Advanced Search: Build a Custom Dashboard
In the fields below, search for indicators by location, topics, population, classification, subgroup, or comparison. No fields are required, but we suggest selecting a location or two to start. In the additional search options section, select options to group and order search results. To learn more about how to customize a dashboard, see our help center.
Visit the Indicator List Page to see the full list of indicators and locations available on the site.
Search Results:
Indicator Gauge Icon Legend
Legend Colors
Red is bad, green is good, blue is not statistically different/neutral.
Compared to Distribution
the value is in the best half of communities.
the value is in the 2nd worst quarter of communities.
the value is in the worst quarter of communities.
Compared to Target
meets target; 
does not meet target.
Compared to a Single Value
lower than the comparison value;
higher than the comparison value;
not statistically different from comparison value.
Trend
non-significant change over time; 
significant change over time; 
no change over time.
Compared to Prior Value
higher than the previous measurement period;
lower than the previous measurement period;
no statistically different change from previous measurement period.
Health / Disabilities
Children with a Disability Census Tract: 06045010601
Children with a Disability Census Tract: 06045010601
0.3%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Mendocino, CA County Value
(5.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Children with a Disability Census Tract: 06045010602
Children with a Disability Census Tract: 06045010602
9.7%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Mendocino, CA County Value
(5.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Children with a Disability Census Tract: 06045010700
Children with a Disability Census Tract: 06045010700
0.3%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Mendocino, CA County Value
(5.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Children with a Disability Census Tract: 06045010801
Children with a Disability Census Tract: 06045010801
0.7%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Mendocino, CA County Value
(5.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Children with a Disability Census Tract: 06045010802
Children with a Disability Census Tract: 06045010802
4.4%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Mendocino, CA County Value
(5.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Children with a Disability Census Tract: 06045010900
Children with a Disability Census Tract: 06045010900
4.9%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Mendocino, CA County Value
(5.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Children with a Disability Census Tract: 06045011001
Children with a Disability Census Tract: 06045011001
0.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Mendocino, CA County Value
(5.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Children with a Disability Census Tract: 06045011002
Children with a Disability Census Tract: 06045011002
0.0%
(2015-2019)
Compared to:
Mendocino, CA County Value
(5.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Children with a Disability Census Tract: 06045011003
Children with a Disability Census Tract: 06045011003
53.1%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Mendocino, CA County Value
(5.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Children with a Disability Census Tract: 06045011004
Children with a Disability Census Tract: 06045011004
3.7%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Mendocino, CA County Value
(5.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Children with a Disability Census Tract: 06045011102
Children with a Disability Census Tract: 06045011102
0.9%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Mendocino, CA County Value
(5.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Children with a Disability Census Tract: 06045011200
Children with a Disability Census Tract: 06045011200
0.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Mendocino, CA County Value
(5.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Children with a Disability Census Tract: 06045011300
Children with a Disability Census Tract: 06045011300
14.4%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Mendocino, CA County Value
(5.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Children with a Disability Census Tract: 06045011400
Children with a Disability Census Tract: 06045011400
2.8%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Mendocino, CA County Value
(5.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Children with a Disability Census Tract: 06045011500
Children with a Disability Census Tract: 06045011500
5.4%
(2015-2019)
Compared to:
Mendocino, CA County Value
(5.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Children with a Disability Census Tract: 06045011501
Children with a Disability Census Tract: 06045011501
0.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Mendocino, CA County Value
(5.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Children with a Disability Census Tract: 06045011502
Children with a Disability Census Tract: 06045011502
4.9%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Mendocino, CA County Value
(5.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Children with a Disability Census Tract: 06045011600
Children with a Disability Census Tract: 06045011600
7.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Mendocino, CA County Value
(5.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Children with a Disability Census Tract: 06045011700
Children with a Disability Census Tract: 06045011700
2.9%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Mendocino, CA County Value
(5.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Children with a Disability Census Tract: 06045011800
Children with a Disability Census Tract: 06045011800
5.3%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Mendocino, CA County Value
(5.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Disabled Persons with Health Insurance County: Mendocino
Disabled Persons with Health Insurance County: Mendocino
91.1%
(2011-2012)
Compared to:
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 44 California counties and county groups.
