Skip to main content

Advanced Search: Build a Custom Dashboard

In the fields below, search for indicators by location, topics, population, classification, subgroup, or comparison. No fields are required, but we suggest selecting a location or two to start. In the additional search options section, select options to group and order search results. To learn more about how to customize a dashboard, see our help center.

Visit the Indicator List Page to see the full list of indicators and locations available on the site.

  • Map View
  • County : Mendocino Census Tracts
  • County : Mendocino Zip Codes
  • All Health Topics
  • All Community Topics
  • All Economy Topics
  • All Education Topics
  • All Environmental Health Topics
Search display options:

Search Results:

Indicator Gauge Icon Legend

Legend Colors

Red is bad, green is good, blue is not statistically different/neutral.

Compared to Distribution

an indicator guage with the arrow in the green the value is in the best half of communities.

an indicator guage with the arrow in the yellow the value is in the 2nd worst quarter of communities.

an indicator guage with the arrow in the red the value is in the worst quarter of communities.

Compared to Target

green circle with white tick inside it meets target; red circle with white cross inside it does not meet target.

Compared to a Single Value

green diamond with downward arrow inside it lower than the comparison value; red diamond with downward arrow inside it higher than the comparison value; blue diamond with downward arrow inside it not statistically different from comparison value.

Trend

green square outline with upward trending arrow inside it green square outline with downward trending arrow inside it non-significant change over time; green square with upward trending arrow inside it green square with downward trending arrow inside it significant change over time; blue square with equals sign no change over time.

Compared to Prior Value

green triangle with upward trending arrow inside it higher than the previous measurement period; green triangle with downward trending arrow inside it lower than the previous measurement period; blue equals sign no statistically different change  from previous measurement period.

More information about the gauges and icons

Health / Diabetes

Health / Diabetes

Health / Diabetes

Adults with Diabetes

Value
Compared to:

Health / Diabetes

Adults with Diabetes

Value
Compared to:

Adults with Diabetes Zip Code: 95490

Current Value:

Adults with Diabetes Zip Code: 95490

9.0%
(2019-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (9.7%), 95490 has a value of 9.0% which is lower and better.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(9.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the prior value, 95490 (9.0%) is less and better than the previously measured value (10.9%).
Prior Value
(10.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

Adults with Diabetes Census Tract: 06045010100

Current Value:

Adults with Diabetes Census Tract: 06045010100

14.9%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06045010100 has a value of 14.9% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.2% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.3%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 8,005 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06045010100 has a value of 14.9% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.3% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.8%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 68,167 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (11.3%), 06045010100 has a value of 14.9% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(11.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults with Diabetes Census Tract: 06045010200

Current Value:

Adults with Diabetes Census Tract: 06045010200

12.5%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06045010200 has a value of 12.5% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.2% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.3%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 8,005 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06045010200 has a value of 12.5% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.3% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.8%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 68,167 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (11.3%), 06045010200 has a value of 12.5% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(11.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults with Diabetes Census Tract: 06045010300

Current Value:

Adults with Diabetes Census Tract: 06045010300

11.6%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06045010300 has a value of 11.6% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.2% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.3%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 8,005 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06045010300 has a value of 11.6% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.3% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.8%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 68,167 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (11.3%), 06045010300 has a value of 11.6% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(11.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults with Diabetes Census Tract: 06045010400

Current Value:

Adults with Diabetes Census Tract: 06045010400

11.2%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06045010400 has a value of 11.2% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.2% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.3%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 8,005 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06045010400 has a value of 11.2% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.3% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.8%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 68,167 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (11.3%), 06045010400 has a value of 11.2% which is lower and better.
US Value
(11.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults with Diabetes Census Tract: 06045010500

Current Value:

Adults with Diabetes Census Tract: 06045010500

12.3%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06045010500 has a value of 12.3% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.2% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.3%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 8,005 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06045010500 has a value of 12.3% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.3% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.8%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 68,167 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (11.3%), 06045010500 has a value of 12.3% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(11.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults with Diabetes Census Tract: 06045010600

Current Value:

Adults with Diabetes Census Tract: 06045010600

11.3%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06045010600 has a value of 11.3% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.2% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.3%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 8,005 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06045010600 has a value of 11.3% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.3% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.8%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 68,167 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (11.3%), 06045010600 has a value of 11.3%.
US Value
(11.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults with Diabetes Census Tract: 06045010700

Current Value:

Adults with Diabetes Census Tract: 06045010700

12.0%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06045010700 has a value of 12.0% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.2% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.3%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 8,005 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06045010700 has a value of 12.0% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.3% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.8%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 68,167 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (11.3%), 06045010700 has a value of 12.0% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(11.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults with Diabetes Census Tract: 06045010801

Current Value:

Adults with Diabetes Census Tract: 06045010801

10.4%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06045010801 has a value of 10.4% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.2% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.3%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 8,005 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06045010801 has a value of 10.4% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.3% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.8%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 68,167 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (11.3%), 06045010801 has a value of 10.4% which is lower and better.
US Value
(11.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults with Diabetes Census Tract: 06045010802

Current Value:

Adults with Diabetes Census Tract: 06045010802

10.1%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06045010802 has a value of 10.1% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.2% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.3%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 8,005 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06045010802 has a value of 10.1% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.3% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.8%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 68,167 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (11.3%), 06045010802 has a value of 10.1% which is lower and better.
US Value
(11.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults with Diabetes Census Tract: 06045010900

Current Value:

Adults with Diabetes Census Tract: 06045010900

11.5%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06045010900 has a value of 11.5% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.2% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.3%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 8,005 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06045010900 has a value of 11.5% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.3% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.8%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 68,167 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (11.3%), 06045010900 has a value of 11.5% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(11.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults with Diabetes Census Tract: 06045011001

Current Value:

Adults with Diabetes Census Tract: 06045011001

12.3%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06045011001 has a value of 12.3% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.2% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.3%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 8,005 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06045011001 has a value of 12.3% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.3% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.8%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 68,167 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (11.3%), 06045011001 has a value of 12.3% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(11.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults with Diabetes Census Tract: 06045011002

Current Value:

Adults with Diabetes Census Tract: 06045011002

10.8%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06045011002 has a value of 10.8% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.2% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.3%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 8,005 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06045011002 has a value of 10.8% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.3% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.8%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 68,167 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (11.3%), 06045011002 has a value of 10.8% which is lower and better.
US Value
(11.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults with Diabetes Census Tract: 06045011102

Current Value:

Adults with Diabetes Census Tract: 06045011102

11.3%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06045011102 has a value of 11.3% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.2% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.3%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 8,005 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06045011102 has a value of 11.3% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.3% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.8%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 68,167 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (11.3%), 06045011102 has a value of 11.3%.
US Value
(11.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults with Diabetes Census Tract: 06045011200

Current Value:

Adults with Diabetes Census Tract: 06045011200

12.6%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06045011200 has a value of 12.6% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.2% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.3%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 8,005 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06045011200 has a value of 12.6% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.3% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.8%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 68,167 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (11.3%), 06045011200 has a value of 12.6% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(11.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults with Diabetes Census Tract: 06045011300

Current Value:

Adults with Diabetes Census Tract: 06045011300

11.0%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06045011300 has a value of 11.0% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.2% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.3%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 8,005 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06045011300 has a value of 11.0% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.3% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.8%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 68,167 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (11.3%), 06045011300 has a value of 11.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(11.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults with Diabetes Census Tract: 06045011400

Current Value:

