Skip to main content

Advanced Search: Build a Custom Dashboard

In the fields below, search for indicators by location, topics, population, classification, subgroup, or comparison. No fields are required, but we suggest selecting a location or two to start. In the additional search options section, select options to group and order search results. To learn more about how to customize a dashboard, see our help center.

Visit the Indicator List Page to see the full list of indicators and locations available on the site.

  • Map View
  • County : Mendocino Census Tracts
  • County : Mendocino Zip Codes
  • All Health Topics
  • All Community Topics
  • All Economy Topics
  • All Education Topics
  • All Environmental Health Topics
Search display options:

Search Results:

Indicator Gauge Icon Legend

Legend Colors

Red is bad, green is good, blue is not statistically different/neutral.

Compared to Distribution

an indicator guage with the arrow in the green the value is in the best half of communities.

an indicator guage with the arrow in the yellow the value is in the 2nd worst quarter of communities.

an indicator guage with the arrow in the red the value is in the worst quarter of communities.

Compared to Target

green circle with white tick inside it meets target; red circle with white cross inside it does not meet target.

Compared to a Single Value

green diamond with downward arrow inside it lower than the comparison value; red diamond with downward arrow inside it higher than the comparison value; blue diamond with downward arrow inside it not statistically different from comparison value.

Trend

green square outline with upward trending arrow inside it green square outline with downward trending arrow inside it non-significant change over time; green square with upward trending arrow inside it green square with downward trending arrow inside it significant change over time; blue square with equals sign no change over time.

Compared to Prior Value

green triangle with upward trending arrow inside it higher than the previous measurement period; green triangle with downward trending arrow inside it lower than the previous measurement period; blue equals sign no statistically different change  from previous measurement period.

More information about the gauges and icons

Health / Cancer

Health / Cancer

Health / Cancer

Colon Cancer Screening: USPSTF Recommendation

Value
Compared to:

Health / Cancer

Colon Cancer Screening: USPSTF Recommendation

Value
Compared to:

Colon Cancer Screening: USPSTF Recommendation Census Place: Leggett

Current Value:

Colon Cancer Screening: USPSTF Recommendation Census Place: Leggett

55.2%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Leggett has a value of 55.2% which is in the worst 25% of census places. Census places in the best 50%  have a value higher than 60.2% while census places in the worst 25% have a value lower than 56.2%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,472 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Leggett has a value of 55.2% which is in the worst 25% of census places. Census places in the best 50%  have a value higher than 69.4% while census places in the worst 25% have a value lower than 65.2%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,435 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (62.7%), Leggett has a value of 55.2% which is lower and worse.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(62.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the US Value (72.4%), Leggett has a value of 55.2% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(72.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Colon Cancer Screening: USPSTF Recommendation Census Place: Little River

Current Value:

Colon Cancer Screening: USPSTF Recommendation Census Place: Little River

61.7%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Little River has a value of 61.7% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50%  have a value higher than 60.2% while census places in the worst 25% have a value lower than 56.2%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,472 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Little River has a value of 61.7% which is in the worst 25% of census places. Census places in the best 50%  have a value higher than 69.4% while census places in the worst 25% have a value lower than 65.2%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,435 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (62.7%), Little River has a value of 61.7% which is lower and worse.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(62.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the US Value (72.4%), Little River has a value of 61.7% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(72.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Colon Cancer Screening: USPSTF Recommendation Census Place: Manchester

Current Value:

Colon Cancer Screening: USPSTF Recommendation Census Place: Manchester

62.3%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Manchester has a value of 62.3% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50%  have a value higher than 60.2% while census places in the worst 25% have a value lower than 56.2%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,472 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Manchester has a value of 62.3% which is in the worst 25% of census places. Census places in the best 50%  have a value higher than 69.4% while census places in the worst 25% have a value lower than 65.2%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,435 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (62.7%), Manchester has a value of 62.3% which is lower and worse.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(62.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the US Value (72.4%), Manchester has a value of 62.3% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(72.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Colon Cancer Screening: USPSTF Recommendation Census Place: Mendocino

Current Value:

Colon Cancer Screening: USPSTF Recommendation Census Place: Mendocino

66.6%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Mendocino has a value of 66.6% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50%  have a value higher than 60.2% while census places in the worst 25% have a value lower than 56.2%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,472 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Mendocino has a value of 66.6% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places. Census places in the best 50%  have a value higher than 69.4% while census places in the worst 25% have a value lower than 65.2%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,435 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (62.7%), Mendocino has a value of 66.6% which is higher and better.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(62.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the US Value (72.4%), Mendocino has a value of 66.6% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(72.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Colon Cancer Screening: USPSTF Recommendation Census Place: Philo

Current Value:

Colon Cancer Screening: USPSTF Recommendation Census Place: Philo

55.7%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Philo has a value of 55.7% which is in the worst 25% of census places. Census places in the best 50%  have a value higher than 60.2% while census places in the worst 25% have a value lower than 56.2%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,472 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Philo has a value of 55.7% which is in the worst 25% of census places. Census places in the best 50%  have a value higher than 69.4% while census places in the worst 25% have a value lower than 65.2%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,435 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (62.7%), Philo has a value of 55.7% which is lower and worse.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(62.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the US Value (72.4%), Philo has a value of 55.7% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(72.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Colon Cancer Screening: USPSTF Recommendation Census Place: Point Arena

Current Value:

Colon Cancer Screening: USPSTF Recommendation Census Place: Point Arena

59.7%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Point Arena has a value of 59.7% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places. Census places in the best 50%  have a value higher than 60.2% while census places in the worst 25% have a value lower than 56.2%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,472 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Point Arena has a value of 59.7% which is in the worst 25% of census places. Census places in the best 50%  have a value higher than 69.4% while census places in the worst 25% have a value lower than 65.2%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,435 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (62.7%), Point Arena has a value of 59.7% which is lower and worse.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(62.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the US Value (72.4%), Point Arena has a value of 59.7% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(72.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Colon Cancer Screening: USPSTF Recommendation Census Place: Potter Valley

Current Value:

Colon Cancer Screening: USPSTF Recommendation Census Place: Potter Valley

62.6%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Potter Valley has a value of 62.6% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50%  have a value higher than 60.2% while census places in the worst 25% have a value lower than 56.2%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,472 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Potter Valley has a value of 62.6% which is in the worst 25% of census places. Census places in the best 50%  have a value higher than 69.4% while census places in the worst 25% have a value lower than 65.2%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,435 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (62.7%), Potter Valley has a value of 62.6% which is lower and worse.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(62.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the US Value (72.4%), Potter Valley has a value of 62.6% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(72.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Colon Cancer Screening: USPSTF Recommendation Census Place: Redwood Valley

Current Value:

Colon Cancer Screening: USPSTF Recommendation Census Place: Redwood Valley

59.3%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Redwood Valley has a value of 59.3% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places. Census places in the best 50%  have a value higher than 60.2% while census places in the worst 25% have a value lower than 56.2%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,472 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Redwood Valley has a value of 59.3% which is in the worst 25% of census places. Census places in the best 50%  have a value higher than 69.4% while census places in the worst 25% have a value lower than 65.2%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,435 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (62.7%), Redwood Valley has a value of 59.3% which is lower and worse.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(62.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the US Value (72.4%), Redwood Valley has a value of 59.3% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(72.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Colon Cancer Screening: USPSTF Recommendation Census Place: Talmage

Current Value:

Colon Cancer Screening: USPSTF Recommendation Census Place: Talmage

57.4%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Talmage has a value of 57.4% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places. Census places in the best 50%  have a value higher than 60.2% while census places in the worst 25% have a value lower than 56.2%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,472 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Talmage has a value of 57.4% which is in the worst 25% of census places. Census places in the best 50%  have a value higher than 69.4% while census places in the worst 25% have a value lower than 65.2%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,435 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (62.7%), Talmage has a value of 57.4% which is lower and worse.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(62.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the US Value (72.4%), Talmage has a value of 57.4% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(72.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Colon Cancer Screening: USPSTF Recommendation Census Place: Ukiah

Current Value:

Colon Cancer Screening: USPSTF Recommendation Census Place: Ukiah

58.5%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Ukiah has a value of 58.5% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places. Census places in the best 50%  have a value higher than 60.2% while census places in the worst 25% have a value lower than 56.2%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,472 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Ukiah has a value of 58.5% which is in the worst 25% of census places. Census places in the best 50%  have a value higher than 69.4% while census places in the worst 25% have a value lower than 65.2%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,435 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (62.7%), Ukiah has a value of 58.5% which is lower and worse.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(62.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the US Value (72.4%), Ukiah has a value of 58.5% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(72.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Colon Cancer Screening: USPSTF Recommendation Census Place: Willits

Current Value:

Colon Cancer Screening: USPSTF Recommendation Census Place: Willits

56.9%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Willits has a value of 56.9% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places. Census places in the best 50%  have a value higher than 60.2% while census places in the worst 25% have a value lower than 56.2%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,472 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Willits has a value of 56.9% which is in the worst 25% of census places. Census places in the best 50%  have a value higher than 69.4% while census places in the worst 25% have a value lower than 65.2%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,435 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (62.7%), Willits has a value of 56.9% which is lower and worse.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(62.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the US Value (72.4%), Willits has a value of 56.9% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(72.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Colon Cancer Screening: USPSTF Recommendation Zip Code: 95410

Current Value:

Colon Cancer Screening: USPSTF Recommendation Zip Code: 95410

64.2%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Zip Codes, 95410 has a value of 64.2% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 60.4% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 56.6%.
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,728 California zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 95410 has a value of 64.2% which is in the worst 25% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 69.6% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 65.7%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 32,310 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (62.7%), 95410 has a value of 64.2% which is higher and better.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(62.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the US Value (72.4%), 95410 has a value of 64.2% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(72.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Colon Cancer Screening: USPSTF Recommendation Zip Code: 95415

Current Value:

Colon Cancer Screening: USPSTF Recommendation Zip Code: 95415

57.8%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Zip Codes, 95415 has a value of 57.8% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 60.4% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 56.6%.
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,728 California zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 95415 has a value of 57.8% which is in the worst 25% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 69.6% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 65.7%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 32,310 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (62.7%), 95415 has a value of 57.8% which is lower and worse.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(62.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the US Value (72.4%), 95415 has a value of 57.8% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(72.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Colon Cancer Screening: USPSTF Recommendation Zip Code: 95417

Current Value:

Colon Cancer Screening: USPSTF Recommendation Zip Code: 95417

58.6%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Zip Codes, 95417 has a value of 58.6% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 60.4% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 56.6%.
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,728 California zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 95417 has a value of 58.6% which is in the worst 25% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 69.6% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 65.7%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 32,310 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (62.7%), 95417 has a value of 58.6% which is lower and worse.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(62.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the US Value (72.4%), 95417 has a value of 58.6% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(72.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Colon Cancer Screening: USPSTF Recommendation Zip Code: 95420

Current Value:

Colon Cancer Screening: USPSTF Recommendation Zip Code: 95420

66.5%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Zip Codes, 95420 has a value of 66.5% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 60.4% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 56.6%.
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,728 California zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 95420 has a value of 66.5% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 69.6% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 65.7%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 32,310 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (62.7%), 95420 has a value of 66.5% which is higher and better.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(62.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the US Value (72.4%), 95420 has a value of 66.5% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(72.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Colon Cancer Screening: USPSTF Recommendation Zip Code: 95427

Current Value:

Colon Cancer Screening: USPSTF Recommendation Zip Code: 95427

57.5%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Zip Codes, 95427 has a value of 57.5% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 60.4% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 56.6%.
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,728 California zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 95427 has a value of 57.5% which is in the worst 25% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 69.6% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 65.7%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 32,310 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (62.7%), 95427 has a value of 57.5% which is lower and worse.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(62.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the US Value (72.4%), 95427 has a value of 57.5% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(72.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Colon Cancer Screening: USPSTF Recommendation Zip Code: 95428

Current Value:

Colon Cancer Screening: USPSTF Recommendation Zip Code: 95428

54.8%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Zip Codes, 95428 has a value of 54.8% which is in the worst 25% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 60.4% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 56.6%.
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,728 California zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 95428 has a value of 54.8% which is in the worst 25% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 69.6% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 65.7%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 32,310 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (62.7%), 95428 has a value of 54.8% which is lower and worse.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(62.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the US Value (72.4%), 95428 has a value of 54.8% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(72.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Colon Cancer Screening: USPSTF Recommendation Zip Code: 95429

Current Value:

Colon Cancer Screening: USPSTF Recommendation Zip Code: 95429

56.4%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Zip Codes, 95429 has a value of 56.4% which is in the worst 25% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 60.4% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 56.6%.
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,728 California zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 95429 has a value of 56.4% which is in the worst 25% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 69.6% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 65.7%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 32,310 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (62.7%), 95429 has a value of 56.4% which is lower and worse.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(62.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the US Value (72.4%), 95429 has a value of 56.4% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(72.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Colon Cancer Screening: USPSTF Recommendation Zip Code: 95432

Current Value:

Colon Cancer Screening: USPSTF Recommendation Zip Code: 95432

60.7%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Zip Codes, 95432 has a value of 60.7% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 60.4% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 56.6%.
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,728 California zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 95432 has a value of 60.7% which is in the worst 25% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 69.6% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 65.7%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 32,310 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (62.7%), 95432 has a value of 60.7% which is lower and worse.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(62.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the US Value (72.4%), 95432 has a value of 60.7% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(72.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Colon Cancer Screening: USPSTF Recommendation Zip Code: 95437

Current Value:

Colon Cancer Screening: USPSTF Recommendation Zip Code: 95437

60.1%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Zip Codes, 95437 has a value of 60.1% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 60.4% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 56.6%.
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,728 California zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 95437 has a value of 60.1% which is in the worst 25% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 69.6% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 65.7%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 32,310 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (62.7%), 95437 has a value of 60.1% which is lower and worse.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(62.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the US Value (72.4%), 95437 has a value of 60.1% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(72.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Colon Cancer Screening: USPSTF Recommendation Zip Code: 95445

Current Value:

Colon Cancer Screening: USPSTF Recommendation Zip Code: 95445

63.4%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Zip Codes, 95445 has a value of 63.4% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 60.4% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 56.6%.
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,728 California zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 95445 has a value of 63.4% which is in the worst 25% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 69.6% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 65.7%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 32,310 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (62.7%), 95445 has a value of 63.4% which is higher and better.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(62.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the US Value (72.4%), 95445 has a value of 63.4% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(72.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Colon Cancer Screening: USPSTF Recommendation Zip Code: 95449

Current Value:

Colon Cancer Screening: USPSTF Recommendation Zip Code: 95449

54.9%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Zip Codes, 95449 has a value of 54.9% which is in the worst 25% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 60.4% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 56.6%.
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,728 California zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 95449 has a value of 54.9% which is in the worst 25% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 69.6% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 65.7%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 32,310 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (62.7%), 95449 has a value of 54.9% which is lower and worse.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(62.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the US Value (72.4%), 95449 has a value of 54.9% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(72.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Colon Cancer Screening: USPSTF Recommendation Zip Code: 95454

Current Value:

Colon Cancer Screening: USPSTF Recommendation Zip Code: 95454

57.6%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Zip Codes, 95454 has a value of 57.6% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 60.4% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 56.6%.
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,728 California zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 95454 has a value of 57.6% which is in the worst 25% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 69.6% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 65.7%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 32,310 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (62.7%), 95454 has a value of 57.6% which is lower and worse.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(62.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the US Value (72.4%), 95454 has a value of 57.6% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(72.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Colon Cancer Screening: USPSTF Recommendation Zip Code: 95456

Current Value:

Colon Cancer Screening: USPSTF Recommendation Zip Code: 95456

64.5%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Zip Codes, 95456 has a value of 64.5% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 60.4% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 56.6%.
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,728 California zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 95456 has a value of 64.5% which is in the worst 25% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 69.6% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 65.7%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 32,310 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (62.7%), 95456 has a value of 64.5% which is higher and better.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(62.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the US Value (72.4%), 95456 has a value of 64.5% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(72.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Colon Cancer Screening: USPSTF Recommendation Zip Code: 95459

Current Value:

Colon Cancer Screening: USPSTF Recommendation Zip Code: 95459

63.5%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Zip Codes, 95459 has a value of 63.5% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 60.4% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 56.6%.
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,728 California zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 95459 has a value of 63.5% which is in the worst 25% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 69.6% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 65.7%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 32,310 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (62.7%), 95459 has a value of 63.5% which is higher and better.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(62.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the US Value (72.4%), 95459 has a value of 63.5% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(72.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Colon Cancer Screening: USPSTF Recommendation Zip Code: 95460

Current Value:

Colon Cancer Screening: USPSTF Recommendation Zip Code: 95460

66.2%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Zip Codes, 95460 has a value of 66.2% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 60.4% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 56.6%.
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,728 California zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 95460 has a value of 66.2% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 69.6% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 65.7%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 32,310 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (62.7%), 95460 has a value of 66.2% which is higher and better.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(62.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the US Value (72.4%), 95460 has a value of 66.2% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(72.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Colon Cancer Screening: USPSTF Recommendation Zip Code: 95463

Current Value:

Colon Cancer Screening: USPSTF Recommendation Zip Code: 95463

59.1%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Zip Codes, 95463 has a value of 59.1% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 60.4% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 56.6%.
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,728 California zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 95463 has a value of 59.1% which is in the worst 25% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 69.6% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 65.7%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 32,310 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (62.7%), 95463 has a value of 59.1% which is lower and worse.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(62.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the US Value (72.4%), 95463 has a value of 59.1% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(72.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Colon Cancer Screening: USPSTF Recommendation Zip Code: 95466

Current Value:

Colon Cancer Screening: USPSTF Recommendation Zip Code: 95466

58.9%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Zip Codes, 95466 has a value of 58.9% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 60.4% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 56.6%.
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,728 California zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 95466 has a value of 58.9% which is in the worst 25% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 69.6% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 65.7%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 32,310 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (62.7%), 95466 has a value of 58.9% which is lower and worse.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(62.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the US Value (72.4%), 95466 has a value of 58.9% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(72.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Colon Cancer Screening: USPSTF Recommendation Zip Code: 95468

Current Value:

Colon Cancer Screening: USPSTF Recommendation Zip Code: 95468

62.2%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Zip Codes, 95468 has a value of 62.2% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 60.4% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 56.6%.
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,728 California zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 95468 has a value of 62.2% which is in the worst 25% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 69.6% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 65.7%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 32,310 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (62.7%), 95468 has a value of 62.2% which is lower and worse.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(62.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the US Value (72.4%), 95468 has a value of 62.2% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(72.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Colon Cancer Screening: USPSTF Recommendation Zip Code: 95469

Current Value:

Colon Cancer Screening: USPSTF Recommendation Zip Code: 95469

62.8%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Zip Codes, 95469 has a value of 62.8% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 60.4% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 56.6%.
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,728 California zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 95469 has a value of 62.8% which is in the worst 25% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 69.6% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 65.7%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 32,310 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (62.7%), 95469 has a value of 62.8% which is higher and better.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(62.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the US Value (72.4%), 95469 has a value of 62.8% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(72.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Colon Cancer Screening: USPSTF Recommendation Zip Code: 95470

Current Value:

Colon Cancer Screening: USPSTF Recommendation Zip Code: 95470

58.9%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Zip Codes, 95470 has a value of 58.9% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 60.4% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 56.6%.
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,728 California zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 95470 has a value of 58.9% which is in the worst 25% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 69.6% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 65.7%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 32,310 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (62.7%), 95470 has a value of 58.9% which is lower and worse.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(62.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the US Value (72.4%), 95470 has a value of 58.9% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(72.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Colon Cancer Screening: USPSTF Recommendation Zip Code: 95482

Current Value:

Colon Cancer Screening: USPSTF Recommendation Zip Code: 95482

58.3%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Zip Codes, 95482 has a value of 58.3% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 60.4% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 56.6%.
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,728 California zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 95482 has a value of 58.3% which is in the worst 25% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 69.6% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 65.7%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 32,310 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (62.7%), 95482 has a value of 58.3% which is lower and worse.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(62.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the US Value (72.4%), 95482 has a value of 58.3% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(72.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Colon Cancer Screening: USPSTF Recommendation Zip Code: 95488

Current Value:

Colon Cancer Screening: USPSTF Recommendation Zip Code: 95488

60.9%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Zip Codes, 95488 has a value of 60.9% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 60.4% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 56.6%.
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,728 California zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 95488 has a value of 60.9% which is in the worst 25% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 69.6% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 65.7%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 32,310 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (62.7%), 95488 has a value of 60.9% which is lower and worse.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(62.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the US Value (72.4%), 95488 has a value of 60.9% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(72.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Colon Cancer Screening: USPSTF Recommendation Zip Code: 95490

Current Value:

Colon Cancer Screening: USPSTF Recommendation Zip Code: 95490

58.4%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Zip Codes, 95490 has a value of 58.4% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 60.4% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 56.6%.
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,728 California zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 95490 has a value of 58.4% which is in the worst 25% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 69.6% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 65.7%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 32,310 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (62.7%), 95490 has a value of 58.4% which is lower and worse.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(62.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the US Value (72.4%), 95490 has a value of 58.4% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(72.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Colon Cancer Screening: USPSTF Recommendation Zip Code: 95494

Current Value:

Colon Cancer Screening: USPSTF Recommendation Zip Code: 95494

56.6%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Zip Codes, 95494 has a value of 56.6% which is in the worst 25% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 60.4% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 56.6%.
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,728 California zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 95494 has a value of 56.6% which is in the worst 25% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 69.6% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 65.7%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 32,310 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (62.7%), 95494 has a value of 56.6% which is lower and worse.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(62.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the US Value (72.4%), 95494 has a value of 56.6% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(72.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Colon Cancer Screening: USPSTF Recommendation Zip Code: 95585

Current Value:

Colon Cancer Screening: USPSTF Recommendation Zip Code: 95585

56.5%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Zip Codes, 95585 has a value of 56.5% which is in the worst 25% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 60.4% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 56.6%.
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,728 California zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 95585 has a value of 56.5% which is in the worst 25% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 69.6% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 65.7%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 32,310 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (62.7%), 95585 has a value of 56.5% which is lower and worse.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(62.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the US Value (72.4%), 95585 has a value of 56.5% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(72.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Colon Cancer Screening: USPSTF Recommendation Zip Code: 95587

Current Value:

Colon Cancer Screening: USPSTF Recommendation Zip Code: 95587

61.4%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Zip Codes, 95587 has a value of 61.4% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 60.4% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 56.6%.
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,728 California zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 95587 has a value of 61.4% which is in the worst 25% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 69.6% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 65.7%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 32,310 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (62.7%), 95587 has a value of 61.4% which is lower and worse.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(62.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the US Value (72.4%), 95587 has a value of 61.4% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(72.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Colon Cancer Screening: USPSTF Recommendation Census Tract: 06045010100

Current Value:

Colon Cancer Screening: USPSTF Recommendation Census Tract: 06045010100

54.8%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06045010100 has a value of 54.8% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 59.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 54.3%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 8,004 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06045010100 has a value of 54.8% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 69.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 64.6%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 72,300 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (62.7%), 06045010100 has a value of 54.8% which is lower and worse.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(62.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the US Value (72.4%), 06045010100 has a value of 54.8% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(72.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Colon Cancer Screening: USPSTF Recommendation Census Tract: 06045010200

Current Value:

Colon Cancer Screening: USPSTF Recommendation Census Tract: 06045010200

58.2%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06045010200 has a value of 58.2% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 59.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 54.3%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 8,004 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06045010200 has a value of 58.2% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 69.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 64.6%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 72,300 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (62.7%), 06045010200 has a value of 58.2% which is lower and worse.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(62.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the US Value (72.4%), 06045010200 has a value of 58.2% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(72.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Colon Cancer Screening: USPSTF Recommendation Census Tract: 06045010300

Current Value:

Colon Cancer Screening: USPSTF Recommendation Census Tract: 06045010300

61.0%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06045010300 has a value of 61.0% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 59.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 54.3%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 8,004 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06045010300 has a value of 61.0% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 69.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 64.6%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 72,300 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (62.7%), 06045010300 has a value of 61.0% which is lower and worse.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(62.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the US Value (72.4%), 06045010300 has a value of 61.0% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(72.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Colon Cancer Screening: USPSTF Recommendation Census Tract: 06045010400

Current Value:

Colon Cancer Screening: USPSTF Recommendation Census Tract: 06045010400

58.6%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06045010400 has a value of 58.6% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 59.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 54.3%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 8,004 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06045010400 has a value of 58.6% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 69.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 64.6%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 72,300 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (62.7%), 06045010400 has a value of 58.6% which is lower and worse.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(62.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the US Value (72.4%), 06045010400 has a value of 58.6% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(72.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Colon Cancer Screening: USPSTF Recommendation Census Tract: 06045010500

Current Value:

Colon Cancer Screening: USPSTF Recommendation Census Tract: 06045010500

57.0%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06045010500 has a value of 57.0% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 59.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 54.3%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 8,004 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06045010500 has a value of 57.0% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 69.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 64.6%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 72,300 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (62.7%), 06045010500 has a value of 57.0% which is lower and worse.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(62.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the US Value (72.4%), 06045010500 has a value of 57.0% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(72.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Colon Cancer Screening: USPSTF Recommendation Census Tract: 06045010600

Current Value:

Colon Cancer Screening: USPSTF Recommendation Census Tract: 06045010600

59.7%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06045010600 has a value of 59.7% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 59.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 54.3%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 8,004 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06045010600 has a value of 59.7% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 69.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 64.6%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 72,300 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (62.7%), 06045010600 has a value of 59.7% which is lower and worse.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(62.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the US Value (72.4%), 06045010600 has a value of 59.7% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(72.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Colon Cancer Screening: USPSTF Recommendation Census Tract: 06045010700

Current Value:

Colon Cancer Screening: USPSTF Recommendation Census Tract: 06045010700

56.6%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06045010700 has a value of 56.6% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 59.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 54.3%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 8,004 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06045010700 has a value of 56.6% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 69.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 64.6%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 72,300 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (62.7%), 06045010700 has a value of 56.6% which is lower and worse.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(62.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the US Value (72.4%), 06045010700 has a value of 56.6% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(72.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Colon Cancer Screening: USPSTF Recommendation Census Tract: 06045010801

Current Value:

Colon Cancer Screening: USPSTF Recommendation Census Tract: 06045010801

59.0%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06045010801 has a value of 59.0% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 59.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 54.3%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 8,004 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06045010801 has a value of 59.0% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 69.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 64.6%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 72,300 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (62.7%), 06045010801 has a value of 59.0% which is lower and worse.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(62.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the US Value (72.4%), 06045010801 has a value of 59.0% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(72.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Colon Cancer Screening: USPSTF Recommendation Census Tract: 06045010802

Current Value:

Colon Cancer Screening: USPSTF Recommendation Census Tract: 06045010802

62.8%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06045010802 has a value of 62.8% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 59.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 54.3%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 8,004 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06045010802 has a value of 62.8% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 69.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 64.6%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 72,300 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (62.7%), 06045010802 has a value of 62.8% which is higher and better.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(62.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the US Value (72.4%), 06045010802 has a value of 62.8% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(72.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Colon Cancer Screening: USPSTF Recommendation Census Tract: 06045010900

Current Value:

Colon Cancer Screening: USPSTF Recommendation Census Tract: 06045010900

57.3%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06045010900 has a value of 57.3% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 59.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 54.3%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 8,004 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06045010900 has a value of 57.3% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 69.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 64.6%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 72,300 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (62.7%), 06045010900 has a value of 57.3% which is lower and worse.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(62.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the US Value (72.4%), 06045010900 has a value of 57.3% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(72.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Colon Cancer Screening: USPSTF Recommendation Census Tract: 06045011001

Current Value:

Colon Cancer Screening: USPSTF Recommendation Census Tract: 06045011001

64.1%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06045011001 has a value of 64.1% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 59.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 54.3%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 8,004 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06045011001 has a value of 64.1% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 69.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 64.6%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 72,300 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (62.7%), 06045011001 has a value of 64.1% which is higher and better.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(62.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the US Value (72.4%), 06045011001 has a value of 64.1% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(72.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Colon Cancer Screening: USPSTF Recommendation Census Tract: 06045011002

Current Value:

Colon Cancer Screening: USPSTF Recommendation Census Tract: 06045011002

64.8%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06045011002 has a value of 64.8% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 59.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 54.3%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 8,004 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06045011002 has a value of 64.8% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 69.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 64.6%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 72,300 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (62.7%), 06045011002 has a value of 64.8% which is higher and better.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(62.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the US Value (72.4%), 06045011002 has a value of 64.8% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(72.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Colon Cancer Screening: USPSTF Recommendation Census Tract: 06045011102

Current Value:

Colon Cancer Screening: USPSTF Recommendation Census Tract: 06045011102

63.0%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06045011102 has a value of 63.0% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 59.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 54.3%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 8,004 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06045011102 has a value of 63.0% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 69.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 64.6%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 72,300 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (62.7%), 06045011102 has a value of 63.0% which is higher and better.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(62.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the US Value (72.4%), 06045011102 has a value of 63.0% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(72.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Colon Cancer Screening: USPSTF Recommendation Census Tract: 06045011200

Current Value:

Colon Cancer Screening: USPSTF Recommendation Census Tract: 06045011200

58.1%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06045011200 has a value of 58.1% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 59.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 54.3%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 8,004 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06045011200 has a value of 58.1% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 69.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 64.6%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 72,300 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (62.7%), 06045011200 has a value of 58.1% which is lower and worse.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(62.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the US Value (72.4%), 06045011200 has a value of 58.1% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(72.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Colon Cancer Screening: USPSTF Recommendation Census Tract: 06045011300

Current Value:

Colon Cancer Screening: USPSTF Recommendation Census Tract: 06045011300

56.7%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06045011300 has a value of 56.7% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 59.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 54.3%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 8,004 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06045011300 has a value of 56.7% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 69.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 64.6%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 72,300 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (62.7%), 06045011300 has a value of 56.7% which is lower and worse.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(62.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the US Value (72.4%), 06045011300 has a value of 56.7% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(72.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Colon Cancer Screening: USPSTF Recommendation Census Tract: 06045011400

Current Value:

Colon Cancer Screening: USPSTF Recommendation Census Tract: 06045011400

63.1%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06045011400 has a value of 63.1% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 59.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 54.3%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 8,004 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06045011400 has a value of 63.1% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 69.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 64.6%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 72,300 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (62.7%), 06045011400 has a value of 63.1% which is higher and better.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(62.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the US Value (72.4%), 06045011400 has a value of 63.1% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(72.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Colon Cancer Screening: USPSTF Recommendation Census Tract: 06045011500

Current Value:

Colon Cancer Screening: USPSTF Recommendation Census Tract: 06045011500

56.0%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06045011500 has a value of 56.0% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 59.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 54.3%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 8,004 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06045011500 has a value of 56.0% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 69.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 64.6%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 72,300 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (62.7%), 06045011500 has a value of 56.0% which is lower and worse.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(62.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the US Value (72.4%), 06045011500 has a value of 56.0% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(72.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Colon Cancer Screening: USPSTF Recommendation Census Tract: 06045011600

