codes, 95468 has a value of $41,599 which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than $40,001 while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than $28,313.
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,739 California zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 95468 has a value of $41,599 which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than $33,715 while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than $27,268.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 32,613 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value ($34,977), 95468 has a value of $41,599 which is higher and better.
Mendocino, CA County Value
($34,977)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Over time, the 95468 value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Per Capita Income Zip Code: 95469

Current Value:

Per Capita Income Zip Code: 95469

$39,559
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Zip Codes, 95469 has a value of $39,559 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than $40,001 while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than $28,313.
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,739 California zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 95469 has a value of $39,559 which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than $33,715 while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than $27,268.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 32,613 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value ($34,977), 95469 has a value of $39,559 which is higher and better.
Mendocino, CA County Value
($34,977)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Over time, the 95469 value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Per Capita Income Zip Code: 95470

Current Value:

Per Capita Income Zip Code: 95470

$35,190
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Zip Codes, 95470 has a value of $35,190 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than $40,001 while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than $28,313.
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,739 California zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 95470 has a value of $35,190 which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than $33,715 while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than $27,268.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 32,613 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value ($34,977), 95470 has a value of $35,190 which is higher and better.
Mendocino, CA County Value
($34,977)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Over time, the 95470 value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Per Capita Income Zip Code: 95482

Current Value:

Per Capita Income Zip Code: 95482

$33,948
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Zip Codes, 95482 has a value of $33,948 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than $40,001 while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than $28,313.
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,739 California zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 95482 has a value of $33,948 which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than $33,715 while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than $27,268.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 32,613 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value ($34,977), 95482 has a value of $33,948 which is lower and worse.
Mendocino, CA County Value
($34,977)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Over time, the 95482 value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Per Capita Income Zip Code: 95488

Current Value:

Per Capita Income Zip Code: 95488

$50,383
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Zip Codes, 95488 has a value of $50,383 which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than $40,001 while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than $28,313.
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,739 California zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 95488 has a value of $50,383 which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than $33,715 while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than $27,268.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 32,613 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value ($34,977), 95488 has a value of $50,383 which is higher and better.
Mendocino, CA County Value
($34,977)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Over time, the 95488 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Per Capita Income Zip Code: 95490

Current Value:

Per Capita Income Zip Code: 95490

$33,736
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Zip Codes, 95490 has a value of $33,736 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than $40,001 while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than $28,313.
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,739 California zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 95490 has a value of $33,736 which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than $33,715 while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than $27,268.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 32,613 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value ($34,977), 95490 has a value of $33,736 which is lower and worse.
Mendocino, CA County Value
($34,977)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Over time, the 95490 value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Per Capita Income Zip Code: 95494

Current Value:

Per Capita Income Zip Code: 95494

$72,474
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Zip Codes, 95494 has a value of $72,474 which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than $40,001 while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than $28,313.
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,739 California zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 95494 has a value of $72,474 which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than $33,715 while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than $27,268.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 32,613 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value ($34,977), 95494 has a value of $72,474 which is higher and better.
Mendocino, CA County Value
($34,977)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Over time, the 95494 value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Per Capita Income Zip Code: 95585

Current Value:

Per Capita Income Zip Code: 95585

$24,324
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Zip Codes, 95585 has a value of $24,324 which is in the worst 25% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than $40,001 while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than $28,313.
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,739 California zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 95585 has a value of $24,324 which is in the worst 25% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than $33,715 while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than $27,268.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 32,613 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value ($34,977), 95585 has a value of $24,324 which is lower and worse.
Mendocino, CA County Value
($34,977)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Over time, the 95585 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Per Capita Income Zip Code: 95587

Current Value:

Per Capita Income Zip Code: 95587

$121,053
(2015-2019)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Zip Codes, 95587 has a value of $121,053 which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than $33,141 while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than $23,754.
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,718 California zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 95587 has a value of $121,053 which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than $28,384 while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than $23,071.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 32,341 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value ($29,035), 95587 has a value of $121,053 which is higher and better.
Mendocino, CA County Value
($29,035)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Over time, the 95587 value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Per Capita Income Census Tract: 06045010100

Current Value:

Per Capita Income Census Tract: 06045010100

$25,666
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06045010100 has a value of $25,666 which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than $39,643 while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than $27,170.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,076 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06045010100 has a value of $25,666 which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than $35,806 while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than $27,342.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,680 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value ($34,977), 06045010100 has a value of $25,666 which is lower and worse.
Mendocino, CA County Value
($34,977)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Over time, the 06045010100 value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Per Capita Income Census Tract: 06045010200

Current Value:

Per Capita Income Census Tract: 06045010200

$24,695
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06045010200 has a value of $24,695 which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than $39,643 while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than $27,170.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,076 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06045010200 has a value of $24,695 which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than $35,806 while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than $27,342.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,680 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value ($34,977), 06045010200 has a value of $24,695 which is lower and worse.
Mendocino, CA County Value
($34,977)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Over time, the 06045010200 value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Per Capita Income Census Tract: 06045010300

Current Value:

Per Capita Income Census Tract: 06045010300

$36,670
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06045010300 has a value of $36,670 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than $39,643 while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than $27,170.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,076 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06045010300 has a value of $36,670 which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than $35,806 while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than $27,342.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,680 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value ($34,977), 06045010300 has a value of $36,670 which is higher and better.
Mendocino, CA County Value
($34,977)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Over time, the 06045010300 value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Per Capita Income Census Tract: 06045010400

Current Value:

Per Capita Income Census Tract: 06045010400

$42,148
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06045010400 has a value of $42,148 which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than $39,643 while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than $27,170.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,076 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06045010400 has a value of $42,148 which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than $35,806 while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than $27,342.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,680 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value ($34,977), 06045010400 has a value of $42,148 which is higher and better.
Mendocino, CA County Value
($34,977)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Over time, the 06045010400 value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Per Capita Income Census Tract: 06045010500

Current Value:

Per Capita Income Census Tract: 06045010500

$24,892
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06045010500 has a value of $24,892 which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than $39,643 while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than $27,170.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,076 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06045010500 has a value of $24,892 which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than $35,806 while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than $27,342.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,680 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value ($34,977), 06045010500 has a value of $24,892 which is lower and worse.
Mendocino, CA County Value
($34,977)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Over time, the 06045010500 value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Per Capita Income Census Tract: 06045010600

Current Value:

Per Capita Income Census Tract: 06045010600

$29,165
(2015-2019)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06045010600 has a value of $29,165 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than $32,181 while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than $21,964.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 8,006 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06045010600 has a value of $29,165 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than $29,774 while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than $22,720.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 72,360 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value ($29,035), 06045010600 has a value of $29,165 which is higher and better.
Mendocino, CA County Value
($29,035)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Over time, the 06045010600 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Per Capita Income Census Tract: 06045010601

Current Value:

Per Capita Income Census Tract: 06045010601

$36,634
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06045010601 has a value of $36,634 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than $39,643 while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than $27,170.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,076 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06045010601 has a value of $36,634 which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than $35,806 while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than $27,342.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,680 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value ($34,977), 06045010601 has a value of $36,634 which is higher and better.
Mendocino, CA County Value
($34,977)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.

Per Capita Income Census Tract: 06045010602

Current Value:

Per Capita Income Census Tract: 06045010602

$36,568
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06045010602 has a value of $36,568 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than $39,643 while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than $27,170.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,076 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06045010602 has a value of $36,568 which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than $35,806 while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than $27,342.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,680 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value ($34,977), 06045010602 has a value of $36,568 which is higher and better.
Mendocino, CA County Value
($34,977)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.