Adults with Diabetes Census Tract: 06045011400

9.6%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06045011400 has a value of 9.6% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.2% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.3%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 8,005 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06045011400 has a value of 9.6% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.3% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.8%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 68,167 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (11.3%), 06045011400 has a value of 9.6% which is lower and better.
US Value
(11.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults with Diabetes Census Tract: 06045011500

Current Value:

Adults with Diabetes Census Tract: 06045011500

10.4%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06045011500 has a value of 10.4% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.2% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.3%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 8,005 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06045011500 has a value of 10.4% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.3% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.8%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 68,167 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (11.3%), 06045011500 has a value of 10.4% which is lower and better.
US Value
(11.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults with Diabetes Census Tract: 06045011600

Current Value:

Adults with Diabetes Census Tract: 06045011600

11.2%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06045011600 has a value of 11.2% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.2% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.3%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 8,005 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06045011600 has a value of 11.2% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.3% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.8%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 68,167 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (11.3%), 06045011600 has a value of 11.2% which is lower and better.
US Value
(11.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults with Diabetes Census Tract: 06045011700

Current Value:

Adults with Diabetes Census Tract: 06045011700

10.8%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06045011700 has a value of 10.8% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.2% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.3%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 8,005 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06045011700 has a value of 10.8% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.3% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.8%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 68,167 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (11.3%), 06045011700 has a value of 10.8% which is lower and better.
US Value
(11.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults with Diabetes Census Tract: 06045011800

Current Value:

Adults with Diabetes Census Tract: 06045011800

12.6%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06045011800 has a value of 12.6% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.2% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.3%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 8,005 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06045011800 has a value of 12.6% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.3% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.8%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 68,167 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (11.3%), 06045011800 has a value of 12.6% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(11.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Health / Diabetes

Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Diabetes

Value
Compared to:

Health / Diabetes

Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Diabetes

Value
Compared to:

Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Diabetes County: Mendocino

Current Value:

Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Diabetes County: Mendocino

20.1
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2019-2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Mendocino has a value of 20.1 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 21.1 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 27.8.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 57 California counties.
Compared to the CA Value (23.1), Mendocino has a value of 20.1 which is lower and better.
CA Value
(23.1)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (24.8), Mendocino has a value of 20.1 which is lower and better.
US Value
(24.8 in 2020)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Compared to the prior value, Mendocino (20.1) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (19.4).
Prior Value
(19.4)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Mendocino value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Health / Diabetes

Diabetes: Medicare Population

Value
Compared to:

Health / Diabetes

Diabetes: Medicare Population

Value
Compared to:

Diabetes: Medicare Population County: Mendocino

Current Value:

Diabetes: Medicare Population County: Mendocino

16.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Mendocino has a value of 16.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 20.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 25.3%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Mendocino has a value of 16.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 25.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 28.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the CA Value (21.0%), Mendocino has a value of 16.0% which is lower and better.
CA Value
(21.0%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (24.0%), Mendocino has a value of 16.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(24.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Mendocino (16.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (16.0%).
Prior Value
(16.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Mendocino value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Health / Disabilities

Health / Disabilities

Health / Disabilities

Adults with Disability

Value
Compared to:

Health / Disabilities

Adults with Disability

Value
Compared to:

Adults with Disability County: Mendocino

Current Value:

Adults with Disability County: Mendocino

28.9%
(2016)
Compared to:
Compared to the CA Value (29.7%), Mendocino has a value of 28.9%.
CA Value
(29.7%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (20.6%), Mendocino has a value of 28.9%.
US Value
(20.6% in 2015)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System
Compared to the prior value, Mendocino (28.9%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (41.7%).
Prior Value
(41.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Mendocino value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Health / Disabilities

Adults with Disability Living in Poverty

Value
Compared to:

Health / Disabilities

Adults with Disability Living in Poverty

Value
Compared to:

Adults with Disability Living in Poverty County: Mendocino

Current Value:

Adults with Disability Living in Poverty County: Mendocino

26.4%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Mendocino has a value of 26.4% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 22.6% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 28.1%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Mendocino has a value of 26.4% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 26.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 32.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,132 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the CA Value (22.7%), Mendocino has a value of 26.4% which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(22.7%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (24.9%), Mendocino has a value of 26.4% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(24.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Mendocino value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Adults with Disability Living in Poverty Census Place: Albion

Current Value:

Adults with Disability Living in Poverty Census Place: Albion

18.8%
(2014-2018)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Albion has a value of 18.8% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 20.8% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 32.5%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,348 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Albion has a value of 18.8% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 23.1% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 37.5%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,465 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (28.4%), Albion has a value of 18.8% which is lower and better.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(28.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the CA Value (24.9%), Albion has a value of 18.8% which is lower and better.
CA Value
(24.9%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (26.7%), Albion has a value of 18.8% which is lower and better.
US Value
(26.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults with Disability Living in Poverty Census Place: Anchor Bay

Current Value:

Adults with Disability Living in Poverty Census Place: Anchor Bay

0.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Anchor Bay has a value of 0.0% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 18.2% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 30.0%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,327 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Anchor Bay has a value of 0.0% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 20.9% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 36.4%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,025 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (26.4%), Anchor Bay has a value of 0.0% which is lower and better.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(26.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the CA Value (22.7%), Anchor Bay has a value of 0.0% which is lower and better.
CA Value
(22.7%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (24.9%), Anchor Bay has a value of 0.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(24.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Anchor Bay value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Adults with Disability Living in Poverty Census Place: Boonville

Current Value:

Adults with Disability Living in Poverty Census Place: Boonville

16.7%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Boonville has a value of 16.7% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 18.2% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 30.0%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,327 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Boonville has a value of 16.7% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 20.9% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 36.4%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,025 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (26.4%), Boonville has a value of 16.7% which is lower and better.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(26.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the CA Value (22.7%), Boonville has a value of 16.7% which is lower and better.
CA Value
(22.7%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (24.9%), Boonville has a value of 16.7% which is lower and better.
US Value
(24.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Boonville value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Adults with Disability Living in Poverty Census Place: Brooktrails

Current Value:

Adults with Disability Living in Poverty Census Place: Brooktrails

0.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Brooktrails has a value of 0.0% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 18.2% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 30.0%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,327 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Brooktrails has a value of 0.0% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 20.9% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 36.4%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,025 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (26.4%), Brooktrails has a value of 0.0% which is lower and better.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(26.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the CA Value (22.7%), Brooktrails has a value of 0.0% which is lower and better.
CA Value
(22.7%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (24.9%), Brooktrails has a value of 0.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(24.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Brooktrails value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Adults with Disability Living in Poverty Census Place: Calpella

Current Value:

Adults with Disability Living in Poverty Census Place: Calpella

0.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Calpella has a value of 0.0% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 18.2% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 30.0%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,327 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Calpella has a value of 0.0% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 20.9% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 36.4%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,025 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (26.4%), Calpella has a value of 0.0% which is lower and better.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(26.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the CA Value (22.7%), Calpella has a value of 0.0% which is lower and better.
CA Value
(22.7%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (24.9%), Calpella has a value of 0.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(24.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Calpella value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Adults with Disability Living in Poverty Census Place: Caspar

Current Value:

Adults with Disability Living in Poverty Census Place: Caspar

100.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Caspar has a value of 100.0% which is in the worst 25% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 18.2% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 30.0%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,327 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Caspar has a value of 100.0% which is in the worst 25% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 20.9% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 36.4%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,025 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (26.4%), Caspar has a value of 100.0% which is higher and worse.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(26.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the CA Value (22.7%), Caspar has a value of 100.0% which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(22.7%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (24.9%), Caspar has a value of 100.0% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(24.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Caspar value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Adults with Disability Living in Poverty Census Place: Cleone