Current Value:

Colon Cancer Screening: USPSTF Recommendation Census Tract: 06045011600

55.1%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06045011600 has a value of 55.1% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 59.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 54.3%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 8,004 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06045011600 has a value of 55.1% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 69.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 64.6%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 72,300 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (62.7%), 06045011600 has a value of 55.1% which is lower and worse.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(62.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the US Value (72.4%), 06045011600 has a value of 55.1% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(72.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Colon Cancer Screening: USPSTF Recommendation Census Tract: 06045011700

Current Value:

Colon Cancer Screening: USPSTF Recommendation Census Tract: 06045011700

61.1%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06045011700 has a value of 61.1% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 59.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 54.3%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 8,004 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06045011700 has a value of 61.1% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 69.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 64.6%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 72,300 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (62.7%), 06045011700 has a value of 61.1% which is lower and worse.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(62.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the US Value (72.4%), 06045011700 has a value of 61.1% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(72.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Colon Cancer Screening: USPSTF Recommendation Census Tract: 06045011800

Current Value:

Colon Cancer Screening: USPSTF Recommendation Census Tract: 06045011800

56.0%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06045011800 has a value of 56.0% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 59.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 54.3%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 8,004 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06045011800 has a value of 56.0% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 69.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 64.6%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 72,300 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (62.7%), 06045011800 has a value of 56.0% which is lower and worse.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(62.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the US Value (72.4%), 06045011800 has a value of 56.0% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(72.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Health / Cancer

Colorectal Cancer Incidence Rate

Value
Compared to:

Health / Cancer

Colorectal Cancer Incidence Rate

Value
Compared to:

Colorectal Cancer Incidence Rate County: Mendocino

Current Value:

Colorectal Cancer Incidence Rate County: Mendocino

39.3
Cases per 100,000 population
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Mendocino has a value of 39.3 which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 33.4 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 36.2.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 56 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Mendocino has a value of 39.3 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 40.1 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 46.1.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,401 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the CA Value (33.5), Mendocino has a value of 39.3 which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(33.5)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (36.5), Mendocino has a value of 39.3 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(36.5)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Mendocino (39.3) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (38.6).
Prior Value
(38.6)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Mendocino value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Health / Cancer

Lung and Bronchus Cancer Incidence Rate

Value
Compared to:

Health / Cancer

Lung and Bronchus Cancer Incidence Rate

Value
Compared to:

Lung and Bronchus Cancer Incidence Rate County: Mendocino

Current Value:

Lung and Bronchus Cancer Incidence Rate County: Mendocino

43.4
Cases per 100,000 population
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Mendocino has a value of 43.4 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 39.5 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 47.4.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 55 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Mendocino has a value of 43.4 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 63.2 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 74.4.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,471 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the CA Value (37.6), Mendocino has a value of 43.4 which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(37.6)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (54.0), Mendocino has a value of 43.4 which is lower and better.
US Value
(54.0)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Mendocino (43.4) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (44.2).
Prior Value
(44.2)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Mendocino value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Health / Cancer

Mammogram in Past 2 Years: 50-74

Value
Compared to:

Health / Cancer

Mammogram in Past 2 Years: 50-74

Value
Compared to:

Mammogram in Past 2 Years: 50-74 County: Mendocino

Current Value:

Mammogram in Past 2 Years: 50-74 County: Mendocino

64.8%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Mendocino has a value of 64.8% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 67.7% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 66.4%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Mendocino has a value of 64.8% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 70.7% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 67.9%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (78.2%), Mendocino has a value of 64.8% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(78.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (80.3%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(80.3%)

Mammogram in Past 2 Years: 50-74 Census Place: Albion

Current Value:

Mammogram in Past 2 Years: 50-74 Census Place: Albion

71.1%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Albion has a value of 71.1% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places. Census places in the best 50%  have a value higher than 72.1% while census places in the worst 25% have a value lower than 70.5%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,472 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Albion has a value of 71.1% which is in the worst 25% of census places. Census places in the best 50%  have a value higher than 74.5% while census places in the worst 25% have a value lower than 71.9%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,432 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (64.8%), Albion has a value of 71.1% which is higher and better.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(64.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the US Value (78.2%), Albion has a value of 71.1% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(78.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (80.3%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(80.3%)

Mammogram in Past 2 Years: 50-74 Census Place: Anchor Bay

Current Value:

Mammogram in Past 2 Years: 50-74 Census Place: Anchor Bay

71.1%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Anchor Bay has a value of 71.1% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places. Census places in the best 50%  have a value higher than 72.1% while census places in the worst 25% have a value lower than 70.5%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,472 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Anchor Bay has a value of 71.1% which is in the worst 25% of census places. Census places in the best 50%  have a value higher than 74.5% while census places in the worst 25% have a value lower than 71.9%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,432 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (64.8%), Anchor Bay has a value of 71.1% which is higher and better.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(64.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the US Value (78.2%), Anchor Bay has a value of 71.1% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(78.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (80.3%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(80.3%)

Mammogram in Past 2 Years: 50-74 Census Place: Boonville

Current Value:

Mammogram in Past 2 Years: 50-74 Census Place: Boonville

71.4%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Boonville has a value of 71.4% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places. Census places in the best 50%  have a value higher than 72.1% while census places in the worst 25% have a value lower than 70.5%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,472 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Boonville has a value of 71.4% which is in the worst 25% of census places. Census places in the best 50%  have a value higher than 74.5% while census places in the worst 25% have a value lower than 71.9%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,432 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (64.8%), Boonville has a value of 71.4% which is higher and better.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(64.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the US Value (78.2%), Boonville has a value of 71.4% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(78.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (80.3%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(80.3%)

Mammogram in Past 2 Years: 50-74 Census Place: Brooktrails

Current Value:

Mammogram in Past 2 Years: 50-74 Census Place: Brooktrails

70.1%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Brooktrails has a value of 70.1% which is in the worst 25% of census places. Census places in the best 50%  have a value higher than 72.1% while census places in the worst 25% have a value lower than 70.5%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,472 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Brooktrails has a value of 70.1% which is in the worst 25% of census places. Census places in the best 50%  have a value higher than 74.5% while census places in the worst 25% have a value lower than 71.9%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,432 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (64.8%), Brooktrails has a value of 70.1% which is higher and better.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(64.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the US Value (78.2%), Brooktrails has a value of 70.1% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(78.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (80.3%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(80.3%)

Mammogram in Past 2 Years: 50-74 Census Place: Calpella

Current Value:

Mammogram in Past 2 Years: 50-74 Census Place: Calpella

69.8%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Calpella has a value of 69.8% which is in the worst 25% of census places. Census places in the best 50%  have a value higher than 72.1% while census places in the worst 25% have a value lower than 70.5%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,472 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Calpella has a value of 69.8% which is in the worst 25% of census places. Census places in the best 50%  have a value higher than 74.5% while census places in the worst 25% have a value lower than 71.9%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,432 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (64.8%), Calpella has a value of 69.8% which is higher and better.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(64.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the US Value (78.2%), Calpella has a value of 69.8% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(78.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (80.3%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(80.3%)

Mammogram in Past 2 Years: 50-74 Census Place: Caspar

Current Value:

Mammogram in Past 2 Years: 50-74 Census Place: Caspar

71.2%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Caspar has a value of 71.2% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places. Census places in the best 50%  have a value higher than 72.1% while census places in the worst 25% have a value lower than 70.5%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,472 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Caspar has a value of 71.2% which is in the worst 25% of census places. Census places in the best 50%  have a value higher than 74.5% while census places in the worst 25% have a value lower than 71.9%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,432 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (64.8%), Caspar has a value of 71.2% which is higher and better.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(64.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the US Value (78.2%), Caspar has a value of 71.2% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(78.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (80.3%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(80.3%)

Mammogram in Past 2 Years: 50-74 Census Place: Cleone

Current Value:

Mammogram in Past 2 Years: 50-74 Census Place: Cleone

71.4%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Cleone has a value of 71.4% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places. Census places in the best 50%  have a value higher than 72.1% while census places in the worst 25% have a value lower than 70.5%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,472 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Cleone has a value of 71.4% which is in the worst 25% of census places. Census places in the best 50%  have a value higher than 74.5% while census places in the worst 25% have a value lower than 71.9%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,432 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (64.8%), Cleone has a value of 71.4% which is higher and better.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(64.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the US Value (78.2%), Cleone has a value of 71.4% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(78.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (80.3%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(80.3%)

Mammogram in Past 2 Years: 50-74 Census Place: Comptche

Current Value:

Mammogram in Past 2 Years: 50-74 Census Place: Comptche

69.9%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Comptche has a value of 69.9% which is in the worst 25% of census places. Census places in the best 50%  have a value higher than 72.1% while census places in the worst 25% have a value lower than 70.5%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,472 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Comptche has a value of 69.9% which is in the worst 25% of census places. Census places in the best 50%  have a value higher than 74.5% while census places in the worst 25% have a value lower than 71.9%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,432 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (64.8%), Comptche has a value of 69.9% which is higher and better.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(64.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the US Value (78.2%), Comptche has a value of 69.9% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(78.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (80.3%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(80.3%)

Mammogram in Past 2 Years: 50-74 Census Place: Covelo

Current Value:

Mammogram in Past 2 Years: 50-74 Census Place: Covelo

68.8%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Covelo has a value of 68.8% which is in the worst 25% of census places. Census places in the best 50%  have a value higher than 72.1% while census places in the worst 25% have a value lower than 70.5%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,472 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Covelo has a value of 68.8% which is in the worst 25% of census places. Census places in the best 50%  have a value higher than 74.5% while census places in the worst 25% have a value lower than 71.9%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,432 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (64.8%), Covelo has a value of 68.8% which is higher and better.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(64.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the US Value (78.2%), Covelo has a value of 68.8% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(78.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (80.3%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(80.3%)

Mammogram in Past 2 Years: 50-74 Census Place: Fort Bragg

Current Value:

Mammogram in Past 2 Years: 50-74 Census Place: Fort Bragg

70.0%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Fort Bragg has a value of 70.0% which is in the worst 25% of census places. Census places in the best 50%  have a value higher than 72.1% while census places in the worst 25% have a value lower than 70.5%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,472 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Fort Bragg has a value of 70.0% which is in the worst 25% of census places. Census places in the best 50%  have a value higher than 74.5% while census places in the worst 25% have a value lower than 71.9%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,432 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (64.8%), Fort Bragg has a value of 70.0% which is higher and better.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(64.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the US Value (78.2%), Fort Bragg has a value of 70.0% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(78.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (80.3%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(80.3%)