Per Capita Income Census Tract: 06045010700

Current Value:

Per Capita Income Census Tract: 06045010700

$31,492
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06045010700 has a value of $31,492 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than $39,643 while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than $27,170.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,076 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06045010700 has a value of $31,492 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than $35,806 while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than $27,342.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,680 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value ($34,977), 06045010700 has a value of $31,492 which is lower and worse.
Mendocino, CA County Value
($34,977)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Over time, the 06045010700 value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Per Capita Income Census Tract: 06045010801

Current Value:

Per Capita Income Census Tract: 06045010801

$35,160
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06045010801 has a value of $35,160 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than $39,643 while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than $27,170.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,076 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06045010801 has a value of $35,160 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than $35,806 while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than $27,342.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,680 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value ($34,977), 06045010801 has a value of $35,160 which is higher and better.
Mendocino, CA County Value
($34,977)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Over time, the 06045010801 value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Per Capita Income Census Tract: 06045010802

Current Value:

Per Capita Income Census Tract: 06045010802

$35,070
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06045010802 has a value of $35,070 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than $39,643 while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than $27,170.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,076 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06045010802 has a value of $35,070 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than $35,806 while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than $27,342.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,680 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value ($34,977), 06045010802 has a value of $35,070 which is higher and better.
Mendocino, CA County Value
($34,977)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Over time, the 06045010802 value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Per Capita Income Census Tract: 06045010900

Current Value:

Per Capita Income Census Tract: 06045010900

$31,467
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06045010900 has a value of $31,467 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than $39,643 while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than $27,170.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,076 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06045010900 has a value of $31,467 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than $35,806 while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than $27,342.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,680 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value ($34,977), 06045010900 has a value of $31,467 which is lower and worse.
Mendocino, CA County Value
($34,977)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Over time, the 06045010900 value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Per Capita Income Census Tract: 06045011001

Current Value:

Per Capita Income Census Tract: 06045011001

$47,716
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06045011001 has a value of $47,716 which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than $39,643 while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than $27,170.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,076 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06045011001 has a value of $47,716 which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than $35,806 while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than $27,342.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,680 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value ($34,977), 06045011001 has a value of $47,716 which is higher and better.
Mendocino, CA County Value
($34,977)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Over time, the 06045011001 value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Per Capita Income Census Tract: 06045011002

Current Value:

Per Capita Income Census Tract: 06045011002

$36,922
(2015-2019)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06045011002 has a value of $36,922 which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than $32,181 while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than $21,964.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 8,006 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06045011002 has a value of $36,922 which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than $29,774 while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than $22,720.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 72,360 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value ($29,035), 06045011002 has a value of $36,922 which is higher and better.
Mendocino, CA County Value
($29,035)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Over time, the 06045011002 value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Per Capita Income Census Tract: 06045011003

Current Value:

Per Capita Income Census Tract: 06045011003

$42,855
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06045011003 has a value of $42,855 which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than $39,643 while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than $27,170.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,076 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06045011003 has a value of $42,855 which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than $35,806 while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than $27,342.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,680 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value ($34,977), 06045011003 has a value of $42,855 which is higher and better.
Mendocino, CA County Value
($34,977)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.

Per Capita Income Census Tract: 06045011004

Current Value:

Per Capita Income Census Tract: 06045011004

$44,103
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06045011004 has a value of $44,103 which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than $39,643 while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than $27,170.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,076 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06045011004 has a value of $44,103 which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than $35,806 while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than $27,342.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,680 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value ($34,977), 06045011004 has a value of $44,103 which is higher and better.
Mendocino, CA County Value
($34,977)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.

Per Capita Income Census Tract: 06045011102

Current Value:

Per Capita Income Census Tract: 06045011102

$45,655
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06045011102 has a value of $45,655 which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than $39,643 while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than $27,170.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,076 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06045011102 has a value of $45,655 which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than $35,806 while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than $27,342.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,680 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value ($34,977), 06045011102 has a value of $45,655 which is higher and better.
Mendocino, CA County Value
($34,977)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Over time, the 06045011102 value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Per Capita Income Census Tract: 06045011200

Current Value:

Per Capita Income Census Tract: 06045011200

$35,724
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06045011200 has a value of $35,724 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than $39,643 while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than $27,170.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,076 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06045011200 has a value of $35,724 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than $35,806 while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than $27,342.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,680 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value ($34,977), 06045011200 has a value of $35,724 which is higher and better.
Mendocino, CA County Value
($34,977)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Over time, the 06045011200 value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Per Capita Income Census Tract: 06045011300

Current Value:

Per Capita Income Census Tract: 06045011300

$25,924
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06045011300 has a value of $25,924 which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than $39,643 while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than $27,170.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,076 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06045011300 has a value of $25,924 which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than $35,806 while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than $27,342.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,680 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value ($34,977), 06045011300 has a value of $25,924 which is lower and worse.
Mendocino, CA County Value
($34,977)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Over time, the 06045011300 value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Per Capita Income Census Tract: 06045011400

Current Value:

Per Capita Income Census Tract: 06045011400

$37,195
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06045011400 has a value of $37,195 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than $39,643 while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than $27,170.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,076 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06045011400 has a value of $37,195 which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than $35,806 while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than $27,342.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,680 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value ($34,977), 06045011400 has a value of $37,195 which is higher and better.
Mendocino, CA County Value
($34,977)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Over time, the 06045011400 value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Per Capita Income Census Tract: 06045011500

Current Value:

Per Capita Income Census Tract: 06045011500

$22,070
(2015-2019)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06045011500 has a value of $22,070 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than $32,181 while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than $21,964.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 8,006 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06045011500 has a value of $22,070 which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than $29,774 while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than $22,720.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 72,360 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value ($29,035), 06045011500 has a value of $22,070 which is lower and worse.
Mendocino, CA County Value
($29,035)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Over time, the 06045011500 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Per Capita Income Census Tract: 06045011501

Current Value:

Per Capita Income Census Tract: 06045011501

$49,470
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06045011501 has a value of $49,470 which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than $39,643 while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than $27,170.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,076 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06045011501 has a value of $49,470 which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than $35,806 while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than $27,342.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,680 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value ($34,977), 06045011501 has a value of $49,470 which is higher and better.
Mendocino, CA County Value
($34,977)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.

Per Capita Income Census Tract: 06045011502

Current Value:

Per Capita Income Census Tract: 06045011502

$30,734
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06045011502 has a value of $30,734 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than $39,643 while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than $27,170.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,076 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06045011502 has a value of $30,734 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than $35,806 while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than $27,342.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,680 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value ($34,977), 06045011502 has a value of $30,734 which is lower and worse.
Mendocino, CA County Value
($34,977)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.

Per Capita Income Census Tract: 06045011600

Current Value:

Per Capita Income Census Tract: 06045011600

$23,634
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06045011600 has a value of $23,634 which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than $39,643 while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than $27,170.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,076 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06045011600 has a value of $23,634 which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than $35,806 while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than $27,342.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,680 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value ($34,977), 06045011600 has a value of $23,634 which is lower and worse.
Mendocino, CA County Value
($34,977)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Over time, the 06045011600 value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Per Capita Income Census Tract: 06045011700

Current Value:

Per Capita Income Census Tract: 06045011700

$46,233
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06045011700 has a value of $46,233 which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than $39,643 while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than $27,170.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,076 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06045011700 has a value of $46,233 which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than $35,806 while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than $27,342.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,680 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value ($34,977), 06045011700 has a value of $46,233 which is higher and better.
Mendocino, CA County Value
($34,977)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Over time, the 06045011700 value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Per Capita Income Census Tract: 06045011800

Current Value:

Per Capita Income Census Tract: 06045011800

$33,286
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06045011800 has a value of $33,286 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than $39,643 while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than $27,170.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,076 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06045011800 has a value of $33,286 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than $35,806 while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than $27,342.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,680 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value ($34,977), 06045011800 has a value of $33,286 which is lower and worse.
Mendocino, CA County Value
($34,977)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Over time, the 06045011800 value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Economy / Poverty

Economy / Poverty

Economy / Poverty

Children Living Below Poverty Level

Value
Compared to:

Economy / Poverty

Children Living Below Poverty Level

Value
Compared to:

Children Living Below Poverty Level County: Mendocino

Current Value:

Children Living Below Poverty Level County: Mendocino

20.6%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Mendocino has a value of 20.6% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 15.8% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 21.0%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Mendocino has a value of 20.6% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 17.4% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 24.3%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,132 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the CA Value (15.6%), Mendocino has a value of 20.6% which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(15.6%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (16.7%), Mendocino has a value of 20.6% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(16.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Mendocino value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Children Living Below Poverty Level Census Place: Boonville

Current Value:

Children Living Below Poverty Level Census Place: Boonville

0.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Boonville has a value of 0.0% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.3% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 22.3%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,362 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Boonville has a value of 0.0% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.2% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 27.0%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,556 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (20.6%), Boonville has a value of 0.0% which is lower and better.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(20.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the CA Value (15.6%), Boonville has a value of 0.0% which is lower and better.
CA Value
(15.6%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (16.7%), Boonville has a value of 0.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(16.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Boonville value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Children Living Below Poverty Level Census Place: Brooktrails

Current Value:

Children Living Below Poverty Level Census Place: Brooktrails

4.7%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Brooktrails has a value of 4.7% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.3% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 22.3%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,362 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Brooktrails has a value of 4.7% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.2% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 27.0%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,556 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (20.6%), Brooktrails has a value of 4.7% which is lower and better.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(20.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the CA Value (15.6%), Brooktrails has a value of 4.7% which is lower and better.
CA Value
(15.6%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (16.7%), Brooktrails has a value of 4.7% which is lower and better.
US Value
(16.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Brooktrails value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Children Living Below Poverty Level Census Place: Calpella

Current Value:

Children Living Below Poverty Level Census Place: Calpella

0.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Calpella has a value of 0.0% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.3% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 22.3%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,362 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Calpella has a value of 0.0% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.2% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 27.0%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,556 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (20.6%), Calpella has a value of 0.0% which is lower and better.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(20.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the CA Value (15.6%), Calpella has a value of 0.0% which is lower and better.
CA Value
(15.6%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (16.7%), Calpella has a value of 0.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(16.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Calpella value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Children Living Below Poverty Level Census Place: Caspar

Current Value:

Children Living Below Poverty Level Census Place: Caspar

0.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Caspar has a value of 0.0% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.3% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 22.3%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,362 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Caspar has a value of 0.0% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.2% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 27.0%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,556 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (20.6%), Caspar has a value of 0.0% which is lower and better.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(20.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the CA Value (15.6%), Caspar has a value of 0.0% which is lower and better.
CA Value
(15.6%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (16.7%), Caspar has a value of 0.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(16.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Caspar value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Children Living Below Poverty Level Census Place: Cleone

Current Value:

Children Living Below Poverty Level Census Place: Cleone

0.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Cleone has a value of 0.0% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.3% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 22.3%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,362 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Cleone has a value of 0.0% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.2% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 27.0%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,556 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (20.6%), Cleone has a value of 0.0% which is lower and better.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(20.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the CA Value (15.6%), Cleone has a value of 0.0% which is lower and better.
CA Value
(15.6%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (16.7%), Cleone has a value of 0.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(16.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Cleone value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Children Living Below Poverty Level Census Place: Comptche

Current Value:

Children Living Below Poverty Level Census Place: Comptche

0.0%
(2017-2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Comptche has a value of 0.0% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.4% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 23.4%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,369 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Comptche has a value of 0.0% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.6% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 27.6%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,596 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (19.4%), Comptche has a value of 0.0% which is lower and better.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(19.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the CA Value (16.2%), Comptche has a value of 0.0% which is lower and better.
CA Value
(16.2%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (17.0%), Comptche has a value of 0.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(17.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Comptche value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Children Living Below Poverty Level Census Place: Covelo

Current Value:

Children Living Below Poverty Level Census Place: Covelo

56.4%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Covelo has a value of 56.4% which is in the worst 25% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.3% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 22.3%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,362 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Covelo has a value of 56.4% which is in the worst 25% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.2% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 27.0%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,556 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (20.6%), Covelo has a value of 56.4% which is higher and worse.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(20.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the CA Value (15.6%), Covelo has a value of 56.4% which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(15.6%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (16.7%), Covelo has a value of 56.4% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(16.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Covelo value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Children Living Below Poverty Level Census Place: Fort Bragg

Current Value:

Children Living Below Poverty Level Census Place: Fort Bragg

26.1%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Fort Bragg has a value of 26.1% which is in the worst 25% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.3% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 22.3%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,362 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Fort Bragg has a value of 26.1% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.2% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 27.0%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,556 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (20.6%), Fort Bragg has a value of 26.1% which is higher and worse.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(20.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the CA Value (15.6%), Fort Bragg has a value of 26.1% which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(15.6%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (16.7%), Fort Bragg has a value of 26.1% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(16.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Fort Bragg value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Children Living Below Poverty Level Census Place: Hopland

Current Value:

Children Living Below Poverty Level Census Place: Hopland

32.9%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Hopland has a value of 32.9% which is in the worst 25% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.3% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 22.3%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,362 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Hopland has a value of 32.9% which is in the worst 25% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.2% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 27.0%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,556 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (20.6%), Hopland has a value of 32.9% which is higher and worse.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(20.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the CA Value (15.6%), Hopland has a value of 32.9% which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(15.6%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (16.7%), Hopland has a value of 32.9% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(16.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Hopland value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Children Living Below Poverty Level Census Place: Laytonville

Current Value:

Children Living Below Poverty Level Census Place: Laytonville

22.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Laytonville has a value of 22.2% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.3% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 22.3%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,362 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Laytonville has a value of 22.2% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.2% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 27.0%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,556 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (20.6%), Laytonville has a value of 22.2% which is higher and worse.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(20.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the CA Value (15.6%), Laytonville has a value of 22.2% which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(15.6%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (16.7%), Laytonville has a value of 22.2% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(16.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Laytonville value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Children Living Below Poverty Level Census Place: Leggett

Current Value:

Children Living Below Poverty Level Census Place: Leggett

0.0%
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Leggett has a value of 0.0% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.3% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 23.8%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,374 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Leggett has a value of 0.0% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 13.1% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 28.3%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,687 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (22.4%), Leggett has a value of 0.0% which is lower and better.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(22.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the CA Value (16.8%), Leggett has a value of 0.0% which is lower and better.
CA Value
(16.8%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (17.5%), Leggett has a value of 0.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(17.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Leggett value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Children Living Below Poverty Level Census Place: Little River

Current Value:

Children Living Below Poverty Level Census Place: Little River

68.4%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Little River has a value of 68.4% which is in the worst 25% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.3% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 22.3%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,362 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Little River has a value of 68.4% which is in the worst 25% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.2% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 27.0%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,556 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (20.6%), Little River has a value of 68.4% which is higher and worse.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(20.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the CA Value (15.6%), Little River has a value of 68.4% which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(15.6%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (16.7%), Little River has a value of 68.4% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(16.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Little River value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Children Living Below Poverty Level Census Place: Manchester

Current Value:

Children Living Below Poverty Level Census Place: Manchester

0.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Manchester has a value of 0.0% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.3% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 22.3%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,362 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Manchester has a value of 0.0% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.2% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 27.0%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,556 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (20.6%), Manchester has a value of 0.0% which is lower and better.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(20.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the CA Value (15.6%), Manchester has a value of 0.0% which is lower and better.
CA Value
(15.6%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (16.7%), Manchester has a value of 0.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(16.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Manchester value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Children Living Below Poverty Level Census Place: Mendocino

Current Value:

Children Living Below Poverty Level Census Place: Mendocino

0.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Mendocino has a value of 0.0% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.3% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 22.3%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,362 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Mendocino has a value of 0.0% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.2% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 27.0%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,556 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (20.6%), Mendocino has a value of 0.0% which is lower and better.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(20.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the CA Value (15.6%), Mendocino has a value of 0.0% which is lower and better.
CA Value
(15.6%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (16.7%), Mendocino has a value of 0.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(16.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Mendocino value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Children Living Below Poverty Level Census Place: Philo

Current Value:

Children Living Below Poverty Level Census Place: Philo

100.0%
(2017-2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Philo has a value of 100.0% which is in the worst 25% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.4% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 23.4%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,369 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Philo has a value of 100.0% which is in the worst 25% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.6% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 27.6%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,596 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (19.4%), Philo has a value of 100.0% which is higher and worse.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(19.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the CA Value (16.2%), Philo has a value of 100.0% which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(16.2%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (17.0%), Philo has a value of 100.0% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(17.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Philo value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Children Living Below Poverty Level Census Place: Point Arena

Current Value:

Children Living Below Poverty Level Census Place: Point Arena

24.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Point Arena has a value of 24.5% which is in the worst 25% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.3% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 22.3%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,362 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Point Arena has a value of 24.5% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.2% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 27.0%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,556 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (20.6%), Point Arena has a value of 24.5% which is higher and worse.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(20.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the CA Value (15.6%), Point Arena has a value of 24.5% which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(15.6%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (16.7%), Point Arena has a value of 24.5% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(16.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Point Arena value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Children Living Below Poverty Level Census Place: Potter Valley

Current Value:

Children Living Below Poverty Level Census Place: Potter Valley

12.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Potter Valley has a value of 12.2% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.3% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 22.3%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,362 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Potter Valley has a value of 12.2% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.2% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 27.0%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,556 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (20.6%), Potter Valley has a value of 12.2% which is lower and better.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(20.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the CA Value (15.6%), Potter Valley has a value of 12.2% which is lower and better.
CA Value
(15.6%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (16.7%), Potter Valley has a value of 12.2% which is lower and better.
US Value
(16.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Potter Valley value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Children Living Below Poverty Level Census Place: Redwood Valley

Current Value:

Children Living Below Poverty Level Census Place: Redwood Valley

0.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Redwood Valley has a value of 0.0% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.3% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 22.3%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,362 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Redwood Valley has a value of 0.0% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.2% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 27.0%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,556 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (20.6%), Redwood Valley has a value of 0.0% which is lower and better.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(20.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the CA Value (15.6%), Redwood Valley has a value of 0.0% which is lower and better.
CA Value
(15.6%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (16.7%), Redwood Valley has a value of 0.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(16.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Redwood Valley value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Children Living Below Poverty Level Census Place: Talmage

Current Value:

Children Living Below Poverty Level Census Place: Talmage

55.4%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Talmage has a value of 55.4% which is in the worst 25% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.3% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 22.3%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,362 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Talmage has a value of 55.4% which is in the worst 25% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.2% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 27.0%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,556 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (20.6%), Talmage has a value of 55.4% which is higher and worse.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(20.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the CA Value (15.6%), Talmage has a value of 55.4% which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(15.6%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (16.7%), Talmage has a value of 55.4% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(16.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Talmage value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Children Living Below Poverty Level Census Place: Ukiah

Current Value:

Children Living Below Poverty Level Census Place: Ukiah

15.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Ukiah has a value of 15.5% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.3% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 22.3%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,362 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Ukiah has a value of 15.5% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.2% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 27.0%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,556 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (20.6%), Ukiah has a value of 15.5% which is lower and better.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(20.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the CA Value (15.6%), Ukiah has a value of 15.5% which is lower and better.
CA Value
(15.6%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (16.7%), Ukiah has a value of 15.5% which is lower and better.
US Value
(16.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Ukiah value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Children Living Below Poverty Level Census Place: Willits

Current Value:

Children Living Below Poverty Level Census Place: Willits

17.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Willits has a value of 17.5% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.3% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 22.3%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,362 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Willits has a value of 17.5% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.2% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 27.0%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,556 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (20.6%), Willits has a value of 17.5% which is lower and better.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(20.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the CA Value (15.6%), Willits has a value of 17.5% which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(15.6%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (16.7%), Willits has a value of 17.5% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(16.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Willits value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Children Living Below Poverty Level Zip Code: 95410

Current Value:

Children Living Below Poverty Level Zip Code: 95410

0.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Zip Codes, 95410 has a value of 0.0% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.3% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 21.8%.
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,634 California zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 95410 has a value of 0.0% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.0% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 23.8%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 31,299 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (20.6%), 95410 has a value of 0.0% which is lower and better.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(20.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Over time, the 95410 value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Children Living Below Poverty Level Zip Code: 95415

Current Value:

Children Living Below Poverty Level Zip Code: 95415

7.8%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Zip Codes, 95415 has a value of 7.8% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.3% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 21.8%.
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,634 California zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 95415 has a value of 7.8% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.0% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 23.8%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 31,299 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (20.6%), 95415 has a value of 7.8% which is lower and better.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(20.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Over time, the 95415 value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Children Living Below Poverty Level Zip Code: 95417

Current Value:

Children Living Below Poverty Level Zip Code: 95417

0.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Zip Codes, 95417 has a value of 0.0% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.3% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 21.8%.
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,634 California zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 95417 has a value of 0.0% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.0% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 23.8%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 31,299 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (20.6%), 95417 has a value of 0.0% which is lower and better.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(20.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Over time, the 95417 value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Children Living Below Poverty Level Zip Code: 95420

Current Value:

Children Living Below Poverty Level Zip Code: 95420

0.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Zip Codes, 95420 has a value of 0.0% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.3% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 21.8%.
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,634 California zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 95420 has a value of 0.0% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.0% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 23.8%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 31,299 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (20.6%), 95420 has a value of 0.0% which is lower and better.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(20.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Over time, the 95420 value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Children Living Below Poverty Level Zip Code: 95427

Current Value:

Children Living Below Poverty Level Zip Code: 95427

45.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Zip Codes, 95427 has a value of 45.5% which is in the worst 25% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.3% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 21.8%.
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,634 California zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 95427 has a value of 45.5% which is in the worst 25% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.0% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 23.8%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 31,299 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (20.6%), 95427 has a value of 45.5% which is higher and worse.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(20.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Over time, the 95427 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Children Living Below Poverty Level Zip Code: 95428

Current Value:

Children Living Below Poverty Level Zip Code: 95428

48.4%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Zip Codes, 95428 has a value of 48.4% which is in the worst 25% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.3% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 21.8%.
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,634 California zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 95428 has a value of 48.4% which is in the worst 25% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.0% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 23.8%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 31,299 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (20.6%), 95428 has a value of 48.4% which is higher and worse.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(20.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Over time, the 95428 value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Children Living Below Poverty Level Zip Code: 95429

Current Value:

Children Living Below Poverty Level Zip Code: 95429

0.0%
(2007-2011)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Zip Codes, 95429 has a value of 0.0% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 14.2% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 27.1%.
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,647 California zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 95429 has a value of 0.0% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 15.3% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 27.7%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 31,406 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (25.1%), 95429 has a value of 0.0% which is lower and better.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(25.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.

Children Living Below Poverty Level Zip Code: 95432

Current Value:

Children Living Below Poverty Level Zip Code: 95432

0.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Zip Codes, 95432 has a value of 0.0% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.3% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 21.8%.
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,634 California zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 95432 has a value of 0.0% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.0% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 23.8%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 31,299 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (20.6%), 95432 has a value of 0.0% which is lower and better.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(20.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Over time, the 95432 value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Children Living Below Poverty Level Zip Code: 95437

Current Value:

Children Living Below Poverty Level Zip Code: 95437

21.1%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Zip Codes, 95437 has a value of 21.1% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.3% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 21.8%.
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,634 California zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 95437 has a value of 21.1% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.0% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 23.8%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 31,299 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (20.6%), 95437 has a value of 21.1% which is higher and worse.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(20.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Over time, the 95437 value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Children Living Below Poverty Level Zip Code: 95445

Current Value:

Children Living Below Poverty Level Zip Code: 95445

0.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Zip Codes, 95445 has a value of 0.0% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.3% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 21.8%.
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,634 California zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 95445 has a value of 0.0% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.0% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 23.8%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 31,299 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (20.6%), 95445 has a value of 0.0% which is lower and better.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(20.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Over time, the 95445 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Children Living Below Poverty Level Zip Code: 95449

Current Value:

Children Living Below Poverty Level Zip Code: 95449

29.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Zip Codes, 95449 has a value of 29.2% which is in the worst 25% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.3% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 21.8%.
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,634 California zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 95449 has a value of 29.2% which is in the worst 25% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.0% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 23.8%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 31,299 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (20.6%), 95449 has a value of 29.2% which is higher and worse.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(20.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Over time, the 95449 value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Children Living Below Poverty Level Zip Code: 95454

Current Value:

Children Living Below Poverty Level Zip Code: 95454

8.3%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Zip Codes, 95454 has a value of 8.3% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.3% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 21.8%.
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,634 California zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 95454 has a value of 8.3% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.0% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 23.8%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 31,299 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (20.6%), 95454 has a value of 8.3% which is lower and better.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(20.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Over time, the 95454 value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Children Living Below Poverty Level Zip Code: 95456

Current Value:

Children Living Below Poverty Level Zip Code: 95456

32.3%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Zip Codes, 95456 has a value of 32.3% which is in the worst 25% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.3% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 21.8%.
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,634 California zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 95456 has a value of 32.3% which is in the worst 25% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.0% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 23.8%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 31,299 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (20.6%), 95456 has a value of 32.3% which is higher and worse.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(20.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Over time, the 95456 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Children Living Below Poverty Level Zip Code: 95459

Current Value:

Children Living Below Poverty Level Zip Code: 95459

1.6%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Zip Codes, 95459 has a value of 1.6% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.3% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 21.8%.
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,634 California zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 95459 has a value of 1.6% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.0% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 23.8%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 31,299 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (20.6%), 95459 has a value of 1.6% which is lower and better.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(20.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Over time, the 95459 value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Children Living Below Poverty Level Zip Code: 95460

Current Value:

Children Living Below Poverty Level Zip Code: 95460

0.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Zip Codes, 95460 has a value of 0.0% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.3% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 21.8%.
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,634 California zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 95460 has a value of 0.0% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.0% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 23.8%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 31,299 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (20.6%), 95460 has a value of 0.0% which is lower and better.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(20.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Over time, the 95460 value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Children Living Below Poverty Level Zip Code: 95463

Current Value:

Children Living Below Poverty Level Zip Code: 95463

0.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Zip Codes, 95463 has a value of 0.0% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.3% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 21.8%.
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,634 California zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 95463 has a value of 0.0% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.0% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 23.8%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 31,299 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (20.6%), 95463 has a value of 0.0% which is lower and better.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(20.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.

Children Living Below Poverty Level Zip Code: 95466

Current Value:

Children Living Below Poverty Level Zip Code: 95466

100.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Zip Codes, 95466 has a value of 100.0% which is in the worst 25% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.3% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 21.8%.
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,634 California zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 95466 has a value of 100.0% which is in the worst 25% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.0% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 23.8%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 31,299 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (20.6%), 95466 has a value of 100.0% which is higher and worse.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(20.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Over time, the 95466 value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Children Living Below Poverty Level Zip Code: 95468

Current Value:

Children Living Below Poverty Level Zip Code: 95468

21.3%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Zip Codes, 95468 has a value of 21.3% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.3% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 21.8%.
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,634 California zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 95468 has a value of 21.3% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.0% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 23.8%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 31,299 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (20.6%), 95468 has a value of 21.3% which is higher and worse.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(20.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Over time, the 95468 value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Children Living Below Poverty Level Zip Code: 95469

Current Value:

Children Living Below Poverty Level Zip Code: 95469

8.1%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Zip Codes, 95469 has a value of 8.1% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.3% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 21.8%.
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,634 California zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 95469 has a value of 8.1% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.0% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 23.8%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 31,299 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (20.6%), 95469 has a value of 8.1% which is lower and better.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(20.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Over time, the 95469 value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Children Living Below Poverty Level Zip Code: 95470

Current Value:

Children Living Below Poverty Level Zip Code: 95470

34.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Zip Codes, 95470 has a value of 34.2% which is in the worst 25% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.3% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 21.8%.
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,634 California zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 95470 has a value of 34.2% which is in the worst 25% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.0% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 23.8%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 31,299 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (20.6%), 95470 has a value of 34.2% which is higher and worse.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(20.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Over time, the 95470 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Children Living Below Poverty Level Zip Code: 95482

Current Value:

Children Living Below Poverty Level Zip Code: 95482

21.3%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Zip Codes, 95482 has a value of 21.3% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.3% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 21.8%.
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,634 California zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 95482 has a value of 21.3% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.0% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 23.8%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 31,299 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (20.6%), 95482 has a value of 21.3% which is higher and worse.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(20.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Over time, the 95482 value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Children Living Below Poverty Level Zip Code: 95488

Current Value:

Children Living Below Poverty Level Zip Code: 95488

0.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Zip Codes, 95488 has a value of 0.0% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.3% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 21.8%.
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,634 California zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 95488 has a value of 0.0% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.0% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 23.8%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 31,299 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (20.6%), 95488 has a value of 0.0% which is lower and better.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(20.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Over time, the 95488 value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Children Living Below Poverty Level Zip Code: 95490

Current Value:

Children Living Below Poverty Level Zip Code: 95490

11.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Zip Codes, 95490 has a value of 11.5% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.3% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 21.8%.
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,634 California zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 95490 has a value of 11.5% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.0% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 23.8%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 31,299 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (20.6%), 95490 has a value of 11.5% which is lower and better.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(20.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Over time, the 95490 value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Children Living Below Poverty Level Zip Code: 95494

Current Value:

Children Living Below Poverty Level Zip Code: 95494

0.0%
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Zip Codes, 95494 has a value of 0.0% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.1% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 23.4%.
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,638 California zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 95494 has a value of 0.0% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.7% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 24.9%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 31,246 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (22.4%), 95494 has a value of 0.0% which is lower and better.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(22.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Over time, the 95494 value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Children Living Below Poverty Level Zip Code: 95585

Current Value:

Children Living Below Poverty Level Zip Code: 95585

0.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Zip Codes, 95585 has a value of 0.0% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.3% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 21.8%.
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,634 California zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 95585 has a value of 0.0% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.0% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 23.8%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 31,299 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (20.6%), 95585 has a value of 0.0% which is lower and better.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(20.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Over time, the 95585 value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Children Living Below Poverty Level Census Tract: 06045010100

Current Value:

Children Living Below Poverty Level Census Tract: 06045010100

48.4%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06045010100 has a value of 48.4% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.0% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 22.5%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,000 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06045010100 has a value of 48.4% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 25.8%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,083 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (20.6%), 06045010100 has a value of 48.4% which is higher and worse.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(20.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Over time, the 06045010100 value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Children Living Below Poverty Level Census Tract: 06045010200

Current Value:

Children Living Below Poverty Level Census Tract: 06045010200

4.7%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06045010200 has a value of 4.7% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.0% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 22.5%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,000 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06045010200 has a value of 4.7% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 25.8%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,083 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (20.6%), 06045010200 has a value of 4.7% which is lower and better.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(20.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Over time, the 06045010200 value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Children Living Below Poverty Level Census Tract: 06045010300

Current Value:

Children Living Below Poverty Level Census Tract: 06045010300

4.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06045010300 has a value of 4.2% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.0% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 22.5%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,000 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06045010300 has a value of 4.2% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 25.8%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,083 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (20.6%), 06045010300 has a value of 4.2% which is lower and better.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(20.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Over time, the 06045010300 value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Children Living Below Poverty Level Census Tract: 06045010400

Current Value:

Children Living Below Poverty Level Census Tract: 06045010400

34.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06045010400 has a value of 34.2% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.0% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 22.5%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,000 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06045010400 has a value of 34.2% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 25.8%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,083 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (20.6%), 06045010400 has a value of 34.2% which is higher and worse.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(20.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Over time, the 06045010400 value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Children Living Below Poverty Level Census Tract: 06045010500

Current Value:

Children Living Below Poverty Level Census Tract: 06045010500

23.3%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06045010500 has a value of 23.3% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.0% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 22.5%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,000 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06045010500 has a value of 23.3% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 25.8%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,083 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (20.6%), 06045010500 has a value of 23.3% which is higher and worse.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(20.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Over time, the 06045010500 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Children Living Below Poverty Level Census Tract: 06045010600

Current Value:

Children Living Below Poverty Level Census Tract: 06045010600

18.4%
(2015-2019)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06045010600 has a value of 18.4% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 26.1%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 7,951 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06045010600 has a value of 18.4% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 14.2% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 28.6%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 71,980 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (25.4%), 06045010600 has a value of 18.4% which is lower and better.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(25.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Over time, the 06045010600 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Children Living Below Poverty Level Census Tract: 06045010601

Current Value:

Children Living Below Poverty Level Census Tract: 06045010601

26.3%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06045010601 has a value of 26.3% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.0% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 22.5%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,000 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06045010601 has a value of 26.3% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 25.8%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,083 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (20.6%), 06045010601 has a value of 26.3% which is higher and worse.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(20.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.