CA Value
(83.2%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Prior Value
(91.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty County: Mendocino
Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty County: Mendocino
7.7%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
CA Value
(4.6%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
US Value
(5.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty Census Place: Albion
Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty Census Place: Albion
9.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Mendocino, CA County Value
(7.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
CA Value
(4.6%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
US Value
(5.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty Census Place: Anchor Bay
Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty Census Place: Anchor Bay
0.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Mendocino, CA County Value
(7.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
CA Value
(4.6%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
US Value
(5.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty Census Place: Boonville
Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty Census Place: Boonville
5.8%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Mendocino, CA County Value
(7.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
CA Value
(4.6%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
US Value
(5.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty Census Place: Brooktrails
Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty Census Place: Brooktrails
8.9%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Mendocino, CA County Value
(7.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
CA Value
(4.6%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
US Value
(5.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty Census Place: Calpella
Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty Census Place: Calpella
5.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Mendocino, CA County Value
(7.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
CA Value
(4.6%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
US Value
(5.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty Census Place: Caspar
Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty Census Place: Caspar
0.4%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Mendocino, CA County Value
(7.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
CA Value
(4.6%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
US Value
(5.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty Census Place: Cleone
Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty Census Place: Cleone
1.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Mendocino, CA County Value
(7.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
CA Value
(4.6%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
US Value
(5.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty Census Place: Comptche
Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty Census Place: Comptche
0.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Mendocino, CA County Value
(7.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
CA Value
(4.6%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
US Value
(5.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty Census Place: Covelo
Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty Census Place: Covelo
5.4%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Mendocino, CA County Value
(7.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
CA Value
(4.6%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
US Value
(5.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty Census Place: Fort Bragg
Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty Census Place: Fort Bragg
11.3%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Mendocino, CA County Value
(7.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
CA Value
(4.6%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
US Value
(5.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty Census Place: Hopland
Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty Census Place: Hopland
1.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Mendocino, CA County Value
(7.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
CA Value
(4.6%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
US Value
(5.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty Census Place: Laytonville
Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty Census Place: Laytonville
16.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Mendocino, CA County Value
(7.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
CA Value
(4.6%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
US Value
(5.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty Census Place: Leggett
Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty Census Place: Leggett
28.3%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Mendocino, CA County Value
(7.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
CA Value
(4.6%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
US Value
(5.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty Census Place: Little River
Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty Census Place: Little River
0.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Mendocino, CA County Value
(7.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
CA Value
(4.6%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
US Value
(5.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty Census Place: Manchester
Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty Census Place: Manchester
0.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Mendocino, CA County Value
(7.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
CA Value
(4.6%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
US Value
(5.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty Census Place: Mendocino
Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty Census Place: Mendocino
0.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Mendocino, CA County Value
(7.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
CA Value
(4.6%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
US Value
(5.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty Census Place: Philo
Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty Census Place: Philo
0.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Mendocino, CA County Value
(7.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
CA Value
(4.6%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
US Value
(5.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty Census Place: Point Arena
Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty Census Place: Point Arena
4.4%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Mendocino, CA County Value
(7.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
CA Value
(4.6%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
US Value
(5.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty Census Place: Potter Valley
Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty Census Place: Potter Valley
1.4%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Mendocino, CA County Value
(7.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
CA Value
(4.6%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
US Value
(5.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty Census Place: Redwood Valley
Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty Census Place: Redwood Valley
6.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Mendocino, CA County Value
(7.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
CA Value
(4.6%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
US Value
(5.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty Census Place: Talmage
Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty Census Place: Talmage
8.1%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Mendocino, CA County Value
(7.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
CA Value
(4.6%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
US Value
(5.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty Census Place: Ukiah
Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty Census Place: Ukiah
9.3%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Mendocino, CA County Value
(7.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
CA Value
(4.6%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
US Value
(5.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty Census Place: Willits
Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty Census Place: Willits
8.7%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Mendocino, CA County Value
(7.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
CA Value
(4.6%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
US Value
(5.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty Zip Code: 95410
Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty Zip Code: 95410