Current Value:

Adults with Disability Living in Poverty Census Place: Cleone

0.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Cleone has a value of 0.0% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 18.2% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 30.0%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,327 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Cleone has a value of 0.0% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 20.9% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 36.4%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,025 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (26.4%), Cleone has a value of 0.0% which is lower and better.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(26.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the CA Value (22.7%), Cleone has a value of 0.0% which is lower and better.
CA Value
(22.7%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (24.9%), Cleone has a value of 0.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(24.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Cleone value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Adults with Disability Living in Poverty Census Place: Comptche

Current Value:

Adults with Disability Living in Poverty Census Place: Comptche

0.0%
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Comptche has a value of 0.0% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 18.4% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 30.9%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,345 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Comptche has a value of 0.0% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 21.3% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 36.7%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,162 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (24.8%), Comptche has a value of 0.0% which is lower and better.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(24.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the CA Value (22.9%), Comptche has a value of 0.0% which is lower and better.
CA Value
(22.9%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (25.4%), Comptche has a value of 0.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(25.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Comptche value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Adults with Disability Living in Poverty Census Place: Covelo

Current Value:

Adults with Disability Living in Poverty Census Place: Covelo

36.6%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Covelo has a value of 36.6% which is in the worst 25% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 18.2% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 30.0%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,327 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Covelo has a value of 36.6% which is in the worst 25% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 20.9% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 36.4%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,025 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (26.4%), Covelo has a value of 36.6% which is higher and worse.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(26.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the CA Value (22.7%), Covelo has a value of 36.6% which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(22.7%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (24.9%), Covelo has a value of 36.6% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(24.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Covelo value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Adults with Disability Living in Poverty Census Place: Fort Bragg

Current Value:

Adults with Disability Living in Poverty Census Place: Fort Bragg

54.1%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Fort Bragg has a value of 54.1% which is in the worst 25% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 18.2% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 30.0%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,327 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Fort Bragg has a value of 54.1% which is in the worst 25% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 20.9% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 36.4%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,025 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (26.4%), Fort Bragg has a value of 54.1% which is higher and worse.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(26.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the CA Value (22.7%), Fort Bragg has a value of 54.1% which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(22.7%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (24.9%), Fort Bragg has a value of 54.1% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(24.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Fort Bragg value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Adults with Disability Living in Poverty Census Place: Hopland

Current Value:

Adults with Disability Living in Poverty Census Place: Hopland

7.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Hopland has a value of 7.5% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 18.2% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 30.0%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,327 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Hopland has a value of 7.5% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 20.9% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 36.4%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,025 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (26.4%), Hopland has a value of 7.5% which is lower and better.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(26.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the CA Value (22.7%), Hopland has a value of 7.5% which is lower and better.
CA Value
(22.7%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (24.9%), Hopland has a value of 7.5% which is lower and better.
US Value
(24.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Hopland value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Adults with Disability Living in Poverty Census Place: Laytonville

Current Value:

Adults with Disability Living in Poverty Census Place: Laytonville

1.9%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Laytonville has a value of 1.9% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 18.2% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 30.0%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,327 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Laytonville has a value of 1.9% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 20.9% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 36.4%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,025 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (26.4%), Laytonville has a value of 1.9% which is lower and better.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(26.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the CA Value (22.7%), Laytonville has a value of 1.9% which is lower and better.
CA Value
(22.7%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (24.9%), Laytonville has a value of 1.9% which is lower and better.
US Value
(24.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Laytonville value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Adults with Disability Living in Poverty Census Place: Leggett

Current Value:

Adults with Disability Living in Poverty Census Place: Leggett

18.8%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Leggett has a value of 18.8% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 18.2% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 30.0%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,327 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Leggett has a value of 18.8% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 20.9% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 36.4%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,025 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (26.4%), Leggett has a value of 18.8% which is lower and better.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(26.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the CA Value (22.7%), Leggett has a value of 18.8% which is lower and better.
CA Value
(22.7%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (24.9%), Leggett has a value of 18.8% which is lower and better.
US Value
(24.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Leggett value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Adults with Disability Living in Poverty Census Place: Manchester

Current Value:

Adults with Disability Living in Poverty Census Place: Manchester

100.0%
(2013-2017)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Manchester has a value of 100.0% which is in the worst 25% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 21.8% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.5%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,358 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Manchester has a value of 100.0% which is in the worst 25% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 23.3% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 37.5%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,567 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (30.2%), Manchester has a value of 100.0% which is higher and worse.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(30.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the CA Value (25.5%), Manchester has a value of 100.0% which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(25.5%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (27.1%), Manchester has a value of 100.0% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(27.1%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults with Disability Living in Poverty Census Place: Philo

Current Value:

Adults with Disability Living in Poverty Census Place: Philo

100.0%
(2017-2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Philo has a value of 100.0% which is in the worst 25% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 18.0% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 29.7%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,332 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Philo has a value of 100.0% which is in the worst 25% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 21.0% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 36.3%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,076 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (25.0%), Philo has a value of 100.0% which is higher and worse.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(25.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the CA Value (22.2%), Philo has a value of 100.0% which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(22.2%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (24.9%), Philo has a value of 100.0% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(24.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Philo value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Adults with Disability Living in Poverty Census Place: Point Arena

Current Value:

Adults with Disability Living in Poverty Census Place: Point Arena

37.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Point Arena has a value of 37.0% which is in the worst 25% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 18.2% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 30.0%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,327 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Point Arena has a value of 37.0% which is in the worst 25% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 20.9% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 36.4%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,025 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (26.4%), Point Arena has a value of 37.0% which is higher and worse.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(26.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the CA Value (22.7%), Point Arena has a value of 37.0% which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(22.7%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (24.9%), Point Arena has a value of 37.0% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(24.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Point Arena value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Adults with Disability Living in Poverty Census Place: Potter Valley

Current Value:

Adults with Disability Living in Poverty Census Place: Potter Valley

0.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Potter Valley has a value of 0.0% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 18.2% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 30.0%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,327 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Potter Valley has a value of 0.0% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 20.9% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 36.4%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,025 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (26.4%), Potter Valley has a value of 0.0% which is lower and better.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(26.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the CA Value (22.7%), Potter Valley has a value of 0.0% which is lower and better.
CA Value
(22.7%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (24.9%), Potter Valley has a value of 0.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(24.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Potter Valley value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Adults with Disability Living in Poverty Census Place: Redwood Valley

Current Value:

Adults with Disability Living in Poverty Census Place: Redwood Valley

0.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Redwood Valley has a value of 0.0% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 18.2% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 30.0%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,327 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Redwood Valley has a value of 0.0% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 20.9% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 36.4%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,025 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (26.4%), Redwood Valley has a value of 0.0% which is lower and better.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(26.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the CA Value (22.7%), Redwood Valley has a value of 0.0% which is lower and better.
CA Value
(22.7%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (24.9%), Redwood Valley has a value of 0.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(24.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Redwood Valley value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Adults with Disability Living in Poverty Census Place: Talmage

Current Value:

Adults with Disability Living in Poverty Census Place: Talmage

39.8%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Talmage has a value of 39.8% which is in the worst 25% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 18.2% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 30.0%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,327 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Talmage has a value of 39.8% which is in the worst 25% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 20.9% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 36.4%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,025 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (26.4%), Talmage has a value of 39.8% which is higher and worse.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(26.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the CA Value (22.7%), Talmage has a value of 39.8% which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(22.7%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (24.9%), Talmage has a value of 39.8% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(24.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Talmage value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Adults with Disability Living in Poverty Census Place: Ukiah