Children Living Below Poverty Level Census Tract: 06045010602

Current Value:

Children Living Below Poverty Level Census Tract: 06045010602

5.9%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06045010602 has a value of 5.9% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.0% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 22.5%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,000 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06045010602 has a value of 5.9% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 25.8%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,083 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (20.6%), 06045010602 has a value of 5.9% which is lower and better.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(20.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.

Children Living Below Poverty Level Census Tract: 06045010700

Current Value:

Children Living Below Poverty Level Census Tract: 06045010700

13.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06045010700 has a value of 13.0% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.0% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 22.5%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,000 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06045010700 has a value of 13.0% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 25.8%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,083 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (20.6%), 06045010700 has a value of 13.0% which is lower and better.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(20.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Over time, the 06045010700 value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Children Living Below Poverty Level Census Tract: 06045010801

Current Value:

Children Living Below Poverty Level Census Tract: 06045010801

34.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06045010801 has a value of 34.2% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.0% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 22.5%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,000 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06045010801 has a value of 34.2% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 25.8%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,083 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (20.6%), 06045010801 has a value of 34.2% which is higher and worse.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(20.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Over time, the 06045010801 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Children Living Below Poverty Level Census Tract: 06045010802

Current Value:

Children Living Below Poverty Level Census Tract: 06045010802

15.9%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06045010802 has a value of 15.9% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.0% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 22.5%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,000 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06045010802 has a value of 15.9% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 25.8%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,083 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (20.6%), 06045010802 has a value of 15.9% which is lower and better.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(20.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Over time, the 06045010802 value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Children Living Below Poverty Level Census Tract: 06045010900

Current Value:

Children Living Below Poverty Level Census Tract: 06045010900

10.3%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06045010900 has a value of 10.3% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.0% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 22.5%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,000 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06045010900 has a value of 10.3% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 25.8%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,083 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (20.6%), 06045010900 has a value of 10.3% which is lower and better.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(20.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Over time, the 06045010900 value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Children Living Below Poverty Level Census Tract: 06045011001

Current Value:

Children Living Below Poverty Level Census Tract: 06045011001

0.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06045011001 has a value of 0.0% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.0% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 22.5%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,000 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06045011001 has a value of 0.0% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 25.8%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,083 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (20.6%), 06045011001 has a value of 0.0% which is lower and better.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(20.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Over time, the 06045011001 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Children Living Below Poverty Level Census Tract: 06045011002

Current Value:

Children Living Below Poverty Level Census Tract: 06045011002

24.5%
(2015-2019)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06045011002 has a value of 24.5% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 26.1%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 7,951 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06045011002 has a value of 24.5% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 14.2% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 28.6%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 71,980 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (25.4%), 06045011002 has a value of 24.5% which is lower and better.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(25.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Over time, the 06045011002 value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Children Living Below Poverty Level Census Tract: 06045011003

Current Value:

Children Living Below Poverty Level Census Tract: 06045011003

26.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06045011003 has a value of 26.2% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.0% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 22.5%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,000 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06045011003 has a value of 26.2% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 25.8%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,083 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (20.6%), 06045011003 has a value of 26.2% which is higher and worse.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(20.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.

Children Living Below Poverty Level Census Tract: 06045011004

Current Value:

Children Living Below Poverty Level Census Tract: 06045011004

16.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06045011004 has a value of 16.2% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.0% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 22.5%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,000 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06045011004 has a value of 16.2% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 25.8%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,083 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (20.6%), 06045011004 has a value of 16.2% which is lower and better.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(20.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.

Children Living Below Poverty Level Census Tract: 06045011102

Current Value:

Children Living Below Poverty Level Census Tract: 06045011102

8.9%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06045011102 has a value of 8.9% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.0% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 22.5%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,000 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06045011102 has a value of 8.9% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 25.8%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,083 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (20.6%), 06045011102 has a value of 8.9% which is lower and better.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(20.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Over time, the 06045011102 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Children Living Below Poverty Level Census Tract: 06045011200

Current Value:

Children Living Below Poverty Level Census Tract: 06045011200

26.6%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06045011200 has a value of 26.6% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.0% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 22.5%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,000 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06045011200 has a value of 26.6% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 25.8%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,083 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (20.6%), 06045011200 has a value of 26.6% which is higher and worse.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(20.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Over time, the 06045011200 value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Children Living Below Poverty Level Census Tract: 06045011300

Current Value:

Children Living Below Poverty Level Census Tract: 06045011300

36.6%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06045011300 has a value of 36.6% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.0% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 22.5%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,000 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06045011300 has a value of 36.6% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 25.8%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,083 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (20.6%), 06045011300 has a value of 36.6% which is higher and worse.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(20.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Over time, the 06045011300 value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Children Living Below Poverty Level Census Tract: 06045011400

Current Value:

Children Living Below Poverty Level Census Tract: 06045011400

23.3%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06045011400 has a value of 23.3% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.0% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 22.5%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,000 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06045011400 has a value of 23.3% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 25.8%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,083 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (20.6%), 06045011400 has a value of 23.3% which is higher and worse.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(20.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Over time, the 06045011400 value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Children Living Below Poverty Level Census Tract: 06045011500

Current Value:

Children Living Below Poverty Level Census Tract: 06045011500

28.4%
(2015-2019)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06045011500 has a value of 28.4% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 26.1%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 7,951 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06045011500 has a value of 28.4% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 14.2% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 28.6%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 71,980 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (25.4%), 06045011500 has a value of 28.4% which is higher and worse.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(25.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Over time, the 06045011500 value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Children Living Below Poverty Level Census Tract: 06045011501

Current Value:

Children Living Below Poverty Level Census Tract: 06045011501

0.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06045011501 has a value of 0.0% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.0% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 22.5%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,000 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06045011501 has a value of 0.0% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 25.8%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,083 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (20.6%), 06045011501 has a value of 0.0% which is lower and better.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(20.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.

Children Living Below Poverty Level Census Tract: 06045011502

Current Value:

Children Living Below Poverty Level Census Tract: 06045011502

7.8%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06045011502 has a value of 7.8% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.0% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 22.5%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,000 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06045011502 has a value of 7.8% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 25.8%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,083 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (20.6%), 06045011502 has a value of 7.8% which is lower and better.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(20.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.