8.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Mendocino, CA County Value
(7.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty Zip Code: 95415
Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty Zip Code: 95415
6.4%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Mendocino, CA County Value
(7.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty Zip Code: 95417
Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty Zip Code: 95417
0.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Mendocino, CA County Value
(7.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty Zip Code: 95420
Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty Zip Code: 95420
0.4%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Mendocino, CA County Value
(7.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty Zip Code: 95427
Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty Zip Code: 95427
2.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Mendocino, CA County Value
(7.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty Zip Code: 95428
Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty Zip Code: 95428
5.6%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Mendocino, CA County Value
(7.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty Zip Code: 95429
Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty Zip Code: 95429
0.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Mendocino, CA County Value
(7.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty Zip Code: 95432
Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty Zip Code: 95432
6.4%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Mendocino, CA County Value
(7.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty Zip Code: 95437
Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty Zip Code: 95437
13.1%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Mendocino, CA County Value
(7.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty Zip Code: 95445
Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty Zip Code: 95445
2.7%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Mendocino, CA County Value
(7.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty Zip Code: 95449
Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty Zip Code: 95449
4.3%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Mendocino, CA County Value
(7.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty Zip Code: 95454
Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty Zip Code: 95454
11.4%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Mendocino, CA County Value
(7.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty Zip Code: 95456
Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty Zip Code: 95456
8.9%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Mendocino, CA County Value
(7.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty Zip Code: 95459
Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty Zip Code: 95459
4.3%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Mendocino, CA County Value
(7.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty Zip Code: 95460
Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty Zip Code: 95460
5.3%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Mendocino, CA County Value
(7.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty Zip Code: 95463
Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty Zip Code: 95463
0.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Mendocino, CA County Value
(7.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty Zip Code: 95466
Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty Zip Code: 95466
6.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Mendocino, CA County Value
(7.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty Zip Code: 95468
Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty Zip Code: 95468
6.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Mendocino, CA County Value
(7.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty Zip Code: 95469
Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty Zip Code: 95469
4.4%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Mendocino, CA County Value
(7.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty Zip Code: 95470
Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty Zip Code: 95470
3.3%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Mendocino, CA County Value
(7.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty Zip Code: 95482
Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty Zip Code: 95482
7.8%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Mendocino, CA County Value
(7.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty Zip Code: 95488
Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty Zip Code: 95488
20.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Mendocino, CA County Value
(7.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty Zip Code: 95490
Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty Zip Code: 95490
7.1%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Mendocino, CA County Value
(7.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty Zip Code: 95494
Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty Zip Code: 95494
0.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Mendocino, CA County Value
(7.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty Zip Code: 95585
Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty Zip Code: 95585
2.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Mendocino, CA County Value
(7.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty Zip Code: 95587
Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty Zip Code: 95587
0.0%
(2017-2021)
Compared to:
Mendocino, CA County Value
(7.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty Census Tract: 06045010100
Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty Census Tract: 06045010100
5.4%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Mendocino, CA County Value
(7.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty Census Tract: 06045010200
Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty Census Tract: 06045010200
9.1%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Mendocino, CA County Value
(7.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty Census Tract: 06045010300
Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty Census Tract: 06045010300
6.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Mendocino, CA County Value
(7.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty Census Tract: 06045010400
Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty Census Tract: 06045010400
11.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Mendocino, CA County Value
(7.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty Census Tract: 06045010500
Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty Census Tract: 06045010500
11.8%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Mendocino, CA County Value
(7.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty Census Tract: 06045010600
Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty Census Tract: 06045010600
4.2%
(2015-2019)
Compared to:
Mendocino, CA County Value
(5.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty Census Tract: 06045010601
Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty Census Tract: 06045010601
2.8%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Mendocino, CA County Value
(7.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty Census Tract: 06045010602
Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty Census Tract: 06045010602
10.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Mendocino, CA County Value
(7.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty Census Tract: 06045010700
Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty Census Tract: 06045010700
7.1%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Mendocino, CA County Value
(7.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty Census Tract: 06045010801
Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty Census Tract: 06045010801
3.4%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Mendocino, CA County Value
(7.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty Census Tract: 06045010802
Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty Census Tract: 06045010802
3.8%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Mendocino, CA County Value
(7.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty Census Tract: 06045010900
Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty Census Tract: 06045010900
7.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Mendocino, CA County Value
(7.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty Census Tract: 06045011001
Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty Census Tract: 06045011001
7.7%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Mendocino, CA County Value
(7.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty Census Tract: 06045011002
Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty Census Tract: 06045011002