Current Value:

Adults with Disability Living in Poverty Census Place: Ukiah

46.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Ukiah has a value of 46.2% which is in the worst 25% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 18.2% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 30.0%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,327 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Ukiah has a value of 46.2% which is in the worst 25% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 20.9% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 36.4%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,025 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (26.4%), Ukiah has a value of 46.2% which is higher and worse.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(26.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the CA Value (22.7%), Ukiah has a value of 46.2% which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(22.7%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (24.9%), Ukiah has a value of 46.2% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(24.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Ukiah value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Adults with Disability Living in Poverty Census Place: Willits

Current Value:

Adults with Disability Living in Poverty Census Place: Willits

47.4%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Willits has a value of 47.4% which is in the worst 25% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 18.2% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 30.0%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,327 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Willits has a value of 47.4% which is in the worst 25% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 20.9% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 36.4%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,025 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (26.4%), Willits has a value of 47.4% which is higher and worse.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(26.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the CA Value (22.7%), Willits has a value of 47.4% which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(22.7%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (24.9%), Willits has a value of 47.4% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(24.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Willits value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Adults with Disability Living in Poverty Zip Code: 95410

Current Value:

Adults with Disability Living in Poverty Zip Code: 95410

69.8%
(2014-2018)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Zip Codes, 95410 has a value of 69.8% which is in the worst 25% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 22.6% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 32.5%.
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,637 California zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 95410 has a value of 69.8% which is in the worst 25% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 22.4% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 34.3%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 31,034 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (28.4%), 95410 has a value of 69.8% which is higher and worse.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(28.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.

Adults with Disability Living in Poverty Zip Code: 95415

Current Value:

Adults with Disability Living in Poverty Zip Code: 95415

39.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Zip Codes, 95415 has a value of 39.0% which is in the worst 25% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 20.2% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 29.8%.
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,625 California zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 95415 has a value of 39.0% which is in the worst 25% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 20.8% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.0%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 30,884 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (26.4%), 95415 has a value of 39.0% which is higher and worse.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(26.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Over time, the 95415 value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Adults with Disability Living in Poverty Zip Code: 95417

Current Value:

Adults with Disability Living in Poverty Zip Code: 95417

0.0%
(2012-2016)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Zip Codes, 95417 has a value of 0.0% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 23.7% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 34.8%.
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,642 California zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 95417 has a value of 0.0% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 23.2% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 34.7%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 31,166 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (34.1%), 95417 has a value of 0.0% which is lower and better.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(34.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.

Adults with Disability Living in Poverty Zip Code: 95420

Current Value:

Adults with Disability Living in Poverty Zip Code: 95420

100.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Zip Codes, 95420 has a value of 100.0% which is in the worst 25% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 20.2% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 29.8%.
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,625 California zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 95420 has a value of 100.0% which is in the worst 25% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 20.8% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.0%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 30,884 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (26.4%), 95420 has a value of 100.0% which is higher and worse.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(26.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Over time, the 95420 value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Adults with Disability Living in Poverty Zip Code: 95427

Current Value:

Adults with Disability Living in Poverty Zip Code: 95427

0.0%
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Zip Codes, 95427 has a value of 0.0% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 20.8% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 30.9%.
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,621 California zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 95427 has a value of 0.0% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 21.2% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.3%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 30,795 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (24.8%), 95427 has a value of 0.0% which is lower and better.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(24.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Over time, the 95427 value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Adults with Disability Living in Poverty Zip Code: 95428

Current Value:

Adults with Disability Living in Poverty Zip Code: 95428

43.3%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Zip Codes, 95428 has a value of 43.3% which is in the worst 25% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 20.2% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 29.8%.
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,625 California zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 95428 has a value of 43.3% which is in the worst 25% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 20.8% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.0%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 30,884 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (26.4%), 95428 has a value of 43.3% which is higher and worse.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(26.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Over time, the 95428 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Adults with Disability Living in Poverty Zip Code: 95429

Current Value:

Adults with Disability Living in Poverty Zip Code: 95429

0.0%
(2014-2018)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Zip Codes, 95429 has a value of 0.0% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 22.6% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 32.5%.
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,637 California zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 95429 has a value of 0.0% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 22.4% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 34.3%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 31,034 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (28.4%), 95429 has a value of 0.0% which is lower and better.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(28.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.

Adults with Disability Living in Poverty Zip Code: 95432

Current Value:

Adults with Disability Living in Poverty Zip Code: 95432

83.3%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Zip Codes, 95432 has a value of 83.3% which is in the worst 25% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 20.2% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 29.8%.
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,625 California zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 95432 has a value of 83.3% which is in the worst 25% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 20.8% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.0%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 30,884 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (26.4%), 95432 has a value of 83.3% which is higher and worse.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(26.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Over time, the 95432 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Adults with Disability Living in Poverty Zip Code: 95437

Current Value:

Adults with Disability Living in Poverty Zip Code: 95437

26.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Zip Codes, 95437 has a value of 26.2% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 20.2% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 29.8%.
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,625 California zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 95437 has a value of 26.2% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 20.8% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.0%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 30,884 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (26.4%), 95437 has a value of 26.2% which is lower and better.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(26.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Over time, the 95437 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Adults with Disability Living in Poverty Zip Code: 95445

Current Value:

Adults with Disability Living in Poverty Zip Code: 95445

45.7%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Zip Codes, 95445 has a value of 45.7% which is in the worst 25% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 20.2% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 29.8%.
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,625 California zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 95445 has a value of 45.7% which is in the worst 25% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 20.8% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.0%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 30,884 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (26.4%), 95445 has a value of 45.7% which is higher and worse.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(26.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Over time, the 95445 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Adults with Disability Living in Poverty Zip Code: 95449

Current Value:

Adults with Disability Living in Poverty Zip Code: 95449

33.3%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Zip Codes, 95449 has a value of 33.3% which is in the worst 25% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 20.2% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 29.8%.
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,625 California zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 95449 has a value of 33.3% which is in the worst 25% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 20.8% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.0%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 30,884 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (26.4%), 95449 has a value of 33.3% which is higher and worse.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(26.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Over time, the 95449 value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Adults with Disability Living in Poverty Zip Code: 95454

Current Value:

Adults with Disability Living in Poverty Zip Code: 95454

5.4%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Zip Codes, 95454 has a value of 5.4% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 20.2% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 29.8%.
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,625 California zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 95454 has a value of 5.4% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 20.8% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.0%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 30,884 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (26.4%), 95454 has a value of 5.4% which is lower and better.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(26.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Over time, the 95454 value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Adults with Disability Living in Poverty Zip Code: 95456

Current Value:

Adults with Disability Living in Poverty Zip Code: 95456

100.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Zip Codes, 95456 has a value of 100.0% which is in the worst 25% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 20.2% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 29.8%.
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,625 California zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 95456 has a value of 100.0% which is in the worst 25% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 20.8% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.0%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 30,884 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (26.4%), 95456 has a value of 100.0% which is higher and worse.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(26.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Over time, the 95456 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Adults with Disability Living in Poverty Zip Code: 95459

Current Value:

Adults with Disability Living in Poverty Zip Code: 95459

25.4%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Zip Codes, 95459 has a value of 25.4% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 20.2% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 29.8%.
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,625 California zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 95459 has a value of 25.4% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 20.8% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.0%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 30,884 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (26.4%), 95459 has a value of 25.4% which is lower and better.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(26.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Over time, the 95459 value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Adults with Disability Living in Poverty Zip Code: 95460