Children Living Below Poverty Level Census Tract: 06045011600

Current Value:

Children Living Below Poverty Level Census Tract: 06045011600

26.3%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06045011600 has a value of 26.3% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.0% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 22.5%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,000 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06045011600 has a value of 26.3% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 25.8%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,083 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (20.6%), 06045011600 has a value of 26.3% which is higher and worse.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(20.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Over time, the 06045011600 value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Children Living Below Poverty Level Census Tract: 06045011700

Current Value:

Children Living Below Poverty Level Census Tract: 06045011700

33.6%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06045011700 has a value of 33.6% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.0% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 22.5%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,000 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06045011700 has a value of 33.6% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 25.8%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,083 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (20.6%), 06045011700 has a value of 33.6% which is higher and worse.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(20.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Over time, the 06045011700 value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Children Living Below Poverty Level Census Tract: 06045011800

Current Value:

Children Living Below Poverty Level Census Tract: 06045011800

24.8%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06045011800 has a value of 24.8% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.0% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 22.5%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 9,000 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06045011800 has a value of 24.8% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 25.8%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,083 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (20.6%), 06045011800 has a value of 24.8% which is higher and worse.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(20.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Over time, the 06045011800 value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Economy / Poverty

Families Living Below Poverty Level

Value
Compared to:

Economy / Poverty

Families Living Below Poverty Level

Value
Compared to:

Families Living Below Poverty Level County: Mendocino

Current Value:

Families Living Below Poverty Level County: Mendocino

11.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Mendocino has a value of 11.5% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 8.9% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 10.8%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Mendocino has a value of 11.5% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 9.2% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.8%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,104 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the CA Value (8.5%), Mendocino has a value of 11.5% which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(8.5%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (8.8%), Mendocino has a value of 11.5% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(8.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Mendocino value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Families Living Below Poverty Level Census Place: Albion

Current Value:

Families Living Below Poverty Level Census Place: Albion

0.0%
(2014-2018)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Albion has a value of 0.0% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 7.5% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 16.0%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,468 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Albion has a value of 0.0% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 8.5% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 16.1%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,826 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (13.5%), Albion has a value of 0.0% which is lower and better.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(13.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the CA Value (10.4%), Albion has a value of 0.0% which is lower and better.
CA Value
(10.4%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (10.1%), Albion has a value of 0.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(10.1%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Albion value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Families Living Below Poverty Level Census Place: Anchor Bay

Current Value:

Families Living Below Poverty Level Census Place: Anchor Bay

0.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Anchor Bay has a value of 0.0% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 6.3% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 13.4%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,457 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Anchor Bay has a value of 0.0% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 7.2% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.4%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,635 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (11.5%), Anchor Bay has a value of 0.0% which is lower and better.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(11.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the CA Value (8.5%), Anchor Bay has a value of 0.0% which is lower and better.
CA Value
(8.5%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (8.8%), Anchor Bay has a value of 0.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(8.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Anchor Bay value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Families Living Below Poverty Level Census Place: Boonville

Current Value:

Families Living Below Poverty Level Census Place: Boonville

0.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Boonville has a value of 0.0% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 6.3% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 13.4%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,457 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Boonville has a value of 0.0% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 7.2% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.4%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,635 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (11.5%), Boonville has a value of 0.0% which is lower and better.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(11.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the CA Value (8.5%), Boonville has a value of 0.0% which is lower and better.
CA Value
(8.5%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (8.8%), Boonville has a value of 0.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(8.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Boonville value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Families Living Below Poverty Level Census Place: Brooktrails

Current Value:

Families Living Below Poverty Level Census Place: Brooktrails

3.9%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Brooktrails has a value of 3.9% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 6.3% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 13.4%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,457 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Brooktrails has a value of 3.9% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 7.2% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.4%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,635 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (11.5%), Brooktrails has a value of 3.9% which is lower and better.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(11.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the CA Value (8.5%), Brooktrails has a value of 3.9% which is lower and better.
CA Value
(8.5%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (8.8%), Brooktrails has a value of 3.9% which is lower and better.
US Value
(8.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Brooktrails value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Families Living Below Poverty Level Census Place: Calpella

Current Value:

Families Living Below Poverty Level Census Place: Calpella

0.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Calpella has a value of 0.0% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 6.3% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 13.4%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,457 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Calpella has a value of 0.0% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 7.2% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.4%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,635 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (11.5%), Calpella has a value of 0.0% which is lower and better.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(11.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the CA Value (8.5%), Calpella has a value of 0.0% which is lower and better.
CA Value
(8.5%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (8.8%), Calpella has a value of 0.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(8.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Calpella value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Families Living Below Poverty Level Census Place: Caspar

Current Value:

Families Living Below Poverty Level Census Place: Caspar

0.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Caspar has a value of 0.0% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 6.3% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 13.4%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,457 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Caspar has a value of 0.0% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 7.2% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.4%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,635 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (11.5%), Caspar has a value of 0.0% which is lower and better.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(11.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the CA Value (8.5%), Caspar has a value of 0.0% which is lower and better.
CA Value
(8.5%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (8.8%), Caspar has a value of 0.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(8.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Caspar value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Families Living Below Poverty Level Census Place: Cleone

Current Value:

Families Living Below Poverty Level Census Place: Cleone

0.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Cleone has a value of 0.0% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 6.3% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 13.4%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,457 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Cleone has a value of 0.0% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 7.2% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.4%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,635 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (11.5%), Cleone has a value of 0.0% which is lower and better.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(11.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the CA Value (8.5%), Cleone has a value of 0.0% which is lower and better.
CA Value
(8.5%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (8.8%), Cleone has a value of 0.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(8.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Cleone value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Families Living Below Poverty Level Census Place: Comptche

Current Value:

Families Living Below Poverty Level Census Place: Comptche

43.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Comptche has a value of 43.5% which is in the worst 25% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 6.3% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 13.4%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,457 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Comptche has a value of 43.5% which is in the worst 25% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 7.2% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.4%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,635 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (11.5%), Comptche has a value of 43.5% which is higher and worse.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(11.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the CA Value (8.5%), Comptche has a value of 43.5% which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(8.5%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (8.8%), Comptche has a value of 43.5% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(8.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Comptche value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Families Living Below Poverty Level Census Place: Covelo

Current Value:

Families Living Below Poverty Level Census Place: Covelo

41.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Covelo has a value of 41.0% which is in the worst 25% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 6.3% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 13.4%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,457 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Covelo has a value of 41.0% which is in the worst 25% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 7.2% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.4%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,635 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (11.5%), Covelo has a value of 41.0% which is higher and worse.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(11.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the CA Value (8.5%), Covelo has a value of 41.0% which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(8.5%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (8.8%), Covelo has a value of 41.0% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(8.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Covelo value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Families Living Below Poverty Level Census Place: Fort Bragg

Current Value:

Families Living Below Poverty Level Census Place: Fort Bragg

15.3%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Fort Bragg has a value of 15.3% which is in the worst 25% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 6.3% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 13.4%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,457 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Fort Bragg has a value of 15.3% which is in the worst 25% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 7.2% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.4%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,635 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (11.5%), Fort Bragg has a value of 15.3% which is higher and worse.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(11.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the CA Value (8.5%), Fort Bragg has a value of 15.3% which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(8.5%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (8.8%), Fort Bragg has a value of 15.3% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(8.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Fort Bragg value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Families Living Below Poverty Level Census Place: Hopland

Current Value:

Families Living Below Poverty Level Census Place: Hopland

14.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Hopland has a value of 14.2% which is in the worst 25% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 6.3% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 13.4%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,457 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Hopland has a value of 14.2% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 7.2% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.4%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,635 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (11.5%), Hopland has a value of 14.2% which is higher and worse.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(11.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the CA Value (8.5%), Hopland has a value of 14.2% which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(8.5%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (8.8%), Hopland has a value of 14.2% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(8.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Hopland value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Families Living Below Poverty Level Census Place: Laytonville

Current Value:

Families Living Below Poverty Level Census Place: Laytonville

8.9%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Laytonville has a value of 8.9% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 6.3% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 13.4%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,457 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Laytonville has a value of 8.9% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 7.2% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.4%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,635 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (11.5%), Laytonville has a value of 8.9% which is lower and better.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(11.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the CA Value (8.5%), Laytonville has a value of 8.9% which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(8.5%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (8.8%), Laytonville has a value of 8.9% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(8.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Laytonville value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Families Living Below Poverty Level Census Place: Leggett

Current Value:

Families Living Below Poverty Level Census Place: Leggett

100.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Leggett has a value of 100.0% which is in the worst 25% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 6.3% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 13.4%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,457 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Leggett has a value of 100.0% which is in the worst 25% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 7.2% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.4%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,635 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (11.5%), Leggett has a value of 100.0% which is higher and worse.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(11.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the CA Value (8.5%), Leggett has a value of 100.0% which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(8.5%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (8.8%), Leggett has a value of 100.0% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(8.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Leggett value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Families Living Below Poverty Level Census Place: Little River