2.8%
(2015-2019)
Compared to:
Mendocino, CA County Value
(5.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty Census Tract: 06045011003
Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty Census Tract: 06045011003
24.9%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Mendocino, CA County Value
(7.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty Census Tract: 06045011004
Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty Census Tract: 06045011004
5.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Mendocino, CA County Value
(7.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty Census Tract: 06045011102
Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty Census Tract: 06045011102
4.7%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Mendocino, CA County Value
(7.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty Census Tract: 06045011200
Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty Census Tract: 06045011200
5.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Mendocino, CA County Value
(7.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty Census Tract: 06045011300
Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty Census Tract: 06045011300
7.1%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Mendocino, CA County Value
(7.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty Census Tract: 06045011400
Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty Census Tract: 06045011400
5.7%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Mendocino, CA County Value
(7.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty Census Tract: 06045011500
Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty Census Tract: 06045011500
7.6%
(2015-2019)
Compared to:
Mendocino, CA County Value
(5.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty Census Tract: 06045011501
Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty Census Tract: 06045011501
6.9%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Mendocino, CA County Value
(7.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty Census Tract: 06045011502
Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty Census Tract: 06045011502
7.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Mendocino, CA County Value
(7.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty Census Tract: 06045011600
Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty Census Tract: 06045011600
13.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Mendocino, CA County Value
(7.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty Census Tract: 06045011700
Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty Census Tract: 06045011700
6.1%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Mendocino, CA County Value
(7.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty Census Tract: 06045011800
Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty Census Tract: 06045011800
4.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Mendocino, CA County Value
(7.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons with a Disability County: Mendocino
Persons with a Disability County: Mendocino
18.7%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
CA Value
(11.0%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
US Value
(12.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons with a Disability Census Place: Albion
Persons with a Disability Census Place: Albion
9.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Mendocino, CA County Value
(18.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
CA Value
(11.0%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
US Value
(12.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons with a Disability Census Place: Anchor Bay
Persons with a Disability Census Place: Anchor Bay
3.3%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Mendocino, CA County Value
(18.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
CA Value
(11.0%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
US Value
(12.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons with a Disability Census Place: Boonville
Persons with a Disability Census Place: Boonville
16.1%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Mendocino, CA County Value
(18.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
CA Value
(11.0%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
US Value
(12.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons with a Disability Census Place: Brooktrails
Persons with a Disability Census Place: Brooktrails
15.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Mendocino, CA County Value
(18.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
CA Value
(11.0%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
US Value
(12.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons with a Disability Census Place: Calpella
Persons with a Disability Census Place: Calpella
15.1%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Mendocino, CA County Value
(18.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
CA Value
(11.0%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
US Value
(12.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons with a Disability Census Place: Caspar
Persons with a Disability Census Place: Caspar
0.3%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Mendocino, CA County Value
(18.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
CA Value
(11.0%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
US Value
(12.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons with a Disability Census Place: Cleone
Persons with a Disability Census Place: Cleone
17.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Mendocino, CA County Value
(18.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
CA Value
(11.0%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
US Value
(12.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons with a Disability Census Place: Comptche
Persons with a Disability Census Place: Comptche
11.7%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Mendocino, CA County Value
(18.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
CA Value
(11.0%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
US Value
(12.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons with a Disability Census Place: Covelo
Persons with a Disability Census Place: Covelo
13.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Mendocino, CA County Value
(18.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
CA Value
(11.0%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
US Value
(12.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons with a Disability Census Place: Fort Bragg
Persons with a Disability Census Place: Fort Bragg
20.9%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Mendocino, CA County Value
(18.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
CA Value
(11.0%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
US Value
(12.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons with a Disability Census Place: Hopland
Persons with a Disability Census Place: Hopland
10.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Mendocino, CA County Value
(18.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
CA Value
(11.0%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
US Value
(12.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons with a Disability Census Place: Laytonville
Persons with a Disability Census Place: Laytonville
39.1%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Mendocino, CA County Value
(18.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
CA Value
(11.0%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
US Value
(12.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons with a Disability Census Place: Leggett
Persons with a Disability Census Place: Leggett
52.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Mendocino, CA County Value
(18.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
CA Value
(11.0%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
US Value
(12.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons with a Disability Census Place: Little River
Persons with a Disability Census Place: Little River
14.3%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Mendocino, CA County Value
(18.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
CA Value
(11.0%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
US Value
(12.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons with a Disability Census Place: Manchester
Persons with a Disability Census Place: Manchester
0.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Mendocino, CA County Value
(18.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
CA Value
(11.0%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
US Value
(12.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons with a Disability Census Place: Mendocino
Persons with a Disability Census Place: Mendocino
4.4%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Mendocino, CA County Value
(18.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