Current Value:

Adults with Disability Living in Poverty Zip Code: 95460

45.9%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Zip Codes, 95460 has a value of 45.9% which is in the worst 25% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 20.2% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 29.8%.
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,625 California zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 95460 has a value of 45.9% which is in the worst 25% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 20.8% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.0%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 30,884 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (26.4%), 95460 has a value of 45.9% which is higher and worse.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(26.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Over time, the 95460 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Adults with Disability Living in Poverty Zip Code: 95463

Current Value:

Adults with Disability Living in Poverty Zip Code: 95463

0.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Zip Codes, 95463 has a value of 0.0% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 20.2% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 29.8%.
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,625 California zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 95463 has a value of 0.0% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 20.8% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.0%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 30,884 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (26.4%), 95463 has a value of 0.0% which is lower and better.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(26.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Over time, the 95463 value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Adults with Disability Living in Poverty Zip Code: 95466

Current Value:

Adults with Disability Living in Poverty Zip Code: 95466

68.1%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Zip Codes, 95466 has a value of 68.1% which is in the worst 25% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 20.2% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 29.8%.
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,625 California zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 95466 has a value of 68.1% which is in the worst 25% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 20.8% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.0%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 30,884 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (26.4%), 95466 has a value of 68.1% which is higher and worse.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(26.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Over time, the 95466 value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Adults with Disability Living in Poverty Zip Code: 95468

Current Value:

Adults with Disability Living in Poverty Zip Code: 95468

19.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Zip Codes, 95468 has a value of 19.2% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 20.2% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 29.8%.
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,625 California zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 95468 has a value of 19.2% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 20.8% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.0%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 30,884 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (26.4%), 95468 has a value of 19.2% which is lower and better.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(26.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Over time, the 95468 value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Adults with Disability Living in Poverty Zip Code: 95469

Current Value:

Adults with Disability Living in Poverty Zip Code: 95469

10.1%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Zip Codes, 95469 has a value of 10.1% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 20.2% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 29.8%.
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,625 California zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 95469 has a value of 10.1% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 20.8% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.0%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 30,884 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (26.4%), 95469 has a value of 10.1% which is lower and better.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(26.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Over time, the 95469 value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Adults with Disability Living in Poverty Zip Code: 95470

Current Value:

Adults with Disability Living in Poverty Zip Code: 95470

7.8%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Zip Codes, 95470 has a value of 7.8% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 20.2% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 29.8%.
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,625 California zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 95470 has a value of 7.8% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 20.8% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.0%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 30,884 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (26.4%), 95470 has a value of 7.8% which is lower and better.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(26.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Over time, the 95470 value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Adults with Disability Living in Poverty Zip Code: 95482

Current Value:

Adults with Disability Living in Poverty Zip Code: 95482

30.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Zip Codes, 95482 has a value of 30.2% which is in the worst 25% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 20.2% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 29.8%.
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,625 California zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 95482 has a value of 30.2% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 20.8% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.0%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 30,884 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (26.4%), 95482 has a value of 30.2% which is higher and worse.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(26.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Over time, the 95482 value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Adults with Disability Living in Poverty Zip Code: 95488

Current Value:

Adults with Disability Living in Poverty Zip Code: 95488

0.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Zip Codes, 95488 has a value of 0.0% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 20.2% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 29.8%.
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,625 California zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 95488 has a value of 0.0% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 20.8% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.0%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 30,884 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (26.4%), 95488 has a value of 0.0% which is lower and better.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(26.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Over time, the 95488 value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Adults with Disability Living in Poverty Zip Code: 95490

Current Value:

Adults with Disability Living in Poverty Zip Code: 95490

23.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Zip Codes, 95490 has a value of 23.5% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 20.2% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 29.8%.
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,625 California zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 95490 has a value of 23.5% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 20.8% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.0%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 30,884 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (26.4%), 95490 has a value of 23.5% which is lower and better.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(26.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Over time, the 95490 value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Adults with Disability Living in Poverty Zip Code: 95494

Current Value:

Adults with Disability Living in Poverty Zip Code: 95494

100.0%
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Zip Codes, 95494 has a value of 100.0% which is in the worst 25% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 20.8% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 30.9%.
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,621 California zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 95494 has a value of 100.0% which is in the worst 25% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 21.2% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.3%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 30,795 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (24.8%), 95494 has a value of 100.0% which is higher and worse.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(24.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Over time, the 95494 value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Adults with Disability Living in Poverty Zip Code: 95585

Current Value:

Adults with Disability Living in Poverty Zip Code: 95585

62.8%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Zip Codes, 95585 has a value of 62.8% which is in the worst 25% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 20.2% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 29.8%.
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,625 California zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 95585 has a value of 62.8% which is in the worst 25% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 20.8% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.0%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 30,884 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (26.4%), 95585 has a value of 62.8% which is higher and worse.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(26.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Over time, the 95585 value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Adults with Disability Living in Poverty Zip Code: 95587

Current Value:

Adults with Disability Living in Poverty Zip Code: 95587

100.0%
(2015-2019)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Zip Codes, 95587 has a value of 100.0% which is in the worst 25% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 21.9% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 31.8%.
CA Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,638 California zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 95587 has a value of 100.0% which is in the worst 25% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 22.0% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.8%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 30,976 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (26.7%), 95587 has a value of 100.0% which is higher and worse.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(26.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Over time, the 95587 value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Adults with Disability Living in Poverty Census Tract: 06045010100

Current Value:

Adults with Disability Living in Poverty Census Tract: 06045010100

43.3%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06045010100 has a value of 43.3% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 18.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 32.0%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 8,997 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06045010100 has a value of 43.3% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 19.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 34.6%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,173 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (26.4%), 06045010100 has a value of 43.3% which is higher and worse.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(26.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Over time, the 06045010100 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Adults with Disability Living in Poverty Census Tract: 06045010200

Current Value:

Adults with Disability Living in Poverty Census Tract: 06045010200

10.4%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06045010200 has a value of 10.4% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 18.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 32.0%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 8,997 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06045010200 has a value of 10.4% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 19.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 34.6%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,173 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (26.4%), 06045010200 has a value of 10.4% which is lower and better.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(26.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Over time, the 06045010200 value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Adults with Disability Living in Poverty Census Tract: 06045010300

Current Value:

Adults with Disability Living in Poverty Census Tract: 06045010300

12.4%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06045010300 has a value of 12.4% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 18.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 32.0%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 8,997 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06045010300 has a value of 12.4% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 19.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 34.6%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,173 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (26.4%), 06045010300 has a value of 12.4% which is lower and better.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(26.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Over time, the 06045010300 value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Adults with Disability Living in Poverty Census Tract: 06045010400

Current Value:

Adults with Disability Living in Poverty Census Tract: 06045010400

48.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06045010400 has a value of 48.0% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 18.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 32.0%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 8,997 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06045010400 has a value of 48.0% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 19.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 34.6%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,173 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (26.4%), 06045010400 has a value of 48.0% which is higher and worse.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(26.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Over time, the 06045010400 value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Adults with Disability Living in Poverty Census Tract: 06045010500

Current Value:

Adults with Disability Living in Poverty Census Tract: 06045010500

53.7%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06045010500 has a value of 53.7% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 18.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 32.0%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 8,997 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06045010500 has a value of 53.7% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 19.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 34.6%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,173 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (26.4%), 06045010500 has a value of 53.7% which is higher and worse.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(26.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Over time, the 06045010500 value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Adults with Disability Living in Poverty Census Tract: 06045010600

Current Value:

Adults with Disability Living in Poverty Census Tract: 06045010600

9.8%
(2015-2019)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06045010600 has a value of 9.8% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 19.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 32.4%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 7,965 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06045010600 has a value of 9.8% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 21.7% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 35.0%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 72,077 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (26.7%), 06045010600 has a value of 9.8% which is lower and better.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(26.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Over time, the 06045010600 value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Adults with Disability Living in Poverty Census Tract: 06045010601

Current Value:

Adults with Disability Living in Poverty Census Tract: 06045010601

24.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06045010601 has a value of 24.5% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 18.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 32.0%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 8,997 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06045010601 has a value of 24.5% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 19.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 34.6%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,173 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (26.4%), 06045010601 has a value of 24.5% which is lower and better.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(26.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.