Current Value:

Families Living Below Poverty Level Census Place: Little River

60.3%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Little River has a value of 60.3% which is in the worst 25% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 6.3% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 13.4%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,457 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Little River has a value of 60.3% which is in the worst 25% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 7.2% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.4%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,635 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (11.5%), Little River has a value of 60.3% which is higher and worse.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(11.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the CA Value (8.5%), Little River has a value of 60.3% which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(8.5%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (8.8%), Little River has a value of 60.3% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(8.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Little River value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Families Living Below Poverty Level Census Place: Manchester

Current Value:

Families Living Below Poverty Level Census Place: Manchester

0.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Manchester has a value of 0.0% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 6.3% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 13.4%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,457 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Manchester has a value of 0.0% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 7.2% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.4%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,635 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (11.5%), Manchester has a value of 0.0% which is lower and better.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(11.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the CA Value (8.5%), Manchester has a value of 0.0% which is lower and better.
CA Value
(8.5%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (8.8%), Manchester has a value of 0.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(8.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Manchester value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Families Living Below Poverty Level Census Place: Mendocino

Current Value:

Families Living Below Poverty Level Census Place: Mendocino

0.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Mendocino has a value of 0.0% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 6.3% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 13.4%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,457 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Mendocino has a value of 0.0% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 7.2% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.4%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,635 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (11.5%), Mendocino has a value of 0.0% which is lower and better.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(11.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the CA Value (8.5%), Mendocino has a value of 0.0% which is lower and better.
CA Value
(8.5%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (8.8%), Mendocino has a value of 0.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(8.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Mendocino value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Families Living Below Poverty Level Census Place: Philo

Current Value:

Families Living Below Poverty Level Census Place: Philo

0.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Philo has a value of 0.0% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 6.3% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 13.4%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,457 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Philo has a value of 0.0% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 7.2% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.4%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,635 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (11.5%), Philo has a value of 0.0% which is lower and better.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(11.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the CA Value (8.5%), Philo has a value of 0.0% which is lower and better.
CA Value
(8.5%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (8.8%), Philo has a value of 0.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(8.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Philo value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Families Living Below Poverty Level Census Place: Point Arena

Current Value:

Families Living Below Poverty Level Census Place: Point Arena

9.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Point Arena has a value of 9.0% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 6.3% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 13.4%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,457 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Point Arena has a value of 9.0% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 7.2% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.4%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,635 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (11.5%), Point Arena has a value of 9.0% which is lower and better.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(11.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the CA Value (8.5%), Point Arena has a value of 9.0% which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(8.5%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (8.8%), Point Arena has a value of 9.0% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(8.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Point Arena value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Families Living Below Poverty Level Census Place: Potter Valley

Current Value:

Families Living Below Poverty Level Census Place: Potter Valley

8.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Potter Valley has a value of 8.5% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 6.3% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 13.4%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,457 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Potter Valley has a value of 8.5% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 7.2% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.4%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,635 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (11.5%), Potter Valley has a value of 8.5% which is lower and better.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(11.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the CA Value (8.5%), Potter Valley has a value of 8.5%.
CA Value
(8.5%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (8.8%), Potter Valley has a value of 8.5% which is lower and better.
US Value
(8.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Potter Valley value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Families Living Below Poverty Level Census Place: Redwood Valley

Current Value:

Families Living Below Poverty Level Census Place: Redwood Valley

10.1%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Redwood Valley has a value of 10.1% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 6.3% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 13.4%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,457 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Redwood Valley has a value of 10.1% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 7.2% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.4%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,635 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (11.5%), Redwood Valley has a value of 10.1% which is lower and better.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(11.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the CA Value (8.5%), Redwood Valley has a value of 10.1% which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(8.5%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (8.8%), Redwood Valley has a value of 10.1% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(8.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Redwood Valley value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Families Living Below Poverty Level Census Place: Talmage

Current Value:

Families Living Below Poverty Level Census Place: Talmage

26.4%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Talmage has a value of 26.4% which is in the worst 25% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 6.3% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 13.4%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,457 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Talmage has a value of 26.4% which is in the worst 25% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 7.2% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.4%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,635 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (11.5%), Talmage has a value of 26.4% which is higher and worse.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(11.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the CA Value (8.5%), Talmage has a value of 26.4% which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(8.5%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (8.8%), Talmage has a value of 26.4% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(8.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Talmage value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Families Living Below Poverty Level Census Place: Ukiah

Current Value:

Families Living Below Poverty Level Census Place: Ukiah

10.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Ukiah has a value of 10.5% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 6.3% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 13.4%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,457 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Ukiah has a value of 10.5% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 7.2% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.4%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,635 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (11.5%), Ukiah has a value of 10.5% which is lower and better.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(11.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the CA Value (8.5%), Ukiah has a value of 10.5% which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(8.5%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (8.8%), Ukiah has a value of 10.5% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(8.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Ukiah value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Families Living Below Poverty Level Census Place: Willits

Current Value:

Families Living Below Poverty Level Census Place: Willits

12.1%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Willits has a value of 12.1% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 6.3% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 13.4%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,457 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Willits has a value of 12.1% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 7.2% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.4%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,635 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (11.5%), Willits has a value of 12.1% which is higher and worse.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(11.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the CA Value (8.5%), Willits has a value of 12.1% which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(8.5%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (8.8%), Willits has a value of 12.1% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(8.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Willits value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Families Living Below Poverty Level Zip Code: 95410

Current Value:

Families Living Below Poverty Level Zip Code: 95410

11.7%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Zip Codes, 95410 has a value of 11.7% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 6.7% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.2%.
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,701 California zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 95410 has a value of 11.7% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 6.7% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.3%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 32,382 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (11.5%), 95410 has a value of 11.7% which is higher and worse.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(11.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Over time, the 95410 value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Families Living Below Poverty Level Zip Code: 95415

Current Value:

Families Living Below Poverty Level Zip Code: 95415

4.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Zip Codes, 95415 has a value of 4.2% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 6.7% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.2%.
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,701 California zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 95415 has a value of 4.2% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 6.7% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.3%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 32,382 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (11.5%), 95415 has a value of 4.2% which is lower and better.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(11.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Over time, the 95415 value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Families Living Below Poverty Level Zip Code: 95417

Current Value:

Families Living Below Poverty Level Zip Code: 95417

22.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Zip Codes, 95417 has a value of 22.2% which is in the worst 25% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 6.7% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.2%.
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,701 California zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 95417 has a value of 22.2% which is in the worst 25% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 6.7% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.3%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 32,382 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (11.5%), 95417 has a value of 22.2% which is higher and worse.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(11.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Over time, the 95417 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Families Living Below Poverty Level Zip Code: 95420

Current Value:

Families Living Below Poverty Level Zip Code: 95420

0.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Zip Codes, 95420 has a value of 0.0% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 6.7% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.2%.
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,701 California zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 95420 has a value of 0.0% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 6.7% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.3%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 32,382 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (11.5%), 95420 has a value of 0.0% which is lower and better.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(11.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Over time, the 95420 value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Families Living Below Poverty Level Zip Code: 95427

Current Value:

Families Living Below Poverty Level Zip Code: 95427

35.6%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Zip Codes, 95427 has a value of 35.6% which is in the worst 25% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 6.7% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.2%.
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,701 California zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 95427 has a value of 35.6% which is in the worst 25% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 6.7% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.3%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 32,382 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (11.5%), 95427 has a value of 35.6% which is higher and worse.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(11.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Over time, the 95427 value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Families Living Below Poverty Level Zip Code: 95428

Current Value:

Families Living Below Poverty Level Zip Code: 95428

23.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Zip Codes, 95428 has a value of 23.5% which is in the worst 25% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 6.7% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.2%.
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,701 California zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 95428 has a value of 23.5% which is in the worst 25% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 6.7% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.3%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 32,382 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (11.5%), 95428 has a value of 23.5% which is higher and worse.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(11.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Over time, the 95428 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.