Mammogram in Past 2 Years: 50-74 Census Place: Hopland

Current Value:

Mammogram in Past 2 Years: 50-74 Census Place: Hopland

70.6%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Hopland has a value of 70.6% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places. Census places in the best 50%  have a value higher than 72.1% while census places in the worst 25% have a value lower than 70.5%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,472 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Hopland has a value of 70.6% which is in the worst 25% of census places. Census places in the best 50%  have a value higher than 74.5% while census places in the worst 25% have a value lower than 71.9%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,432 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (64.8%), Hopland has a value of 70.6% which is higher and better.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(64.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the US Value (78.2%), Hopland has a value of 70.6% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(78.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (80.3%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(80.3%)

Mammogram in Past 2 Years: 50-74 Census Place: Laytonville

Current Value:

Mammogram in Past 2 Years: 50-74 Census Place: Laytonville

70.2%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Laytonville has a value of 70.2% which is in the worst 25% of census places. Census places in the best 50%  have a value higher than 72.1% while census places in the worst 25% have a value lower than 70.5%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,472 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Laytonville has a value of 70.2% which is in the worst 25% of census places. Census places in the best 50%  have a value higher than 74.5% while census places in the worst 25% have a value lower than 71.9%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,432 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (64.8%), Laytonville has a value of 70.2% which is higher and better.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(64.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the US Value (78.2%), Laytonville has a value of 70.2% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(78.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (80.3%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(80.3%)

Mammogram in Past 2 Years: 50-74 Census Place: Leggett

Current Value:

Mammogram in Past 2 Years: 50-74 Census Place: Leggett

69.4%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Leggett has a value of 69.4% which is in the worst 25% of census places. Census places in the best 50%  have a value higher than 72.1% while census places in the worst 25% have a value lower than 70.5%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,472 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Leggett has a value of 69.4% which is in the worst 25% of census places. Census places in the best 50%  have a value higher than 74.5% while census places in the worst 25% have a value lower than 71.9%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,432 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (64.8%), Leggett has a value of 69.4% which is higher and better.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(64.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the US Value (78.2%), Leggett has a value of 69.4% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(78.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (80.3%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(80.3%)

Mammogram in Past 2 Years: 50-74 Census Place: Little River

Current Value:

Mammogram in Past 2 Years: 50-74 Census Place: Little River

72.2%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Little River has a value of 72.2% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50%  have a value higher than 72.1% while census places in the worst 25% have a value lower than 70.5%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,472 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Little River has a value of 72.2% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places. Census places in the best 50%  have a value higher than 74.5% while census places in the worst 25% have a value lower than 71.9%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,432 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (64.8%), Little River has a value of 72.2% which is higher and better.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(64.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the US Value (78.2%), Little River has a value of 72.2% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(78.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (80.3%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(80.3%)

Mammogram in Past 2 Years: 50-74 Census Place: Manchester

Current Value:

Mammogram in Past 2 Years: 50-74 Census Place: Manchester

73.6%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Manchester has a value of 73.6% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50%  have a value higher than 72.1% while census places in the worst 25% have a value lower than 70.5%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,472 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Manchester has a value of 73.6% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places. Census places in the best 50%  have a value higher than 74.5% while census places in the worst 25% have a value lower than 71.9%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,432 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (64.8%), Manchester has a value of 73.6% which is higher and better.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(64.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the US Value (78.2%), Manchester has a value of 73.6% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(78.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (80.3%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(80.3%)

Mammogram in Past 2 Years: 50-74 Census Place: Mendocino

Current Value:

Mammogram in Past 2 Years: 50-74 Census Place: Mendocino

72.3%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Mendocino has a value of 72.3% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50%  have a value higher than 72.1% while census places in the worst 25% have a value lower than 70.5%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,472 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Mendocino has a value of 72.3% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places. Census places in the best 50%  have a value higher than 74.5% while census places in the worst 25% have a value lower than 71.9%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,432 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (64.8%), Mendocino has a value of 72.3% which is higher and better.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(64.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the US Value (78.2%), Mendocino has a value of 72.3% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(78.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (80.3%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(80.3%)

Mammogram in Past 2 Years: 50-74 Census Place: Philo

Current Value:

Mammogram in Past 2 Years: 50-74 Census Place: Philo

71.6%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Philo has a value of 71.6% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places. Census places in the best 50%  have a value higher than 72.1% while census places in the worst 25% have a value lower than 70.5%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,472 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Philo has a value of 71.6% which is in the worst 25% of census places. Census places in the best 50%  have a value higher than 74.5% while census places in the worst 25% have a value lower than 71.9%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,432 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (64.8%), Philo has a value of 71.6% which is higher and better.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(64.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the US Value (78.2%), Philo has a value of 71.6% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(78.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (80.3%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(80.3%)

Mammogram in Past 2 Years: 50-74 Census Place: Point Arena

Current Value:

Mammogram in Past 2 Years: 50-74 Census Place: Point Arena

72.3%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Point Arena has a value of 72.3% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50%  have a value higher than 72.1% while census places in the worst 25% have a value lower than 70.5%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,472 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Point Arena has a value of 72.3% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places. Census places in the best 50%  have a value higher than 74.5% while census places in the worst 25% have a value lower than 71.9%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,432 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (64.8%), Point Arena has a value of 72.3% which is higher and better.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(64.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the US Value (78.2%), Point Arena has a value of 72.3% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(78.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (80.3%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(80.3%)

Mammogram in Past 2 Years: 50-74 Census Place: Potter Valley

Current Value:

Mammogram in Past 2 Years: 50-74 Census Place: Potter Valley

72.8%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Potter Valley has a value of 72.8% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50%  have a value higher than 72.1% while census places in the worst 25% have a value lower than 70.5%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,472 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Potter Valley has a value of 72.8% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places. Census places in the best 50%  have a value higher than 74.5% while census places in the worst 25% have a value lower than 71.9%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,432 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (64.8%), Potter Valley has a value of 72.8% which is higher and better.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(64.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the US Value (78.2%), Potter Valley has a value of 72.8% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(78.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (80.3%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(80.3%)

Mammogram in Past 2 Years: 50-74 Census Place: Redwood Valley

Current Value:

Mammogram in Past 2 Years: 50-74 Census Place: Redwood Valley

70.6%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Redwood Valley has a value of 70.6% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places. Census places in the best 50%  have a value higher than 72.1% while census places in the worst 25% have a value lower than 70.5%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,472 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Redwood Valley has a value of 70.6% which is in the worst 25% of census places. Census places in the best 50%  have a value higher than 74.5% while census places in the worst 25% have a value lower than 71.9%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,432 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (64.8%), Redwood Valley has a value of 70.6% which is higher and better.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(64.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the US Value (78.2%), Redwood Valley has a value of 70.6% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(78.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (80.3%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(80.3%)

Mammogram in Past 2 Years: 50-74 Census Place: Talmage

Current Value:

Mammogram in Past 2 Years: 50-74 Census Place: Talmage

70.8%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Talmage has a value of 70.8% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places. Census places in the best 50%  have a value higher than 72.1% while census places in the worst 25% have a value lower than 70.5%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,472 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Talmage has a value of 70.8% which is in the worst 25% of census places. Census places in the best 50%  have a value higher than 74.5% while census places in the worst 25% have a value lower than 71.9%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,432 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (64.8%), Talmage has a value of 70.8% which is higher and better.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(64.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the US Value (78.2%), Talmage has a value of 70.8% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(78.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (80.3%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(80.3%)

Mammogram in Past 2 Years: 50-74 Census Place: Ukiah

Current Value:

Mammogram in Past 2 Years: 50-74 Census Place: Ukiah

70.2%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Ukiah has a value of 70.2% which is in the worst 25% of census places. Census places in the best 50%  have a value higher than 72.1% while census places in the worst 25% have a value lower than 70.5%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,472 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Ukiah has a value of 70.2% which is in the worst 25% of census places. Census places in the best 50%  have a value higher than 74.5% while census places in the worst 25% have a value lower than 71.9%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,432 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (64.8%), Ukiah has a value of 70.2% which is higher and better.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(64.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the US Value (78.2%), Ukiah has a value of 70.2% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(78.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (80.3%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(80.3%)

Mammogram in Past 2 Years: 50-74 Census Place: Willits

Current Value:

Mammogram in Past 2 Years: 50-74 Census Place: Willits

69.2%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Willits has a value of 69.2% which is in the worst 25% of census places. Census places in the best 50%  have a value higher than 72.1% while census places in the worst 25% have a value lower than 70.5%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,472 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Willits has a value of 69.2% which is in the worst 25% of census places. Census places in the best 50%  have a value higher than 74.5% while census places in the worst 25% have a value lower than 71.9%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,432 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (64.8%), Willits has a value of 69.2% which is higher and better.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(64.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the US Value (78.2%), Willits has a value of 69.2% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(78.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (80.3%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(80.3%)

Mammogram in Past 2 Years: 50-74 Zip Code: 95410

Current Value:

Mammogram in Past 2 Years: 50-74 Zip Code: 95410

72.1%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Zip Codes, 95410 has a value of 72.1% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 72.5% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 70.7%.
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,724 California zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 95410 has a value of 72.1% which is in the worst 25% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 74.9% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 72.4%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 32,250 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (64.8%), 95410 has a value of 72.1% which is higher and better.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(64.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the US Value (78.2%), 95410 has a value of 72.1% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(78.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (80.3%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(80.3%)

Mammogram in Past 2 Years: 50-74 Zip Code: 95415

Current Value:

Mammogram in Past 2 Years: 50-74 Zip Code: 95415

71.3%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Zip Codes, 95415 has a value of 71.3% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 72.5% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 70.7%.
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,724 California zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 95415 has a value of 71.3% which is in the worst 25% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 74.9% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 72.4%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 32,250 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (64.8%), 95415 has a value of 71.3% which is higher and better.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(64.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the US Value (78.2%), 95415 has a value of 71.3% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(78.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (80.3%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(80.3%)

Mammogram in Past 2 Years: 50-74 Zip Code: 95417

Current Value:

Mammogram in Past 2 Years: 50-74 Zip Code: 95417

71.1%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Zip Codes, 95417 has a value of 71.1% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 72.5% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 70.7%.
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,724 California zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 95417 has a value of 71.1% which is in the worst 25% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 74.9% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 72.4%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 32,250 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (64.8%), 95417 has a value of 71.1% which is higher and better.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(64.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the US Value (78.2%), 95417 has a value of 71.1% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(78.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (80.3%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(80.3%)