Adults with Disability Living in Poverty Census Tract: 06045010602

Current Value:

Adults with Disability Living in Poverty Census Tract: 06045010602

0.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06045010602 has a value of 0.0% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 18.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 32.0%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 8,997 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06045010602 has a value of 0.0% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 19.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 34.6%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,173 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (26.4%), 06045010602 has a value of 0.0% which is lower and better.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(26.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.

Adults with Disability Living in Poverty Census Tract: 06045010700

Current Value:

Adults with Disability Living in Poverty Census Tract: 06045010700

38.3%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06045010700 has a value of 38.3% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 18.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 32.0%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 8,997 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06045010700 has a value of 38.3% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 19.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 34.6%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,173 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (26.4%), 06045010700 has a value of 38.3% which is higher and worse.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(26.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Over time, the 06045010700 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Adults with Disability Living in Poverty Census Tract: 06045010801

Current Value:

Adults with Disability Living in Poverty Census Tract: 06045010801

8.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06045010801 has a value of 8.0% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 18.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 32.0%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 8,997 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06045010801 has a value of 8.0% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 19.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 34.6%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,173 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (26.4%), 06045010801 has a value of 8.0% which is lower and better.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(26.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Over time, the 06045010801 value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Adults with Disability Living in Poverty Census Tract: 06045010802

Current Value:

Adults with Disability Living in Poverty Census Tract: 06045010802

4.6%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06045010802 has a value of 4.6% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 18.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 32.0%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 8,997 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06045010802 has a value of 4.6% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 19.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 34.6%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,173 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (26.4%), 06045010802 has a value of 4.6% which is lower and better.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(26.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Over time, the 06045010802 value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Adults with Disability Living in Poverty Census Tract: 06045010900

Current Value:

Adults with Disability Living in Poverty Census Tract: 06045010900

16.3%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06045010900 has a value of 16.3% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 18.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 32.0%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 8,997 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06045010900 has a value of 16.3% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 19.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 34.6%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,173 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (26.4%), 06045010900 has a value of 16.3% which is lower and better.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(26.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Over time, the 06045010900 value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Adults with Disability Living in Poverty Census Tract: 06045011001

Current Value:

Adults with Disability Living in Poverty Census Tract: 06045011001

88.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06045011001 has a value of 88.2% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 18.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 32.0%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 8,997 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06045011001 has a value of 88.2% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 19.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 34.6%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,173 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (26.4%), 06045011001 has a value of 88.2% which is higher and worse.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(26.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Over time, the 06045011001 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Adults with Disability Living in Poverty Census Tract: 06045011002

Current Value:

Adults with Disability Living in Poverty Census Tract: 06045011002

0.0%
(2015-2019)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06045011002 has a value of 0.0% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 19.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 32.4%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 7,965 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06045011002 has a value of 0.0% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 21.7% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 35.0%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 72,077 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (26.7%), 06045011002 has a value of 0.0% which is lower and better.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(26.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Over time, the 06045011002 value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Adults with Disability Living in Poverty Census Tract: 06045011003

Current Value:

Adults with Disability Living in Poverty Census Tract: 06045011003

0.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06045011003 has a value of 0.2% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 18.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 32.0%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 8,997 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06045011003 has a value of 0.2% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 19.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 34.6%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,173 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (26.4%), 06045011003 has a value of 0.2% which is lower and better.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(26.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.

Adults with Disability Living in Poverty Census Tract: 06045011004

Current Value:

Adults with Disability Living in Poverty Census Tract: 06045011004

45.9%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06045011004 has a value of 45.9% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 18.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 32.0%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 8,997 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06045011004 has a value of 45.9% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 19.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 34.6%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,173 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (26.4%), 06045011004 has a value of 45.9% which is higher and worse.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(26.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.

Adults with Disability Living in Poverty Census Tract: 06045011102

Current Value:

Adults with Disability Living in Poverty Census Tract: 06045011102

25.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06045011102 has a value of 25.0% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 18.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 32.0%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 8,997 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06045011102 has a value of 25.0% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 19.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 34.6%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,173 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (26.4%), 06045011102 has a value of 25.0% which is lower and better.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(26.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Over time, the 06045011102 value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Adults with Disability Living in Poverty Census Tract: 06045011200

Current Value:

Adults with Disability Living in Poverty Census Tract: 06045011200

47.1%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06045011200 has a value of 47.1% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 18.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 32.0%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 8,997 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06045011200 has a value of 47.1% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 19.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 34.6%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,173 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (26.4%), 06045011200 has a value of 47.1% which is higher and worse.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(26.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Over time, the 06045011200 value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Adults with Disability Living in Poverty Census Tract: 06045011300

Current Value:

Adults with Disability Living in Poverty Census Tract: 06045011300

12.9%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06045011300 has a value of 12.9% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 18.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 32.0%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 8,997 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06045011300 has a value of 12.9% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 19.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 34.6%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,173 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (26.4%), 06045011300 has a value of 12.9% which is lower and better.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(26.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Over time, the 06045011300 value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Adults with Disability Living in Poverty Census Tract: 06045011400

Current Value:

Adults with Disability Living in Poverty Census Tract: 06045011400

27.7%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06045011400 has a value of 27.7% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 18.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 32.0%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 8,997 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06045011400 has a value of 27.7% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 19.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 34.6%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,173 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (26.4%), 06045011400 has a value of 27.7% which is higher and worse.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(26.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Over time, the 06045011400 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Adults with Disability Living in Poverty Census Tract: 06045011500

Current Value:

Adults with Disability Living in Poverty Census Tract: 06045011500

40.3%
(2015-2019)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06045011500 has a value of 40.3% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 19.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 32.4%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 7,965 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06045011500 has a value of 40.3% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 21.7% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 35.0%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 72,077 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (26.7%), 06045011500 has a value of 40.3% which is higher and worse.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(26.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Over time, the 06045011500 value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Adults with Disability Living in Poverty Census Tract: 06045011501

Current Value:

Adults with Disability Living in Poverty Census Tract: 06045011501

30.6%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06045011501 has a value of 30.6% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 18.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 32.0%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 8,997 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06045011501 has a value of 30.6% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 19.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 34.6%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,173 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (26.4%), 06045011501 has a value of 30.6% which is higher and worse.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(26.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.

Adults with Disability Living in Poverty Census Tract: 06045011502

Current Value:

Adults with Disability Living in Poverty Census Tract: 06045011502

35.4%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06045011502 has a value of 35.4% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 18.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 32.0%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 8,997 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06045011502 has a value of 35.4% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 19.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 34.6%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,173 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (26.4%), 06045011502 has a value of 35.4% which is higher and worse.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(26.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.