CA Value
(11.0%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
US Value
(12.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons with a Disability Census Place: Philo
Persons with a Disability Census Place: Philo
22.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Mendocino, CA County Value
(18.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
CA Value
(11.0%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
US Value
(12.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons with a Disability Census Place: Point Arena
Persons with a Disability Census Place: Point Arena
15.6%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Mendocino, CA County Value
(18.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
CA Value
(11.0%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
US Value
(12.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons with a Disability Census Place: Potter Valley
Persons with a Disability Census Place: Potter Valley
6.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Mendocino, CA County Value
(18.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
CA Value
(11.0%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
US Value
(12.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons with a Disability Census Place: Redwood Valley
Persons with a Disability Census Place: Redwood Valley
28.7%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Mendocino, CA County Value
(18.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
CA Value
(11.0%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
US Value
(12.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons with a Disability Census Place: Talmage
Persons with a Disability Census Place: Talmage
30.4%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Mendocino, CA County Value
(18.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
CA Value
(11.0%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
US Value
(12.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons with a Disability Census Place: Ukiah
Persons with a Disability Census Place: Ukiah
17.6%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Mendocino, CA County Value
(18.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
CA Value
(11.0%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
US Value
(12.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons with a Disability Census Place: Willits
Persons with a Disability Census Place: Willits
23.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Mendocino, CA County Value
(18.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
CA Value
(11.0%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
US Value
(12.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons with a Disability Zip Code: 95410
Persons with a Disability Zip Code: 95410
15.6%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Mendocino, CA County Value
(18.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons with a Disability Zip Code: 95415
Persons with a Disability Zip Code: 95415
13.6%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Mendocino, CA County Value
(18.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons with a Disability Zip Code: 95417
Persons with a Disability Zip Code: 95417
0.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Mendocino, CA County Value
(18.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons with a Disability Zip Code: 95420
Persons with a Disability Zip Code: 95420
2.8%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Mendocino, CA County Value
(18.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons with a Disability Zip Code: 95427
Persons with a Disability Zip Code: 95427
8.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Mendocino, CA County Value
(18.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons with a Disability Zip Code: 95428
Persons with a Disability Zip Code: 95428
15.7%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Mendocino, CA County Value
(18.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons with a Disability Zip Code: 95429
Persons with a Disability Zip Code: 95429
11.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Mendocino, CA County Value
(18.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons with a Disability Zip Code: 95432
Persons with a Disability Zip Code: 95432
11.9%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Mendocino, CA County Value
(18.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons with a Disability Zip Code: 95437
Persons with a Disability Zip Code: 95437
24.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Mendocino, CA County Value
(18.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons with a Disability Zip Code: 95445
Persons with a Disability Zip Code: 95445
9.4%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Mendocino, CA County Value
(18.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons with a Disability Zip Code: 95449
Persons with a Disability Zip Code: 95449
12.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Mendocino, CA County Value
(18.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons with a Disability Zip Code: 95454
Persons with a Disability Zip Code: 95454
28.6%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Mendocino, CA County Value
(18.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons with a Disability Zip Code: 95456
Persons with a Disability Zip Code: 95456
27.6%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Mendocino, CA County Value
(18.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons with a Disability Zip Code: 95459
Persons with a Disability Zip Code: 95459
11.1%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Mendocino, CA County Value
(18.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons with a Disability Zip Code: 95460
Persons with a Disability Zip Code: 95460
12.3%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Mendocino, CA County Value
(18.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons with a Disability Zip Code: 95463
Persons with a Disability Zip Code: 95463
27.3%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Mendocino, CA County Value
(18.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons with a Disability Zip Code: 95466
Persons with a Disability Zip Code: 95466
14.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Mendocino, CA County Value
(18.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons with a Disability Zip Code: 95468
Persons with a Disability Zip Code: 95468
16.9%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Mendocino, CA County Value
(18.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons with a Disability Zip Code: 95469
Persons with a Disability Zip Code: 95469
14.6%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Mendocino, CA County Value
(18.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons with a Disability Zip Code: 95470
Persons with a Disability Zip Code: 95470
14.4%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Mendocino, CA County Value
(18.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons with a Disability Zip Code: 95482
Persons with a Disability Zip Code: 95482
18.9%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Mendocino, CA County Value
(18.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons with a Disability Zip Code: 95488
Persons with a Disability Zip Code: 95488
20.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Mendocino, CA County Value
(18.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons with a Disability Zip Code: 95490
Persons with a Disability Zip Code: 95490
20.3%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Mendocino, CA County Value
(18.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons with a Disability Zip Code: 95494
Persons with a Disability Zip Code: 95494
4.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Mendocino, CA County Value
(18.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons with a Disability Zip Code: 95585
Persons with a Disability Zip Code: 95585
18.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Mendocino, CA County Value
(18.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons with a Disability Zip Code: 95587
Persons with a Disability Zip Code: 95587
100.0%
(2017-2021)
Compared to:
Mendocino, CA County Value
(19.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons with a Disability Census Tract: 06045010100
Persons with a Disability Census Tract: 06045010100
16.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Mendocino, CA County Value
(18.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons with a Disability Census Tract: 06045010200
Persons with a Disability Census Tract: 06045010200
21.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Mendocino, CA County Value
(18.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons with a Disability Census Tract: 06045010300
Persons with a Disability Census Tract: 06045010300
21.9%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Mendocino, CA County Value
(18.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