Mammogram in Past 2 Years: 50-74 Zip Code: 95420

Current Value:

Mammogram in Past 2 Years: 50-74 Zip Code: 95420

71.3%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Zip Codes, 95420 has a value of 71.3% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 72.5% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 70.7%.
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,724 California zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 95420 has a value of 71.3% which is in the worst 25% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 74.9% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 72.4%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 32,250 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (64.8%), 95420 has a value of 71.3% which is higher and better.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(64.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the US Value (78.2%), 95420 has a value of 71.3% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(78.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (80.3%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(80.3%)

Mammogram in Past 2 Years: 50-74 Zip Code: 95427

Current Value:

Mammogram in Past 2 Years: 50-74 Zip Code: 95427

70.5%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Zip Codes, 95427 has a value of 70.5% which is in the worst 25% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 72.5% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 70.7%.
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,724 California zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 95427 has a value of 70.5% which is in the worst 25% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 74.9% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 72.4%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 32,250 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (64.8%), 95427 has a value of 70.5% which is higher and better.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(64.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the US Value (78.2%), 95427 has a value of 70.5% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(78.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (80.3%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(80.3%)

Mammogram in Past 2 Years: 50-74 Zip Code: 95428

Current Value:

Mammogram in Past 2 Years: 50-74 Zip Code: 95428

68.3%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Zip Codes, 95428 has a value of 68.3% which is in the worst 25% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 72.5% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 70.7%.
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,724 California zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 95428 has a value of 68.3% which is in the worst 25% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 74.9% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 72.4%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 32,250 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (64.8%), 95428 has a value of 68.3% which is higher and better.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(64.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the US Value (78.2%), 95428 has a value of 68.3% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(78.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (80.3%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(80.3%)

Mammogram in Past 2 Years: 50-74 Zip Code: 95429

Current Value:

Mammogram in Past 2 Years: 50-74 Zip Code: 95429

70.4%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Zip Codes, 95429 has a value of 70.4% which is in the worst 25% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 72.5% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 70.7%.
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,724 California zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 95429 has a value of 70.4% which is in the worst 25% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 74.9% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 72.4%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 32,250 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (64.8%), 95429 has a value of 70.4% which is higher and better.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(64.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the US Value (78.2%), 95429 has a value of 70.4% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(78.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (80.3%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(80.3%)

Mammogram in Past 2 Years: 50-74 Zip Code: 95432

Current Value:

Mammogram in Past 2 Years: 50-74 Zip Code: 95432

72.5%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Zip Codes, 95432 has a value of 72.5% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 72.5% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 70.7%.
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,724 California zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 95432 has a value of 72.5% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 74.9% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 72.4%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 32,250 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (64.8%), 95432 has a value of 72.5% which is higher and better.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(64.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the US Value (78.2%), 95432 has a value of 72.5% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(78.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (80.3%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(80.3%)

Mammogram in Past 2 Years: 50-74 Zip Code: 95437

Current Value:

Mammogram in Past 2 Years: 50-74 Zip Code: 95437

70.6%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Zip Codes, 95437 has a value of 70.6% which is in the worst 25% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 72.5% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 70.7%.
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,724 California zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 95437 has a value of 70.6% which is in the worst 25% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 74.9% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 72.4%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 32,250 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (64.8%), 95437 has a value of 70.6% which is higher and better.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(64.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the US Value (78.2%), 95437 has a value of 70.6% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(78.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (80.3%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(80.3%)

Mammogram in Past 2 Years: 50-74 Zip Code: 95445

Current Value:

Mammogram in Past 2 Years: 50-74 Zip Code: 95445

71.2%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Zip Codes, 95445 has a value of 71.2% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 72.5% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 70.7%.
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,724 California zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 95445 has a value of 71.2% which is in the worst 25% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 74.9% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 72.4%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 32,250 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (64.8%), 95445 has a value of 71.2% which is higher and better.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(64.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the US Value (78.2%), 95445 has a value of 71.2% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(78.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (80.3%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(80.3%)

Mammogram in Past 2 Years: 50-74 Zip Code: 95449

Current Value:

Mammogram in Past 2 Years: 50-74 Zip Code: 95449

70.1%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Zip Codes, 95449 has a value of 70.1% which is in the worst 25% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 72.5% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 70.7%.
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,724 California zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 95449 has a value of 70.1% which is in the worst 25% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 74.9% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 72.4%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 32,250 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (64.8%), 95449 has a value of 70.1% which is higher and better.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(64.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the US Value (78.2%), 95449 has a value of 70.1% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(78.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (80.3%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(80.3%)

Mammogram in Past 2 Years: 50-74 Zip Code: 95454

Current Value:

Mammogram in Past 2 Years: 50-74 Zip Code: 95454

70.8%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Zip Codes, 95454 has a value of 70.8% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 72.5% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 70.7%.
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,724 California zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 95454 has a value of 70.8% which is in the worst 25% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 74.9% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 72.4%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 32,250 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (64.8%), 95454 has a value of 70.8% which is higher and better.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(64.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the US Value (78.2%), 95454 has a value of 70.8% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(78.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (80.3%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(80.3%)

Mammogram in Past 2 Years: 50-74 Zip Code: 95456

Current Value:

Mammogram in Past 2 Years: 50-74 Zip Code: 95456

72.1%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Zip Codes, 95456 has a value of 72.1% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 72.5% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 70.7%.
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,724 California zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 95456 has a value of 72.1% which is in the worst 25% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 74.9% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 72.4%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 32,250 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (64.8%), 95456 has a value of 72.1% which is higher and better.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(64.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the US Value (78.2%), 95456 has a value of 72.1% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(78.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (80.3%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(80.3%)

Mammogram in Past 2 Years: 50-74 Zip Code: 95459

Current Value:

Mammogram in Past 2 Years: 50-74 Zip Code: 95459

71.1%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Zip Codes, 95459 has a value of 71.1% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 72.5% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 70.7%.
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,724 California zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 95459 has a value of 71.1% which is in the worst 25% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 74.9% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 72.4%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 32,250 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (64.8%), 95459 has a value of 71.1% which is higher and better.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(64.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the US Value (78.2%), 95459 has a value of 71.1% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(78.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (80.3%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(80.3%)

Mammogram in Past 2 Years: 50-74 Zip Code: 95460

Current Value:

Mammogram in Past 2 Years: 50-74 Zip Code: 95460

71.7%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Zip Codes, 95460 has a value of 71.7% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 72.5% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 70.7%.
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,724 California zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 95460 has a value of 71.7% which is in the worst 25% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 74.9% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 72.4%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 32,250 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (64.8%), 95460 has a value of 71.7% which is higher and better.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(64.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the US Value (78.2%), 95460 has a value of 71.7% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(78.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (80.3%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(80.3%)

Mammogram in Past 2 Years: 50-74 Zip Code: 95463

Current Value:

Mammogram in Past 2 Years: 50-74 Zip Code: 95463

71.1%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Zip Codes, 95463 has a value of 71.1% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 72.5% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 70.7%.
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,724 California zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 95463 has a value of 71.1% which is in the worst 25% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 74.9% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 72.4%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 32,250 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (64.8%), 95463 has a value of 71.1% which is higher and better.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(64.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the US Value (78.2%), 95463 has a value of 71.1% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(78.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (80.3%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(80.3%)

Mammogram in Past 2 Years: 50-74 Zip Code: 95466

Current Value:

Mammogram in Past 2 Years: 50-74 Zip Code: 95466

70.9%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Zip Codes, 95466 has a value of 70.9% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 72.5% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 70.7%.
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,724 California zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 95466 has a value of 70.9% which is in the worst 25% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 74.9% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 72.4%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 32,250 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (64.8%), 95466 has a value of 70.9% which is higher and better.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(64.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the US Value (78.2%), 95466 has a value of 70.9% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(78.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (80.3%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(80.3%)

Mammogram in Past 2 Years: 50-74 Zip Code: 95468

Current Value:

Mammogram in Past 2 Years: 50-74 Zip Code: 95468

70.5%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Zip Codes, 95468 has a value of 70.5% which is in the worst 25% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 72.5% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 70.7%.
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,724 California zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 95468 has a value of 70.5% which is in the worst 25% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 74.9% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 72.4%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 32,250 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (64.8%), 95468 has a value of 70.5% which is higher and better.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(64.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the US Value (78.2%), 95468 has a value of 70.5% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(78.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (80.3%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(80.3%)

Mammogram in Past 2 Years: 50-74 Zip Code: 95469

Current Value:

Mammogram in Past 2 Years: 50-74 Zip Code: 95469

71.6%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Zip Codes, 95469 has a value of 71.6% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 72.5% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 70.7%.
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,724 California zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 95469 has a value of 71.6% which is in the worst 25% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 74.9% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 72.4%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 32,250 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (64.8%), 95469 has a value of 71.6% which is higher and better.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(64.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the US Value (78.2%), 95469 has a value of 71.6% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(78.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (80.3%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(80.3%)

Mammogram in Past 2 Years: 50-74 Zip Code: 95470

Current Value:

Mammogram in Past 2 Years: 50-74 Zip Code: 95470

70.4%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Zip Codes, 95470 has a value of 70.4% which is in the worst 25% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 72.5% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 70.7%.
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,724 California zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 95470 has a value of 70.4% which is in the worst 25% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 74.9% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 72.4%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 32,250 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (64.8%), 95470 has a value of 70.4% which is higher and better.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(64.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the US Value (78.2%), 95470 has a value of 70.4% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(78.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (80.3%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(80.3%)

Mammogram in Past 2 Years: 50-74 Zip Code: 95482

Current Value:

Mammogram in Past 2 Years: 50-74 Zip Code: 95482

70.2%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Zip Codes, 95482 has a value of 70.2% which is in the worst 25% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 72.5% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 70.7%.
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,724 California zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 95482 has a value of 70.2% which is in the worst 25% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 74.9% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 72.4%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 32,250 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (64.8%), 95482 has a value of 70.2% which is higher and better.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(64.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the US Value (78.2%), 95482 has a value of 70.2% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(78.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (80.3%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(80.3%)

Mammogram in Past 2 Years: 50-74 Zip Code: 95488

Current Value:

Mammogram in Past 2 Years: 50-74 Zip Code: 95488

71.7%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Zip Codes, 95488 has a value of 71.7% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 72.5% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 70.7%.
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,724 California zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 95488 has a value of 71.7% which is in the worst 25% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 74.9% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 72.4%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 32,250 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (64.8%), 95488 has a value of 71.7% which is higher and better.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(64.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the US Value (78.2%), 95488 has a value of 71.7% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(78.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (80.3%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(80.3%)