Adults with Disability Living in Poverty Census Tract: 06045011600

Current Value:

Adults with Disability Living in Poverty Census Tract: 06045011600

57.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06045011600 has a value of 57.2% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 18.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 32.0%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 8,997 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06045011600 has a value of 57.2% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 19.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 34.6%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,173 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (26.4%), 06045011600 has a value of 57.2% which is higher and worse.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(26.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Over time, the 06045011600 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Adults with Disability Living in Poverty Census Tract: 06045011700

Current Value:

Adults with Disability Living in Poverty Census Tract: 06045011700

40.8%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06045011700 has a value of 40.8% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 18.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 32.0%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 8,997 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06045011700 has a value of 40.8% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 19.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 34.6%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,173 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (26.4%), 06045011700 has a value of 40.8% which is higher and worse.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(26.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Over time, the 06045011700 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Adults with Disability Living in Poverty Census Tract: 06045011800

Current Value:

Adults with Disability Living in Poverty Census Tract: 06045011800

33.3%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Tracts, 06045011800 has a value of 33.3% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 18.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 32.0%.
CA Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 8,997 California census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 06045011800 has a value of 33.3% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 19.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 34.6%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,173 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (26.4%), 06045011800 has a value of 33.3% which is higher and worse.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(26.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Over time, the 06045011800 value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Health / Disabilities

Children with a Disability

Value
Compared to:

Health / Disabilities

Children with a Disability

Value
Compared to:

Children with a Disability County: Mendocino

Current Value:

Children with a Disability County: Mendocino

5.4%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the CA Value (3.7%), Mendocino has a value of 5.4%.
CA Value
(3.7%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (4.5%), Mendocino has a value of 5.4%.
US Value
(4.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Mendocino value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Children with a Disability Census Place: Boonville

Current Value:

Children with a Disability Census Place: Boonville

0.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (5.4%), Boonville has a value of 0.0%.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(5.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the CA Value (3.7%), Boonville has a value of 0.0%.
CA Value
(3.7%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (4.5%), Boonville has a value of 0.0%.
US Value
(4.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Boonville value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Children with a Disability Census Place: Brooktrails

Current Value:

Children with a Disability Census Place: Brooktrails

7.9%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (5.4%), Brooktrails has a value of 7.9%.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(5.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the CA Value (3.7%), Brooktrails has a value of 7.9%.
CA Value
(3.7%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (4.5%), Brooktrails has a value of 7.9%.
US Value
(4.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Brooktrails value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Children with a Disability Census Place: Calpella

Current Value:

Children with a Disability Census Place: Calpella

33.6%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (5.4%), Calpella has a value of 33.6%.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(5.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the CA Value (3.7%), Calpella has a value of 33.6%.
CA Value
(3.7%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (4.5%), Calpella has a value of 33.6%.
US Value
(4.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Calpella value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Children with a Disability Census Place: Caspar

Current Value:

Children with a Disability Census Place: Caspar

0.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (5.4%), Caspar has a value of 0.0%.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(5.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the CA Value (3.7%), Caspar has a value of 0.0%.
CA Value
(3.7%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (4.5%), Caspar has a value of 0.0%.
US Value
(4.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Caspar value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Children with a Disability Census Place: Cleone

Current Value:

Children with a Disability Census Place: Cleone

23.6%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (5.4%), Cleone has a value of 23.6%.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(5.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the CA Value (3.7%), Cleone has a value of 23.6%.
CA Value
(3.7%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (4.5%), Cleone has a value of 23.6%.
US Value
(4.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Cleone value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Children with a Disability Census Place: Comptche

Current Value:

Children with a Disability Census Place: Comptche

0.0%
(2017-2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (5.3%), Comptche has a value of 0.0%.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(5.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the CA Value (3.5%), Comptche has a value of 0.0%.
CA Value
(3.5%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (4.4%), Comptche has a value of 0.0%.
US Value
(4.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Comptche value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Children with a Disability Census Place: Covelo

Current Value:

Children with a Disability Census Place: Covelo

4.1%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (5.4%), Covelo has a value of 4.1%.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(5.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the CA Value (3.7%), Covelo has a value of 4.1%.
CA Value
(3.7%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (4.5%), Covelo has a value of 4.1%.
US Value
(4.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Covelo value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Children with a Disability Census Place: Fort Bragg

Current Value:

Children with a Disability Census Place: Fort Bragg

0.7%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (5.4%), Fort Bragg has a value of 0.7%.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(5.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the CA Value (3.7%), Fort Bragg has a value of 0.7%.
CA Value
(3.7%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (4.5%), Fort Bragg has a value of 0.7%.
US Value
(4.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Fort Bragg value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Children with a Disability Census Place: Hopland

Current Value:

Children with a Disability Census Place: Hopland

0.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (5.4%), Hopland has a value of 0.0%.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(5.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the CA Value (3.7%), Hopland has a value of 0.0%.
CA Value
(3.7%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (4.5%), Hopland has a value of 0.0%.
US Value
(4.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Hopland value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Children with a Disability Census Place: Laytonville

Current Value:

Children with a Disability Census Place: Laytonville

0.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (5.4%), Laytonville has a value of 0.0%.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(5.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the CA Value (3.7%), Laytonville has a value of 0.0%.
CA Value
(3.7%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (4.5%), Laytonville has a value of 0.0%.
US Value
(4.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Laytonville value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Children with a Disability Census Place: Leggett

Current Value:

Children with a Disability Census Place: Leggett

0.0%
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (4.4%), Leggett has a value of 0.0%.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(4.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the CA Value (3.4%), Leggett has a value of 0.0%.
CA Value
(3.4%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (4.3%), Leggett has a value of 0.0%.
US Value
(4.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Leggett value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Children with a Disability Census Place: Little River

Current Value:

Children with a Disability Census Place: Little River

0.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (5.4%), Little River has a value of 0.0%.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(5.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the CA Value (3.7%), Little River has a value of 0.0%.
CA Value
(3.7%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (4.5%), Little River has a value of 0.0%.
US Value
(4.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Little River value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Children with a Disability Census Place: Manchester

Current Value:

Children with a Disability Census Place: Manchester

0.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (5.4%), Manchester has a value of 0.0%.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(5.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the CA Value (3.7%), Manchester has a value of 0.0%.
CA Value
(3.7%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (4.5%), Manchester has a value of 0.0%.
US Value
(4.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Manchester value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Children with a Disability Census Place: Mendocino

Current Value:

Children with a Disability Census Place: Mendocino

0.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (5.4%), Mendocino has a value of 0.0%.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(5.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the CA Value (3.7%), Mendocino has a value of 0.0%.
CA Value
(3.7%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (4.5%), Mendocino has a value of 0.0%.
US Value
(4.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Children with a Disability Census Place: Philo

Current Value:

Children with a Disability Census Place: Philo

0.0%
(2017-2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (5.3%), Philo has a value of 0.0%.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(5.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the CA Value (3.5%), Philo has a value of 0.0%.
CA Value
(3.5%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (4.4%), Philo has a value of 0.0%.
US Value
(4.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Philo value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Children with a Disability Census Place: Point Arena

Current Value:

Children with a Disability Census Place: Point Arena

2.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (5.4%), Point Arena has a value of 2.5%.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(5.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the CA Value (3.7%), Point Arena has a value of 2.5%.
CA Value
(3.7%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (4.5%), Point Arena has a value of 2.5%.
US Value
(4.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Point Arena value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Children with a Disability Census Place: Potter Valley

Current Value:

Children with a Disability Census Place: Potter Valley

0.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (5.4%), Potter Valley has a value of 0.0%.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(5.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the CA Value (3.7%), Potter Valley has a value of 0.0%.
CA Value
(3.7%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (4.5%), Potter Valley has a value of 0.0%.
US Value
(4.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Potter Valley value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Children with a Disability Census Place: Redwood Valley