Mammogram in Past 2 Years: 50-74 Zip Code: 95490

Current Value:

Mammogram in Past 2 Years: 50-74 Zip Code: 95490

69.9%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Zip Codes, 95490 has a value of 69.9% which is in the worst 25% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 72.5% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 70.7%.
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,724 California zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 95490 has a value of 69.9% which is in the worst 25% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 74.9% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 72.4%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 32,250 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (64.8%), 95490 has a value of 69.9% which is higher and better.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(64.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the US Value (78.2%), 95490 has a value of 69.9% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(78.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (80.3%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(80.3%)

Mammogram in Past 2 Years: 50-74 Zip Code: 95494

Current Value:

Mammogram in Past 2 Years: 50-74 Zip Code: 95494

72.6%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Zip Codes, 95494 has a value of 72.6% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 72.5% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 70.7%.
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,724 California zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 95494 has a value of 72.6% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 74.9% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 72.4%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 32,250 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (64.8%), 95494 has a value of 72.6% which is higher and better.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(64.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the US Value (78.2%), 95494 has a value of 72.6% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(78.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (80.3%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(80.3%)

Mammogram in Past 2 Years: 50-74 Zip Code: 95585

Current Value:

Mammogram in Past 2 Years: 50-74 Zip Code: 95585

71.3%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Zip Codes, 95585 has a value of 71.3% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 72.5% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 70.7%.
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,724 California zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 95585 has a value of 71.3% which is in the worst 25% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 74.9% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 72.4%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 32,250 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (64.8%), 95585 has a value of 71.3% which is higher and better.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(64.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the US Value (78.2%), 95585 has a value of 71.3% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(78.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (80.3%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(80.3%)

Mammogram in Past 2 Years: 50-74 Zip Code: 95587

Current Value:

Mammogram in Past 2 Years: 50-74 Zip Code: 95587

70.0%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Zip Codes, 95587 has a value of 70.0% which is in the worst 25% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 72.5% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 70.7%.
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,724 California zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 95587 has a value of 70.0% which is in the worst 25% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 74.9% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 72.4%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 32,250 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (64.8%), 95587 has a value of 70.0% which is higher and better.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(64.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the US Value (78.2%), 95587 has a value of 70.0% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(78.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (80.3%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(80.3%)

Mammogram in Past 2 Years: 50-74 Census Tract: 06045010100

Current Value:

Mammogram in Past 2 Years: 50-74 Census Tract: 06045010100

68.4%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06045010100 has a value of 68.4% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 73.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 71.2%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 7,996 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06045010100 has a value of 68.4% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 75.9% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 73.4%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 72,248 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (64.8%), 06045010100 has a value of 68.4% which is higher and better.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(64.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the US Value (78.2%), 06045010100 has a value of 68.4% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(78.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (80.3%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(80.3%)

Mammogram in Past 2 Years: 50-74 Census Tract: 06045010200

Current Value:

Mammogram in Past 2 Years: 50-74 Census Tract: 06045010200

70.8%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06045010200 has a value of 70.8% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 73.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 71.2%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 7,996 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06045010200 has a value of 70.8% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 75.9% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 73.4%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 72,248 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (64.8%), 06045010200 has a value of 70.8% which is higher and better.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(64.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the US Value (78.2%), 06045010200 has a value of 70.8% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(78.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (80.3%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(80.3%)

Mammogram in Past 2 Years: 50-74 Census Tract: 06045010300

Current Value:

Mammogram in Past 2 Years: 50-74 Census Tract: 06045010300

70.4%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06045010300 has a value of 70.4% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 73.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 71.2%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 7,996 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06045010300 has a value of 70.4% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 75.9% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 73.4%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 72,248 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (64.8%), 06045010300 has a value of 70.4% which is higher and better.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(64.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the US Value (78.2%), 06045010300 has a value of 70.4% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(78.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (80.3%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(80.3%)

Mammogram in Past 2 Years: 50-74 Census Tract: 06045010400

Current Value:

Mammogram in Past 2 Years: 50-74 Census Tract: 06045010400

70.1%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06045010400 has a value of 70.1% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 73.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 71.2%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 7,996 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06045010400 has a value of 70.1% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 75.9% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 73.4%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 72,248 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (64.8%), 06045010400 has a value of 70.1% which is higher and better.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(64.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the US Value (78.2%), 06045010400 has a value of 70.1% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(78.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (80.3%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(80.3%)

Mammogram in Past 2 Years: 50-74 Census Tract: 06045010500

Current Value:

Mammogram in Past 2 Years: 50-74 Census Tract: 06045010500

69.6%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06045010500 has a value of 69.6% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 73.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 71.2%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 7,996 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06045010500 has a value of 69.6% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 75.9% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 73.4%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 72,248 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (64.8%), 06045010500 has a value of 69.6% which is higher and better.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(64.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the US Value (78.2%), 06045010500 has a value of 69.6% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(78.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (80.3%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(80.3%)

Mammogram in Past 2 Years: 50-74 Census Tract: 06045010600

Current Value:

Mammogram in Past 2 Years: 50-74 Census Tract: 06045010600

70.3%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06045010600 has a value of 70.3% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 73.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 71.2%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 7,996 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06045010600 has a value of 70.3% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 75.9% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 73.4%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 72,248 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (64.8%), 06045010600 has a value of 70.3% which is higher and better.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(64.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the US Value (78.2%), 06045010600 has a value of 70.3% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(78.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (80.3%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(80.3%)

Mammogram in Past 2 Years: 50-74 Census Tract: 06045010700

Current Value:

Mammogram in Past 2 Years: 50-74 Census Tract: 06045010700

69.3%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06045010700 has a value of 69.3% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 73.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 71.2%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 7,996 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06045010700 has a value of 69.3% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 75.9% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 73.4%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 72,248 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (64.8%), 06045010700 has a value of 69.3% which is higher and better.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(64.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the US Value (78.2%), 06045010700 has a value of 69.3% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(78.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (80.3%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(80.3%)

Mammogram in Past 2 Years: 50-74 Census Tract: 06045010801

Current Value:

Mammogram in Past 2 Years: 50-74 Census Tract: 06045010801

70.4%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06045010801 has a value of 70.4% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 73.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 71.2%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 7,996 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06045010801 has a value of 70.4% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 75.9% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 73.4%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 72,248 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (64.8%), 06045010801 has a value of 70.4% which is higher and better.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(64.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the US Value (78.2%), 06045010801 has a value of 70.4% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(78.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (80.3%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(80.3%)

Mammogram in Past 2 Years: 50-74 Census Tract: 06045010802

Current Value:

Mammogram in Past 2 Years: 50-74 Census Tract: 06045010802

72.0%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06045010802 has a value of 72.0% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 73.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 71.2%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 7,996 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06045010802 has a value of 72.0% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 75.9% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 73.4%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 72,248 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (64.8%), 06045010802 has a value of 72.0% which is higher and better.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(64.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the US Value (78.2%), 06045010802 has a value of 72.0% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(78.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (80.3%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(80.3%)

Mammogram in Past 2 Years: 50-74 Census Tract: 06045010900

Current Value:

Mammogram in Past 2 Years: 50-74 Census Tract: 06045010900

69.7%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06045010900 has a value of 69.7% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 73.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 71.2%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 7,996 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06045010900 has a value of 69.7% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 75.9% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 73.4%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 72,248 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (64.8%), 06045010900 has a value of 69.7% which is higher and better.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(64.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the US Value (78.2%), 06045010900 has a value of 69.7% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(78.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (80.3%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(80.3%)

Mammogram in Past 2 Years: 50-74 Census Tract: 06045011001

Current Value:

Mammogram in Past 2 Years: 50-74 Census Tract: 06045011001

72.2%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06045011001 has a value of 72.2% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 73.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 71.2%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 7,996 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06045011001 has a value of 72.2% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 75.9% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 73.4%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 72,248 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (64.8%), 06045011001 has a value of 72.2% which is higher and better.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(64.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the US Value (78.2%), 06045011001 has a value of 72.2% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(78.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (80.3%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(80.3%)

Mammogram in Past 2 Years: 50-74 Census Tract: 06045011002

Current Value:

Mammogram in Past 2 Years: 50-74 Census Tract: 06045011002

72.0%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06045011002 has a value of 72.0% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 73.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 71.2%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 7,996 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06045011002 has a value of 72.0% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 75.9% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 73.4%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 72,248 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (64.8%), 06045011002 has a value of 72.0% which is higher and better.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(64.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the US Value (78.2%), 06045011002 has a value of 72.0% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(78.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (80.3%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(80.3%)

Mammogram in Past 2 Years: 50-74 Census Tract: 06045011102

Current Value:

Mammogram in Past 2 Years: 50-74 Census Tract: 06045011102

71.0%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06045011102 has a value of 71.0% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 73.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 71.2%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 7,996 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06045011102 has a value of 71.0% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 75.9% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 73.4%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 72,248 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (64.8%), 06045011102 has a value of 71.0% which is higher and better.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(64.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the US Value (78.2%), 06045011102 has a value of 71.0% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(78.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (80.3%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(80.3%)

Mammogram in Past 2 Years: 50-74 Census Tract: 06045011200

Current Value:

Mammogram in Past 2 Years: 50-74 Census Tract: 06045011200

71.2%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06045011200 has a value of 71.2% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 73.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 71.2%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 7,996 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06045011200 has a value of 71.2% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 75.9% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 73.4%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 72,248 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (64.8%), 06045011200 has a value of 71.2% which is higher and better.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(64.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the US Value (78.2%), 06045011200 has a value of 71.2% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(78.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (80.3%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(80.3%)

Mammogram in Past 2 Years: 50-74 Census Tract: 06045011300

Current Value:

Mammogram in Past 2 Years: 50-74 Census Tract: 06045011300

69.4%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06045011300 has a value of 69.4% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 73.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 71.2%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 7,996 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06045011300 has a value of 69.4% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 75.9% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 73.4%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 72,248 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (64.8%), 06045011300 has a value of 69.4% which is higher and better.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(64.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the US Value (78.2%), 06045011300 has a value of 69.4% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(78.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (80.3%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(80.3%)

Mammogram in Past 2 Years: 50-74 Census Tract: 06045011400

Current Value:

Mammogram in Past 2 Years: 50-74 Census Tract: 06045011400

71.7%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06045011400 has a value of 71.7% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 73.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 71.2%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 7,996 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06045011400 has a value of 71.7% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 75.9% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 73.4%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 72,248 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (64.8%), 06045011400 has a value of 71.7% which is higher and better.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(64.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the US Value (78.2%), 06045011400 has a value of 71.7% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(78.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (80.3%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(80.3%)

Mammogram in Past 2 Years: 50-74 Census Tract: 06045011500

Current Value:

Mammogram in Past 2 Years: 50-74 Census Tract: 06045011500

69.4%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06045011500 has a value of 69.4% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 73.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 71.2%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 7,996 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06045011500 has a value of 69.4% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 75.9% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 73.4%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 72,248 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (64.8%), 06045011500 has a value of 69.4% which is higher and better.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(64.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the US Value (78.2%), 06045011500 has a value of 69.4% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(78.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (80.3%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(80.3%)

Mammogram in Past 2 Years: 50-74 Census Tract: 06045011600

Current Value:

Mammogram in Past 2 Years: 50-74 Census Tract: 06045011600

69.4%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06045011600 has a value of 69.4% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 73.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 71.2%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 7,996 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06045011600 has a value of 69.4% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 75.9% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 73.4%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 72,248 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (64.8%), 06045011600 has a value of 69.4% which is higher and better.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(64.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the US Value (78.2%), 06045011600 has a value of 69.4% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(78.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (80.3%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(80.3%)

Mammogram in Past 2 Years: 50-74 Census Tract: 06045011700

Current Value:

Mammogram in Past 2 Years: 50-74 Census Tract: 06045011700

71.7%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06045011700 has a value of 71.7% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 73.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 71.2%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 7,996 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06045011700 has a value of 71.7% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 75.9% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 73.4%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 72,248 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (64.8%), 06045011700 has a value of 71.7% which is higher and better.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(64.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the US Value (78.2%), 06045011700 has a value of 71.7% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(78.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (80.3%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(80.3%)

Mammogram in Past 2 Years: 50-74 Census Tract: 06045011800

Current Value:

Mammogram in Past 2 Years: 50-74 Census Tract: 06045011800

69.9%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06045011800 has a value of 69.9% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 73.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 71.2%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 7,996 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06045011800 has a value of 69.9% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 75.9% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 73.4%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 72,248 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (64.8%), 06045011800 has a value of 69.9% which is higher and better.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(64.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the US Value (78.2%), 06045011800 has a value of 69.9% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(78.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (80.3%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(80.3%)

Health / Cancer

Mammography Screening: Medicare Population

Value
Compared to:

Health / Cancer

Mammography Screening: Medicare Population

Value
Compared to:

Mammography Screening: Medicare Population County: Mendocino

Current Value:

Mammography Screening: Medicare Population County: Mendocino

37.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Mendocino has a value of 37.0% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 41.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 38.0%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Mendocino has a value of 37.0% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 45.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 40.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,123 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the CA Value (41.0%), Mendocino has a value of 37.0% which is lower and worse.
CA Value
(41.0%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (47.0%), Mendocino has a value of 37.0% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(47.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Mendocino (37.0%) is greater and better than the previously measured value (36.0%).
Prior Value
(36.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Mendocino value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Health / Cancer

Oral Cavity and Pharynx Cancer Incidence Rate

Value
Compared to:

Health / Cancer

Oral Cavity and Pharynx Cancer Incidence Rate

Value
Compared to:

Oral Cavity and Pharynx Cancer Incidence Rate County: Mendocino

Current Value:

Oral Cavity and Pharynx Cancer Incidence Rate County: Mendocino

11.9
Cases per 100,000 population
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Mendocino has a value of 11.9 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.4 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 13.0.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 54 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Mendocino has a value of 11.9 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 13.1 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 15.1.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 1,706 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the CA Value (10.1), Mendocino has a value of 11.9 which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(10.1)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (11.9), Mendocino has a value of 11.9.
US Value
(11.9)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Mendocino (11.9) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (10.5).
Prior Value
(10.5)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Mendocino value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Health / Cancer

Prostate Cancer Incidence Rate

Value
Compared to:

Health / Cancer

Prostate Cancer Incidence Rate

Value
Compared to:

Prostate Cancer Incidence Rate County: Mendocino

Current Value:

Prostate Cancer Incidence Rate County: Mendocino

88.1
Cases per 100,000 males
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Mendocino has a value of 88.1 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 93.3 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 102.0.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 57 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Mendocino has a value of 88.1 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 107.9 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 125.6.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,500 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the CA Value (95.4), Mendocino has a value of 88.1 which is lower and better.
CA Value
(95.4)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (110.5), Mendocino has a value of 88.1 which is lower and better.
US Value
(110.5)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Mendocino (88.1) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (87.8).
Prior Value
(87.8)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Mendocino value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Health / Diabetes

Health / Diabetes

Health / Diabetes

Adults with Diabetes

Value
Compared to:

Health / Diabetes

Adults with Diabetes

Value
Compared to:

Adults with Diabetes County: Mendocino

Current Value:

Adults with Diabetes County: Mendocino

8.2%
(2021-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Mendocino has a value of 8.2% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 8.9% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 11.9%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to the CA Value (10.7%), Mendocino has a value of 8.2% which is lower and better.
CA Value
(10.7%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (11.5%), Mendocino has a value of 8.2% which is lower and better.
US Value
(11.5% in 2022)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System
Compared to the prior value, Mendocino (8.2%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (9.8%).
Prior Value
(9.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Mendocino value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Adults with Diabetes Zip Code: 95410

Current Value:

Adults with Diabetes Zip Code: 95410

5.9%
(2019-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (9.7%), 95410 has a value of 5.9% which is lower and better.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(9.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the prior value, 95410 (5.9%) is less and better than the previously measured value (11.3%).
Prior Value
(11.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

Adults with Diabetes Zip Code: 95415

Current Value:

Adults with Diabetes Zip Code: 95415

12.2%
(2019-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (9.7%), 95415 has a value of 12.2% which is higher and worse.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(9.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the prior value, 95415 (12.2%) is less and better than the previously measured value (14.4%).
Prior Value
(14.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

Adults with Diabetes Zip Code: 95427

Current Value:

Adults with Diabetes Zip Code: 95427

11.9%
(2019-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (9.7%), 95427 has a value of 11.9% which is higher and worse.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(9.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the prior value, 95427 (11.9%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (9.5%).
Prior Value
(9.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

Adults with Diabetes Zip Code: 95428

Current Value:

Adults with Diabetes Zip Code: 95428

10.7%
(2019-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (9.7%), 95428 has a value of 10.7% which is higher and worse.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(9.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the prior value, 95428 (10.7%) is less and better than the previously measured value (14.5%).
Prior Value
(14.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

Adults with Diabetes Zip Code: 95432

Current Value:

Adults with Diabetes Zip Code: 95432

5.9%
(2019-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (9.7%), 95432 has a value of 5.9% which is lower and better.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(9.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the prior value, 95432 (5.9%) is less and better than the previously measured value (6.9%).
Prior Value
(6.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

Adults with Diabetes Zip Code: 95437

Current Value:

Adults with Diabetes Zip Code: 95437

8.5%
(2019-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (9.7%), 95437 has a value of 8.5% which is lower and better.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(9.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the prior value, 95437 (8.5%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (8.6%).
Prior Value
(8.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

Adults with Diabetes Zip Code: 95445

Current Value:

Adults with Diabetes Zip Code: 95445

10.5%
(2019-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (9.7%), 95445 has a value of 10.5% which is higher and worse.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(9.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the prior value, 95445 (10.5%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (9.8%).
Prior Value
(9.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

Adults with Diabetes Zip Code: 95449

Current Value:

Adults with Diabetes Zip Code: 95449

11.0%
(2019-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (9.7%), 95449 has a value of 11.0% which is higher and worse.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(9.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the prior value, 95449 (11.0%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (6.4%).
Prior Value
(6.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

Adults with Diabetes Zip Code: 95454

Current Value:

Adults with Diabetes Zip Code: 95454

7.0%
(2019-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (9.7%), 95454 has a value of 7.0% which is lower and better.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(9.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the prior value, 95454 (7.0%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (6.3%).
Prior Value
(6.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

Adults with Diabetes Zip Code: 95456

Current Value:

Adults with Diabetes Zip Code: 95456

5.9%
(2019-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (9.7%), 95456 has a value of 5.9% which is lower and better.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(9.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the prior value, 95456 (5.9%) is less and better than the previously measured value (6.9%).
Prior Value
(6.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

Adults with Diabetes Zip Code: 95460

Current Value:

Adults with Diabetes Zip Code: 95460

7.7%
(2019-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (9.7%), 95460 has a value of 7.7% which is lower and better.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(9.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the prior value, 95460 (7.7%) is less and better than the previously measured value (8.7%).
Prior Value
(8.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

Adults with Diabetes Zip Code: 95463

Current Value:

Adults with Diabetes Zip Code: 95463

11.9%
(2019-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (9.7%), 95463 has a value of 11.9% which is higher and worse.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(9.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the prior value, 95463 (11.9%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (9.5%).
Prior Value
(9.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

Adults with Diabetes Zip Code: 95466

Current Value:

Adults with Diabetes Zip Code: 95466

11.9%
(2019-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (9.7%), 95466 has a value of 11.9% which is higher and worse.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(9.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the prior value, 95466 (11.9%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (9.5%).
Prior Value
(9.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

Adults with Diabetes Zip Code: 95468

Current Value:

Adults with Diabetes Zip Code: 95468

9.7%
(2019-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (9.7%), 95468 has a value of 9.7%.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(9.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the prior value, 95468 (9.7%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (9.1%).
Prior Value
(9.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

Adults with Diabetes Zip Code: 95469

Current Value:

Adults with Diabetes Zip Code: 95469

8.8%
(2019-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (9.7%), 95469 has a value of 8.8% which is lower and better.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(9.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the prior value, 95469 (8.8%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (8.6%).
Prior Value
(8.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

Adults with Diabetes Zip Code: 95470

Current Value:

Adults with Diabetes Zip Code: 95470

12.9%
(2019-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (9.7%), 95470 has a value of 12.9% which is higher and worse.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(9.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the prior value, 95470 (12.9%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (13.1%).
Prior Value
(13.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

Adults with Diabetes Zip Code: 95482

Current Value:

Adults with Diabetes Zip Code: 95482

10.1%
(2019-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (9.7%), 95482 has a value of 10.1% which is higher and worse.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(9.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the prior value, 95482 (10.1%) is less and better than the previously measured value (12.6%).
Prior Value
(12.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the 95482 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.