Current Value:

Children with a Disability Census Place: Redwood Valley

0.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (5.4%), Redwood Valley has a value of 0.0%.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(5.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the CA Value (3.7%), Redwood Valley has a value of 0.0%.
CA Value
(3.7%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (4.5%), Redwood Valley has a value of 0.0%.
US Value
(4.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Redwood Valley value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Children with a Disability Census Place: Talmage

Current Value:

Children with a Disability Census Place: Talmage

5.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (5.4%), Talmage has a value of 5.2%.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(5.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the CA Value (3.7%), Talmage has a value of 5.2%.
CA Value
(3.7%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (4.5%), Talmage has a value of 5.2%.
US Value
(4.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Talmage value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Children with a Disability Census Place: Ukiah

Current Value:

Children with a Disability Census Place: Ukiah

3.9%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (5.4%), Ukiah has a value of 3.9%.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(5.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the CA Value (3.7%), Ukiah has a value of 3.9%.
CA Value
(3.7%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (4.5%), Ukiah has a value of 3.9%.
US Value
(4.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Ukiah value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Children with a Disability Census Place: Willits

Current Value:

Children with a Disability Census Place: Willits

0.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (5.4%), Willits has a value of 0.0%.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(5.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Compared to the CA Value (3.7%), Willits has a value of 0.0%.
CA Value
(3.7%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (4.5%), Willits has a value of 0.0%.
US Value
(4.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Willits value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Children with a Disability Zip Code: 95410

Current Value:

Children with a Disability Zip Code: 95410

0.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (5.4%), 95410 has a value of 0.0%.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(5.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Over time, the 95410 value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Children with a Disability Zip Code: 95415

Current Value:

Children with a Disability Zip Code: 95415

0.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (5.4%), 95415 has a value of 0.0%.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(5.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Over time, the 95415 value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Children with a Disability Zip Code: 95417

Current Value:

Children with a Disability Zip Code: 95417

0.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (5.4%), 95417 has a value of 0.0%.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(5.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Over time, the 95417 value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Children with a Disability Zip Code: 95420

Current Value:

Children with a Disability Zip Code: 95420

0.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (5.4%), 95420 has a value of 0.0%.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(5.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Over time, the 95420 value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Children with a Disability Zip Code: 95427

Current Value:

Children with a Disability Zip Code: 95427

0.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (5.4%), 95427 has a value of 0.0%.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(5.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Over time, the 95427 value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Children with a Disability Zip Code: 95428

Current Value:

Children with a Disability Zip Code: 95428

6.9%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (5.4%), 95428 has a value of 6.9%.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(5.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Over time, the 95428 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Children with a Disability Zip Code: 95432

Current Value:

Children with a Disability Zip Code: 95432

0.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (5.4%), 95432 has a value of 0.0%.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(5.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Over time, the 95432 value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Children with a Disability Zip Code: 95437

Current Value:

Children with a Disability Zip Code: 95437

10.9%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (5.4%), 95437 has a value of 10.9%.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(5.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Over time, the 95437 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Children with a Disability Zip Code: 95445

Current Value:

Children with a Disability Zip Code: 95445

0.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (5.4%), 95445 has a value of 0.0%.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(5.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Over time, the 95445 value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Children with a Disability Zip Code: 95449

Current Value:

Children with a Disability Zip Code: 95449

6.1%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (5.4%), 95449 has a value of 6.1%.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(5.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Over time, the 95449 value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Children with a Disability Zip Code: 95454

Current Value:

Children with a Disability Zip Code: 95454

0.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (5.4%), 95454 has a value of 0.0%.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(5.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Over time, the 95454 value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Children with a Disability Zip Code: 95456

Current Value:

Children with a Disability Zip Code: 95456

0.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (5.4%), 95456 has a value of 0.0%.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(5.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Over time, the 95456 value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Children with a Disability Zip Code: 95459

Current Value:

Children with a Disability Zip Code: 95459

1.1%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (5.4%), 95459 has a value of 1.1%.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(5.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Over time, the 95459 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Children with a Disability Zip Code: 95460

Current Value:

Children with a Disability Zip Code: 95460

5.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (5.4%), 95460 has a value of 5.2%.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(5.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Over time, the 95460 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Children with a Disability Zip Code: 95463

Current Value:

Children with a Disability Zip Code: 95463

0.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (5.4%), 95463 has a value of 0.0%.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(5.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.

Children with a Disability Zip Code: 95466

Current Value:

Children with a Disability Zip Code: 95466

0.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (5.4%), 95466 has a value of 0.0%.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(5.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Over time, the 95466 value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Children with a Disability Zip Code: 95468

Current Value:

Children with a Disability Zip Code: 95468

1.7%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (5.4%), 95468 has a value of 1.7%.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(5.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Over time, the 95468 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Children with a Disability Zip Code: 95469

Current Value:

Children with a Disability Zip Code: 95469

4.9%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (5.4%), 95469 has a value of 4.9%.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(5.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Over time, the 95469 value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Children with a Disability Zip Code: 95470

Current Value:

Children with a Disability Zip Code: 95470

0.7%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (5.4%), 95470 has a value of 0.7%.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(5.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Over time, the 95470 value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Children with a Disability Zip Code: 95482

Current Value:

Children with a Disability Zip Code: 95482

6.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (5.4%), 95482 has a value of 6.0%.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(5.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Over time, the 95482 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Children with a Disability Zip Code: 95488

Current Value:

Children with a Disability Zip Code: 95488

0.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (5.4%), 95488 has a value of 0.0%.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(5.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Over time, the 95488 value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Children with a Disability Zip Code: 95490

Current Value:

Children with a Disability Zip Code: 95490

3.9%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (5.4%), 95490 has a value of 3.9%.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(5.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Over time, the 95490 value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Children with a Disability Zip Code: 95494

Current Value:

Children with a Disability Zip Code: 95494

0.0%
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (4.4%), 95494 has a value of 0.0%.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(4.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Over time, the 95494 value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Children with a Disability Zip Code: 95585

Current Value:

Children with a Disability Zip Code: 95585

0.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (5.4%), 95585 has a value of 0.0%.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(5.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Over time, the 95585 value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Children with a Disability Census Tract: 06045010100

Current Value:

Children with a Disability Census Tract: 06045010100

6.9%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (5.4%), 06045010100 has a value of 6.9%.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(5.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Over time, the 06045010100 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Children with a Disability Census Tract: 06045010200

Current Value:

Children with a Disability Census Tract: 06045010200

0.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (5.4%), 06045010200 has a value of 0.0%.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(5.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Over time, the 06045010200 value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Children with a Disability Census Tract: 06045010300

Current Value:

Children with a Disability Census Tract: 06045010300

6.9%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (5.4%), 06045010300 has a value of 6.9%.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(5.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Over time, the 06045010300 value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Children with a Disability Census Tract: 06045010400

Current Value:

Children with a Disability Census Tract: 06045010400

0.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (5.4%), 06045010400 has a value of 0.0%.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(5.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Over time, the 06045010400 value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Children with a Disability Census Tract: 06045010500

Current Value:

Children with a Disability Census Tract: 06045010500

0.9%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (5.4%), 06045010500 has a value of 0.9%.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(5.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.
Over time, the 06045010500 value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Children with a Disability Census Tract: 06045010600

Current Value:

Children with a Disability Census Tract: 06045010600

1.3%
(2015-2019)
Compared to:
Compared to the Mendocino, CA County Value (5.5%), 06045010600 has a value of 1.3%.
Mendocino, CA County Value
(5.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Mendocino County value.